RESUMEN
OBJECTIVES: Metastasectomy in patients with metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC) confers a significant survival benefit. We hypothesized that conversion to resectability (C2R) correlates with superior overall survival (OS) in patients with unresectable mCRC. METHODS: A prospectively registered systematic review (PROSPERO CRD42015024104) of randomized clinical trials published after 2003 was conducted. Exposure of interest was C2R with a primary outcome of OS. Clinical trials were classified based on difference in C2R between study arms (<2%, 2% to 2.9%, ≥3%). Generalized estimating equations were used to measure associations while adjusting for multiple observations from the same trial. RESULTS: Of 2902 studies reviewed, 30 satisfied selection criteria (n=13,618 patients). Median C2R was 7.3% (interquartile range [IQR]: 5% to 12.9%), with maximum C2R in the FOLFOX/FOLFIRI+cetuximab arm (28.6%). The median difference in C2R between 2 arms of the same study was 2.3% (IQR: 1.3% to 3.4%) with a maximum difference of 15.4% seen in FOLFOX/FOLFIRI+cetuximab versus FOLFOX/FOLFIRI. Median OS for the entire patient cohort was 20.7 months (IQR: 18.9 to 22.7 mo), with a between group difference of 1.3 months (IQR: -1.2 to 3.6 mo). The median survival difference between the 2 study arms with <2% C2R difference was 0.8 months versus 1.6 months with ≥3% C2R rates . Increasing C2R had an incremental dose-effect response on OS ( P =0.021), and higher response rates correlated with C2R rates ( P =0.003). CONCLUSIONS: C2R occurs infrequently and variably in clinical trials enrolling patients with unresectable mCRC. Prioritization of chemotherapeutic agents that enhance C2R might improve OS of patients.
Asunto(s)
Neoplasias del Colon , Neoplasias Colorrectales , Neoplasias del Recto , Protocolos de Quimioterapia Combinada Antineoplásica/uso terapéutico , Bevacizumab/uso terapéutico , Camptotecina/uso terapéutico , Cetuximab/uso terapéutico , Neoplasias del Colon/tratamiento farmacológico , Neoplasias Colorrectales/tratamiento farmacológico , Neoplasias Colorrectales/cirugía , Fluorouracilo/uso terapéutico , Humanos , Leucovorina/uso terapéutico , Neoplasias del Recto/tratamiento farmacológicoRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Relapse of early-stage colon cancer (CC) after curative-intent resection occurs. We hypothesized that known risk factors for peritoneal metastases (PM) can define a high-risk state (HRS) that predicts recurrence and mortality. METHODS: CALGB9581 trial patients receiving no adjuvant treatment after stage-II CC resection were included. Positive radial margins, T4 invasion, obstruction/perforation or lymphovascular invasion defined the HRS. Cox proportional hazard models determined association with overall (OS) and disease-free survival (DFS). RESULTS: Median follow-up in 873 included patients was 8.1 years. Five-year OS was 85.8%. HRS+ patients had lower 5-year DFS (68.7 vs. 82.4%, P = 0.003) and OS (75.5 vs. 87.8%, P = 0.001). HRS+ was independently predictive of worse DFS and OS (HR 1.52 and 1.64, P < 0.01). Among recurrences, HRS+ patients showed shorter median OS (3.3 vs. 5.3 years, P = 0.01). CONCLUSIONS: HRS criteria identify a cohort of CC patients at high-risk of recurrence and death. Studies of novel surveillance techniques in such patients are warranted.
