Application of electronic medical record-derived analytics in critical care: Rothman Index predicts mortality and readmissions in surgical intensive care unit patients.

INTRODUCTION: The Rothman Index (RI) is an objective measurement of a patient's overall condition, automatically generated from 26 variables including vital signs, laboratory data, cardiac rhythms, and nursing assessments. The purpose of this study was to assess the validity of RI scores in predicting surgical ICU (SICU) readmission rates and mortality. METHODS: We conducted a single-center retrospective analysis of surgical patients who were transferred from the SICU to the surgical floor from December 2014 to December 2016. Data included demographics, length of stay (LOS), mortality, and RI at multiple pretransfer and post-transfer time points. RESULTS: A total of 1,445 SICU patients were transferred to the surgical floor; 79 patients (5.5%) were readmitted within 48 hours of transfer. Mean age was 52 years, and 67% were male. Compared to controls, patients readmitted to the SICU within 48 hours experienced higher LOS (29 vs. 11 days, p < 0.05) as well as higher mortality (2.5% vs. 0.6%, p < 0.05). Patients requiring readmission also had a lower RI at 72, 48, and 24 hours before transfer as well as at 24 and 48 hours after transfer (p < 0.05 for all). Rothman Index scores were categorized into higher-risk (<40), medium-risk (40-65), and lower-risk groups (>65); RI scores at 24 hours before transfer were inversely proportional to overall mortality (RI < 40 = 2.5%, RI 40-65 = 0.3%, and RI > 65 = 0%; p < 0.05) and SICU readmission rates (RI < 40 = 9%, RI 40-65 = 5.2%, and RI > 65 = 2.8%; p < 0.05). Patients transferred with RI scores greater than 83 did not require SICU readmission within 48 hours. CONCLUSION: Surgical ICU patients requiring readmission within 48 hours of transfer have a significantly higher mortality and longer LOS compared to those who do not. Patients requiring readmission also have significantly lower pretransfer and post-transfer RI scores compared to those who do not. Rothman Index scores may be used as a clinical tool for evaluating patients before transfer from the SICU. Prospective studies are warranted to further validate use of this technology. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Retrospective database review, level III.

Pathophysiology, research challenges, and clinical management of smoke inhalation injury.

Smoke inhalation injury is a serious medical problem that increases morbidity and mortality after severe burns. However, relatively little attention has been paid to this devastating condition, and the bulk of research is limited to preclinical basic science studies. Moreover, no worldwide consensus criteria exist for its diagnosis, severity grading, and prognosis. Therapeutic approaches are highly variable depending on the country and burn centre or hospital. In this Series paper, we discuss understanding of the pathophysiology of smoke inhalation injury, the best evidence-based treatments, and challenges and future directions in diagnostics and management.

The National Trauma Research Repository: Ushering in a New ERA of trauma research (Commentary).

Despite being the leading cause of death in the United States for individuals 46 years and younger and the primary cause of death among military service members, trauma care research has been underfunded for the last 50 years. Sustained federal funding for a coordinated national trauma clinical research program is required to advance the science of caring for the injured. The Department of Defense is committed to funding studies with military relevance; therefore, it cannot fund pediatric or geriatric trauma clinical trials. Currently, trauma clinical trials are often performed within a single site or a small group of trauma hospitals, and research data are not available for secondary analysis or sharing across studies. Data-sharing platforms encourage transfer of research data and knowledge between civilian and military researchers, reduce redundancy, and maximize limited research funding. In collaboration with the Department of Defense, trauma researchers formed the Coalition for National Trauma Research (CNTR) in 2014 to advance trauma research in a coordinated effort. CNTR's member organizations are the American Association for the Surgery of Trauma (AAST), the American College of Surgeons Committee on Trauma (ACS COT), the Eastern Association for the Surgery of Trauma (EAST), the Western Trauma Association (WTA), and the National Trauma Institute (NTI). CNTR advocates for sustained federal funding for a multidisciplinary national trauma research program to be conducted through a large clinical trials network and a national trauma research repository. The initial advocacy and research activities underway to accomplish these goals are presented.

The National Trauma Institute: Lessons learned in the funding and conduct of 16 trauma research studies.

BACKGROUND: To increase trauma-related research and elevate trauma on the national research agenda, the National Trauma Institute (NTI) issued calls for proposals, selected funding recipients, and coordinated 16 federally funded (Department of Defense) trauma research awards over a 4-year period. We sought to collect and describe the lessons learned from this activity to inform future researchers of barriers and facilitators. METHODS: Fifteen principal investigators participated in semistructured interviews focused on study management issues such as securing institutional approvals, screening and enrollment, multisite trials management, project funding, staffing, and institutional support. NTI Science Committee meeting minutes and study management data were included in the analysis. Simple descriptive statistics were generated and textual data were analyzed for common themes. RESULTS: Principal investigators reported challenges in obtaining institutional approvals, delays in study initiation, screening and enrollment, multisite management, and study funding. Most were able to successfully resolve challenges and have been productive in terms of scholarly publications, securing additional research funding, and training future trauma investigators. CONCLUSION: Lessons learned in the conduct of the first two funding rounds managed by NTI are instructive in four key areas: regulatory processes, multisite coordination, adequate funding, and the importance of an established research infrastructure to ensure study success. Recommendations for addressing institution-related and investigator-related challenges are discussed along with ongoing advocacy efforts to secure sustained federal funding of a national trauma research program commensurate with the burden of injury.

