Risk of infective endocarditis after surgical and transcatheter aortic valve replacement.

OBJECTIVE: To define the incidence and risk factors for infective endocarditis (IE) following surgical aortic valve replacement (SAVR) and transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI). METHODS: All patients who underwent first SAVR or TAVI in England between 2007 and 2016 were identified from the NICOR databases. Hospital admissions with a primary diagnosis of IE were identified by linkage with the NHS Hospital Episode Statistics database. Approval was obtained from the NHS Research Ethics Committee. RESULTS: 2057 of 91 962 patients undergoing SAVR developed IE over a median follow-up of 53.9 months-an overall incidence of 4.81 [95% CI 4.61 to 5.03] per 1000 person-years. Correspondingly, 140 of 14 195 patients undergoing TAVI developed IE over a median follow-up of 24.5 months-an overall incidence of 3.57 [95% CI 3.00 to 4.21] per 1000 person-years. The cumulative incidence of IE at 60 months was higher after SAVR than after TAVI (2.4% [95% CI 2.3 to 2.5] vs 1.5% [95% CI 1.3 to 1.8], HR 1.60, p<0.001). Across the entire cohort, SAVR remained an independent predictor of IE after multivariable adjustment. Risk factors for IE included younger age, male sex, atrial fibrillation, and dialysis. CONCLUSIONS: IE is a rare complication of SAVR and TAVI. In our population, the incidence of IE was higher after SAVR than after TAVI.

Cardiovascular magnetic resonance facilitates entirely contrast-free transcatheter aortic valve implantation: case report.

BACKGROUND: Transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI) is usually planned using contrast-enhanced computed tomography (CT) to determine the suitability of cardiovascular anatomy. Computed tomography for TAVI planning requires the administration of intravenous contrast, which may not be desirable in patients with severely reduced renal function. CASE SUMMARY: We present an unusual case of an 89-year-old patient with an urgent need for treatment of critical, symptomatic aortic stenosis who also had severe chronic kidney disease. We judged that this posed a relative contraindication to the use of intravenous contrast. We designed and implemented a novel, contrast-free cardiovascular magnetic resonance (CMR) protocol and used this to plan all aspects of the procedure. Transcatheter aortic valve implantation was conducted successfully with zero contrast medium administration leading to an excellent clinical result and recovery of renal function. CONCLUSION: Contrast-free CMR appears to be a viable alternative to CT for planning structural aortic valve intervention in the rare cases where intravenous contrast is relatively contraindicated.

Anticoagulation for patients with mechanical heart valves at the end of life: understanding clinician attitudes and improving decision making.

BACKGROUND: Decisions regarding continuation or cessation of anticoagulation for patients with mechanical heart valves nearing the end of life represent a difficult balance of risks. The risk of suffering and disability that may result from thromboembolism must be weighed against the burden of continued anticoagulation therapy and the excess bleeding risk this confers. Data allowing quantification of the relative risks are scarce, and this translates to a lack of published guidance on the topic. Here we describe how this lack of guidance is impacting upon healthcare professionals and their patients through misconception of risk and under-confidence in decision-making. We also present local guidance we have developed that aims to improve objective risk assessment and promote individualised, patient-centred decision-making. METHODS: Our survey was developed by specialists in palliative care and cardiology. The survey explored respondents' conception of the risks of stopping anticoagulation for patients with mechanical heart valves at the end of life, as well as their ability to identify patient factors that modify this risk. Respondent decision-making, confidence, and readiness to accept further guidance were also explored. Healthcare professionals at two university teaching hospitals were invited to participate in the survey. The study population included hospital specialists, generalists, and trainees. RESULTS: Fifty-two healthcare professionals completed the survey, including 16 palliative care specialists. 47 (90%) of respondents felt poorly informed of the risks of stopping or continuing anticoagulation. 6 (12%) correctly identified risk of thromboembolism in patients with mechanical heart valves who are not anticoagulated. The remainder overestimated risk by a factor of two (18, 35%) or five (27, 52%). 49 (94%) would find further guidance on this issue helpful. CONCLUSIONS: The healthcare professionals we surveyed felt poorly informed and ill-equipped to make decisions regarding anticoagulation for patients with mechanical heart valves at the end of life. They were objectively poor at estimating the risks involved. In the absence of robust data to support protocolisation of practice, we believe these decisions must be taken in conversation with the patient, taking account of individual circumstances and priorities. We have developed guidance for local use to support such individualised decision-making.

A retrospective analysis of outcomes in low- and intermediate-high-risk pulmonary embolism patients managed on an ambulatory medical unit in the UK.

Pulmonary embolism (PE) is common and guidelines recommend outpatient care only for PE patients with low predicted mortality. Outcomes for patients with intermediate-to-high predicted mortality managed as outpatients are unknown. Electronic records were analysed for adults with PE managed on our ambulatory care unit over 2 years. Patients were stratified into low or intermediate-to-high mortality risk groups using the Pulmonary Embolism Severity Index (PESI). Primary outcomes were the proportion of patients ambulated, 30-day all-cause mortality, 30-day PE-specific mortality and 30-day re-admission rate. Of 199 PE patients, 74% were ambulated and at 30 days, all-cause mortality was 2% (four out of 199) and PE-specific mortality was 1% (two out of 199). Ambulated patients had lower PESI scores, better vital signs and lower troponin levels (morning attendance favoured ambulation). Over a third of ambulated patients had an intermediate-to-high risk PESI score but their all-cause mortality rate was low at 1.9% (one out of 52). In patients with intermediate-to-high risk, oxygen saturation was higher and pulse rate lower in those who were ambulated. Re-admission rate did not differ between ambulated and admitted patients. Two-thirds of patients with intermediate-to-high risk PE were ambulated and their mortality rate remained low. It is possible for selected patients with intermediate-to-high risk PESI scores to be safely ambulated.