Technique of C2 Nerve Root Preservation in the Presence of Anomalous Vertebral Artery in Atlantoaxial Operations.

While accessing the C1-C2 joint during posterior atlantoaxial fixation, the C2 nerve root along with its perineural venous plexus remains an obstacle for a panoramic visualization of the entry point of the C1 lateral mass and joint preparation. Therefore, many surgeons frequently advocate its intentional sectioning during this approach, with no related major complications.1,2 However, this sectioning has at times been associated with symptoms such as hypoesthesia, numbness, dysesthesia, and neuropathic ulcers.3 Thus C2 nerve root preservation during posterior approach for atlantoaxial dislocation (AAD) could potentially avoid such consequences.4 Its preservation has been described for AAD cases with relatively normal C1-C2 joint anatomy with no osseovascular abnormalities.2 In contrast, attempt at C2 nerve root preservation in patients with congenital AAD harboring bony and vascular anomalies poses a greater challenge owing to a restricted operative space and the potential for perineural venous bleeding during dissection. This is more so for young neurosurgeons in the initial part of their learning curve. Video 1 details the technique of C2 nerve root dissection and preservation in a case of congenital AAD with an anomalous vertebral artery (VA). Computed tomography (CT) of this 30-year-old male patient with spastic quadriparesis showed AAD/basilar invagination with an assimilated C1-arch and right anomalous VA on CT angiography. He underwent C1-C2 joint manipulation and short-segment fixation. At 1-year follow-up, the patient's limb weakness had improved and CT showed good bony fusion. The salient operative steps involve gentle teasing and dissection of perineural soft tissues above and below the nerve root; the key to minimize venous bleeding is to dissect, coagulate, and divide them sequentially. A thorough release of the perineural soft tissues allows adequate nerve root mobilization, which in turn provides clear visualization of the C1-C2 joint space, preventing an undue nerve stretching during the C1-lateral mass screw insertion. The anomalous VA usually lies anterior to the C2 nerve root, and careful imaging evaluation allows its anticipation.3 We do not prefer the easy alternative of C2 nerve root sacrifice because of its inherent complications we noticed in our earlier clinical practice.3.

C2 Nerve Root Preservation During Posterior Fixation for Instability Secondary to Congenital Craniovertebral Junction Anomalies: Feasibility Factors and Related Outcomes.

OBJECTIVE: Patients with instability because of congenital craniovertebral anomalies often have complex C1-C2 osseovascular anomalies. C2 nerve root sacrifice has been described to address such difficult anatomy during posterior C1-C2 fixation and has its own downsides. Its preservation as a recent alternative poses greater surgical challenge, and the considerations differ from other causes of craniovertebral junctional instability; the pertaining outcomes have been scarcely studied. The objective of this study was to prospectively determine the feasibility and outcomes related to C2 nerve root preservation in patients with congenital atlantoaxial dislocation (CAAD) after posterior C1-C2 fixation. METHODS: In this observational study, 63 patients (126 nerve roots) with CAAD after posterior fixation were prospectively assessed. Underlying osseovascular anomalies affecting the feasibility of C2 nerve root preservation, and C2 nerve-related dysfunction at 12 months follow-up were analyzed. RESULTS: The overall C2 nerve root preservation rate was 89.7%. Even in the presence of extreme joint obliquity/spondyloptosis and anomalous vertebral artery, it was feasible in about three fourths. After preservation, 28.3% patients developed new-onset C2 nerve root dysfunction: neuralgia in 2, dysesthesia in 6, and hypoesthesia/paresthesia in 9. The symptoms were not disabling in most patients. CONCLUSIONS: In most patients with CAAD, C2 nerve root preservation is feasible despite an aberrant bony and vascular anatomy. A few patients after nerve root preservation develop related symptoms that are conservatively manageable, with no significant adverse consequences. Given the controversy in the literature on C2 nerve sacrifice-related outcomes, we favor an attempt at C2 nerve root preservation.