Limitations in human auditory spectral analysis at high frequencies.

Humans are adept at identifying spectral patterns, such as vowels, in different rooms, at different sound levels, or produced by different talkers. How this feat is achieved remains poorly understood. Two psychoacoustic analogs of spectral pattern recognition are spectral profile analysis and spectrotemporal ripple direction discrimination. This study tested whether pattern-recognition abilities observed previously at low frequencies are also observed at extended high frequencies. At low frequencies (center frequency ∼500 Hz), listeners were able to achieve accurate profile-analysis thresholds, consistent with prior literature. However, at extended high frequencies (center frequency ∼10 kHz), listeners' profile-analysis thresholds were either unmeasurable or could not be distinguished from performance based on overall loudness cues. A similar pattern of results was observed with spectral ripple discrimination, where performance was again considerably better at low than at high frequencies. Collectively, these results suggest a severe deficit in listeners' ability to analyze patterns of intensity across frequency in the extended high-frequency region that cannot be accounted for by cochlear frequency selectivity. One interpretation is that the auditory system is not optimized to analyze such fine-grained across-frequency profiles at extended high frequencies, as they are not typically informative for everyday sounds.

Benefits of Harmonicity for Hearing in Noise Are Limited to Detection and Pitch-Related Discrimination Tasks.

Harmonic complex tones are easier to detect in noise than inharmonic complex tones, providing a potential perceptual advantage in complex auditory environments. Here, we explored whether the harmonic advantage extends to other auditory tasks that are important for navigating a noisy auditory environment, such as amplitude- and frequency-modulation detection. Sixty young normal-hearing listeners were tested, divided into two equal groups with and without musical training. Consistent with earlier studies, harmonic tones were easier to detect in noise than inharmonic tones, with a signal-to-noise ratio (SNR) advantage of about 2.5 dB, and the pitch discrimination of the harmonic tones was more accurate than that of inharmonic tones, even after differences in audibility were accounted for. In contrast, neither amplitude- nor frequency-modulation detection was superior with harmonic tones once differences in audibility were accounted for. Musical training was associated with better performance only in pitch-discrimination and frequency-modulation-detection tasks. The results confirm a detection and pitch-perception advantage for harmonic tones but reveal that the harmonic benefits do not extend to suprathreshold tasks that do not rely on extracting the fundamental frequency. A general theory is proposed that may account for the effects of both noise and memory on pitch-discrimination differences between harmonic and inharmonic tones.

Role of Age and Myopia in Simultaneous Assessment of Corneal and Extraocular Tissue Stiffness by Air-Puff Applanation.

PURPOSE: To assess the correlation of age and myopia with corneal and extraocular tissue stiffness derived from air-puff applanation using a composite viscoelastic model. METHODS: This retrospective, cross-sectional study evaluated 155 normal eyes (age range: 5 to 50 years) measured on Corvis ST (Oculus Optikgeräte GmbH, Wetzlar, Germany). Manifest refraction spherical equivalent was also analyzed. A linear viscoelastic model that segregated corneal and extraocular tissue stiffness from the applanation deformation waveform was implemented. Corvis ST measured the total deformation (deformation amplitude waveform), which was simply the sum of corneal and extraocular tissue deformation. Age- and myopia-based multivariate analyses of variance between deformation parameters were performed after adjusting for intraocular pressure and central corneal thickness. Corvis ST corneal hysteresis was also calculated from the corneal deformation waveform. RESULTS: All myopia and age groups were matched for intraocular pressure and central corneal thickness. Extraocular tissue stiffness significantly increased with age (P = .03). Some other extraocular tissue deformation parameters also correlated with age, indicating age-related stiffening (P < .05). Corneal and extraocular tissue stiffness decreased with increasing myopia, but the trend was not significant (P = .10). Corvis ST corneal hysteresis increased with increasing age (P = .01) but not with increasing myopia (P = .61). CONCLUSIONS: Extraocular deformation parameters indicated stiffening of the extraocular tissues with age. Corneal deformation parameters were unaffected by age and myopia. Further studies with larger sample sizes are needed to clearly understand the effect of myopia on corneal and extraocular tissue stiffness. [J Refract Surg. 2016;32(7):486-493.].