Normalization and cross-sectional validation of an extended Adverse Event Profile (E AEP) in a large cohort of patients with epilepsy.

PURPOSE: The Liverpool Adverse Event Profile (L AEP) is commonly used in clinical practice and pharmacological trials for the monitoring of side effects of anti-seizure medication (ASM). However potentially unrelated, additional symptoms and normative data should be considered to put patients´ complaints into perspective. METHODS: An extended 32-item AEP (E AEP) was given to 537 healthy subjects and 1,605 patients with epilepsy as part of the Bonn ASM side effect registry. The tool was factor-analyzed, corrected for age, gender, and repeated application, and related to drug load and individual substances (with N> 100) on item and scale level (total E AEP and its subscales cognition, dizziness, energy, mood, bodily symptoms, aggression, and sexuality). RESULTS: Compared to non-normalized results, at item level, between one and two-thirds of responses suggesting impairment were found to be unlikely to be related to ASM treatment after normalization. Binary regression analyses revealed differential effects of medication choice, but also of antidepressants and neuroleptics on complaint domains. The explained variance was better for physical than psychological domains. The results reflect both known drug side effects and indications. Patients´ explicit attribution of problems to their medications barely improved the correlation of the E AEP and treatment parameters. CONCLUSION: Application of a norm-referenced AEP is highly recommended to avoid overestimation of treatment related problems in patients with epilepsy. It allows evaluation on item and scale level for individuals as well as groups in drug trials. Plausible relations to individual drugs and to drug load can be demonstrated. The explanatory power was better for physical than psychological domains. Drug-related complaint patterns reflect known drug side effects (e.g. perampanel and brivaracetam with aggression) as well as drug indications (e.g. lamotrigine for depression). This is likely to be particularly relevant when side effects may have affected treatment decisions. Longitudinal evaluation with repeated application of the E AEP with changes of drug treatment is in progress.

Focal Cortex Stimulation With a Novel Implantable Device and Antiseizure Outcomes in 2 Prospective Multicenter Single-Arm Trials.

Importance: For the large population of people with drug-refractory epilepsy, alternative treatment approaches are needed. Clinical trial outcomes of a novel stimulation device, which is newly available in Europe for the treatment of patients with a predominant seizure focus, are reported for the first time. Objective: To perform a pooled analysis of the results of 2 prospective, multicenter, single-arm trials, A Pilot Study to Assess the Feasibility of Neurostimulation With the EASEE System to Treat Medically Refractory Focal Epilepsy (EASEE II) and A Pilot Study to Assess the Feasibility of Patient-Controlled Neurostimulation With the EASEE System to Treat Medically Refractory Focal Epilepsy (PIMIDES I), assessing the safety and efficacy of epicranial focal cortex stimulation (FCS) with a novel implantable device (EASEE [Precisis]) as adjunctive treatment for adult patients with drug-refractory focal epilepsy. Design, Setting, and Participants: This study was a pooled analysis of 2 nonrandomized uncontrolled trials, EASEE II and PIMIDES I, which began on January 15, 2019, and January 14, 2020, respectively, and ended on July 28, 2021. EASEE II and PIMIDES I were the first in-human, prospective, single-arm trials with an 8-month evaluation period. Patients were recruited at 7 European epilepsy centers. Consecutive participants with drug-refractory focal epilepsy were enrolled. Study data were analyzed from September 29, 2021, to February 2, 2022. Interventions: After a 1-month prospective baseline period, patients were implanted with the neurostimulation device. After a 1-month postimplantation recovery period, unblinded FCS was activated using both high-frequency and direct current (DC)-like components performed via electrode arrays placed epicranially above the individual epileptic focus region. Main Outcomes and Measures: Efficacy was prospectively assessed by the responder rate in the sixth month of stimulation compared with baseline; safety and additional end points were assessed after device implantation and during the stimulation period. Results: Of the 34 adult patients enrolled at 6 German and 1 Belgian investigational site, 33 (mean [SD] age, 34.6 [13.5] years; 18 male patients [54.5%]) received the neurostimulation device implant. A total of 32 patients underwent combined high-frequency direct current-like stimulation at least until the 8-month postimplant follow-up visit. After 6 months of stimulation, 17 of 32 patients (53.1%) were responders to treatment with at least a 50% reduction in seizure frequency compared with baseline, corresponding to a significant median seizure reduction by 52% (95% CI, 0.37%-0.76%; P < .001). No device- or procedure-related serious adverse events were reported (0; 95% CI, 0%-10.58%). There were no significant alterations in cognition, mood, or overall quality of life. Conclusions and Relevance: Results of this pooled analysis of 2 nonrandomized uncontrolled trials suggest that FCS with a novel neurostimulation device was associated with an effective reduction in seizure frequency in patients with drug-refractory focal epilepsy and may offer a promising treatment option for patients with a predominant epileptic focus. Trial Registration: German Clinical Trials Register: DRKS00015918 and DRKS00017833, respectively, and jointly under PROSPERO: CRD42021266440.

