Comparing two techniques of performing an epidural catheter-assisted epidural blood patch using a 20 ml syringe versus a 5 ml syringe and its effect on clotting time, the strength of clot retraction and haemolysis - A prospective in vitro study (EC-EBP study).

Background and Aims: Epidural blood patch (EBP) is performed by injecting autologous blood into the epidural space using a Tuohy needle. Certain clinical scenarios mandate an epidural catheter (EC)-assisted EBP. Collecting blood in a 20-ml versus 5-ml syringe appears to influence the quality of the clot. This in vitro study compared the techniques of performing the EC-assisted EBP using 20-ml versus 5-ml syringe on clotting time (CT), clot retraction (CR) and haemolysis. Methods: This in vitro study was performed in a haematology laboratory. Five consented adult healthy male volunteers donated blood. In the 5-ml syringe technique, blood was injected through an EC, and as it flowed out of the tip, it was collected at the beginning and the end of 1 min. With the 20-ml technique, blood was collected at the beginning and end of the first, second and third minute. The samples were tested for CT, CR and haemolysis by measuring the plasma-free haemoglobin (PFHb). Results: Five injections were made using a 5-ml syringe, and another five with a 20-ml syringe. Injection time was shorter in the 5-ml technique (80.80 ± 5.89 vs. 272 ± 28.4 s, P < 0.0001). With the 20-ml technique, CT progressively increased (>15 min), whereas, with the 5-ml syringe, the CT was normal. Both techniques caused mild, insignificant haemolysis (PFHb >0.005 g/dl), without affecting the quality of CR. Conclusion: EC-assisted EBP using a 5-ml syringe technique shortens the injection time and deposits fresh blood quickly without affecting CT and CR.

Challenges of anaesthetising a child with Bow Hunter's syndrome and dilated cardiomyopathy for occipitocervical fusion.

Paediatric Bow Hunter's syndrome (BHS), or rotational vertebral artery syndrome, is a rare cause of posterior circulation insufficiency in children. It results from mechanical obstruction of the vertebral artery by the transverse process of cervical vertebrae resulting in vertebrobasilar insufficiency during the neck rotation to the sides. Paediatric dilated cardiomyopathy (DCM) is a rare myocardial disease that presents with ventricular dilatation and cardiac dysfunction. This case report describes the successful anaesthetic management of an boy with BHS due to atlantoaxial dislocation and DCM. The child was anaesthetised by keeping the following anaesthetic goals in mind such as maintenance of the heart rate, rhythm, preload, afterload and contractility close to the baseline for both DCM and BHS. Haemodynamic management with optimal fluids, inotrope and a vasopressor and titrating its volume and doses using multimodal haemodynamic monitoring while keeping both cardio and neuroprotective strategies, and the multimodal analgesia techniques helped the child for faster recovery.

The Utility of COMPASS-31 Questionnaire to Predict Autonomic Dysfunction in Patients With Cervical/Upper Thoracic Compressive Myelopathy.

BACKGROUND: Patients with cervical/upper thoracic compressive myelopathy may have autonomic dysfunction. The composite autonomic severity score (CASS) is the gold standard test to detect autonomic dysfunction, and the self-rated composite autonomic system scale (COMPASS-31) questionnaire is a screening tool to diagnose autonomic dysfunction. This study compared the COMPASS-31 and modified CASS scores for the detection of autonomic dysfunction in patients with compressive myelopathy. METHODS: Patients with cervical/upper thoracic compressive myelopathy scheduled for decompressive surgery completed a COMPASS-31 questionnaire and underwent autonomic function tests to calculate the modified CASS score before surgery. RESULTS: Forty-two patients were included in the study; 19 (45.2%) had mild autonomic dysfunction, 5 (11.9%) had moderate autonomic dysfunction, and 18 (42.9%) had severe autonomic dysfunction. Median (interquartile range) of modified CASS and COMPASS-31 scores were 19 (6.33) and 3 (2.5), respectively. There was a positive correlation between modified CASS and COMPASS-31 scores ( r =0.43; P =0.004). Receiver operating characteristic curve analysis confirmed that COMPASS-31 had fair accuracy for prediction of moderate to severe autonomic dysfunction (area under the curve, 0.74; 95% confidence interval, 0.64-0.82; P =0.009). A cut-off of 30 for total COMPASS-31 score had a sensitivity of 52.2% and specificity of 89.5% to detect moderate to severe autonomic dysfunction, with positive and negative predictive values of 85.7% and 60.7%, respectively. CONCLUSION: Patients with cervical/upper thoracic compressive myelopathy had varying degrees of autonomic dysfunction based on the modified CASS. There was a positive correlation between the modified CASS and COMPASS-31 questionnaire. A COMPASS-31 score of >30 30 could be utilized to predict moderate to severe autonomic dysfunction in patients with compressive myelopathy.