Asunto(s)
Neoplasias del Colon , Neoplasias Peritoneales , Quimioterapia Adyuvante , Neoplasias del Colon/patología , Neoplasias del Colon/cirugía , Supervivencia sin Enfermedad , Humanos , Recurrencia Local de Neoplasia/epidemiología , Recurrencia Local de Neoplasia/patología , Estadificación de Neoplasias , Neoplasias Peritoneales/patología , Neoplasias Peritoneales/cirugía , Pronóstico , Modelos de Riesgos ProporcionalesRESUMEN
OBJECTIVE: Amid the ongoing coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic, health care workers of multiple disciplines have been designated as frontline doctors. This unforeseen situation has led to psychological problems among these health care workers. The objective of this study was to evaluate the mental health status of pan-Indian frontline doctors combating the COVID-19 pandemic. METHODS: A cross-sectional, observational study was conducted among frontline doctors of tertiary care hospitals in India (East: Kolkata, West Bengal; North: New Delhi; West: Nagpur, Maharashtra; and South: Thiruvananthapuram, Kerala) from May 23, 2020, to June 6, 2020. Doctors involved in clinical services in outpatient departments, designated COVID-19 wards, screening blocks, fever clinics, and intensive care units completed an online questionnaire. The 9-item Patient Health Questionnaire and the Perceived Stress Scale were used to assess depression and perceived stress. RESULTS: The results of 422 responses revealed a 63.5% and 45% prevalence of symptoms of depression and stress, respectively, among frontline COVID-19 doctors. Postgraduate trainees constituted the majority (45.5%) of the respondents. Moderately severe and severe depression was noted in 14.2% and 3.8% of the doctors, respectively. Moderate and severe stress was noted in 37.4% and 7.6% of participants, respectively. Multivariate regression analysis showed working ≥ 6 hours/day (adjusted odds ratio: 3.5; 95% CI, 1.9-6.3; P < .0001) to be a significant risk factor for moderate or severe perceived stress, while single relationship status (adjusted odds ratio: 2.9; 95% CI, 1.5-5.9; P = .002) and working ≥ 6 hours/day (adjusted odds ratio: 10.3; 95% CI, 4.3-24.6; P < .0001) significantly contributed to the development of moderate, moderately severe, or severe depression. CONCLUSIONS: The pandemic has taken a serious toll on the physical and mental health of doctors, as evident from our study. Regular screening of medical personnel involved in the diagnosis and treatment of patients with COVID-19 should be conducted to evaluate for stress, anxiety, and depression.
Asunto(s)
Infecciones por Coronavirus , Depresión/epidemiología , Trastorno Depresivo/epidemiología , Pandemias , Médicos/psicología , Neumonía Viral , Estrés Psicológico/epidemiología , Adulto , Betacoronavirus , COVID-19 , Estudios Transversales , Femenino , Humanos , India/epidemiología , Internado y Residencia , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Cuestionario de Salud del Paciente , Admisión y Programación de Personal , Médicos/estadística & datos numéricos , Prevalencia , Características de la Residencia , Factores de Riesgo , SARS-CoV-2 , Carga de Trabajo , Adulto JovenAsunto(s)
COVID-19/terapia , Dermatólogos/psicología , Salud Mental , SARS-CoV-2 , Adulto , Estudios Transversales , Femenino , Humanos , MasculinoRESUMEN
Importance: Unregulated drug prices increase cancer therapy costs. After induction chemotherapy, patients with metastatic colon cancer can receive maintenance capecitabine and bevacizumab therapy based on improved progression-free survival, but whether this treatment's cost justifies its benefits has not been evaluated in the United States. Objective: This study sought to determine the influence of capecitabine and bevacizumab drug prices on cost-effectiveness from a Medicare payer's perspective. Design, Setting, and Participants: The incremental cost-effectiveness of capecitabine and bevacizumab maintenance therapy was determined with a Markov model using a quality-of-life penalty based on outcomes data from the CAIRO phase 3 randomized clinical trial (RCT), which included 558 adults in the Netherlands with unresectable metastatic colorectal cancer who had stable disease or better following induction chemotherapy. The outcomes were modeled using Markov chains to account for patients who had treatment complications or cancer progression. Transition probabilities between patient states were determined, and each state's costs were determined using US Medicare data on payments for capecitabine and bevacizumab treatment. Deterministic and probabilistic sensitivity analyses identified factors affecting cost-effectiveness. Main Outcomes and Measures: Life-years gained were adjusted using CAIRO3 RCT quality-of-life data to determine quality-adjusted life-years (QALYs). The primary end point was the incremental cost-effectiveness ratio, representing incremental costs per QALY gained using a capecitabine and bevacizumab maintenance regimen compared with observation alone. Results: Markov model estimated survival and complication outcomes closely matched those reported in the CAIRO3 RCT, which included 558 adults (n = 197 women, n = 361 men; median age, 64 and 63 years for patients in the observation and maintenance therapy groups, respectively) in the Netherlands with unresectable metastatic colorectal cancer who had stable disease or better following induction chemotherapy. Incremental costs for a 3-week maintenance chemotherapy cycle were $6601 per patient. After 29 model iterations corresponding to 60 months of follow-up, mean per-patient costs were $105â¯239 for maintenance therapy and $21.10 for observation. Mean QALYs accrued were 1.34 for maintenance therapy and 1.20 for observation. The incremental cost-effectiveness ratio favored maintenance treatment, at an incremental cost of $725â¯601 per QALY. The unadjusted ratio was $438â¯394 per life-year. Sensitivity analyses revealed that cost-effectiveness varied with changes in drug costs. To achieve an incremental cost-effectiveness ratio of less than $59â¯039 (median US household income) per unadjusted life-year would require capecitabine and bevacizumab drug costs to be reduced from $6173 (current cost) to $452 per 3-week chemotherapy cycle. Conclusions and Relevance: Antineoplastic therapy is expensive for payers and society. The price of capecitabine and bevacizumab maintenance therapy would need to be reduced by 93% to make it cost-effective, a finding useful for policy decision making and payment negotiations.
