Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 8 de 8
Filtrar
Más filtros












Base de datos
Intervalo de año de publicación
1.
J Curr Glaucoma Pract ; 17(2): 91-97, 2023.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37485460

RESUMEN

Purpose: To compare Ahmed glaucoma valve (AGV) outcomes in neovascular glaucoma (NVG) eyes with and without a postoperative (PO) hypertensive (HTN) phase. Design: Retrospective study at a single tertiary care center of patients who underwent AGV implantation for NVG treatment with ≥6-month follow-up. Methods: Main outcome measures included intraocular pressure (IOP), number of glaucoma medications (GM), and failure at month 6 or at the most recent visit. Failure was defined as decline to no light perception (NLP) vision, IOP >21 mm Hg, or need for glaucoma reoperations (all with GM). Results: A total of 76 eyes of 74 patients (37 without HTN phase and 39 with HTN phase) with a mean follow-up duration of 28.9 ± 25.7 months (p = 0.602) were included. Both groups had similar demographics, visual acuity (VA), number of GM, etiology of NVG, and retina treatment perioperatively. Baseline IOP was significantly higher in the HTN phase group (p = 0.001). Compared to eyes without an HTN phase, HTN phase eyes more commonly met failure criteria at month 6 (33.3 vs 9.1%; p = 0.01), but both groups had a comparable cumulative failure for the entire follow-up period (p = 0.180). At the most recent visit, the number of GM was higher in the HTN phase group (p = 0.019), but IOP was similar in both groups. PO complications were comparable and uncommon in both groups. Conclusion: Hypertensive (HTN) phase following AGV implantation for NVG is associated with higher preoperative IOP and greater failure by PO month (POM) 6. However, eyes with and without the HTN phase had similar needs for GM and failure rates over the long term. How to cite this article: Ramesh S, Shalaby WS, Myers JS, et al. Evaluation of the Hypertensive Phase after Ahmed Glaucoma Valve Implantation in Neovascular Glaucoma. J Curr Glaucoma Pract 2023;17(2):91-97.

2.
J Neurosurg ; 137(6): 1786-1793, 2022 12 01.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35535832

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVE: Stent-assisted coil (SAC) embolization has been the mainstay endovascular treatment for bifurcation aneurysms. The recent introduction of the Woven EndoBridge (WEB) device has presented an alternative endovascular treatment modality for these aneurysms. Direct comparisons of outcomes between these two modalities are limited in the literature. Here, the authors compared the outcomes of bifurcation aneurysms treated with SAC and WEB devices. METHODS: This retrospective single-center study comprised 148 bifurcation aneurysms that were treated endovascularly with SAC or WEB devices between 2011 and 2019. The primary outcome was complete occlusion of the aneurysm at 6 months on catheter angiography. RESULTS: The SAC and WEB cohorts comprised 85 and 63 aneurysms, respectively. The baseline characteristics were well balanced after inverse probability weight (IPW) adjustment, except for smoking status. The 6-month complete occlusion rate was higher in the WEB cohort than the SAC cohort (67.4% vs 40.6%; unadjusted OR [95% CI] 3.014 [1.385-6.563], p = 0.005). However, this difference in complete occlusion rates did not remain significant after IPW adjustment and multiple imputations. The neck remnant rate was lower in the WEB cohort than the SAC cohort (20% vs 50%; OR [95% CI] 0.250 [0.107-0.584], p = 0.001), and this difference remained significant after IPW adjustment (OR [95% CI] 0.304 [0.116-0.795], p = 0.015) and multiple imputations. CONCLUSIONS: Use of SAC and WEB demonstrated comparable 6-month complete occlusion rates for bifurcation aneurysms. WEB appeared to be associated with a lower rate of neck remnant at 6 and 12 months compared with SAC. WEB was also associated with fewer complications and decreased retreatment rates compared with SAC.


Asunto(s)
Embolización Terapéutica , Procedimientos Endovasculares , Aneurisma Intracraneal , Humanos , Estudios Retrospectivos , Resultado del Tratamiento , Aneurisma Intracraneal/diagnóstico por imagen , Aneurisma Intracraneal/terapia , Stents , Angiografía Cerebral
3.
Neurosurgery ; 90(5): 627-635, 2022 05 01.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35285450

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: The anterior communicating artery (AcoA) is the most common location for intracranial aneurysms. OBJECTIVE: To present occlusion outcomes, complication rate, recurrence rate, and predictors of recurrence in a large cohort with AcoA aneurysms treated primarily with endosaccular embolization. We also attempt to present data on the most effective treatment modality for recurrent AcoA aneurysms. METHODS: This is a retrospective, single-center study, reviewing the outcomes of 463 AcoA aneurysms treated endovascularly between 2003 and 2018. RESULTS: The study cohort consisted of 463 patients. Adequate immediate occlusion was achieved in 418 (90.3%). Independent functional status at discharge was observed in 269 patients (58.0%), and the mortality rate was 6.8% (31). At 6 months, adequate occlusion was achieved in 418 (90.4%). Of all the patients, recurrence was observed in 101 cases (21.8%), and of those, 98 (22.4%) underwent retreatment. The combined frequency of retreatment for the coiling group was 42.4%, which was significantly higher than the 0 incident of retreatment in the clipping group (P < .0001). Among the retreatment cohort, there was a significantly higher subsequent retreatment rate in the endovascular group (0% in the clipping group vs 42.4% in the endovascular group, P < .0001). CONCLUSION: Coiling with and without stent/balloon assistance is a relatively safe and effective modality for the treatment of AcoA aneurysms; however, in the setting of recurrence, microsurgical reconstruction leads to improved outcomes regarding durable occlusion, thus avoiding the potential for multiple interventions in the future.


