Validation of the psychometric properties of a "Modified Version of the Hornheider Screening Instrument" (HSI-MV) using a sample of outpatient and inpatient skin tumor patients.

BACKGROUND: The basis for adequate psycho-oncological care is the identification of patients with psychosocial support needs. The German Working Group for Psychooncology also recommends the Hornheider Screening Instrument (HSI) for this purpose. The question, "Is anyone in your family particularly burdened by the hospital stay?" is intended to capture disease-related family stress. But is this item equally suitable for outpatients and inpatients? The study objective was to examine how replacing the original item affects the test performance of this modified version of the HSI and the frequency of psychosocial stress. PATIENTS AND METHODS: 92 outpatients and 98 inpatients with skin tumors assessed their psychosocial situation using different questionnaires. RESULTS: Compared to inpatients, less than half as many outpatients answered the item in the affirmative. If the question was replaced by: "Is someone in your family particularly burdened by your disease or the course of the disease?" this setting-related difference did not arise. The "Alternative item" and the "Modified version of the HIS" (HSI-MV) proved to be superior to the original item and the original HSI with regard to all examined criteria. CONCLUSIONS: The HSI-MV can be used as a reliable and valid instrument for the systematic assessment of psychosocial care needs in outpatient and inpatient settings. Depending on care capacity, a threshold of ≥ 5 or ≥ 4 is appropriate. In addition to screening, the desire for support should be enquired.

Psychosocial stress of dermatology inpatients and their relatives - Comparison of patients with and without cancer.

BACKGROUND: In the clinical treatment pathways of certified oncological centers, psychotherapeutic services are mandatory. Although patients with somatic, non-oncological illnesses show an equally high prevalence of psychosocial stress, these guidelines do not exist for the general hospital sector. Are these patients really less burdened and is psychological support only needed in individual cases? The example of dermatological patients will be used to show whether the need for psychosocial care and the desire for support vary between individuals with and without malignant disease. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Using the Hornheider screening instrument and distress thermometer, 216 dermatological inpatients assessed their psychosocial stress and that of a close relative. In addition, they were asked about their desire for support and preferred support provider. RESULTS: i) Patients without skin cancer were more frequently and more severely distressed than cancer patients. ii) Patients of both groups assessed their relatives to be approximately equally distressed. Compared with their own distress, cancer patients assessed their relatives as more frequently and on average more severely distressed. More than 50 % of all patients regarded their own disease as the cause of their relatives' distress. iii) The desire for support in both groups was about 18 %. iv) Doctors and psychologists were usually named as potential contact persons. CONCLUSIONS: The expansion of psychosocial support services for non-tumor patients and their relatives seems necessary. The establishment of appropriate screening methods should be considered. Further studies in other clinical areas are required.