Asunto(s)
Protocolos de Quimioterapia Combinada Antineoplásica/economía , Protocolos de Quimioterapia Combinada Antineoplásica/uso terapéutico , Bevacizumab/administración & dosificación , Bevacizumab/economía , Capecitabina/administración & dosificación , Capecitabina/economía , Neoplasias Colorrectales/tratamiento farmacológico , Neoplasias Colorrectales/economía , Costos de los Medicamentos , Anciano , Protocolos de Quimioterapia Combinada Antineoplásica/efectos adversos , Bevacizumab/efectos adversos , Capecitabina/efectos adversos , Neoplasias Colorrectales/mortalidad , Neoplasias Colorrectales/patología , Análisis Costo-Beneficio , Progresión de la Enfermedad , Femenino , Humanos , Quimioterapia de Mantención/economía , Masculino , Cadenas de Markov , Medicare/economía , Persona de Mediana Edad , Modelos Económicos , Metástasis de la Neoplasia , Calidad de Vida , Años de Vida Ajustados por Calidad de Vida , Ensayos Clínicos Controlados Aleatorios como Asunto , Factores de Tiempo , Resultado del Tratamiento , Estados UnidosRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Medical therapy is widely used for managing benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH) and has made an impact on the profile of patients who ultimately undergo surgery. This changing profile may impact outcomes of surgery and associated complications. To assess the impact of medical management, we evaluated the profile of patients who had surgery for BPH at our institution. METHODS: A retrospective chart-review was performed of patient demographics, indications for surgery, preoperative comorbid conditions and postoperative course in patients who underwent surgery for BPH over a 5-year period. The data were analysed for demographic trends in comparison with historical cohorts. RESULTS: A total of 327 patients underwent surgery for BPH between 2008 and 2012. Their mean age was 66.4 years, the mean prostate gland weight was 59.2 g and the mean duration of symptoms was 35.3 months; 34% had a prostate gland weight of >60 g; 1 59 (48.6%) patients had an absolute indication for surgery; 139 (42.5%) of these were catheterized and 6.1% of patients presented with azotaemia or upper tract changes without urinary retention. CONCLUSIONS: In comparison with historical cohorts, more patients are undergoing surgery for absolute indications including retention of urine and hydroureteronephrosis. However, the patients are younger, they have fewer comorbid conditions and have a similar rate of complications after the procedure.