Efficacy and safety of adjunctive padsevonil in adults with drug-resistant focal epilepsy: Results from two double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled trials.

OBJECTIVE: To characterize efficacy, safety/tolerability, and pharmacokinetics of padsevonil (PSL) administered concomitantly with ≤3 antiseizure medications (ASMs) for observable focal seizures in adults with drug-resistant epilepsy in two multicenter, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, parallel-group trials. METHODS: The phase 2b dose-finding trial (EP0091/NCT03373383) randomized patients 1:1:1:1:1 to PSL 50/100/200/400 mg or placebo twice daily (b.i.d.). The phase 3 efficacy trial (EP0092/NCT03739840) randomized patients 1:1:1:1 to PSL 100/200/400 mg or placebo b.i.d. Patients with observable (focal aware with motor symptoms, focal impaired awareness, focal to bilateral tonic-clonic) focal seizures for ≥3 years, experiencing them ≥4 times per 28 days including during the 4-week baseline period despite treatment with ≥4 lifetime ASMs including current ASMs, were enrolled. RESULTS: In EP0091 and EP0092, 410 and 231 patients, respectively, were randomized and received at least one dose of trial medication. In patients in EP0091 on PSL 50/100/200/400 mg b.i.d. (n = 80/82/81/81, respectively) versus placebo (n = 81), outcomes included percentage reductions over placebo in observable focal seizure frequency during the 12-week maintenance period: 17.2%, 19.1% (p = 0.128), 19.2% (p = 0.128), 12.4% (p = 0.248); 75% responder rates (p-values for odds ratios): 13.8%, 12.2% (p = 0.192), 11.1% (p = 0.192), 16.0% (p = 0.124) versus 6.2%; 50% responder rates: 33.8% (p = 0.045), 31.7% (p = 0.079), 25.9% (p = 0.338), 32.1% (p = 0.087), versus 21.0%; TEAEs were reported by 82.7% (67/81), 78.3% (65/83), 74.4% (61/82), 90.1% (73/81) versus 78.3% (65/83). In patients in EP0092 on PSL 100/200/400 mg b.i.d. (n = 60/56/56, respectively) versus placebo (n = 54), outcomes included percentage reductions over placebo: -5.6% (p = 0.687), 6.5% (p = 0.687), 6.3% (p = 0.687); 75% responder rates: 15.3% (p = 0.989), 12.5% (p = 0.989), 14.3% (p = 0.989) versus 13.0%; 50% responder rates: 35.6% (p = 0.425), 33.9% (p = 0.625), and 42.9% (p = 0.125) versus 27.8%; TEAEs were reported by 80.0% (48/60), 78.9% (45/57), 83.1% (49/59) versus 67.3% (37/55). SIGNIFICANCE: In both trials, the primary outcomes did not reach statistical significance in any PSL dose group compared with placebo. PSL was generally well tolerated, and no new safety signals were identified.

Cognitive reawakening and improved quality of life achieved after discontinuing 16 years of anti-seizure treatment with topiramate.

