RESUMEN
The receptor tyrosine kinase FGFR3 is frequently mutated in bladder cancer and is a validated therapeutic target. Although pan-FGFR tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKI) have shown clinical efficacy, toxicity and acquired resistance limit the benefit of these agents. While antibody-based therapeutics can offer superior selectivity than TKIs, conventional ligand-blocking antibodies are usually ineffective inhibitors of constitutively active receptor tyrosine kinases. Furthermore, the existence of multiple oncogenic variants of FGFR3 presents an additional challenge for antibody-mediated blockade. Here, we developed a tetravalent FGFR3×FGFR3 bispecific antibody that inhibited FGFR3 point mutants and fusion proteins more effectively than any of the conventional FGFR3 antibodies that we produced. Each arm of the bispecific antibody contacted two distinct epitopes of FGFR3 through a cis mode of binding. The antibody blocked dimerization of the most common FGFR3 oncogenic variant (S249C extracellular domain mutation) and inhibited the function of FGFR3 variants that are resistant to pan-FGFR TKIs. The antibody was highly effective in suppressing growth of FGFR3-driven tumor models, providing efficacy comparable to that of the FDA-approved TKI erdafitinib. Thus, this bispecific antibody may provide an effective approach for broad and highly selective inhibition of oncogenic FGFR3 variants. Significance: Development of a bispecific antibody that broadly inhibits gain-of-function FGFR3 variants provides a therapeutic strategy to target tumors with oncogenic FGFR3 point mutations and fusions, a particularly difficult case for antibody blockade.
Asunto(s)
Anticuerpos Biespecíficos , Receptor Tipo 3 de Factor de Crecimiento de Fibroblastos , Neoplasias de la Vejiga Urinaria , Anticuerpos Biespecíficos/farmacología , Receptor Tipo 3 de Factor de Crecimiento de Fibroblastos/antagonistas & inhibidores , Receptor Tipo 3 de Factor de Crecimiento de Fibroblastos/genética , Receptor Tipo 3 de Factor de Crecimiento de Fibroblastos/inmunología , Receptor Tipo 3 de Factor de Crecimiento de Fibroblastos/metabolismo , Humanos , Animales , Ratones , Neoplasias de la Vejiga Urinaria/tratamiento farmacológico , Neoplasias de la Vejiga Urinaria/inmunología , Neoplasias de la Vejiga Urinaria/genética , Neoplasias de la Vejiga Urinaria/patología , Ensayos Antitumor por Modelo de Xenoinjerto , Línea Celular Tumoral , Inhibidores de Proteínas Quinasas/farmacología , Inhibidores de Proteínas Quinasas/uso terapéutico , Femenino , Mutación PuntualRESUMEN
The artemin-GFRα3 signaling pathway has been implicated in various painful conditions including migraine, cold allodynia, hyperalgesia, inflammatory bone pain, and mouse knees contain GFRα3-immunoreactive nerve endings. We developed high affinity mouse (REGN1967) and human (REGN5069) GFRα3-blocking monoclonal antibodies and, following in vivo evaluations in mouse models of chronic joint pain (osteoarthritic-like and inflammatory), conducted a first-in-human phase 1 pharmacokinetics (PK) and safety trial of REGN5069 (NCT03645746) in healthy volunteers, and a phase 2 randomized placebo-controlled efficacy and safety trial of REGN5069 (NCT03956550) in patients with knee osteoarthritis (OA) pain. In three commonly used mouse models of chronic joint pain (destabilization of the medial meniscus, intra-articular monoiodoacetate, or Complete Freund's Adjuvant), REGN1967 and REGN5069 attenuated evoked behaviors including tactile allodynia and thermal hyperalgesia without discernably impacting joint pathology or inflammation, prompting us to further evaluate REGN5069 in humans. In the phase 1 study in healthy subjects, the safety profiles of single doses of REGN5069 up to 3000 mg (intravenous) or 600 mg (subcutaneous) were comparable to placebo; PK were consistent with a monoclonal antibody exhibiting target-mediated disposition. In the phase 2 study in patients with OA knee pain, two doses of REGN5069 (100 mg or 1000 mg intravenous every 4 weeks) for 8 weeks failed to achieve the 12-week primary and secondary efficacy endpoints relative to placebo. In addition to possible differences in GFRα3 biology between mice and humans, we highlight here differences in experimental parameters that could have contributed to a different profile of efficacy in mouse models versus human OA pain. Additional research is required to more fully evaluate any potential role of GFRα3 in human pain.