Long-term survivorship care after CAR-T cell therapy.

While cytokine release syndrome and immune effector cell-associated neurotoxicity syndrome are well-recognized acute toxicities of chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) T cell therapy, these complications have become increasingly manageable by protocolized treatment algorithms incorporating the early administration of tocilizumab and corticosteroids. As CAR-T cell therapy expands to new disease indications and the number of long-term survivors steadily increases, there is growing recognition of the need to appropriately evaluate and manage the late effects of CAR-T cell therapy, including late-onset or persistent neurotoxicity, prolonged cytopenias, delayed immune reconstitution and infections, subsequent malignancies, organ dysfunction, psychological distress, and fertility implications. In this review, we provide a practical approach to the long-term survivorship care of the CAR-T cell recipient, with a focus on the optimal strategies to address the common and challenging late complications affecting this unique population.

Consolidative Autotransplantation Achieves High Cure Rates in Adverse-Risk Large B Cell Lymphoma.

There remains an unmet need to optimize the first-line treatment of patients with high-risk large B cell lymphoma (LBCL), particularly those with a high International Prognostic Index (IPI) score or a positive interim positron emission tomography (PET) scan who experience poor outcomes with R-CHOP. This study was conducted to evaluate the real-world effectiveness of consolidative autologous stem cell transplantation (ASCT) among patients with high-risk LBCL. This retrospective study included consecutive patients with LBCL and IPI score 4 or 5 who underwent consolidative ASCT as part of first-line therapy in Alberta, Canada. Progression-free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS), and disease-specific survival (DSS) were determined using the Kaplan-Meier method. The study cohort comprised 114 patients with median age of 60 years (range, 18 to 73 years), of whom 81 (71%) had an IPI score of 4 and 33 (29%) had an IPI score of 5. With a median follow-up of 5.6 years, the 5-year PFS was 72% (95% confidence interval [CI], 62% to 79%), 5-year OS was 74% (95% CI, 64% to 81%), and 5-year DSS was 80% (95% CI, 71% to 87%). There was no significant difference in PFS among patients with and patients without positive interim PET scans (n = 24), MYC and BCL2 and/or BCL6 rearrangements (n = 26), or central nervous system involvement (n = 15). Consolidative ASCT is associated with high cure rates and favorable survival outcomes in patients with high-risk LBCL and may overcome the adverse prognostic impact of a positive interim PET scan.

Corticosteroids as graft-versus-host disease prophylaxis for allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplant recipients with calcineurin inhibitor intolerance.

BACKGROUND AIMS: Although calcineurin inhibitors (CNIs) have a well-established role in the prevention of graft-versus-host disease (GVHD) after allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation (HCT), their use can be limited by significant toxicities, which may result in premature treatment discontinuation. The optimal management of patients with CNI intolerance is unknown. The objective of this study was to determine the effectiveness of corticosteroids as GVHD prophylaxis for patients with CNI intolerance. METHODS: This retrospective single-center study included consecutive adult patients with hematologic malignancies who underwent myeloablative peripheral blood allogeneic HCT with anti-thymocyte globulin, CNI, and methotrexate GVHD prophylaxis in Alberta, Canada. Multivariable competing-risks regression was used to compare cumulative incidences of GVHD, relapse, and non-relapse mortality between recipients of corticosteroid versus continuous CNI prophylaxis, and multivariable Cox proportional hazards regression was applied to compare overall survival, relapse-free survival (RFS) and moderate-to-severe chronic GVHD and RFS. RESULTS: Among 509 allogeneic HCT recipients, 58 (11%) patients developed CNI intolerance and were switched to corticosteroid prophylaxis at median 28 days (range 1-53) after HCT. Compared with patients who received continuous CNI prophylaxis, recipients of corticosteroid prophylaxis had significantly greater cumulative incidences of grade 2-4 acute GVHD (subhazard ratio [SHR] 1.74, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.08-2.80, P = 0.024), grade 3-4 acute GVHD (SHR 3.22, 95% CI 1.55-6.72, P = 0.002), and GVHD-related non-relapse mortality (SHR 3.07, 95% CI 1.54-6.12, P = 0.001). There were no significant differences in moderate-to-severe chronic GVHD (SHR 0.84, 95% CI 0.43-1.63, P = 0.60) or relapse (SHR 0.92, 95% CI 0.53-1.62, P = 0.78), but corticosteroid prophylaxis was associated with significantly inferior overall survival (hazard ratio [HR] 1.77, 95% CI 1.20-2.61, P = 0.004), RFS (HR 1.54, 95% CI 1.06-2.25, P = 0.024), and chronic GVHD and RFS (HR 1.46, 95% CI 1.04-2.05, P = 0.029). CONCLUSIONS: Allogeneic HCT recipients with CNI intolerance are at increased risks of acute GVHD and poor outcomes despite institution of corticosteroid prophylaxis following premature CNI discontinuation. Alternative GVHD prophylaxis strategies are needed for this high-risk population.

