Regorafenib with immunotherapy versus regorafenib alone as second-line treatment for hepatocellular carcinoma: A multicenter real-world study.

INTRODUCTION: Regorafenib remains the standard and widely used second-line strategy for advanced hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). There is still a lack of large-scale multicenter real-world evidence concerning the concurrent use of regorafenib with immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICI). This study aims to evaluate whether combining regorafenib with ICI provides greater clinical benefit than regorafenib monotherapy as second-line therapy for advanced HCC under real-world circumstances. PATIENTS AND METHODS: The study included 208 patients from five medical facilities. One hundred forty-three patients received regorafenib plus ICI combination therapy, while 65 patients received regorafenib monotherapy. Propensity score matching (PSM) analysis was employed. RESULTS: The regorafenib plus ICI group demonstrated significantly higher objective response rate (24.3% vs. 10.3%, after PSM, p = 0.030) and disease control rate (79.4% vs. 50.0%, after PSM, p < 0.001) compared to the regorafenib monotherapy group based on mRECIST criteria. Median progression-free survival (7.9 vs. 3.2 months, after PSM, p < 0.001) and overall survival (25.6 vs. 16.4 months, p = 0.010, after PSM) were also considerably longer in the regorafenib plus ICI group. The incidence of Grades 3-4 treatment-related adverse events (TRAEs) was marginally greater in the regorafenib plus ICI group than in the regorafenib group (23.8% vs. 20.0%, p = 0.546). Notably, there were no instances of treatment-related mortality or emergence of new TRAEs in any treatment group. CONCLUSION: The combination of regorafenib and ICI shows potential as a viable second-line treatment for advanced HCC, exhibiting favorable efficacy while maintaining a tolerable safety profile in contrast to regorafenib monotherapy.

METTL9-SLC7A11 axis promotes hepatocellular carcinoma progression through ferroptosis inhibition.

Methytransferase-like proteins 9 (METTL9) has been characterized as an oncogene in several cancers, however, its role in hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) remains unknown. Here, we investigated the function and molecular mechanism of METTL9 in HCC. We showed that METTL9 expression was elevated in HCC, and its high expression was associated with poor survival outcomes. Knockdown of METTL9 observed a significant inhibition of HCC cell viability, migration, and invasion both in vitro and in vivo. By contrast, METTL9 overexpression HCC cells obtained stronger abilities in cell proliferation and migration. Mechanistically, we discovered that METTL9 knockdown led to a reduction in the expression level of SLC7A11, a key suppressor of ferroptosis, in turn, promoted ferroptosis in HCC cells, impeding the progression of HCC. Moreover, we have proved that targeting METTL9 could significantly restrain the growth of HCC patient-derived xenograft (PDX). Our study established METTL9 as a critical role in promoting HCC development and provides a foundation for further investigation and potential therapeutic interventions targeting ferroptosis in HCC.

NXN suppresses metastasis of hepatocellular carcinoma by promoting degradation of Snail through binding to DUB3.

The poor prognosis of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) could be attributed to its high metastasis rate. Here, we report the role of nucleoredoxin (NXN), a multifunctional redox-active protein, in HCC metastasis. The expression of NXN in HCC tissues was measured by immunohistochemistry. The role of NXN on HCC proliferation was determined by CCK-8, EdU and colony formation assays in vitro and subcutaneous tumor formation model in vivo. Transwell and wound healing assays and tail vein injection model were performed to assess the function of NXN on HCC metastasis. Co-immunoprecipitation assay was performed to examine the interaction among NXN, Snail and DUB3. Our results showed that NXN was downregulated in HCC tissues compared to adjacent liver tissues. Patients with low NXN expression had shorter overall survival (OS) time (P < 0.001) than those with high NXN expression. Biologically, ectopic expression of NXN significantly inhibited the proliferation and metastasis of HCC cells both in vitro and in vivo by suppressing epithelial-mesenchymal transition (EMT). Mechanistically, NXN promoted the ubiquitin-proteasome-mediated degradation of Snail through interaction with DUB3. Further, depletion of Snail abolished NXN-inhibited cell proliferation and metastasis. In summary, NXN suppressed the proliferation and metastasis of HCC by inhibiting DUB3-mediated deubiquitylation of Snail protein. Our study demonstrates that NXN, DUB3 and Snail complex functioned as an important regulatory mechanism of HCC progression and indicates a potential therapeutic approach for the treatment of HCC metastasis.

