"We're sinking": a qualitative interview-based study on stakeholder perceptions of structural and process limitations to the Canadian healthcare system.

BACKGROUND: Despite longstanding efforts and calls for reform, Canada's incremental approach to healthcare changes has left the country lagging behind other OECD nations. Reform to the Canadian healthcare system is essential to develop a higher performing system. This study sought to gain a deeper understanding of the views of Canadian stakeholders on structural and process deficiencies and strategies to improve the Canadian healthcare system substantially and meaningfully. METHODS: We conducted individual, ~ 45-minute, semi-structured virtual interviews from May 2022 to August 2022. Using existing contacts and snowball sampling, we targeted one man and one woman from five regions in Canada across four stakeholder groups: (1) public citizens; (2) healthcare leaders; (3) academics; and (4) political decision makers. Interviews centered on participants' perceptions of the state of the current healthcare system, including areas where major improvements are required, and strategies to achieve suggested enhancements; Donabedian's Model (i.e., structure, process, outcomes) was the guiding conceptual framework. Interviews were audio-recorded, transcribed verbatim, and de-identified, and inductive thematic analysis was performed independently and in duplicate according to published methods. RESULTS: The data from 31 interviews with 13 (41.9%) public citizens, 10 (32.3%) healthcare leaders, 4 (12.9%) academics, and 4 (12.9%) political decision makers resulted in three themes related to the structure of the healthcare system (1. system reactivity; 2. linkage with the Canadian identity; and 3. political and funding structures), three themes related to healthcare processes (1. staffing shortages; 2. inefficient care; and 3. inconsistent care), and three strategies to improve short- and long-term population health outcomes (1. delineating roles and revising incentives; 2. enhanced health literacy; 3. interdisciplinary and patient-centred care). CONCLUSION: Canadians in our sample identified important structural and process limitations to the Canadian healthcare system. Meaningful reforms are needed and will require addressing the link between the Canadian identity and our healthcare system to facilitate effective development and implementation of strategies to improve population health outcomes.

Association between sodium-glucose cotransporter-2 inhibitors and arrhythmic outcomes in patients with diabetes and pre-existing atrial fibrillation.

AIMS: Prior studies suggest that sodium-glucose cotransporter-2 inhibitors (SGLT2is) may decrease the incidence of atrial fibrillation (AF). However, it is unknown whether SGLT2i can attenuate the disease course of AF among patients with pre-existing AF and Type II diabetes mellitus (DM). In this study, our objective was to examine the association between SGLT2i prescription and arrhythmic outcomes among patients with DM and pre-existing AF. METHODS AND RESULTS: We conducted a population-based cohort study of adults with DM and AF between 2014 and 2019. Using a prevalent new-user design, individuals prescribed SGLT2i were matched 1:1 to those prescribed dipeptidyl peptidase-4 inhibitors (DPP4is) based on time-conditional propensity scores. The primary endpoint was a composite of AF-related healthcare utilization (i.e. hospitalization, emergency department visits, electrical cardioversion, or catheter ablation). Secondary outcome measures included all-cause mortality, heart failure (HF) hospitalization, and ischaemic stroke or transient ischaemic attack (TIA). Cox proportional hazard models were used to examine the association of SGLT2i with the study endpoint. Among 2242 patients with DM and AF followed for an average of 3.0 years, the primary endpoint occurred in 8.7% (n = 97) of patients in the SGLT2i group vs. 10.0% (n = 112) of patients in the DPP4i group [adjusted hazard ratio 0.73 (95% confidence interval 0.55-0.96; P = 0.03)]. Sodium-glucose cotransporter-2 inhibitors were associated with significant reductions in all-cause mortality and HF hospitalization, but there was no difference in the risk of ischaemic stroke/TIA. CONCLUSION: Among patients with DM and pre-existing AF, SGLT2is are associated with decreased AF-related health resource utilization and improved arrhythmic outcomes compared with DPP4is.

Sodium-glucose co-transporter-2 inhibitors are associated with kidney benefits at all degrees of albuminuria: A retrospective cohort study of adults with diabetes.