Asunto(s)
Prostatectomía/estadística & datos numéricos , Hiperplasia Prostática/terapia , Centros de Atención Terciaria/estadística & datos numéricos , Enfermedades Urológicas/epidemiología , Inhibidores de 5-alfa-Reductasa/uso terapéutico , Antagonistas Adrenérgicos alfa/uso terapéutico , Adulto , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Comorbilidad , Humanos , Incidencia , India/epidemiología , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Próstata/patología , Próstata/cirugía , Prostatectomía/tendencias , Hiperplasia Prostática/epidemiología , Hiperplasia Prostática/patología , Estudios Retrospectivos , Resultado del Tratamiento , Enfermedades Urológicas/etiología , Enfermedades Urológicas/terapiaRESUMEN
IMPORTANCE: Curative cancer operations lead to debility and loss of autonomy in a population vulnerable to suicide death. The extent to which operative intervention impacts suicide risk is not well studied. OBJECTIVE: To examine the effects of morbidity of curative cancer surgeries and prognosis of disease on the risk of suicide in patients with solid tumors. DESIGN: Retrospective cohort study using Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results data from 2004 to 2011; multilevel systematic review. SETTING: General US population. PARTICIPANTS: Participants were 482 781 patients diagnosed with malignant neoplasm between 2004 and 2011 who underwent curative cancer surgeries. MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES: Death by suicide or self-inflicted injury. RESULTS: Among 482 781 patients that underwent curative cancer surgery, 231 committed suicide (16.58/100 000 person-years [95% confidence interval, CI, 14.54-18.82]). Factors significantly associated with suicide risk included male sex (incidence rate [IR], 27.62; 95% CI, 23.82-31.86) and age >65 years (IR, 22.54; 95% CI, 18.84-26.76). When stratified by 30-day overall postoperative morbidity, a significantly higher incidence of suicide was found for high-morbidity surgeries (IR, 33.30; 95% CI, 26.50-41.33) vs moderate morbidity (IR, 24.27; 95% CI, 18.92-30.69) and low morbidity (IR, 9.81; 95% CI, 7.90-12.04). Unit increase in morbidity was significantly associated with death by suicide (odds ratio, 1.01; 95% CI, 1.00-1.03; P = .02) and decreased suicide-specific survival (hazards ratio, 1.02; 95% CI, 1.00-1.03, P = .01) in prognosis-adjusted models. CONCLUSIONS: In this sample of cancer patients in the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results database, patients that undergo high-morbidity surgeries appear most vulnerable to death by suicide. The identification of this high-risk cohort should motivate health care providers and particularly surgeons to adopt screening measures during the postoperative follow-up period for these patients.
Asunto(s)
Neoplasias/cirugía , Suicidio/estadística & datos numéricos , Adulto , Factores de Edad , Anciano , Bases de Datos Factuales , Femenino , Humanos , Incidencia , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Morbilidad , Análisis Multivariante , Neoplasias/epidemiología , Neoplasias/psicología , Vigilancia de la Población , Pronóstico , Estudios Retrospectivos , Factores de Riesgo , Factores Sexuales , Suicidio/psicología , Factores de TiempoRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: The surgical management of duodenal gastrointestinal stromal tumors (DGIST) is poorly characterized. Limited resection may be technically feasible and oncologically safe, but anatomic considerations may compromise the resection margins due to the proximity of critical structures, thereby necessitating more extensive resections such as pancreaticoduodenectomy. METHODS: Patients undergoing surgery for DGIST at two institutions from 1994 to 2014 were identified. Clinicopathologic and survival data were analyzed to compare outcomes in patients treated with limited or radical resection. RESULTS: Sixty patients underwent surgery for DGIST. Pancreaticoduodenectomy was performed in 38 % while the rest underwent limited resections. The most common type of limited resection was wedge resection and primary closure (49 %) followed by segmental resection with an end-to-end or side-to-side duodenojejunostomy (27 %). The pancreaticoduodenectomy group tended to have larger tumors with the majority located in D2/3 (87 %) and at the mesenteric border (91 %). The pancreaticoduodenectomy group also had significantly greater intraoperative blood loss, longer operative time, longer hospital stay, and higher 90-day morbidity and readmission rates. The 5-year relapse-free survival, recurrence-free survival, and overall survival for the pancreaticoduodenectomy versus limited resection were 81 versus 56 % (p = 0.05), 64 versus 53 % (p = 0.5), and 76 versus 72 % (p = 0.6), respectively. A surgical algorithm based on the location and size of the tumor is proposed. CONCLUSIONS: Limited resection of DGIST is safe, but may be associated with lower 5-year relapse-free survival. Pancreaticoduodenectomy is recommended for selected patients with DGIST when an R0 resection cannot be performed without removing the ampulla or part of the pancreas.