SNRPC promotes hepatocellular carcinoma cell motility by inducing epithelial-mesenchymal transition.

The therapeutic outcome of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) remains unsatisfactory because of poor response and acquired drug resistance. To better elucidate the molecular mechanisms of HCC, here we used three Gene Expression Omnibus datasets to identify potential oncogenes, and thereby identified small nuclear ribonucleoprotein polypeptide C (SNRPC). We report that SNRPC is highly up-regulated in HCC tissues as determined using immunohistochemistry assays of samples from a cohort of 224 patients with HCC, and overexpression of SNRPC was correlated with multiple tumors, advanced stage, and poor outcome. Kaplan-Meier analysis confirmed that patients with high SNRPC expression exhibited shorter survival in four independent HCC cohorts (all P < 0.05). Furthermore, SNRPC mutations are significantly more frequent in HCC tissues than in normal liver tissues and are an early event in the development of HCC. Functional network analysis suggested that SNRPC is linked to the regulation of ribosome, spliceosome, and proteasome signaling. Subsequently, gain- and loss-of-function assays showed that SNRPC promotes the motility and epithelial-mesenchymal transition of HCC cells in vitro. SNRPC expression was negatively correlated with the infiltration of CD4+ T cells, macrophage cells, and neutrophil cells (all P < 0.05), as determined by analyzing the TIMER (Tumor IMmune Estimation Resource) database. In conclusion, our findings suggest that SNRPC has a potential role in epithelial-mesenchymal transition and motility in HCC.

Elafin promotes tumour metastasis and attenuates the anti-metastatic effects of erlotinib via binding to EGFR in hepatocellular carcinoma.

BACKGROUND: Elafin is a serine protease inhibitor critical for host defence. We previously reported that Elafin was associated with the recurrence of early-stage hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) after surgery. However, the exact role of Elafin in HCC remains obscure. METHODS: HCC tissue microarrays were used to investigate the correlation between Elafin expression and the prognosis of HCC patients. In vitro migration, invasion and wound healing assays and in vivo lung metastasis models were used to determine the role of Elafin in HCC metastasis. Mass spectrometry, co-immunoprecipitation, western blotting, and immunofluorescence staining assays were performed to uncover the mechanism of Elafin in HCC. Dual-luciferase reporter and chromatin immunoprecipitation assays were employed to observe the transcriptional regulation of Elafin. RESULTS: Elafin expression was frequently increased in HCC tissues compared to normal tissues, and high Elafin expression in HCC tissues was correlated with aggressive tumour phenotypes and a poor prognosis in HCC patients. Elafin dramatically enhanced the metastasis of HCC cells both in vitro and in vivo by interacting with EGFR and activating EGFR/AKT signalling. Moreover, Elafin attenuated the suppressive effects of erlotinib on HCC metastasis. Besides, Elafin was transcriptionally regulated by Sp1 in HCC cells. Clinically, Elafin expression was positively correlated with Sp1, Vimentin, and EGFR signalling in both our HCC tissue microarrays and TCGA database analysis. CONCLUSIONS: Upregulation of Elafin by Sp1 enhanced HCC metastasis via EGFR/AKT pathway, and overexpression of Elafin attenuated the anti-metastatic effects of erlotinib, suggesting a valuable prognostic biomarker and therapeutic target for HCC.

Surgical Resection versus Re-Ablation for Intrahepatic Recurrent Hepatocellular Carcinoma after Initial Ablation Therapy.

BACKGROUND AND AIMS: Whether surgical resection or repeated ablation should be recommended for intrahepatic recurrent hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) conforming to the Milan criteria after initial ablation remains unclear. In this study, we compared the outcomes of patients who underwent surgical resection with those who underwent re-ablation for recurrent HCC after initial curative-intent ablation. METHODS: The data of 28 and 98 patients who underwent surgical resection and re-ablation, respectively, for recurrent HCC after initial ablation between January 2003 and 2017 were analyzed using propensity score matching. RESULTS: Before matching, the 1-, 3-, and 5-year overall survival (OS) rates were 95.7, 83.0, and 74.4% for the ablation group, compared to 92.9, 89.1, and 70.9% for the resection group (p = 0.490). The corresponding disease-free survival (DFS) rates were 67.5, 40.1, and 25.6% for the ablation group and were 85.4, 59.9, and 53.3% for the resection group (p = 0.018). After matching, the 1-, 3-, and 5-year OS rates for the ablation and resection group were 95.2, 85.5 and 81.8% versus 96.0, 96.0, and 76.4%, respectively (p = 0.550). The 1-, 3-, and 5-year DFS rates were 58.0, 39.5, and 29.9% for the ablation group and were 95.8, 67.2, and 59.8% for the resection group (p = 0.004). Cox proportional hazards model identified surgical resection as the only significant prognostic factor for DFS but not for OS. CONCLUSION: For intrahepatic recurrent HCC patients after initial ablation, surgical resection could provide better DFS than re-ablation, while no difference in OS was observed between the 2 treatment groups.