AIM: To estimate the real-world effectiveness of sodium-glucose co-transporter-2 inhibitors (SGLT2is) versus dipeptidyl peptidase-4 inhibitors (DPP4is) at reducing loss of kidney function and adverse kidney events in adults with varying levels of albuminuria. MATERIALS AND METHODS: In this retrospective cohort study using administrative data, we matched new SGLT2i users 1:2 to DPP4i users on diabetes therapy, chronic kidney disease (CKD) stage, albuminuria and time-conditional propensity score. Albuminuria was defined by spot urine albumin or equivalent as mild, moderate or severe. Linear regression was used to model the estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR), and Poisson regression for a composite kidney outcome (> 40% loss of eGFR, kidney replacement therapy or death from kidney causes) and all-cause mortality. RESULTS: SGLT2i users (n = 19 238, median age 57.9 years, female 40.9%) had mostly nil/mild albuminuria (70.7%). SGLT2is were associated with a 1.36 (95% CI 0.98-1.74) mL/min/1.73m2 (P < .001) acute (≤ 60 days) decline in eGFR, relative to DPP4is. Thereafter, SGLT2is were associated with 1.04 (95% CI 0.93-1.15) mL/min/1.73m2 (P < .001) less annual eGFR loss. SGLT2i users had fewer adverse kidney outcomes (incidence rate ratio [IRR] 0.58 [0.47-0.71]; P < .001), but not all-cause mortality (IRR 0.82 [0.66-1.01]; P = .06). Outcomes were similar considering only those with nil/mild albuminuria. CONCLUSIONS: SGLT2is may prevent eGFR decline and reduce the risk of adverse kidney events in adults with diabetes and nil or non-severe albuminuria.

Physician Variation and the Impact of Payment Model in Cardiac Imaging.

BACKGROUND: The influence of fee-for-service reimbursement on cardiac imaging has not been compared with other payment models. Furthermore, variation in ordering practices is not well understood. METHODS AND RESULTS: This retrospective, population-based cohort study using linked administrative data from Alberta, Canada included adults with chronic heart disease (atrial fibrillation, coronary artery disease, and heart failure) seen by cardiac specialists for a new outpatient consultation April 2012 to December 2018. Generalized linear mixed-effects models estimated the association of payment model (including the ability to bill to interpret imaging tests) and the use of cardiac imaging and quantified variation in cardiac imaging. Among 31 685 adults seen by 308 physicians at 136 sites, patients received an observed mean of 0.67 (95% CI, 0.67-0.68) imaging tests per consultation. After adjustment, patients seeing fee-for-service physicians had 2.07 (95% CI, 1.68-2.54) and fee-for-service physicians with ability to interpret had 2.87 (95% CI, 2.16-3.81) times the rate of receiving a test than those seeing salaried physicians. Measured patient, physician, and site effects accounted for 31% of imaging variation and, following adjustment, reduced unexplained site-level variation 40% and physician-level variation 29%. CONCLUSIONS: We identified substantial variation in the use of outpatient cardiac imaging related to physician and site factors. Physician payment models have a significant association with imaging use. Our results raise concern that payment models may influence cardiac imaging practice. Similar methods could be applied to identify the source and magnitude of variation in other health care processes and outcomes.

A North Star Vision: Results from a Deliberative Dialogue to Identify Policy Strategies to Improve Value in Healthcare.

We hosted a deliberative dialogue with citizens (n = 3), policy researchers (n = 3), government decision makers (n = 3) and health system leaders (n = 3) to identify evidence-informed policy options to improve the value of Canadian healthcare. The analysis resulted in three themes: (1) the need for a vision to guide reforms, (2) community-based care and (3) community-engaged care. Results suggest the need for a new paradigm: community-focused health systems. Such a paradigm could serve as a North Star guiding healthcare transformation, improving value by aligning citizen and healthcare system goals, prioritizing spending on services that address the social determinants of health and improving quality and equity.

Economic evaluation in cardiac electrophysiology: Determining the value of emerging technologies.

Cardiac electrophysiology is a constantly evolving speciality that has benefited from technological innovation and refinements over the past several decades. Despite the potential of these technologies to reshape patient care, their upfront costs pose a challenge to health policymakers who are responsible for the assessment of the novel technology in the context of increasingly limited resources. In this context, it is critical for new therapies or technologies to demonstrate that the measured improvement in patients' outcomes for the cost of achieving that improvement is within conventional benchmarks for acceptable health care value. The field of Health Economics, specifically economic evaluation methods, facilitates this assessment of value in health care. In this review, we provide an overview of the basic principles of economic evaluation and provide historical applications within the field of cardiac electrophysiology. Specifically, the cost-effectiveness of catheter ablation for both atrial fibrillation (AF) and ventricular tachycardia, novel oral anticoagulants for stroke prevention in AF, left atrial appendage occlusion devices, implantable cardioverter defibrillators, and cardiac resynchronization therapy will be reviewed.

