Lateral Subdermic Venous Plexus Insufficiency: The Association of Varicose Veins with Restless Legs Syndrome and Nocturnal Leg Cramps.

PURPOSE: To determine whether nocturnal symptoms of restless legs syndrome (RLS) and muscle cramps in the legs are associated specifically with lateral subdermic venous plexus (LSVP) insufficiency and whether treatment can provide symptomatic relief. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A retrospective cross-sectional observational study of 506 patients at a single site analyzed whether RLS or nighttime leg cramping symptoms were associated with venous reflux in the LSVP using comprehensive venous ultrasound. The treatment outcomes of ultrasound-guided foam sclerotherapy (USGFS) were followed up for 1 year. RESULTS: Of 209 patients who reported restless legs symptoms, 179 (85%) demonstrated an abnormal LSVP. A total of 214 patients reported nighttime muscle cramping, of whom 197 (92%) demonstrated an abnormal LSVP. Among 124 patients presenting with both the symptoms, 113 (91%) demonstrated an abnormal LSVP. Conversely, of 83 patients who presented with neither RLS nor nocturnal cramping, 2 (2%) had an abnormal LSVP. Among 242 symptomatic patients with an abnormal LSVP who underwent treatment, the technical success rate was 100%. At 90-day follow-up, 224 patients (93%) reported continued relief, which was maintained at 93% (224/242) at follow-up at 1 year. When substratified, 90 patients presented primarily with RLS or cramping and showed only LSVP reflux, and when treated, all 90 (100%) had significant or complete relief of the symptoms. CONCLUSIONS: LSVP insufficiency demonstrates an association with symptoms of RLS and nocturnal leg cramps. LSVP treatment using USGFS demonstrated high technical and clinical success rates, with symptomatic relief up to 1 year, most pronounced when the LSVP was the only treated vein.

Issues Most Pressing to Early-Career Interventional Radiologists: Results of a Descriptive Survey.

PURPOSE: To determine demographics, practice patterns, needs from Society of Interventional Radiology (SIR), and preferences of interventional radiologists (IRs) early in their careers. METHODS: A 28-question descriptive survey was used to identify demographic and practice composition, practice issues, and needs of early career IRs. The survey was distributed to SIR members in the United States (US) (n = 859) within the first 8 years of practice, with 213 respondents (25%). RESULTS: Respondents were primarily male (n = 181, 87%), less than 40 years old (n = 156, 73%), in practice for 6 years or less (n = 167, 79%), and satisfied with IR as a career (n = 183, 92.4%). The majority were in academic practice (n = 89, 43.2%) or large private practice group (n = 67, 32.5%). Most respondents read diagnostic imaging daily or weekly (n = 130, 61%). The majority of respondents perform complex procedures regularly including transarterial tumor therapy, percutaneous tumor ablation, peripheral arterial interventions, and biliary interventions monthly. Many respondents (n = 49, 23%) have changed jobs at least once citing career advancement, practice issues/disagreements, or compensation as reason. Most respondents would serve as mentors (n = 170, 80%) for trainees and were satisfied with their career mentorship (n = 166, 78%). Respondents felt that mentorship, identification of barriers facing early career IRs, and networking should be the most important functions of the Early Career Section (ECS)of the SIR. CONCLUSION: As nearly all survey respondents indicated that early career IRs have different needs and priorities than established physicians, they felt that mentorship, identification of barriers facing early career IRs, and networking should be the most important functions of the ECS. Additionally, this same group of IRs report low comfort with the business side of medicine and may benefit from directed content provided by the SIR ECS.

What Does It Mean to Be an Interventional Radiologist? SIR and the Private Practice Initiative.

The new interventional radiology (IR) residency training pathways seek to graduate physicians who are not only experts at imaging and technically savvy but clinically oriented doctors capable of preprocedural workup and postprocedural care. The goal is for compassionate IRs who are holistic in their treatment of the patient and their disease, not just an expert at the procedure. However, much of this new envisioned approach for the modern IR is contradicted by the stark reality that most IRs in practice today (and most of the job market) are in private practice, where resources for clinical care in reality may not be prioritized as much in this idealistic scenario. The Society of Interventional Radiology (SIR) has recently made it a priority to represent the unique needs and frustrations of IRs in private practice and hopefully find a solution to the imminent reality that is facing most practicing IRs and future graduates.