Primary tumor location affects recurrence-free survival for patients with colorectal liver metastases after hepatectomy: a propensity score matching analysis.

BACKGROUND: Whether primary tumor location of colorectal cancer (CRC) affects survival of patients after resection of liver metastases remains controversial. This study was conducted to investigate the differences in clinicopathological characteristics and prognosis between right-sided CRC and left-sided CRC patients with liver metastases after hepatectomy. METHODS: From 2002 to 2018, 611 patients with colorectal liver metastases (CRLM) who underwent hepatectomy at our center were reviewed. Primary tumors located from the cecum to transverse colon were defined as right-sided group (n = 141); tumors located from the splenic flexure to rectum were defined as left-sided group (n = 470). Patients were compared between two groups before and after a 1:1 propensity score matching (PSM) analysis. RESULTS: Before PSM, median survival time and 5-year overall survival (OS) rate in right-sided group were 77 months and 56.3%, and those in left-sided group were 64 months and 51.1%, respectively. After PSM, median survival time and 5-year OS rate in right-sided group were 77 months and 55.9%, and those in left-sided group were 58.8 months and 47.3%, respectively. The OS rates did not differ between two groups before and after PSM (P = 0.575, P = 0.453). However, significant different recurrence-free survival (RFS) rate was found before and after PSM between right-sided and left-sided group (P = 0.028, P = 0.003). CONCLUSIONS: Compared to patients with left-sided primary tumors, patients with right-sided primary tumors had a worse RFS but similar OS. Careful preoperative evaluation, intensive preoperative chemotherapy, and frequent follow-up to detect early recurrence might be justified for CRLM patients with right-sided primary tumors.

Dysregulated Sp1/miR-130b-3p/HOXA5 axis contributes to tumor angiogenesis and progression of hepatocellular carcinoma.

Angiogenesis, one of the hallmarks of cancer, is essential for both tumor growth and metastasis. However, its molecular mechanisms in hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) are largely unknown. Here, we report the role of HOXA5 in tumor angiogenesis of HCC. Methods: The expression of miR-130b-3p and HOXA5 was determined by qRT-PCR and immunohistochemistry, respectively. Capillary tube formation assay, chicken chorioallantoic membrane assay, and subcutaneous xenograft experiments were performed to investigate the role of miR-130-3p and HOXA5. Luciferase reporter assay and chromatin immunoprecipitation assay were performed to evaluate the interaction between Sp1, miR-130b-3p and HOXA5. Results: miR-130b-3p was found up-regulated in HCC and correlated with a poor prognosis. miR-130b-3p promoted HCC angiogenesis both in vitro and in vivo. Mechanistically, HOXA5 was validated as a direct target of miR-130b-3p. Furthermore, we demonstrated that HOXA5 was down-regulated in HCC and its down-regulation was associated with larger tumor size, shorter overall survival, and higher recurrence probability. Moreover, HOXA5 was significantly associated with angiogenesis biomarkers such as CD31 and CD34. Functional studies revealed that the knockdown of HOXA5 also significantly promoted HCC angiogenesis both in vitro and in vivo. Knocking-down HOXA5 significantly provoked HCC cells to induce the capillary tube formation, migration and proliferation of endothelial cells. In xenograft animal models, we found that a decrease of HOXA5 effectively enhanced tumor growth and increased microvessel densities. We further demonstrated that miR-130b-3p could be directly transcriptionally regulated by Sp1. Conclusions: This study showed that a dysregulation in the Sp1/miR-130b-3p/HOXA5 axis contributed to HCC progression and angiogenesis, and that HOXA5 can be considered as a promising therapeutic target for treating HCC.