Long-term follow-up demonstrates curative potential of autologous stem cell transplantation for relapsed follicular lymphoma.

Although autologous stem cell transplantation (ASCT) can achieve durable responses in eligible patients with follicular lymphoma (FL), long-term follow-up is needed to determine if it has curative potential. This retrospective, multicenter study included 162 patients who received ASCT for relapsed FL in Alberta, Canada. With a median (range) follow-up time of 12.5 years (0.1-27.9), the 12-year time-to-progression (TTP) was 57% (95% confidence interval [CI] 49%-65%), time-to-next-treatment was 61% (95% CI 52%-69%), progression-free survival was 51% (95% CI 42%-59%) and overall survival was 69% (95% CI 60%-76%). A plateau emerged on the TTP curve at 57% starting 9 years after ASCT with no relapses occurring beyond this timepoint. Ten patients remained in remission 20 years or more after ASCT. Patients undergoing ASCT at first or second relapse had superior outcomes compared to third or later relapse (12-year TTP 61% vs. 34%), as did patients without progression of disease within 24 months (POD24) of frontline treatment versus those with POD24 (12-year TTP 67% vs. 50%). ASCT achieves high rates of durable remission in relapsed FL, with long-term follow-up revealing that more than 50% of transplanted patients may be functionally cured of their lymphoma. The optimal timing to consider ASCT is at first or second relapse, regardless of POD24 status.

Rituximab Toxicity after Preemptive or Therapeutic Administration for Post-Transplant Lymphoproliferative Disorder.

Rituximab is commonly used as prevention, preemption, or therapeutically for post-transplant lymphoproliferative disorder (PTLD) after hematopoietic cell transplantation (HCT). Although it is generally assumed that rituximab toxicity (ie, infections resulting from hypogammaglobulinemia and neutropenia) is negligible in relation to mortality due to PTLD, limited evidence supports the validity of this assumption. We sought to determine the impact of rituximab on immunoglobulin levels, neutrophil count, infection density, and mortality outcomes. This study retrospectively analyzed 349 HCT recipients, 289 of whom did not receive rituximab and 60 of whom received rituximab preemptively or therapeutically at a median of 55 days post-transplantation. IgM, IgG, and IgA levels at 6 months and 12 months post-transplantation were lower in patients who received rituximab compared with those who did not (significant at P < .05 for IgM and IgA at 6 months and for IgM and IgG at 12 months). Rituximab recipients also had a higher incidence of severe neutropenia (<.5/nl) between 3 and 24 months (subhazard ratio [SHR], 2.3; P = .020). Regarding non-Epstein-Barr viral infections/PTLD, the rituximab group had a higher infection density between 3 and 24 months compared with the no-rituximab group (3.8 versus 1.6 infections per 365 days at risk; incidence rate ratio, 2.2; P < .001). The rituximab group also had a higher incidence of fatal infections (SHR, 3.1; P = .026), higher nonrelapse mortality (SHR, 2.4; P = .006), and higher overall mortality (hazard ratio, 1.7; P = .033). There were no significant between-group differences in the incidence of clinically significant graft-versus-host disease, graft failure, or relapse. Based on this study, rituximab given for PTLD is associated with substantial morbidity and mortality. Whether the benefit of preemptive rituximab outweighs the risk remains to be determined. © 2022 American Society for Transplantation and Cellular Therapy. Published by Elsevier Inc.

Favorable Outcomes with R-CHOP Induction and Consolidative Autologous Stem Cell Transplantation for Double-Hit Lymphoma.