Reflection: evolution of the field over seven decades.

Marked expansion of physiologic understanding and the improvement of burn patient outcomes have resulted from multidisciplinary clinical/laboratory research programs at burn centers in the United States and elsewhere.

Malpractice risk and cost are significantly reduced after tort reform.

BACKGROUND: Rising medical malpractice premiums have reached a crisis point in many areas of the United States. In 2003 the Texas legislature passed a comprehensive package of tort reform laws that included a cap at $250,000 on noneconomic damages in most medical malpractice cases. We hypothesized that tort reform laws significantly reduce the risk of malpractice lawsuit in an academic medical center. We compared malpractice prevalence, incidence, and liability costs before and after comprehensive state tort reform measures were implemented. STUDY DESIGN: Two prospectively maintained institutional databases were used to calculate and characterize malpractice risk: a surgical operation database and a risk management and malpractice database. Risk groups were divided into pretort reform (1992 to 2004) and post-tort reform groups (2004 to the present). Operative procedures were included for elective, urgent, and emergency general surgery procedures. RESULTS: During the study period, 98,513 general surgical procedures were performed. A total of 28 lawsuits (25 pre-reform, 3 postreform) were filed, naming general surgery faculty or residents. The prevalence of lawsuits filed/100,000 procedures performed is as follows: before reform, 40 lawsuits/100,000 procedures, and after reform, 8 lawsuits/100,000 procedures (p < 0.01, relative risk 0.21 [95% CI 0.063 to 0.62]). Virtually all of the liability and defense cost was in the pretort reform period: $595,000/year versus $515/year in the postreform group (p < 0.01). CONCLUSIONS: Implementation of comprehensive tort reform in Texas was associated with a significant decrease in the prevalence and cost of surgical malpractice lawsuits at one academic medical center.

Cardiac contractility during hemofiltration in an awake model of hyperdynamic endotoxemia.

BACKGROUND: To determine whether continuous veno-venous hemofiltration can ameliorate hemodynamic instability and left ventricular (LV) dysfunction by reducing circulating plasma mediators, the authors used the LV end-systolic elastance (Ees) as a contractility index, in an awake swine model simulating human hyperdynamic endotoxemia. METHODS: Nineteen instrumented pigs were divided into a control group (CTRL, n = 7), a hemofiltration (HF, n = 7) group, and an extracorporeal circuit (ECC, n = 5) only group. All animals received intravenous E. coli endotoxin (10 microg x kg x h) and resuscitation in a common regimen for 24 hours. Hemofiltration was started 30 minutes after initiation of endotoxemia and continued until the end of the experiment. RESULTS: : Ees was maintained at baseline levels in the HF group, whereas a progressive decrease of Ees was found in both the CTRL and the ECC groups. Cardiac output was significantly higher in the HF group than the CTRL group. There was no significant difference between the groups in plasma catecholamines. CONCLUSION: We conclude that hemofiltration prevented LV impairment.

An historical perspective on advances in burn care over the past 100 years.

The accelerated pace of clinical and laboratory research over the past century and application of the research findings to patient care have resulted in unprecedented survival of burned patients in all age groups. Resuscitation based on an understanding of the nature and magnitude of the multisystem response to injury now prevents burn shock; effective topical antimicrobial chemotherapy and early excision prevent wound toxemia and sepsis; biologic and bioengineered dressings compensate for the missing skin; and broad spectrum metabolic support regimens prevent exhaustion and accelerate convalescence. Rehabilitation programs have also been developed to restore physical function and permit the burn patient to reenter society as a productive individual.

Intensive insulin protocol improves glucose control and is associated with a reduction in intensive care unit mortality.

BACKGROUND: Intensive insulin therapy to maintain serum glucose levels between 80 and 110 mg/dL has previously been shown to reduce mortality in the critically ill; recent data, however, have called this benefit into question. In addition, maintaining uniform, tight glucose control is challenging and resource demanding. We hypothesized that, by use of a protocol, tight glucose control could be achieved in the surgical trauma intensive care unit (STICU), and that improved glucose control would be beneficial. STUDY DESIGN: During the study period, a progressively more rigorous approach to glucose control was used, culminating in an implemented protocol in 2005. We reviewed STICU patients' blood glucose levels, measured by point-of-care testing, from 2003 to 2006. Mortality was tracked over the course of the study, and patient charts were retrospectively reviewed to measure illness and injury severity. RESULTS: Mean blood glucose levels steadily improved (p < 0.01). In addition to absolute improvements in glucose control, total variability of glucose ranges in the STICU steadily diminished. A reduction in STICU mortality was temporally associated with implementation of the protocol (p < 0.01). There were fewer intraabdominal abscesses and fewer postinjury ventilator days after implementation of the protocol. There was a small increase in the incidence of clinically relevant hypoglycemia. CONCLUSIONS: Improvements in glucose control in the ICU can be achieved by using a protocol for intensive insulin therapy. In our ICU, this was temporally associated with a significant reduction in mortality.