Low-value preoperative cardiac testing before low-risk surgical procedures: a population-based cohort study.

BACKGROUND: Choosing Wisely Canada (CWC) recommends avoiding noninvasive advanced cardiac testing (e.g., exercise stress testing [EST], echocardiography and myocardial perfusion imaging [MPI]) for preoperative assessment in patients scheduled to undergo low-risk noncardiac surgery. In this study, we assessed the temporal trends in testing, overlapping with the introduction of the CWC recommendations in 2014, and patient and provider factors associated with low-value testing. METHODS: In this population-based retrospective cohort study, we used linked health administrative data in Alberta, Canada, to identify adult patients who underwent elective noncardiac surgery between Apr. 1, 2011, and Mar. 31, 2019, who had preoperative noninvasive advanced cardiac tests (EST, echocardiography or MPI) within 6 months before surgery. We included electrocardiography as an exploratory outcome. We excluded patients at high risk using the Revised Cardiac Risk Index (score ≥ 1 considered to indicate high risk), and modelled patient and temporal factors associated with the number of tests. RESULTS: We identified 1 045 896 elective noncardiac operations performed in 798 599 patients and 25 599 advanced preoperative cardiac tests; 2.1% of operations were preceded by advanced cardiac testing. The incidence of testing increased over the study period, and, by 2018/19, patients were 1.3 times (95% confidence interval 1.2-1.4) more likely to receive a preoperative advanced test compared to 2011/12. Urban patients were more likely to receive a preoperative advanced cardiac test than their rural counterparts. Electrocardiography was the most common preoperative cardiac test, preceding 182 128 procedures (17.4%). INTERPRETATION: Preoperative advanced cardiac testing was infrequent in adult Albertans who underwent low-risk elective noncardiac operations. Despite CWC recommendations, the use of some tests appears to be increasing, and there was substantial variation across geographic areas.

Patterns and Patients' Characteristics Associated With Use of Sodium-Glucose Cotransporter-2 Inhibitors Among Adults With Type 2 Diabetes: A Population-based Cohort Study.

OBJECTIVES: Our aim in this study was to describe patterns and patient-level factors associated with use of sodium-glucose cotransporter-2 inhibitors (SGLT2is) among adults with diabetes being treated in Alberta, Canada. METHODS: Using linked administrative data sets from 2014 to 2019, we defined a retrospective cohort of adults with prevalent or incident type 2 diabetes with indications for SGLT2i use and who did not have advanced kidney disease (glomerular filtration rate <30 mL/min per 1.73 m2) or previous amputation. We describe medication dispensation patterns of SGLT2is over time in the overall cohort and among the subgroup with cardiovascular disease (CVD). Multivariable logistic regression was used to determine patients' characteristics associated with SGLT2i use. RESULTS: Of the 341,827 patients with diabetes (mean age, 60.7 years; 45.6% female), 107,244 (31.3%) had CVD. The proportion of patients with an SGLT2i prescription increased in a linear fashion to a maximum of 10.8% (95% confidence interval [CI], 10.7% to 10.9%) of the eligible cohort by the end of the observation period (March 2019). The proportion of filled prescriptions was similar for patients with CVD (10.4%; 95% CI, 10.1% to 10.6%) and for those without CVD (10.9%; 95% CI, 10.8% to 11.0%). Patients' characteristics associated with lower odds of filling an SGLT2i prescription included female sex, older age and lower income. CONCLUSIONS: The use of SGLT2is is increasing among patients with diabetes but remains low even in those with CVD. Policy and practice changes to increase prescribing, especially in older adults, may help to reduce morbidity and mortality related to cardiovascular and renal complications.

Laboratory testing and antihypertensive medication adherence following initial treatment of incident, uncomplicated hypertension: A real-world data analysis.

