Rotational thromboelastometry (ROTEM) profile in a cohort of asystole donors. / Perfil de tromboelastometría rotacional (ROTEM) en una cohorte de asistolia no controlada.

BACKGROUND: Hypoperfusion plays a central role in shock states, and has been proposed as a coagulopathy trigger. The study of the rotational thromboelastometry (ROTEM) profile during cardiac arrest could offer new insights to the role of hypoperfusion in coagulation during shock states. OUTCOME: To describe the ROTEM profile in a cohort of asystole donors and elucidate the incidence of hyperfibrinolysis. DESIGN: A prospective observational study was carried out in 18 patients consecutively admitted to the ICU after out-of-hospital non-recovered cardiac arrest (CA). Initial rhythm and time between CA and admission were recorded. Conventional coagulation and ROTEM (EXTEM, APTEM, FIBTEM) tests were performed within 30minutes after blood sample collection. SCOPE: An asystole donor reference hospital. PARTICIPANTS: Patients admitted to the ICU after out-of-hospital non-recovered CA. RESULTS: The median age was 50years, and 14 of the patients were men (77.8%). The time from CA to hospital admission expressed as the median (interquartile range) was 91minutes (75-104). The results of the routine tests were: INR 1.25 (1.19-1.34), aPTT 55s (45-73) and fibrinogen 161mg/dl (95-295). For the ROTEM APTEM assay the results were: CT 126s (104-191), CFT 247s (203-694). Hyperfibrinolysis criteria were recorded in 15 patients (83.3%). In addition, MCF improved in APTEM versus EXTEM. Prolonged CA times were associated to lower fibrinogen levels and lower values for MCF FIBTEM (P<.05). CONCLUSIONS: The ROTEM assays revealed severe alterations of the clot formation parameters and a high incidence of hyperfibrinolysis.

Prediction of massive bleeding in a prehospital setting: validation of six scoring systems. / Predicción de hemorragia masiva a nivel extrahospitalario: validación de seis escalas.

OBJECTIVE: To validate the diagnostic ability of six different scores to predict massive bleeding in a prehospital setting. DESIGN: Retrospective cohort. SETTING: Prehospital attention of patients with severe trauma. SUBJECTS: Subjects with more than 15 years, a history of severe trauma (defined by code 15 criteria), that were initially assisted in a prehospital setting by the emergency services between January 2010 and December 2015 and were then transferred to a level one trauma center in Madrid. VARIABLES: To validate: 1. Trauma Associated Severe Haemorrhage Score. 2. Assessment of Blood Consumption Score. 3. Emergency Transfusión Score. 4. Índice de Shock. 5. Prince of Wales Hospital/Rainer Score. 6. Larson Score. RESULTS: 548 subjects were studied, 76,8% (420) were male, median age was 38 (interquartile range [IQR]: 27-50). Injury Severity Score was 18 (IQR: 9-29). Blunt trauma represented 82,5% (452) of the cases. Overall, frequency of MB was 9,2% (48), median intensive care unit admission days was 2,1 (IQR: 0,8 - 6,2) and hospital mortality rate was 11,2% (59). Emergency Transfusión Score had the highest precisions (AUC 0,85), followed by Trauma Associated Severe Haemorrhage score and Prince of Wales Hospital/Rainer Score (AUC 0,82); Assessment of Blood Consumption Score was the less precise (AUC 0,68). CONCLUSION: In the prehospital setting the application of any the six scoring systems predicts the presence of massive hemorrhage and allows the activation of massive transfusion protocols while the patient is transferred to a hospital.

Prediction of massive bleeding. Shock index and modified shock index. / Predicción de hemorragia masiva. Índice de shock e índice de shock modificado.

OBJECTIVE: To determine the predictive value of the Shock Index and Modified Shock Index in patients with massive bleeding due to severe trauma. DESIGN: Retrospective cohort. SETTING: Severe trauma patient's initial attention at the intensive care unit of a tertiary hospital. SUBJECTS: Patients older than 14 years that were admitted to the hospital with severe trauma (Injury Severity Score >15) form January 2014 to December 2015. VARIABLES: We studied the sensitivity (Se), specificity (Sp), positive and negative predictive value (PV+ and PV-), positive and negative likelihood ratio (LR+ and LR-), ROC curves (Receiver Operating Characteristics) and the area under the same (AUROC) for prediction of massive hemorrhage. RESULTS: 287 patients were included, 76.31% (219) were male, mean age was 43,36 (±17.71) years and ISS was 26 (interquartile range [IQR]: 21-34). The overall frequency of massive bleeding was 8.71% (25). For Shock Index: AUROC was 0.89 (95% confidence intervals [CI] 0.84 to 0.94), with an optimal cutoff at 1.11, Se was 91.3% (95% CI: 73.2 to 97.58) and Sp was 79.69% (95% CI: 74.34 to 84.16). For the Modified Shock Index: AUROC was 0.90 (95% CI: 0.86 to 0.95), with an optimal cutoff at 1.46, Se was 95.65% (95% CI: 79.01 to 99.23) and Sp was 75.78% (95% CI: 70.18 to 80.62). CONCLUSION: Shock Index and Modified Shock Index are good predictors of massive bleeding and could be easily incorporated to the initial workup of patients with severe trauma.