Double-hit lymphoma (DHL) is an aggressive large B cell lymphoma associated with a poor prognosis with R-CHOP chemotherapy. The optimal treatment is unknown, but outcomes might be improved with intensive induction regimens or consolidative high-dose chemotherapy and autologous stem cell transplantation (HDT/ASCT). The purpose of this study was to determine the real-world outcomes of patients with DHL treated with primarily R-CHOP induction and consolidative HDT/ASCT. This retrospective, multicenter study included consecutive patients age 18 to 70 years with newly diagnosed DHL intended for consolidative HDT/ASCT in Alberta, Canada. Progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) were determined using the Kaplan-Meier method. The cohort comprised 58 patients with a median age of 59.5 years (range, 30 to 69 years). High-risk features at diagnosis included International Prognostic Index score 3 to 5 in 45 patients (78%), transformed indolent lymphoma in 25 (43%), and central nervous system involvement in 3 (5%). Forty-six patients (79%) patients received R-CHOP induction, and 45 (78%) proceeded to consolidative HDT/ASCT. With a median follow-up of 4.6 years, the 4-year PFS and OS rates were 67% (95% confidence interval [CI], 53% to 78%) and 68% (95% CI, 54% to 79%), respectively, for all patients and 86% (95% CI, 72% to 93%) and 88% (95% CI, 73% to 95%) for those undergoing HDT/ASCT. R-CHOP induction and consolidative HDT/ASCT result in excellent outcomes for patients with chemosensitive DHL, whereas patients with primary refractory disease might benefit from alternative strategies, such as earlier use of chimeric antigen receptor T cell therapy.

Incomplete chimerism following myeloablative and anti-thymocyte globulin-conditioned hematopoietic cell transplantation is a risk factor for relapse and chronic graft-versus-host disease.

BACKGROUND AIMS: The value of routine chimerism determination after myeloablative hematopoietic cell transplantation (HCT) is unclear, particularly in the setting of anti-thymocyte globulin (ATG)-based graft-versus-host disease (GVHD) prophylaxis. METHODS: Blood samples were collected at 3 months post-HCT from 558 patients who received myeloablative conditioning and ATG-based GVHD prophylaxis. Chimerism was assessed using multiplex polymerase chain reaction of short tandem repeats in sorted T cells (CD3+) and leukemia lineage cells (CD13+CD33+ for myeloid malignancies and CD19+ for B-lymphoid malignancies). ATG exposure was determined using a flow cytometry-based assay. The primary outcomes of interest were relapse and chronic GVHD (cGVHD). RESULTS: Incomplete (<95%) T-cell chimerism and leukemia lineage chimerism were present in 17% and 4% of patients, respectively. Patients with incomplete T-cell chimerism had a significantly greater incidence of relapse (36% versus 22%, subhazard ratio [SHR] = 2.03, P = 0.001) and lower incidence of cGVHD (8% versus 25%, SHR = 0.29, P < 0.001) compared with patients with complete chimerism. In multivariate modeling, patients with high post-transplant ATG area under the curve and any cytomegalovirus (CMV) serostatus other than donor/recipient seropositivity (non-D+R+) had an increased likelihood of incomplete T-cell chimerism. Patients with incomplete leukemia lineage chimerism had a significantly greater incidence of relapse (50% versus 23%, SHR = 2.70, P = 0.011) and, surprisingly, a greater incidence of cGVHD (45% versus 20%, SHR = 2.64, P = 0.003). CONCLUSIONS: High post-transplant ATG exposure and non-D+R+ CMV serostatus predispose patients to incomplete T-cell chimerism, which is associated with an increased risk of relapse. The increased risk of cGVHD with incomplete B-cell/myeloid chimerism is a novel finding that suggests an important role for recipient antigen-presenting cells in cGVHD pathogenesis.

Toward optimization of cyclosporine concentration target to prevent acute graft-versus-host disease following myeloablative allogeneic stem cell transplant.

INTRODUCTION: Despite the common use of cyclosporine (CsA) for acute graft-versus-host disease (aGVHD) prophylaxis following allogeneic stem cell transplant, the optimal CsA trough target remains unknown. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Here, we report on outcomes of adult patients following myeloablative conditioning to identify an optimal CsA trough target and characterize the most relevant timeframe post-transplant for CsA trough targeting to minimize aGVHD. We retrospectively reviewed 399 consecutive patients who underwent first peripheral blood allogeneic stem cell transplant for hematological malignancies between January 2009 and December 2018. RESULTS: In the unadjusted and adjusted analyses, the incidence of grades 2-4 aGVHD was significantly higher among patients with an average CsA trough concentration <250 mcg/L compared to patients with an average CsA trough concentration ≥250 mcg/L during days 15-28 post-transplant (31.5% versus 18.8%, P = 0.037), with an odds ratio (OR) of 1.97 (95% confidence interval 1.04-3.71). In contrast, no correlations between CsA trough concentration and relapse, non-relapse mortality and overall survival was found. CONCLUSION: In conclusion, early post-transplant CsA trough concentrations are an important factor in the prophylaxis against aGVHD. Our findings suggest that CsA trough concentrations should be maximized between days 15-28 post-myeloablative transplant.

Improving the outcomes of secondary CNS lymphoma with high-dose thiotepa, busulfan, melphalan, rituximab conditioning and autotransplant.