Measurement of non-invasive blood pressure in lateral decubitus position under general anaesthesia - Which arm gives more accurate BP in relation to invasive BP - dependent or non-dependent arm?

BACKGROUND AND AIMS: Non-invasive blood pressure (NiBP) varies with the arm and body position. In the lateral decubitus position (LDP), the non-dependent arm reads lower, and the dependent arm reads higher pressure. We aimed to study the correlation between the NiBP and invasive arterial blood pressure (ABP) as anaesthesia progressed and its correlation in different BP ranges. METHODS: American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA I-III) patients, between 18-70 years undergoing neurosurgical procedures in the LDP were studied. All were anaesthetised using a standard protocol, positioned in the LDP. NiBP was measured every 15 min in both dependent and non-dependent arms and correlated with the ABP. RESULTS: Intra-class correlation (ICC) done between the dependent arm NiBP and ABP showed good correlation for mean and systolic BP and moderate correlation for diastolic BP. ICC was 0.800, 0.846 and 0.818 for mean and 0.771, 0.782, 0.792 for systolic BP at 15 min, 1 h, and 2 h, respectively. The ICC between the non-dependent arm NiBP and the invasive ABP showed poor correlation for all BP (systolic, diastolic and mean). As anaesthesia progressed, the mean difference between the NiBP and the ABP decreased in the dependent arm and increased in the non-dependent arm. The strength of agreement between the NiBP and the ABP in various BP ranges showed moderate correlation for the dependent arm NiBP (0.45-0.54) and poor correlation (0.21-0.38) for the non-dependent arm. CONCLUSION: The NiBP of the dependent arm correlated well with ABP in LDP under general anaesthesia (GA). It is better to defer measuring NiBP in the non-dependent arm as the correlation with ABP is poor.

An observational case-control study comparing the recovery profile in patients receiving additional dose of anticonvulsant vs. regular dose during supratentorial craniotomy.

BACKGROUND AND AIMS: Anticonvulsants are used routinely for seizure prophylaxis in patients with supratentorial tumour who present with/without seizures. Excessive use of prophylactic anticonvulsant may delay the recovery from anaesthesia. We have studied the recovery profiles of patients who received an additional dose of anticonvulsant in comparison with those who received only the regular dose. METHODS: In this prospective observational study, patients were anaesthetised using standard anaesthesia protocol. An additional dose of anticonvulsant was administered in one group, while the other group received only the regular dose. Time taken for extubation, eye opening, obeying commands and orientation were compared between the two groups. Haemodynamics, depth of anaesthesia, the plasma anticonvulsant levels and the incidence of seizures were compared between the two groups. RESULTS: A total of 36 patients were studied, of which 19 received regular dose and 17 received an additional dose. There was no significant difference in recovery time between the two groups. Subgroup analysis was performed for phenytoin and sodium valproate. There was a clinically significant delay in recovery in patients who received an additional phenytoin compared to those who received regular dose (time to obey commands >15 min and orientation time >1hour) but, it was not statistically significant. Administration of an additional dose of valproate did not prolong the recovery time. CONCLUSION: An additional dose of sodium valproate did not cause a delay in recovery both, clinically and statistically. However, the administration of an additional dose of phenytoin caused a clinically significant delay in recovery but was not statistically significant.