Asunto(s)
Neoplasias Duodenales/cirugía , Tumores del Estroma Gastrointestinal/cirugía , Anciano , Pérdida de Sangre Quirúrgica/estadística & datos numéricos , Neoplasias Duodenales/patología , Duodenoscopía , Femenino , Tumores del Estroma Gastrointestinal/patología , Humanos , Yeyunostomía , Tiempo de Internación/estadística & datos numéricos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Tempo Operativo , Pancreaticoduodenectomía , Readmisión del Paciente/estadística & datos numéricos , Tasa de Supervivencia , Resultado del TratamientoRESUMEN
BACKGROUND/OBJECTIVES: For various reasons, some patients undergo a gross margin positive resection (R2) leading to a dilemma in care. We hypothesized that there is a subset of patients who have long-term survival (LTS, ≥5 years) after R2 resection for retroperitoneal sarcoma (RPS). METHODS: National Cancer Database data from 1998 to 2011 were reviewed to identify patients with RPS who had R2 resections. Logistic and Cox regression models were used to compare LTS with short-term survival. RESULTS: Of 12,028 patients, R2 resection rate was 3.28% (4.9% in 1998; 2.5% in 2011). Median survival for RPS with R2 resection was 21 months versus 69 months for those with R0/R1 resections (P < 0.001). Of 272 patients with available survival, 24% (n = 64) survived ≥5 years with 64% alive at follow-up. LTS was most often seen in younger patients (<65 years) with well-differentiated liposarcoma. Chemotherapy appeared to improve survival in the first 3 postoperative years, but paradoxical effects were seen in LTS (Hazards Ratio [HR] 0.69, 95%CI: 0.50-0.95, P = 0.024) in first 3 years versus (HR 2.15, 95%CI: 1.21-3.81, P = 0.009). CONCLUSION: Long-term survival is possible for a subset of patients after an R2 resection for RPS, especially with favorable histology characteristics. Benefits of chemotherapy in margin positive settings need to be investigated. J. Surg. Oncol. 2016;113:823-827. © 2016 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.
Asunto(s)
Márgenes de Escisión , Neoplasias Retroperitoneales/mortalidad , Neoplasias Retroperitoneales/cirugía , Sarcoma/mortalidad , Sarcoma/cirugía , Adulto , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Antineoplásicos/uso terapéutico , Quimioterapia Adyuvante , Bases de Datos Factuales , Femenino , Estudios de Seguimiento , Humanos , Modelos Logísticos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Pronóstico , Neoplasias Retroperitoneales/tratamiento farmacológico , Neoplasias Retroperitoneales/patología , Estudios Retrospectivos , Sarcoma/tratamiento farmacológico , Sarcoma/patología , Análisis de SupervivenciaRESUMEN
Isolated hepatic perfusion uses the unique vascular supply of hepatic malignancies to deliver cytotoxic chemotherapy. The procedure involves vascular isolation of the liver and delivery of chemotherapy via the hepatic artery and extraction from retrohepatic vena cava. Benefits of hepatic perfusion have been observed in hepatic metastases of ocular melanoma and colorectal cancer and primary hepatocellular carcinoma. Percutaneous and prophylactic perfusions are avenues of ongoing research.
Asunto(s)
Quimioterapia del Cáncer por Perfusión Regional , Neoplasias Hepáticas/tratamiento farmacológico , Quimioterapia del Cáncer por Perfusión Regional/métodos , Humanos , Selección de PacienteRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Malignant peritoneal disease can lead to significant debility due to bowel obstructions, ascites, and cancer cachexia. Moreover, inadequate imaging techniques can lead to the suboptimal detection of disease, and the poor vascularity of tumors can lead to a poor response to systemic chemotherapy. However, combination cytoreductive surgery/hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy (HIPEC) is a promising novel treatment for patients with this disease. METHODS: The medical literature focusing on diagnostic updates and the management of peritoneal disease was reviewed. The application principles of HIPEC for use in peritoneal disease were also summarized. RESULTS: Improvements in imaging and the application of laparoscopic techniques have significantly increased the rate of diagnosis of early peritoneal disease with consequently less morbid cytoreductive procedures. Appropriate patient selection based on prognostic scores along with complete cytoreduction can identify a cohort of patients likely to derive durable benefit from this combination treatment. CONCLUSIONS: Advances in diagnostic and therapeutic techniques, including surgical cytoreductive techniques, have demonstrated significant survival gains in patients with peritoneal disease. Although HIPEC can be used for the management of various types of histologies, further development of high-level evidence is necessary to advance the field.
