Real-time three-dimensional myocardial contrast echocardiography: is it clinically feasible?

AIMS: Real-time 3D echocardiography (RT3DE) and 2D low mechanical index (LMI), contrast specific, myocardial perfusion imaging are now both accepted techniques. We evaluated the feasibility of an RT3DE LMI implementation in unselected patients. METHODS AND RESULTS: Forty-six patients undergoing contrast enhanced dobutamine stress echo were imaged with novel 3D LMI power modulation software. All patients underwent contrast enhanced 2D and RT3DE acquisitions, in left ventricular opacification (LVO), and LMI perfusion modes. The data sets were evaluated segmentally for wall motion (WM) and myocardial contrast enhancement. Of the 736 evaluated segments, WM could be assessed in 726 (98.6%) of the 2D and 708 (96.2%) 3D segments (P = 0.007). Perfusion could be assessed in 721 (98%) of 2D and 701 (95.2%) of 3D segments (P = 0.006). Six hundred and sixty-one segments had normal WM and thickening in 2D and of these RT3DE demonstrated normal myocardial opacification in 77.2% of basal, 85% of mid, and 91.8% of apical segments. Thirty-four segments were akinetic, with no evidence of perfusion in 2D, and of these RT3DE revealed a perfusion defect in 31 (91%, P = NS). CONCLUSION: LMI RT3DE evaluation of myocardial perfusion is feasible in most segments. It has the potential to accurately locate and possibly quantify perfusion defects.

Use of harmonic imaging without echocardiographic contrast to improve two-dimensional image quality.

The aim of this study was to determine whether harmonic imaging (HI) improves endocardial visualization during 2-dimensional echocardiography without echocardiographic contrast. HI differs from fundamental imaging (FI) by transmitting ultrasound at one frequency and receiving at twice the transmitted frequency. This technique has been used in conjunction with contrast echocardiography to enhance myocardial contrast visualization. HI and FI were sequentially performed in 20 patients. Images were digitally stored and subsequently reviewed by 2 observers for the quality of endocardial visualization. In addition, acoustic quantification was performed in both FI and HI modes and endocardial tracking qualitatively judged. HI was compared with FI during dobutamine stress echocardiography in 17 patients who were imaged at baseline and peak stress. Overall, the harmonic images had less clutter and better myocardial blood contrast. Individual segments were better visualized with HI in 30% to 73% of cases. The acoustic quantification endocardial tracking was rated better with HI in 67% of short-axis views and in 58% of apical 4-chamber views. During dobutamine stress testing the overall number of interpretable segments improved from 64% for FI to 84% with HI. Many segments traditionally difficult to image were improved with HI. HI without the use of contrast agents improved endocardial visualization during routine 2-dimensional echocardiography. This improved endocardial visualization led to better endocardial tracking with acoustic quantification and to more segments being clinically interpretable during dobutamine stress testing.