RESUMEN
Stroke remains one of the greatest health challenges worldwide, due to a high mortality rate and, despite great progress in its treatment, the significant disability that it causes. Studies conducted around the world show that the diagnosis of stroke in children is often significantly delayed. Paediatric ischaemic arterial stroke (PAIS) is not only a problem that varies greatly in frequency compared to the adult population, it is also completely different in terms of its risk factors, clinical course and outcome. The main reason for the lack of a rapid diagnosis of PAIS is a lack of access to neuroimaging under general anaesthesia. The insufficient knowledge regarding PAIS in society as a whole is also of great importance. Parents and carers of children should always bear in mind that paediatric age is not a factor that excludes a diagnosis of stroke. The aim of this article was to develop recommendations for the management of children with acute neurological symptoms suspected of ischaemic stroke and further treatment after confirmation of the ischaemic aetiology of the problem. These recommendations are based on current global recommendations for the management of children with stroke, but our goal was also to match them as closely as possible to the needs and technical diagnostic and therapeutic possibilities encountered in Poland. Due to the multifactorial problem of stroke in children, not only paediatric neurologists but also a neurologist, a paediatric cardiologist, a paediatric haematologist and a radiologist took part in the preparation of these recommendations.
Asunto(s)
Isquemia Encefálica , Accidente Cerebrovascular Isquémico , Accidente Cerebrovascular , Niño , Humanos , Accidente Cerebrovascular/diagnóstico , Accidente Cerebrovascular/terapia , Accidente Cerebrovascular/epidemiología , Isquemia Encefálica/diagnóstico , Isquemia Encefálica/terapia , Isquemia Encefálica/epidemiología , Polonia , NeuroimagenRESUMEN
Introduction: In 2020, the new nationwide protocol of prophylaxis in Polish plasma-derived FVIII (pdFVIII) previously treated patients (PTPs) with severe hemophilia A (sHA) was introduced, resulting in the necessity of switching from pdFVIII to recombinant FVIII (octocog-alpha; rFVIII). The study aimed to: (1) assess the safety of switching from pdFVIII to rFVIII, (2) assess the safety and efficacy of pharmacokinetically based (PK-based) personalized prophylaxis in severe hemophilia A. Patients and methods: 151 children and adolescents receiving prophylaxis with a standard dose (40â U/kg 3 x weekly) of pdFVIII were included in this study. Annualized bleeding rate (ABR) and annualized joint bleeding rate (AJBR) were analyzed for all patients before enrollment. Using myPKFiT application, pharmacokinetic (PK) analysis followed by the selection of the optimal model of prophylaxis was performed in all patients. Two possible models of prophylaxis (standard-dose rFVIII versus PK-based rFVIII) were discussed, with parents leaving the choice to their decision. Parents reported all episodes of bleeds. Screening for inhibitor was performed every 3 months. ABR and AJBR were prospectively analyzed again after a minimum follow-up time of 26 weeks. Results: 141/151 (93.4%) patients completed the study. 34 patients decided to continue standard prophylaxis with rFVIII (Group I), whereas 107 were switched to PK-based prophylaxis (Group II). The risk of inhibitor development could be assessed in 137/151 (90.7%) patients. Only 2/137 (1.47%) patients (both on PK-based prophylaxis) developed low-titer inhibitor with its spontaneous elimination. The retrospective analysis of bleeds during the last 12 months of standard pdFVIII prophylaxis revealed that patients who decided to continue standard prophylaxis had historically lower ABR and AJBR than those who started PK-based personalized prophylaxis. After a minimum of 26 weeks, ABR and AJBR improved significantly in both groups. There was no significant difference in ABR and AJBR between Group I and Group II during the follow-up period. However, the rate of reduction of ABR and AJBR was higher in patients on PK-based personalized prophylaxis. Conclusion: (1) Switching from pdFVIII to rFVIII (octocog-alpha) in PTPs with sHA is safe, (2) PK-based personalized prophylaxis may decrease ABR and AJBR in children and adolescents with sHA.
RESUMEN
Not required for Clinical Vignette.
Asunto(s)
Enfermedad de Graves/complicaciones , Trombosis Intracraneal/etiología , Trombosis de los Senos Intracraneales/diagnóstico , Trombosis de la Vena/etiología , Adolescente , Enfermedad de Graves/diagnóstico , Enfermedad de Graves/tratamiento farmacológico , Humanos , Hipertiroidismo , Trombosis Intracraneal/diagnóstico por imagen , Accidente Cerebrovascular Isquémico , Imagen por Resonancia Magnética , Masculino , Metimazol/uso terapéutico , Factores Desencadenantes , Resultado del Tratamiento , Trombosis de la Vena/diagnóstico por imagenRESUMEN
Invasive mucormycosis in immunocompromised children is a life-threatening fungal infection. We report a case of a 7-year-old girl treated for acute lymphoblastic leukaemia complicated by disseminated mucormycosis during induction therapy. Microscopic examination of surgically removed lung tissue revealed wide, pauci-septate hyphae suggesting a Mucorales infection. This diagnosis was confirmed immunohistochemically and by PCR analysis followed by a final identification of Cunninghamella sp. The patient was treated successfully with surgical debridement and antifungal combination therapy with amphotericin B, caspofungin and isavuconazole. The use of isavuconazole in a child was not previously reported. Additionally, case reports concerning pulmonary mucormycoses in paediatric population published after 2010 were reviewed. Nineteen out of 26 identified patients suffered from haematological diseases. Reported mortality reached 38.5%. By the fact of rising morbidity, unsatisfactory results of treatment and remaining high mortality of mucormycoses in immunocompromised patients, new therapeutic options are warrant. Isavuconazole, with its broad-spectrum activity, good safety profile and favourable pharmacokinetics, is a promising drug. However, further studies are necessary to confirm positive impact of isavuconazole on mucormycosis treatment in children.