Asunto(s)
Procedimientos Quirúrgicos de Citorreducción , Hipertermia Inducida/métodos , Neoplasias Peritoneales/secundario , Neoplasias Peritoneales/terapia , Antineoplásicos/uso terapéutico , Terapia Combinada , Femenino , Humanos , Laparoscopía/métodos , Selección de Paciente , Neoplasias Peritoneales/cirugíaRESUMEN
BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: The multi-modal treatment of retroperitoneal sarcoma has seen increased use of neoadjuvant radiation. However, its effect on local recurrence and survival remain controversial. We aimed to synthesize and evaluate the literature. METHODS: The review was conducted according the recommendation of the Meta-Analysis of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (MOOSE) group with pre-specified inclusion and exclusion criteria. RESULTS: Of 8,701 citations collected, 15 articles reported on 464 patients. The median age was 56 years (45-64). The predominant histological subtypes were liposarcoma (51.54%) and leiomyosarcoma (23.26%). Tumor differentiation composed of 37.1% well-, 12.8% moderate-, 46.0% poorly-, and 4.1% undifferentiated. Most studies featured external beam radiation therapy (EBRT) treatment regimen with some who included patients treated with IMRT instead. Median follow-up averaged 41.4 months (19-106 months). Median 5-year OS, PFS, and LRR rates were 58%, 71.5%, and 25%. Using the NCI CTCAE, toxicities from Grade 1 (Mild) through Grade 5 (death) were experienced by 18.8%, 10.2%, 16.3%, 0.7%, and 1.6% of patients. CONCLUSIONS: NART is a safe to use for RPS, but its effect toward survival and local control remains unclear. Without randomized control trials, common reporting criteria for pro- and retrospective studies are needed to allow comparison between studies. J. Surg. Oncol. 2016;113:628-634. © 2016 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.
Asunto(s)
Terapia Neoadyuvante , Neoplasias Retroperitoneales/radioterapia , Sarcoma/radioterapia , Humanos , Recurrencia Local de Neoplasia/prevención & control , Radioterapia Adyuvante , Neoplasias Retroperitoneales/mortalidad , Neoplasias Retroperitoneales/cirugía , Sarcoma/mortalidad , Sarcoma/cirugía , Resultado del TratamientoRESUMEN
Complex surgical operations performed at centers of high volume have improved outcomes due to improved surgical proficiency, and betters systems of care including avoidance of errors. Cytoreductive surgery (CRS) and hyperthermic intra-peritoneal chemoperfusion (HIPEC), which has been shown to be an oncologically effective strategy for peritoneal carcinomatosis (PC), is one such procedure with significant morbidity and mortality. The learning curve to reach technical proficiency in CRS + HIPEC is about 140-220 cases for a center. Focus on improving surgical proficiency through training, improving systems of care through partnerships and reporting mechanisms for quality could reduce the time to proficiency.
RESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Prognosis of appendiceal adenocarcinoma patients is based on burden of disease, histology, and nature of therapy, which remains static despite time in follow-up. We hypothesized that conditional survival provides an informative metric that allows patients better understanding of their disease. METHODS: Using the Surveillance, Epidemiology and End Results database, patients with appendiceal adenocarcinoma from 1988 to 2012 were included. Actuarial Life table analyses and Kaplan-Meier curves were used for statistical inference. RESULTS: Of 5,952 patients, the median age was 60 years (IQR 50-72) and 52 % were female. Histologies included were adenocarcinoma (NOS 37 %), mucinous adenocarcinoma (MA 53 %), and signet ring cell (SRC 10 %). Five-year overall survival (OS) at diagnosis for patients with metastatic disease was 11 % (NOS), 45 % (MA), and 8 % (SRC), respectively. Annual conditional probability of survival from years 1-5 after diagnosis for patients with SRC with metastatic disease was 55, 60, 68, 55, and 82 % compared with 84, 86, 86, 88, and 92 % with MA. Probability of surviving the first year after extended surgery was 77 % (NOS), 85 % (MA), and 75 % (SRC). Those that survived 5 years after surgery had a 94 % (NOS), 93 % (MA), and 86 % (SRC) probability of surviving the sixth year. CONCLUSIONS: In the setting of dismal cumulative probability of survival (or overall survival), conditional probability is more informative in providing prognostication. This distinction might be important for patients especially with SRC who may live in constant fear of disease. Such data can be used to reassure patients and perhaps modify surveillance strategies for patients.