Perceptions and attitudes of critical care training and careers among United States surgical residents: who wants to be a surgical intensivist?

Less than 50 per cent of surgical critical care (SCC) fellowship positions are filled each year. We surveyed senior surgical residents to determine their opinions regarding a career in SCC and acute care surgery. A survey was sent to 1348 postgraduate year 3, 4, and 5 residents in the United States. Two hundred fifty-one surveys were returned (19% response rate). Whereas 78 per cent were planning to complete a fellowship, 21 per cent expressed interest in SCC. Fifty-six per cent plan to handle SCC problems only for their own patients, whereas 39 per cent plan to turn this management over to a critical care provider. SCC fellowships were considered to be potentially more appealing if the following changes could be made to the existing structure: adding more general surgery (70% of respondents); adding more trauma experience (50%); adding emergency neurosurgery (44%); adding more emergency orthopedics (42%); or decreasing months of critical care (36%). Increasing salary enhanced appeal for 82 per cent. SCC has limited appeal for most senior surgical residents. Theoretical expansion of surgical critical fellowships to include more general or trauma surgery (acute care surgery) increased the level of interest among senior surgical residents.

A crisis in the delivery of care to patients with brain injuries in South Texas.

BACKGROUND: To determine the opinions of neurosurgeons regarding the care of the injured and to assess the impact of these attitudes on the care of the patients with brain injuries. METHODS: A survey was sent to the 2,465 active members of the American Association of Neurologic Surgeons. A manpower assessment of neurosurgical coverage of South Texas was also performed. RESULTS: In total, 872 surveys were returned (35%). Seventy-one percent of the respondents were over the age of 44. Eighty-seven percent of neurosurgeons stated that they currently provide trauma care: 74% at Level I or II trauma centers. The majority of neurosurgeons treated <5 trauma patients per week, 80% placed 2 or fewer intracranial pressure (ICP) monitors per month. Fifty-nine percent of the respondents preferred not to treat trauma patients because of (1) perceived increased medicolegal risk (80%), (2) conflict with elective practice (75%), (3) time required (70%), and (4) inadequate compensation (65%). Fifty-six percent received no compensation for trauma call. The majority of neurosurgeons indicated that no personnel other than neurosurgeons should be allowed to perform trauma craniotomies (90%) or insert ICP monitors (76%). However, 61% thought that non-neurosurgeons should be able to perform neuro-critical care. A maldistribution of neurosurgeons was identified in South Texas, with much of the population uncovered for trauma care. Significant delays in definitive neurosurgical care were identified as a result of this maldistribution. CONCLUSIONS: One-half of neurosurgeons prefer not to care for trauma patients because of perceived added time commitment, conflicts with elective practice, lack of compensation, and perceived medicolegal risk. But, they thought that only neurosurgeons should provide emergency neurosurgical procedures. These attitudes appear to impinge on the care of the patients with brain injuries in South Texas.

Transparent and open discussion of errors does not increase malpractice risk in trauma patients.

OBJECTIVE: We set out to determine if there is an increased medical malpractice lawsuit rate when trauma patient cases are presented at an open, multidisciplinary morbidity and mortality conference (M&M). INTRODUCTION: Patient safety proponents emphasize the importance of transparency with respect to medical errors. In contrast, the tort system focuses on blame and punishment, which encourages secrecy. Our question: Can the goals of the patient safety movement be met without placing care providers and healthcare institutions at unacceptably high malpractice risk? METHODS: The trauma registry, a risk management database, along with the written minutes of the trauma morbidity and mortality conference (M&M) were used to determine the number and incidence of malpractice suits filed following full discussion at an open M&M conference at an academic level I trauma center. RESULTS: A total of 20,749 trauma patients were admitted. A total of 412 patients were discussed at M&M conference and a total of seven lawsuits were filed. Six of the patients were not discussed at M&M prior to the lawsuit being filed. One patient was discussed at M&M prior to the lawsuit being filed. The incidence of lawsuit was calculated in three groups: all trauma patients, all trauma patients with complications, and all patients presented at trauma M&M conference. The ratio of lawsuits filed to patients admitted and incidence in the three groups is as follows: All Patients, 7 lawsuits/20,479 patients (4.25 lawsuits/100,000 patients/year); M&M Presentation, 1 lawsuit/421 patients (29.6 lawsuits/100,000 patients/year); All Trauma Complications, 7 lawsuits/6,225 patients (14 lawsuits/100,000 patients/year). Patients with a complication were more likely to sue (P < 0.01); otherwise, there were no statistical differences between groups. CONCLUSIONS: A transparent discussion of errors, complications, and deaths does not appear to lead to an increased risk of lawsuit.