Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 2 de 2
Filtrar
Más filtros












Base de datos
Intervalo de año de publicación
1.
NeuroRehabilitation ; 38(1): 15-25, 2016.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26889794

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Locomotor training with a robot-assisted gait orthosis (LT-RGO) and transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) are interventions that can significantly enhance motor performance after spinal cord injury (SCI). No studies have investigated whether combining these interventions enhances lower extremity motor function following SCI. OBJECTIVE: Determine whether active tDCS paired with LT-RGO improves lower extremity motor function more than a sham condition, in subjects with motor incomplete SCI. METHODS: Fifteen adults with SCI received 36 sessions of either active (n = 9) or sham (n = 6) tDCS (20 minutes) preceding LT-RGO (1 hour). Outcome measures included manual muscle testing (MMT; primary outcome measure); 6-Minute Walk Test (6MinWT); 10-Meter Walk Test (10MWT); Timed Up and Go Test (TUG); Berg Balance Scale (BBS); and Spinal Cord Independence Measure-III (SCIM-III). RESULTS: MMT showed significant improvements after active tDCS, with the most pronounced improvement in the right lower extremity. 10MWT, 6MinWT, and BBS showed improvement for both groups. TUG and SCIM-III showed improvement only for the sham tDCS group. CONCLUSION: Pairing tDCS with LT-RGO can improve lower extremity motor function more than LT-RGO alone. Future research with a larger sample size is recommended to determine longer-term effects on motor function and activities of daily living.


Asunto(s)
Encéfalo , Trastornos Neurológicos de la Marcha/terapia , Marcha , Robótica/métodos , Traumatismos de la Médula Espinal/terapia , Estimulación Transcraneal de Corriente Directa/métodos , Actividades Cotidianas , Adulto , Anciano , Tirantes , Encéfalo/fisiología , Terapia Combinada , Método Doble Ciego , Terapia por Ejercicio/instrumentación , Terapia por Ejercicio/métodos , Femenino , Marcha/fisiología , Trastornos Neurológicos de la Marcha/diagnóstico , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Modalidades de Fisioterapia/instrumentación , Proyectos Piloto , Robótica/instrumentación , Traumatismos de la Médula Espinal/diagnóstico , Técnicas Estereotáxicas/instrumentación , Estimulación Transcraneal de Corriente Directa/instrumentación
2.
NeuroRehabilitation ; 38(1): 27-35, 2016.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26889795

RESUMEN

STUDY DESIGN: This double-blind, sham-controlled, crossover case study combined transvertebral direct current stimulation (tvDCS) and locomotor training on a robot-assisted gait orthosis (LT-RGO). OBJECTIVE: Determine whether cathodal tvDCS paired with LT-RGO leads to greater changes in function and neuroplasticity than sham tvDCS paired with LT-RGO. SETTING: University of Kentucky (UK) HealthCare Stroke and Spinal Cord Neurorehabilitation Research at HealthSouth Cardinal Hill Hospital. METHODS: A single subject with motor incomplete spinal cord injury (SCI) participated in 24 sessions of sham tvDCS paired with LT-RGO before crossover to 24 sessions of cathodal tvDCS paired with LT-RGO. Functional outcomes were measured with 10 Meter Walk Test (10MWT), 6 Minute Walk Test (6MWT), Spinal Cord Independence Measure-III (SCIM-III) mobility component, lower extremity manual muscle test (MMT), and Berg Balance Scale (BBS). Corticospinal changes were assessed using transcranial magnetic stimulation. RESULTS: Improvement in 10MWT speed, SCIM-III mobility component, and BBS occurred with both conditions. 6MWT worsened after sham tvDCS and improved after cathodal tvDCS. MMT scores for both lower extremities improved following sham tvDCS but decreased following cathodal tvDCS. Corticospinal excitability increased following cathodal tvDCS but not sham tvDCS. CONCLUSION: These results suggest that combining cathodal tvDCS and LT-RGO may improve functional outcomes, increase corticospinal excitability, and possibly decrease spasticity. Randomized controlled trials are needed to confirm these conclusions. SPONSORSHIP: This publication was supported by the National Center for Research Resources and the National Center for Advancing Translational Sciences, National Institutes of Health, through Grant UL1TR000117, and the HealthSouth Cardinal Hill Stroke and Spinal Cord Endowment (1215375670).


Asunto(s)
Actividad Motora , Robótica/métodos , Traumatismos de la Médula Espinal/diagnóstico , Traumatismos de la Médula Espinal/terapia , Estimulación Transcraneal de Corriente Directa/métodos , Tirantes , Enfermedad Crónica , Terapia Combinada/métodos , Estudios Cruzados , Método Doble Ciego , Prueba de Esfuerzo/métodos , Femenino , Humanos , Persona de Mediana Edad , Actividad Motora/fisiología , Rehabilitación Neurológica/métodos , Aparatos Ortopédicos , Modalidades de Fisioterapia
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA
...