Asunto(s)
Adenocarcinoma Mucinoso/mortalidad , Adenocarcinoma/mortalidad , Apendicectomía/mortalidad , Neoplasias del Apéndice/mortalidad , Carcinoma de Células en Anillo de Sello/mortalidad , Adenocarcinoma/patología , Adenocarcinoma/cirugía , Adenocarcinoma Mucinoso/patología , Adenocarcinoma Mucinoso/cirugía , Anciano , Neoplasias del Apéndice/patología , Neoplasias del Apéndice/cirugía , Carcinoma de Células en Anillo de Sello/patología , Carcinoma de Células en Anillo de Sello/cirugía , Estudios de Cohortes , Femenino , Estudios de Seguimiento , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Pronóstico , Programa de VERF , Tasa de SupervivenciaRESUMEN
PURPOSE: A significant portion of national cancer expenditure is attributed to chemotherapy.Although the National Comprehensive Cancer Network has generated recommendations for the treatment of various solid tumors, the outlined chemotherapeutic strategies lack information about the cost differential for increasing effectiveness. METHODS: Chemotherapy regimens (curative [adjuvant/neoadjuvant] and metastatic therapy) and dosages outlined in the 2013 National Comprehensive Cancer Network guidelines were acquired for four common cancers: bladder, breast, colon, and lung. Baseline drug and treatment costs (in US dollars)were calculated for the average US adult male on the basis of the payment allowance in the 2013 Medicare Part B average sales price (ASP) drug pricing files. Costs were extrapolated for a treatment period of 6 months. RESULTS: Of the 62 regimens included, the 6-month mean cost of chemotherapy was $26,989 ± $29,971, and the median cost was $9,611 (interquartile range, $6,305-$39,383). The mean cost of metastatic cancer therapy regimens (n = 32) was $35,315 ± 32,962 compared with $18,107 ± 23,873 for curative therapy (P = .02). Of the 13 regimens with biologics used, the mean costs were $77,278 versus $13,646 for 49 regimens that did not use biologics (P<.001). The cost differential between extremes of costs for regimens with presumed similar efficacy was $90,843 ($79,165 for curative therapy and $90,210 for metastatic cancer therapy). The highest cost differential was noted in breast cancer regimens at $71,041 for metastatic cancer therapy and $63,926 for curative therapy. CONCLUSION: A significant cost differential exists between chemotherapeutic regimens for the most common solid tumors. Incorporation of costs and incremental effectiveness in current guidelines may encourage socially responsible practice patterns.
Asunto(s)
Protocolos de Quimioterapia Combinada Antineoplásica/economía , Costos de los Medicamentos , Adulto , Protocolos de Quimioterapia Combinada Antineoplásica/uso terapéutico , Neoplasias de la Mama/tratamiento farmacológico , Neoplasias de la Mama/economía , Neoplasias del Colon/tratamiento farmacológico , Neoplasias del Colon/economía , Análisis Costo-Beneficio , Femenino , Humanos , Neoplasias Pulmonares/tratamiento farmacológico , Neoplasias Pulmonares/economía , Masculino , Estados Unidos , Neoplasias de la Vejiga Urinaria/tratamiento farmacológico , Neoplasias de la Vejiga Urinaria/economíaRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Elderly patients (EPs) suffering from retroperitoneal rhabdomyosarcoma (RRMS) carry a considerably poorer prognosis compared to younger patients (YPs). We hypothesized that EPs received less aggressive and comprehensive treatment than YPs, resulting in poorer survival outcomes. MATERIALS AND METHODS: All patients diagnosed with RRMS since 1998 in the National Cancer Data Base (NCDB) were reviewed for patient demographics, tumor characteristics, treatment modalities and survival outcomes. RESULTS: Of the 100 patients identified, 35 % were ≥65 years of age. EPs (aged ≥65 years), when compared to YPs (aged <65), were less likely to receive systemic chemotherapy (20 % EPs vs 71 % YPs, p < 0.001) and treatment at an academic center (34 % EPs vs 60 % YPs, p = 0.05), although the frequency of radiation (23 % EPs vs 31 % YPs, p = 0.40) and radical surgery (26 % EPs vs 22 % YPs, p = 0.55) were similar. EPs received treatment more frequently at comprehensive community cancer programs (57 %) and had a shorter median distance of travel for care (6.4 vs 13 miles, p = 0.009). After adjusting for gender and tumor size, EPs had a hazard ratio of 3.6 (95 % CI 1.8-7.2, p < 0.001), with a median survival of 2 months (interquartile range [IQR] 1-8 months) versus 17 months for YPs (IQR 8-43 months). CONCLUSION: Altered practice patterns exist for EPs and include reduced use of systemic chemotherapy which may contribute to poorer outcomes for RRMS patients. Although regionalization of care poses challenges, this may offer benefit to the EP group.
