Respiratory tract viral infections associated sepsis in patients with underlying liver disease: Viral sepsis an entity to look forward!

BACKGROUND: Sepsis remains a global health burden associated with significant morbidity and mortality. Bacteria are known to be the predominant pathogens in sepsis; however, viral etiologies in sepsis are still under diagnosed. Respiratory viral pathogens have been previously linked to sepsis, but the knowledge of incidence, disease burden and mortality of viral-induced sepsis remains limited. This study aimed at understanding the role of respiratory viral infections in the causation of sepsis in liver disease patients. METHODS: In this retrospective study, the clinical records of liver disease patients with influenza-like illness, whose requests for respiratory viral testing were received from January 2019 to December 2022, were reviewed. Respiratory viruses were identified using FilmArray 2.0 respiratory panel (BioFire Diagnostics, Utah, USA). RESULTS: Of 1391 patients tested, a respiratory viral etiology was detected in 23%. The occurrence of sepsis was seen in 35%. Among these, isolated viral etiology with no other bacterial/fungal coinfection was found in 55% of patients. Rhinovirus/Enterovirus was found as the most common underlying viral etiology (23.4%). The sepsis prevalence was higher among patients with associated comorbidities (45%) and decompensated cirrhosis (84%). On multi-variable analysis, no factor was found independently associated with sepsis-related mortality. CONCLUSION: This study underlines the importance of isolated viral etiology in causation of sepsis among liver disease patients. Patients with comorbidities, older age and decompensated cirrhosis are at an increased risk of developing sepsis and are associated with poorer outcomes. Accurate and timely identification of the viral etiology in sepsis would prevent the misuse of antibiotics and improve overall patient care.

Performance evaluation of NeuMoDx 96 system for hepatitis B and C viral load.

BACKGROUND: Hepatitis B virus (HBV) and hepatitis C virus (HCV) viral load (VL) estimation is essential for the management of both HBV and HCV infections. Due to a longer turnaround time for VL estimation, many patients drop out from the cascade of care. To achieve the global goals of reducing morbidity and mortality due to HBV/HCV and moving towards their elimination by 2030, molecular diagnostic platforms with faster and random (i.e. single sample) access are needed. AIM: To evaluate the performance of the recently launched NeuMoDx 96 random access system with the conventional COBAS®AmpliPrep/COBAS TaqMan system for HBV and HCV VL estimation. METHODS: Archived once-thawed plasma samples were retrieved and tested on both platforms. Correlation between the assays was determined by linear regression and Bland-Altman analysis. The study included samples from 186 patients, 99 for HBV of which 49 were true infected HBV cases (hepatitis B surface antigen, anti-hepatitis B core antibody, and HBV DNA-positive) and 87 for HCV assay in which 39 were true positives for HCV infection (anti-HCV and HCV RNA-positive). RESULTS: The median VL detected by NeuMoDx for HBV was 2.9 (interquartile range [IQR]: 2.0-4.3) log10 IU/mL and by COBAS it was 3.70 (IQR: 2.28-4.56) log10 IU/mL, with excellent correlation (R2 = 0.98). In HCV, the median VL detected by NeuMoDx was 4.9 (IQR: 4.2-5.4) log10 IU/mL and by COBAS it was 5.10 (IQR: 4.07-5.80) log10 IU/mL with good correlation (R2 = 0.96). CONCLUSION: The overall concordance between both the systems was 100% for both HBV and HCV VL estimation. Moreover, no genotype-specific bias for HBV/HCV VL quantification was seen in both the systems. Our findings reveal that NeuMoDx HBV and HCV quantitative assays have shown overall good clinical performance and provide faster results with 100% sensitivity and specificity compared to the COBAS AmpliPrep/COBAS TaqMan system.

Prevalence and Predictors for Respiratory Viral Infections among Liver Disease Patients.