Asunto(s)
Embolización Terapéutica , Procedimientos Endovasculares , Aneurisma Intracraneal , Adulto , Niño , Humanos , Aneurisma Intracraneal/cirugía , Estudios Retrospectivos , Stents , Resultado del Tratamiento
4.
Clin Neurol Neurosurg ; 215: 107183, 2022 04.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35259678

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Rescue stenting is used as a bailout technique during mechanical thrombectomy for stroke. We performed a retrospective study analyzing outcomes of patients that received a stent as a bailout measure and compared results to a control group. METHODS: We identified all patients who underwent a mechanical thrombectomy for a large vessel occlusion between January 2010 and October 2019. Subjects with mTICI 0-2 A after at least three passes were defined as failed MT and constituted the control group (NSG-controls). Patients that received a rescue stent (RSG) formed the study group. RESULTS: Comparative analysis of patient demographics between NSG-controls and SRG was performed. Baseline characteristics and comorbidities were not significantly different between both groups. NIHSS at admission and IV t-PA were not significantly different among both groups (16.5 vs. 14.2, p = 0.19) and (39.4% vs. 29.4%, p = 0.30), respectively. There was no significant difference in procedural and post-procedural complications between both the groups. In the RSG, 24 patients (82.4%) achieved favorable revascularization outcomes. NIHSS at discharge (p = 0.01) was higher in the NSG-controls, while favorable functional outcome at three months (12% vs. 39.2%, p = 0.01) was observed at a higher proportion in the RSG. There was also a significant mortality difference, with 15.2% mortality in the RSG compared to 35.1% mortality in the NSG-controls (p = 0.03). In multivariate analysis, stenting was an independent predictor of favorable outcome (OR: 10.0, p = 0.009). CONCLUSION: Herein, we demonstrated that rescue stenting is a feasible, safe, and effective procedure to improve stroke outcomes and should be seriously considered if the primary mechanical thrombectomy is not successful.


Asunto(s)
Isquemia Encefálica , Accidente Cerebrovascular Isquémico , Accidente Cerebrovascular , Isquemia Encefálica/complicaciones , Humanos , Accidente Cerebrovascular Isquémico/cirugía , Estudios Retrospectivos , Stents/efectos adversos , Accidente Cerebrovascular/etiología , Trombectomía/métodos , Resultado del Tratamiento
5.
Front Neurol ; 12: 605959, 2021.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33746873

RESUMEN

Background: Deep Brain Stimulation (DBS) is an underutilized surgical therapy for Parkinson's Disease (PD). Both physician and patient hesitancies have been described as potential barriers to DBS, but the specifics of patient perceptions of DBS have not been well-characterized in the general PD population. Objective: To characterize the understanding and impressions of surgical therapy in PD patients prior to formal surgical evaluation. Methods: A 30-question survey assessing impressions of surgical therapy for PD and understanding of DBS for PD was administered to PD patients seen at an urban movement disorders clinic. Results: One hundred and two patients completed the survey. When asked if they would undergo a hypothetical risk-free, curative brain surgery for PD, 98 patients responded "yes." Patients were more agreeable to "reversible," "minimally-invasive," and "incisionless" surgery. 51.2% thought DBS is an "effective" treatment for PD, 76.6% thought it was "invasive," and 18.3% thought it was "reversible." 45.2% reported fear of being awake during DBS surgery. Regarding costs, 52.4% were concerned that DBS was "very expensive" or "not covered by insurance." Initial source of information and perceived treatment effectiveness were not associated with concerns about DBS effectiveness or threats to normality. Negative perceptions of past surgery were associated with concerns about DBS altering mood and personality. Conclusion: Overall, patients expressed concerns regarding procedural efficacy, invasiveness, cost, and irreversibility-independent of the original source of information. Future studies are required to allow us to better understand the impact of these initial findings on DBS hesitancy and underutilization.