A 42-year-old female patient with epilepsy and a co-morbid migraine suffered from the severe cognitive side effects of topiramate (TPM) for more than 16 years with detrimental consequences for her daily functioning, career, and social interaction. Even a prodromal stage of dementia was suggested, giving rise to fears of developing a neurodegenerative disease. Recently, cognitive monitoring of attention and executive function before and after withdrawal of TPM revealed a significant recovery from the severe negative cognitive side effects of the long-standing and inefficacious antiseizure medication (ASM). Whereas the side effects were reversible after cessation, their consequences for the patient`s biography were permanent. A considerable increase in quality of life, however, was observed without TPM and family members were impressed by the improvements. This case illustrates the potentially severe consequences of negative cognitive side effects which affect daily functioning, career and social life, thus underscoring the importance of being knowledgeable of the potential cognitive risks when prescribing an ASM. Because cognitive side effects may not depend solely on ASM choice and drug load, but also on individual idiosyncratic intolerances, and patients might stay on their treatment for many years, cognitive monitoring is highly recommended.

Changes in cognition after introduction or withdrawal of zonisamide versus topiramate in epilepsy patients: A retrospective study using Bayes statistics.

OBJECTIVE: We aim to evaluate the impact of zonisamide (ZNS) compared to topiramate (TPM) on cognition in patients with epilepsy. Although the risk of cognitive side effects has been clearly demonstrated for TPM, comparable side effects in ZNS have been suggested but evidence from studies is inconclusive. METHODS: In this retrospective observational study, we analyzed patients' records from before and after introduction or withdrawal of ZNS vs TPM. Data were gathered during routine clinical care protocols. Standardized monitoring of executive functions (EpiTrack), verbal memory (short version of verbaler lern- und merkfähigkeitstest, VLMT), and subjective health (extended Adverse Events Profile; quality of life in epilepsy inventory, QOLIE-10) was performed in 73 patients when TPM (n = 45) or ZNS (n = 28) was introduced and 62 patients when TPM (n = 29) or ZNS (n = 33) was withdrawn. The data were analyzed using Bayes statistics that quantify evidence for or against an effect through Bayes factors (BFs). RESULTS: There was decisive evidence for a negative effect of adjunctive ZNS and TPM on executive function (BF = 965.08) and a positive effect of their withdrawal (BF = 429.51). The ZNS effect seemed smaller, although the difference was inconclusive. Verbal memory and subjective quality of life were not significantly affected. Subjectively, ZNS was connected to lower anxiety and fewer headaches, whereas TPM had a perceived effect on weight, fluent speech and comprehension, headaches, and balance. SIGNIFICANCE: This is the first study to provide objective evidence for a considerable negative effect of ZNS treatment on executive function in a naturalistic treatment setting. Comparable to the well-known TPM effect, cognition worsens with adjunction and recovers with withdrawal of ZNS. However, the majority of patients do not show a significant negative effect, suggesting disparate susceptibilities to adverse events. The findings emphasize the need for routine monitoring of cognitive side effects to identify early on those patients who are negatively affected by new AED.

Evaluating the longer-term cognitive effects of adjunctive perampanel compared to lacosamide in a naturalistic outpatient setting.

PURPOSE: This retrospective longitudinal study aims to compare the longer-term cognitive and behavioral side effects of adjunctive antiepileptic treatment with perampanel (PER) and lacosamide (LCM), two third generation antiepileptic drugs with suggested favorable cognitive profiles. The two drugs were monitored according to a previously established routine diagnostic protocol (Helmstaedter et al. E&B 2013;26:182-7) which facilitates the retrospective comparison of antiepileptic drug tolerability in a naturalistic outpatient setting. METHODS: Records from 94 patients were evaluated who underwent neuropsychological assessment before and under adjunctive treatment with either PER (n = 57) or LCM (n = 37). Cognition was assessed using the EpiTrack screening for executive functions and a VLMT short form for verbal memory. Subjective assessments included a German QOLIE-10 adaptation (quality of life) and an extended Adverse Events Profile (AEP). The median follow-up interval was 36 weeks. RESULTS: Multivariate repeated measures statistics revealed a non-significant trend towards an interaction effect "time - treatment arm" on both executive function and memory. When analyzed separately executive functions and memory scores significantly improved under LCM (t = -2.76 p < 0.01 and t = -2.44 p < 0.05 respectively). Subjectively, PER was associated with improvements in 2/18 physiological domains and in the LCM group 1/9 cognitive domains deteriorated. Seizure freedom was achieved for five patients treated with LCM (14%) and 15 treated with PER (26%, χ2 = 2.2, n.s.). CONCLUSION: In a naturalistic outpatient setting, chronic adjunctive treatment with PER and LCM did not negatively affect cognition and LCM may even improve cognition. Neither drug increased self-reported irritability or aggression. This suggests favorable longer-term tolerability.