Secondary central nervous system lymphoma (SCNSL) affects approximately 5% of patients with aggressive large B-cell lymphoma (LBCL) and is associated with poor outcomes. This retrospective, multicenter study included 62 consecutive patients with SCNSL intended for transplant with high-dose methotrexate (HD-MTX)-based induction followed by high-dose thiotepa, busulfan, melphalan, rituximab (TBMR) conditioning and autologous stem cell transplantation (ASCT). Median age was 58 years (range 20-75) and 52 (84%) patients had ECOG performance status >1 at diagnosis of SCNSL. Fifty-two (84%) patients completed induction and proceeded to TBMR/ASCT. With median follow-up 5.7 years, 5-year progression-free and overall survival rates were 53% (95% CI 39-65%) and 65% (95% CI 51-76%) for all patients and 62% (95% CI 45-74%) and 73% (95% CI 57-84%) for those undergoing TBMR/ASCT, respectively. Despite a historically poor prognosis, HD-MTX-based induction followed by TBMR/ASCT has the potential to achieve long-term survival in a substantial proportion of patients with SCNSL.

Real-World Eligibility for Second-Line Chimeric Antigen Receptor T Cell Therapy in Large B Cell Lymphoma: A Population-Based Analysis.

The ZUMA-7 trial demonstrated the superiority of second-line chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) T cell therapy over standard of care chemotherapy with or without autologous stem cell transplantation (ASCT) for relapsed/refractory (r/r) large B cell lymphoma (LBCL). We conducted a retrospective population-based analysis to determine eligibility for second-line CAR-T cell therapy in the real-world setting. Among 125 patients with r/r LBCL between 2015 and 2019, 82% progressed within 12 months of first-line chemoimmunotherapy (CIT), 40% were treated with intention-to-transplantation, 22% underwent ASCT, and 7% achieved a durable remission after ASCT. With a median follow-up of 2.8 years, the median overall survival (OS) was 5.1 months, and 3-year OS was 15% (95% confidence interval [CI], 7% to 20%) for all patients and 10% (95% CI, 5% to 17%) for those progressing within 12 months of CIT. Although only 14% of patients met all the ZUMA-7 study inclusion criteria, as many as 65% of patients progressing within 12 months of CIT had adequate performance status to be considered potentially eligible for second-line CAR T cell therapy. Whereas the current standard of care results in poor outcomes for most patients with r/r LBCL, the use of CAR T cell therapy in second-line therapy could substantially increase the proportion of patients able to receive curative-intent treatment at first progression of LBCL.

The role of allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation for chronic lymphocytic leukemia: A review.

Although the use of allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation (HCT) for chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL) has declined with the development of novel targeted agents, it continues to play an important role for eligible patients with high-risk or heavily pretreated CLL who lack other treatment options. CLL is susceptible to a potent graft-versus-leukemia (GVL) effect which produces long-lasting remissions in 30-50% of transplanted patients. While allogeneic HCT is associated with significant risks of graft-versus-host disease (GVHD), infection, and non-relapse mortality (NRM), improvements in patient and donor selection, reduced intensity conditioning (RIC), GVHD prophylaxis, and supportive care have rendered this an increasingly safe and effective procedure in the current era. In this review, we discuss recent advances in allogeneic HCT for CLL, with a focus on the optimal evidence-based strategies to maximize benefit and minimize toxicity of this potentially curative cellular therapy.

Inferior outcomes with R-CEOP for patients with diffuse large B-cell lymphoma and cardiovascular comorbidities.

Anthracycline-based chemoimmunotherapy with R-CHOP is the standard treatment for diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL) but is associated with increased risks of cardiotoxicity. The alternative regimen R-CEOP substitutes etoposide for doxorubicin and is commonly administered to DLBCL patients with cardiovascular comorbidities, although there is limited evidence supporting its use. This multicenter real-world study included 138 consecutive patients with newly-diagnosed DLBCL treated with R-CEOP and 414 patients treated with R-CHOP matched 1:3 for age and International Prognostic Index. With median follow-up time 4.6 years, R-CEOP was associated with significantly inferior 4-year progression-free survival (32 vs. 52%, p < 0.0001), overall survival (39 vs. 59%, p < 0.0001), and disease-specific survival (48 vs. 69%, p < 0.0001) compared to R-CHOP. R-CHOP should remain the preferred regimen for most patients with DLBCL. While R-CEOP may be a reasonable choice for patients strictly ineligible for anthracyclines, the inferior outcomes of this regimen suggest that this high-risk population requires novel therapeutic approaches.