6.
J Stroke Cerebrovasc Dis ; 30(3): 105589, 2021 Mar.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33418445

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVES: The transradial approach (TRA) is technically feasible for both diagnostic and therapeutic neurointerventions. It improves patient comfort and is not associated with increased procedural complications when compared to the transfemoral approach (TFA). To date, no studies have looked at barriers to adoption of TRA in the neurointerventionalist community. This study aims to obtain neurointerventionalist perspectives on their adoption of TRA. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Online survey distributed to neurointerventionalists. RESULTS: A total of 55 neurointerventionalists, 52 of whom utilized TRA, responded to our survey. Overall, participants were not concerned about TRA's technical feasibility for diagnostic or therapeutic neurointerventions or about procedural complications. Most of our cohort adopted TRA due to its increased patient comfort and to reduce access site complications. In-institution interventionalists were strongly perceived to be the most effective method of teaching TRA when compared to other methods. Catheters and equipment issues were reported by about 30% of our cohort as a barrier to TRA adoption. CONCLUSIONS: The neurointerventionalist community largely perceives TRA to be technically feasible and was not concerned about its procedural complications. In-person institutionalists are strongly perceived to be the most effective method of teaching the approach. A significant barrier to adoption seems to be related to catheters and equipment issues.


Asunto(s)
Cateterismo Periférico/tendencias , Procedimientos Endovasculares/tendencias , Neurología/tendencias , Neurorradiografía/tendencias , Pautas de la Práctica en Medicina/tendencias , Arteria Radial , Adulto , Cateterismo Periférico/efectos adversos , Procedimientos Endovasculares/efectos adversos , Femenino , Encuestas de Atención de la Salud , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Neurorradiografía/efectos adversos , Punciones
7.
Stroke Vasc Neurol ; 5(1): 80-85, 2020.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32411412

RESUMEN

Care for acute ischaemic stroke is one of the most rapidly evolving fields due to the robust outcomes achieved by mechanical thrombectomy. Large vessel occlusion (LVO) accounts for up to 38% of acute ischaemic stroke and comes with devastating outcomes for patients, families and society in the pre-intervention era. A paradigm shift and a breakthrough brought mechanical thrombectomy back into the spotlight for acute ischaemic stroke; this was because five randomised controlled trials from several countries concluded that mechanical thrombectomy for acute stroke offered overwhelming benefits. This review article will present a comprehensive overview of LVO management, techniques and devices used, and the future of stroke therapy. In addition, we review our institution experience of mechanical thrombectomy for posterior and distal circulation occlusion.


Asunto(s)
Isquemia Encefálica/terapia , Procedimientos Endovasculares , Trombosis Intracraneal/terapia , Accidente Cerebrovascular/terapia , Trombectomía , Isquemia Encefálica/diagnóstico por imagen , Isquemia Encefálica/mortalidad , Isquemia Encefálica/fisiopatología , Toma de Decisiones Clínicas , Terapia Combinada , Procedimientos Endovasculares/efectos adversos , Procedimientos Endovasculares/instrumentación , Procedimientos Endovasculares/mortalidad , Humanos , Trombosis Intracraneal/diagnóstico por imagen , Trombosis Intracraneal/mortalidad , Trombosis Intracraneal/fisiopatología , Medición de Riesgo , Factores de Riesgo , Stents , Accidente Cerebrovascular/diagnóstico por imagen , Accidente Cerebrovascular/mortalidad , Accidente Cerebrovascular/fisiopatología , Trombectomía/efectos adversos , Trombectomía/instrumentación , Trombectomía/mortalidad , Resultado del Tratamiento
8.
Ophthalmic Plast Reconstr Surg ; 36(5): 490-496, 2020.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32134771

RESUMEN

PURPOSE: To determine the association of Fitzpatrick skin type (FST) with conjunctival melanoma. METHODS: Retrospective case series of 540 patients with conjunctival melanoma to assess clinical features and outcomes per FST. RESULTS: The FST was Type I (n = 126, 23%), II (n = 337, 62%), III (n = 56, 10%), IV (n = 8, 2%), V (n = 12, 2%), and VI (n = 1, <1%). A comparison (FST I vs. II vs. III, IV, V, and VI) revealed Types I and II associated with older mean patient age (63.9 vs. 60.7 vs. 51.1 years, p < 0.001), greater percentage of female patients (68% vs. 44% vs. 42%, p < 0.001), lower frequency of complexion associated melanosis (1% vs. 2% vs. 13%, p < 0.001), smaller tumor thickness (2.1 vs. 2.8 vs. 3.6 mm, p = 0.01), and less eyelid involvement (13% vs. 13% vs. 28%, p = 0.02). Kaplan-Meier estimates for 5-year risk showed no difference by Types for visual acuity loss ≥3 lines, local tumor recurrence, exenteration, metastasis, or death. CONCLUSION AND RELEVANCE: Most patients with conjunctival melanoma show FST I or II, and this demonstrated no association with 5-year rate of vision loss, tumor recurrence, exenteration, metastasis, or death.


Asunto(s)
Neoplasias de la Conjuntiva , Melanoma , Melanosis , Neoplasias de la Conjuntiva/epidemiología , Neoplasias de la Conjuntiva/terapia , Femenino , Humanos , Melanoma/diagnóstico , Melanoma/epidemiología , Melanoma/terapia , Recurrencia Local de Neoplasia , Estudios Retrospectivos
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA
...