Asunto(s)
Terapia Combinada/estadística & datos numéricos , Disparidades en Atención de Salud , Neoplasias Retroperitoneales/terapia , Rabdomiosarcoma/terapia , Centros Médicos Académicos , Adulto , Factores de Edad , Anciano , Antineoplásicos/uso terapéutico , Bases de Datos Factuales , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Modelos de Riesgos Proporcionales , Radioterapia/estadística & datos numéricos , Tasa de Supervivencia , Estados UnidosRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Patients with unresectable Colorectal Liver Metastases (CRLM) are increasingly being managed using Hepatic Artery Based Therapies (HAT), including Hepatic Arterial Infusion (HAI), Radioembolization (RE), and Transcatheter Arterial Chemoembolization (TACE). Limited data is available on the comparative effectiveness of these options. We hypothesized that outcomes in terms of survival and toxicity were equivalent across the three strategies. METHODS: A meta-analysis was performed using a prospectively registered search strategy at PROSPERO (CRD42013003861) that utilized studies from PubMed (2003-2013). Primary outcome was median overall survival (OS). Secondary outcomes were treatment toxicity, tumor response, and conversion of the tumor to resectable. Additional covariates included prior or concurrent systemic therapy. RESULTS: Of 491 studies screened, 90 were selected for analyses-52 (n = 3,000 patients) HAI, 24 (n = 1,268) RE, 14 (n = 1,038) TACE. The median OS (95% CI) for patients receiving HAT in the first-line were RE 29.4 vs. HAI 21.4 vs. TACE 15.2 months (p = 0.97, 0.69 respectively). For patients failing at least one line of prior systemic therapy, the survival outcomes were TACE 21.3 (20.6-22.4) months vs. HAI 13.2 (12.2-14.2) months vs. RE 10.7 (9.5-12.0). Grade 3-4 toxicity for HAT alone was 40% in the HAI group, 19% in the RE group, and 18% in the TACE groups, which was increased with the addition of systemic chemotherapy. Level 1 evidence was available in 5 studies for HAI, 2 studies for RE and 1 for TACE. CONCLUSION: HAI, RE, and TACE are equally effective in patients with unresectable CRLM with marginal differences in survival.
Asunto(s)
Neoplasias Colorrectales/terapia , Neoplasias Hepáticas/terapia , Antineoplásicos/administración & dosificación , Quimioembolización Terapéutica , Neoplasias Colorrectales/mortalidad , Neoplasias Colorrectales/patología , Arteria Hepática , Humanos , Neoplasias Hepáticas/mortalidad , Neoplasias Hepáticas/secundario , Resultado del TratamientoRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Solitary fibrous tumors (SFT) of the retroperitoneum are rare spindle cell neoplasms, with a paucity of data on treatment outcomes. We hypothesized that surgical excision offered acceptable outcomes in SFTs. METHODS: The National Cancer Database (NCDB) was used to identify patients with SFT from 2004 to 2011. Primary outcome measures were 30 day mortality and overall survival. Descriptive analyses were performed. Furthermore, a systematic review of published literature was conducted after creating a pre-specified search strategy. RESULTS: Of 51 patients in the NCDB, 58.8 % (n = 30) were males, with a median age 60 years (IQR 49-72 years). Median tumor size was 16 cm (IQR 11-21 cm). Surgical resection was performed in 92.2 % (n = 47) with 63.8 % (n = 30) having a margin negative resection. Peri-operative mortality was 2.1 % (n = 1). Of survival outcomes available for 18 patients, the median OS was 51.1 months. From the systematic review, we identified 8 studies, with 24 patients. Median age and tumor size was similar to the NCDB [47.5 years (IQR 39-66.5 years), 12 cm (IQR 7-17 cm)]. Majority [91.7 % (n = 22)] underwent surgical excision alone while one received adjuvant chemotherapy and none received radiation. After median follow up of 54 months (IQR 28-144 months), 79.2 % (n = 19) were alive without disease. Three patients (12.5 %) died of disease, one was alive with disease and one was lost to follow up. Recurrence was reported in 16.7 % (n = 4) of patients. CONCLUSION: Complete surgical excision is a viable treatment modality for retroperitoneal SFT leading to long term survival. Low recurrence rates would argue against the need for routine adjuvant radiation or chemotherapy.