In this study on medication adherence among newly diagnosed patients with uncomplicated, incident hypertension, we conducted a retrospective cohort study using available administrative and laboratory data from April 1, 2012 to March 31, 2017 in Alberta, Canada to understand the extent to which baseline laboratory assessment and/or subsequent follow-up was associated with persistence with antihypertensive therapy. We determined the frequency of baseline and follow-up testing and compared the rates of medication persistence by patient-, neighbourhood-, and treatment-related factors. Of 103 232 patients with newly diagnosed, uncomplicated hypertension who filled their first prescription within our study timeframe, 52.5% were non-persistent within 6 months. Persistent patients were more often female and residing in neighbourhoods with higher social status (with exception to rurality). Aside from older age, the strongest predictor of persistence was performance of laboratory testing related to hypertension with an apparent effect in which higher levels of medication persistence were seen with more frequent laboratory testing. We concluded that medication persistence was far from optimal, dropping off considerably after 6 months for more than half of patients. Medication persistence is a substantial barrier to realizing the full societal benefits of antihypertensive treatment. Ongoing follow up with patients, including laboratory testing, may be a critical component of better long term treatment persistence.

Geographic and temporal variation in the treatment and outcomes of atrial fibrillation: a population-based analysis of national quality indicators.

BACKGROUND: Assessment of potential geographic variation in quality indicators of atrial fibrillation care may identify opportunities for improvement in the quality of atrial fibrillation care. The objective of this study was to assess for potential geographic variation in the quality of atrial fibrillation care in Alberta, Canada. METHODS: In a population-based cohort of adults (age ≥ 18 yr) with incident nonvalvular atrial fibrillation (NVAF) diagnosed between Apr. 1, 2008, and Mar. 31, 2016, in Alberta, we investigated the variation in national quality indicators of atrial fibrillation care developed by the Canadian Cardiovascular Society. Specifically, we assessed the geographic and temporal variation in the proportion of patients with initiation of oral anticoagulant therapy, persistence with therapy, ischemic stroke and major bleeding outcomes 1 year after atrial fibrillation diagnosis using linked administrative data sets. We defined stroke risk using the CHADS2 score. We assessed geographic variation using small-area variation statistics and geospatial data analysis. RESULTS: Of the 64 093 patients in the study cohort (35 019 men [54.6%] and 29 074 women [45.4%] with a mean age of 69 [standard deviation 15.9] yr), 36 199 were at high risk for stroke and 14 411 were at moderate risk. Within 1 year of NVAF diagnosis, 20 180 patients (55.7%) in the high-risk group and 6448 patients (44.7%) in the moderate-risk group were prescribed anticoagulation. A total of 2187 patients (3.4%) had an ischemic stroke, and 2996 patients (4.7%) experienced a major bleed. There was substantial regional variation observed in initiation of oral anticoagulant therapy but not in the proportion of patients with ischemic stroke or major bleeding. Among the 64 Health Status Areas in Alberta, therapy initiation rates ranged from 22.6% to 71.2% among patients at high stroke risk and from 22.7% to 55.8% among those at moderate stroke risk, with clustering of lower therapy initiation rates in rural northern regions. INTERPRETATION: The rate of initiation of oral anticoagulant therapy among adults with incident atrial fibrillation was less than 60% in patients in whom oral anticoagulant therapy would be considered guideline-appropriate care. The large geographic variation in oral anticoagulant prescribing warrants additional study into patient, provider and health care system factors that contribute to variation and drive disparities in high-quality, equitable atrial fibrillation care.

Optimizing Physician Payment Models to Address Health System Priorities: Perspectives from Specialist Physicians.

OBJECTIVE: Despite well-documented data on the mixed impact of physician payment models, there is limited evidence on how to enhance existing payment model designs. This study examines the approaches to optimizing payment models from the perspective of specialist physicians to better support patient and physician experience and other health system objectives. METHOD: Semi-structured interviews were conducted with 32 specialist physicians across Alberta, Canada. Data from the interviews were analyzed using a framework approach. RESULTS: Respondents emphasized the need to incentivize physicians with the right blend of financial and non-financial incentives, including physician wellness. Respondents also highlighted the need for physician involvement and accountability to optimize the value of physician payment models. CONCLUSION: To optimize physician payment models, it may be useful to include a blend of financial and non-financial incentives with clear accountability measures as this may better align physician practice with health system priorities.

Antihypertensive Prescribing for Uncomplicated, Incident Hypertension: Opportunities for Cost Savings.