Changes in hormone and lipid levels in male patients with focal seizures when switched from carbamazepine to lacosamide as adjunctive treatment to levetiracetam: A small phase IIIb, prospective, multicenter, open-label trial.

Treatment with enzyme-inducing antiepileptic drugs (AEDs) such as carbamazepine (CBZ) can lead to changes in reproductive, endocrine, and lipid parameters, resulting in clinical symptoms for some patients. Previous studies indicate that these changes can be reversed by switching to a nonenzyme-inducing AED. Lacosamide is a newer-generation AED, not known to induce or strongly inhibit cytochrome P450 (CYP450) enzymes. In this phase IIIb, prospective, multicenter, open-label, single-arm trial (NCT01375374), the serum concentrations of CYP-related reproductive hormones, thyroid hormones, and lipids were assessed in otherwise healthy male patients with focal seizures (N=11), before and after a switch from CBZ (600-1200mg/day at baseline) to lacosamide (target dose: 400mg/day by the end of titration) as adjunctive treatment to the nonenzyme-inducing AED levetiracetam (LEV, stable dosage of >1000mg/day throughout). Cross titration took place over 4weeks, followed by an 8-week maintenance period. Serum measurements were conducted at baseline and at the end of maintenance. The median serum sex-hormone-binding globulin (SHBG) concentration was towards the higher end of the normal range at baseline and decreased following the switch (61.7 to 47.5nmol/L, N=10, p=0.027 by Wilcoxon signed-rank test). Free androgen index (100×testosterone/SHBG) and free thyroxine serum concentration increased (25.4 to 36.4 and 13.0 to 14.9pmol/L, respectively, both N=10 and p=0.002). At baseline, the median progesterone serum concentration was below the normal range (0.7nmol/L), whereas median cholesterol and low-density lipoprotein concentrations were above the normal range (5.5 and 3.6mmol/L, respectively). By the end of maintenance, all measured parameters were within the normal range. The safety and tolerability profile of lacosamide was consistent with that observed in previous studies. Furthermore, antiseizure efficacy appeared to be maintained, suggesting that deinduction of CYP enzymes following a switch from CBZ to lacosamide as adjunctive therapy to LEV is feasible within 8weeks and is associated with normalization of serum parameters.

Bodyweight gain under pregabalin therapy in epilepsy: mitigation by counseling patients?

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate bodyweight gain during pregabalin therapy for epilepsy and the utility of a short counseling program to prevent this side effect. METHODS: Randomized controlled trial on the effects of extended versus standard patient counseling on the risk of bodyweight gain with 3- and 6-month follow-up including a consecutive sample of adult outpatients with epilepsy eligible for pregabalin add-on treatment (N=98). RESULTS: The seizure response rate was about 30%, the seizure freedom rate was 5% at the 6-month follow-up (intent-to-treat sample, N=98). The median bodyweight gain for the according-to-protocol sample (N=62) was 4.0 kg with no effect of extended counseling. Bodyweight gain was correlated with number of anticonvulsant drugs (r=.32, p<.05). CONCLUSIONS: Pregabalin treatment is associated with a high risk for bodyweight gain which in part depends on total anticonvulsant drug load. This side effect cannot be prevented by extended patient counseling within a standard clinical setting.