BACKGROUND: A range of first-line similarly effective medications ranging in price are recommended for treating uncomplicated hypertension. Considering drug costs alone, thiazides and thiazide-like diuretics are the most cost-efficient option. We determined incident prescribing of thiazides for newly diagnosed hypertension as first-line treatment in Alberta, factors that predicted receiving thiazides vs more costly medications, and how much could be saved if more patients were prescribed thiazides. METHODS: Using a retrospective cohort design, factors predicting receiving thiazides vs other agents were determined using mixed effects logistic regression. Cost savings were simulated by shifting patients from other antihypertensive medications to thiazides and calculating the difference. RESULTS: Within our cohort of 89,548 adults, only 12% received thiazides as first-line treatment whereas 44% received angiotensin converting enzyme inhibitors, 17% received angiotensin receptor blockers, 16% received calcium channel blockers, and 10% received ß-blockers. Antihypertensive medications were typically prescribed by office-based, general practitioners (88%). Being male and receiving a prescription from a physician with ≥ 20 years of practice and a high clinical workload were associated with increased odds of receiving nonthiazides. In the extreme case that all patients received thiazides as their first prescription, spending would have been reduced by a maximum of 95% (CAD$1.8 million). CONCLUSIONS: Only 12% of Albertan adults with incident, uncomplicated hypertension were prescribed thiazides as first-line treatment. With the opportunity for drug cost savings, future research should evaluate the risk of adverse events and side effects across the drug classes and whether the costs associated with managing those risks could offset the savings achieved through increased thiazide use.

CONTEXTE: De nombreux médicaments tous aussi efficaces les uns que les autres, mais de prix variable, sont recommandés pour le traitement de première intention de l'hypertension non compliquée. Si l'on tient compte du coût du médicament seulement, les thiazides et les diurétiques apparentés aux thiazides sont les options les plus économiques. Nous avons évalué le taux de prescription d'un thiazide pour le traitement de première intention de l'hypertension nouvellement diagnostiquée en Alberta, les facteurs de prédiction de la prescription d'un thiazide plutôt que d'un autre médicament plus coûteux, ainsi que les économies qui pourraient être réalisées si on prescrivait un thiazide à un plus grand nombre de patients. MÉTHODOLOGIE: Dans le cadre de notre étude de cohorte rétrospective, nous avons déterminé les facteurs de prédiction de la prescription d'un thiazide plutôt que d'un autre agent à l'aide d'une régression logistique à effets mixtes. Nous avons simulé les économies qui pourraient être réalisées en faisant passer à un thiazide les patients à qui un autre médicament antihypertenseur a été prescrit et en calculant la différence. RÉSULTATS: Dans notre cohorte de 89 548 adultes, seulement 12 % des patients ont reçu un thiazide en première intention; 44 % ont reçu un inhibiteur de l'enzyme de conversion de l'angiotensine; 17 %, un antagoniste des récepteurs de l'angiotensine; 16 %, un inhibiteur calcique; et 10 %, des bêtabloquants. Les agents antihypertenseurs sont généralement prescrits par des omnipraticiens en cabinet (88 %). Le fait d'être un homme et le fait d'obtenir une prescription auprès d'un médecin exerçant depuis au moins 20 ans et ayant une lourde charge de travail clinique étaient associés à une probabilité supérieure de recevoir un agent autre qu'un thiazide. Dans le cas extrême où tous les patients se verraient prescrire un thiazide en première intention, la réduction des dépenses pourrait atteindre 95 % (soit 1,8 million de dollars canadiens). CONCLUSIONS: En Alberta, un thiazide a été prescrit en première intention à seulement 12 % des adultes venant de recevoir un diagnostic d'hypertension non compliquée. Compte tenu des économies qui pourraient être réalisées si un thiazide était prescrit dans ce contexte, il conviendrait d'effectuer des recherches plus poussées pour évaluer le risque de manifestations indésirables et d'effets secondaires associé aux différentes classes de médicaments, et pour déterminer si les coûts liés à la prise en charge de ce risque annuleraient les économies réalisées en augmentant le recours aux thiazides.

First-line pharmacotherapy for incident type 2 diabetes: Prescription patterns, adherence and associated costs.

AIMS: To use real-world prescription data from Alberta, Canada to: (a) describe the prescribing patterns for initial pharmacotherapy for those with newly diagnosed uncomplicated type 2 diabetes; (b) describe medication-taking behaviours (adherence and persistence) in the first year after initiating pharmacotherapy; and (c) explore healthcare system costs associated with prescribing patterns. METHODS: We employed a retrospective cohort design using linked administrative datasets from 2012 to 2017 to define a cohort of those with uncomplicated incident diabetes. We summarized the initial prescription patterns, adherence and costs (healthcare and pharmaceutical) over the first year after initiation of pharmacotherapy. Using multivariable regression, we determined the association of these outcomes with various sociodemographic characteristics. RESULTS: The majority of individuals for whom metformin was indicated as first-line therapy received a prescription for metformin monotherapy (89%). Older individuals, those with higher baseline A1C and those with no comorbidities, were most likely to be started on non-metformin agents. Adherence with the initially prescribed regimen was suboptimal overall, with nearly half (48%) being non-adherent over the first year. One-third of those who started metformin discontinued it in the first 3 months. Those started on non-metformin agents had roughly twice the healthcare costs, and five to seven times higher medication costs, compared to those started on metformin, in the first year after starting therapy. CONCLUSIONS: With the addition of new classes of medications, healthcare providers who look after those with type 2 diabetes have more pharmaceutical options than ever. Most individuals continue to be prescribed metformin monotherapy. However, adherence is suboptimal, and drops off considerably within the first 3 months.

Commentary: Improving the Sustainability of Healthcare in Canada through Physician-Engaged Delivery System Reforms.

Increasing private healthcare financing has been suggested as a solution toward improving healthcare quality and access within the Canadian healthcare system. However, Lee et al. (2021) find no evidence that increasing private financing would address the challenges faced by Canadian healthcare. We suggest turning our focus away from reforms that solely increase private healthcare financing and toward evidence-based delivery-system reforms to address both quality and sustainability. We present examples and supporting evidence of the effectiveness of patient-, physician-, organization- and system-level strategies. Changes should engage physicians and be implemented across Canada to facilitate a cultural shift toward experimentation and high-value care delivery.

Factors that influence specialist physician preferences for fee-for-service and salary-based payment models: A qualitative study.

Most physicians across the world are paid through fee-for-service. However, there is increased interest in alternative payment models such as salary, capitation, episode-based payment, pay-for-performance, and strategic blends of these models. Such models may be more aligned with broad health policy goals such as fiscal sustainability, delivery of high-quality care, and physician and patient well-being. Despite this, there is limited research on physicians' preferences for different models and a disproportionate focus on differences in income over other issues such as physician autonomy and purpose. Using qualitative interviews with 32 specialist physicians in Alberta, Canada, we examined factors that influence preferences for fee-for-service (FFS) and salary-based payment models. Our findings suggest that a series of factors relating to (1) physician characteristics, (2) payment model characteristics, and (3) professional interests influence preferences. Within these themes, flexibility, autonomy, and compatibility with academic roles were highlighted. To encourage physicians to select a specific payment model, the model must appeal to them in terms of income potential as well as non-monetary values. These findings can support constructive discussions about the merits of different payment models and can assist policy makers in considering the impact of payment reform.

Impact of payment model on the behaviour of specialist physicians: A systematic review.

Physician payment models are perceived to be an important strategy for improving health, access, quality, and the value of health care. Evidence is predominantly from primary care, and little is known regarding whether specialists respond similarly. We conducted a systematic review to synthesize evidence on the impact of specialist physician payment models across the domains of health care quality; clinical outcomes; utilization, access, and costs; and patient and physician satisfaction. We searched Medline, Embase, and six other databases from their inception through October 2018. Eligible articles addressed specialist physicians, payment models, outcomes of interest, and used an experimental or quasi-experimental design. Of 11,648 studies reviewed for eligibility, 11 articles reporting on seven payment reforms were included. Fee-for-service (FFS) was associated with increased desired utilization and fewer adverse outcomes (in the case of hemodialysis patients) and better access to care (in the case of emergency department services). Replacing FFS with capitation and salary models led to fewer elective surgical procedures (cataracts and tubal ligations) and, with an episode-based model, appeared to increase the use of less costly resources. Four of the seven reforms met their goals but many had unintended consequences. Payment model appears to affect utilization of specialty care, although the association with other outcomes is unclear due to mixed results or lack of evidence. Studies of salary and salary-based reforms point to specialists responding to some incentives differently than theory would predict. Additional research is warranted to improve the evidence driving specialist payment policy.

Association between change in physician remuneration and use of peritoneal dialysis: a population-based cohort analysis.

BACKGROUND: Health care payers are interested in policy-level interventions to increase peritoneal dialysis use in end-stage renal disease. We examined whether increases in physician remuneration for peritoneal dialysis were associated with greater peritoneal dialysis use. METHODS: We studied a cohort of patients in Alberta who started long-term dialysis with at least 90 days of preceding nephrologist care between Jan. 1, 2001, and Dec. 31, 2014. We compared peritoneal dialysis use 90 days after dialysis initiation in patients cared for by fee-for-service nephrologists and those cared for by salaried nephrologists before and after weekly peritoneal dialysis remuneration increased from $0 to $32 (fee change 1, Apr. 1, 2002), $49 to $71 (fee change 2, Apr. 1, 2007), and $71 to $135 (fee change 3, Apr. 1, 2009). Remuneration for peritoneal dialysis remained less than hemodialysis until fee change 3. We performed a patient-level differences-in-differences logistic regression, adjusted for demographic characteristics and comorbidities, as well as an unadjusted interrupted time-series analysis of monthly outcome data. RESULTS: Our cohort included 4262 patients. There was no statistical evidence of a difference in the adjusted differences-indifferences estimator following fee change 1 (0.89, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.44-1.81), 2 (1.15, 95% CI 0.73-1.83), or 3 (1.52, 95% CI 0.96-2.40). There was no significant difference in the immediate change or the trend over time in peritoneal dialysis use between fee-for-service and salaried groups following any of the fee changes in the interrupted time-series analysis. INTERPRETATION: We identified no statistical evidence of an increase in peritoneal dialysis use following increased fee-for-service remuneration for peritoneal dialysis. It remains unclear what role, if any, physician payment plays in selection of dialysis modality.

Association of Specialist Physician Payment Model With Visit Frequency, Quality, and Costs of Care for People With Chronic Disease.

Importance: Specialist physicians are key members of chronic care management teams; to date, however, little is known about the association between specialist payment models and outcomes for patients with chronic diseases. Objective: To examine the association of payment model with visit frequency, quality of care, and costs for patients with chronic diseases seen by specialists. Design, Setting, and Participants: A retrospective cohort study using propensity-score matching in patients seen by a specialist physician was conducted between April 1, 2011, and September 31, 2014. The study was completed on March 31, 2015, and data analysis was conducted from June 2017 to February 2018 and finalized in August 2019. In a population-based design, 109 839 adults with diabetes or chronic kidney disease newly referred to specialists were included. Because patients seen by independent salary-based and fee-for-service (FFS) specialists were significantly different in observed baseline characteristics, patients were matched 1:1 on demographic, illness, and physician characteristics. Exposures: Specialist physician payment model (salary-based or FFS). Main Outcomes and Measures: Follow-up outpatient visits, guideline-recommended care delivery, adverse events, and costs. Results: A total of 90 605 patients received care from FFS physicians and 19 234 received care from salary-based physicians. Before matching, the patients seen by salary-based physicians had more advanced chronic kidney disease (2630 of 14 414 [18.2%] vs 6627 of 54 489 [12.2%]), and a higher proportion had 5 or more comorbidities (5989 of 19 234 [31.3%] vs 23 326 of 90 605 [25.7%]). Propensity-score matching resulted in a cohort of 31 898 patients (15 949 FFS, 15 949 salary-based) seeing 489 specialists. In the matched cohort, patients were similar (mean [SD] age, 61.3 [18.2] years; 17 632 women [55.3%]; 29 251 residing in urban settings [91.7%]). Patients seen by salary-based specialists had a higher follow-up visit rate compared with those seen by FFS specialists (1.74 visits; 95% CI, 1.58-1.92 visits vs 1.54 visits; 95% CI, 1.41-1.68 visits), but the difference was not significant (rate ratio, 1.13; 95% CI, 0.99-1.28; P = .06). There was no statistical difference in guideline-recommended care delivery, hospital or emergency department visits for ambulatory care-sensitive conditions, or costs between patients seeing FFS and salary-based specialists. The median association of physician clustering with health care use and quality outcomes was consistently greater than the association with the physician payment, suggesting variation between physicians (eg, median rate ratio for follow-up outpatient visit rate was 1.74, which is greater than the rate ratio of 1.13). Conclusions and Relevance: Specialist physician payment does not appear to be associated with variation in visits, quality, and costs for outpatients with chronic diseases; however, there is variation in outcomes between physicians. This finding suggests the need to consider other strategies to reduce physician variation to improve the value of care and outcomes for people with chronic diseases.