Aim and background: Respiratory viral infections (RVIs) cause significant hospitalizations every year. Also, RVIs caused by either influenza or noninfluenza group of viruses can have adverse outcomes, especially among immunosuppressed patients. Regular and timely supervision is needed for accurate etiological identification, to prevent inappropriate use of antibiotics in patients with nonbacterial etiology. This study aimed to identify the spectrum of RVIs and clinical characteristics among liver disease patients with influenza-like illness (ILI). Materials and methods: In this study, medical records of patients with ILI, whose requests for respiratory viral testing came from September 2016 to December 2022 were retrospectively reviewed. Respiratory viruses were identified using FilmArray 2.0 respiratory panel (BioFire Diagnostics, USA). Results: Of the 1,577 liver disease patients with ILI, the overall prevalence of RVI was 28% (n = 449). Infection by noninfluenza viruses (NIVs) was detected in 329 patients (73%), higher than those infected with influenza viruses. In multivariable logistic regression analysis, female gender [odds ratio (OR): 2.5, 95% confidence interval (CI): 1.5-4.2], infection with influenza B (OR: 3.3, 95% CI: 1.09-9.9) and decompensated cirrhosis (OR: 3.9, 95% CI: 1.7-8.5) were independent risk factors for mortality. Regarding seasonality, influenza peaked in monsoons and winters, whereas NIVs circulated throughout the year. Conclusion: Overall, this study adds new knowledge regarding the incidence of RVI and the distribution of respiratory viral etiologies among liver disease patients with ILI. The findings highlight that female gender, decompensated cirrhosis, and influenza B infection are independently associated with poor clinical outcomes. Early etiological identification of viral causes of ILI could aid in an enhanced understanding of the prevalence of ILI and the timely management of the patients. Clinical significance: Respiratory viral infections can cause severe illness in individuals with underlying liver disease. Accurate diagnosis and risk stratification is crucial in mitigating the adverse health effects. How to cite this article: Samal J, Prabhakar T, Prasad M, et al. Prevalence and Predictors for Respiratory Viral Infections among Liver Disease Patients. Euroasian J Hepato-Gastroenterol 2023;13(2):108-114.

Naturally Occurring Resistance Associated Substitutions in Non-Cirrhotic, Treatment Naive HCV-HIV Co-Infected Patients Does Not Affect the Treatment Response for Anti-HCV Antiviral Therapy.

PURPOSE: Limited literature on the prevalence of baseline resistance associated substitutions (BL-RAS) among HCV-HIV co-infected patients and their association with treatment outcomes is available especially from India. Hence, the present study aimed to study naturally occurring RAS among non-cirrhotic HCV-HIV co-infected patients and their impact on the response to anti-HCV therapy. PATIENTS AND METHODS: In this retrospective study, archived blood samples of 80 HCV-HIV co-infected patients, before anti-HCV therapy initiation, were tested for substitutions at the drug acting sites (NS5a and NS5b) in the HCV genome by direct PCR sequencing. RESULTS: BL-RAS were seen in 19 (23.7%) patients. As well as BL-RAS, all patients were given sofosbuvir (SOF) 400 mg+ daclatasvir (DCV) 60 mg for 12 weeks. Overall, sustained virological response (SVR) was achieved in 63 (78.8%) patients, in 13 with BL-RAS and in 50 without BL-RAS. All the SVR failure cases (n=17) were retreated with SOF (400 mg) +DCV (60 mg)+ ribavirin (RBV) for 24 weeks. SVR was eventually attained in 14 (82.3%) patients, in 4/6 (66.6%) with BL-RAS and in 10/11 (91%) without BL-RAS. On univariate analysis, age more than 30 years (OR: 11.6; 95% CI: 3.0-45.5, p-value<0.001) and female gender (OR: 8.6; 95% CI: 1.1-69, p-value <0.009) were found to be significant factors associated with the attainment of SVR. CONCLUSION: BL-RAS are common in HCV-HIV co-infected patients. The existence of BL-RAS, however, did not affect the attainment of SVR among non-cirrhotic, treatment naive HCV-HIV co-infected patients.

Performance evaluation of Xpert HBV viral load (VL) assay: Point-of-care molecular test to strengthen and decentralize management of chronic hepatitis B (CHB) infection.

INTRODUCTION: Estimation of hepatitis B (HBV) viral load (VL) is critical in hepatitis-B cascade-of-care and at present there is no point of care (POC) molecular assay available for the same. This study evaluated the performance of a new near point of care molecular assay Xpert HBV- VL assay against the approved assays. MATERIALS & METHODS: In this study 172 archived previously tested samples, were simultaneously re-tested for HBV DNA on 3 real-time PCR assays: Abbott Real-Time HBV, Roche TaqMan® HBV and Xpert HBV assay. RESULTS: Out of 172 samples, 119 were previously positive for HBV DNA with a median VL 4.46 (IQR: 1-8.76)log10IU/mL and 53 were HBV DNA negative. Genotyping could be done in 95 (79.8 %) samples and genotype D (83; 87.3 %) was the commonest type. The Xpert assay demonstrated a good correlation with Abbott (R2 = 0.94) and Roche (R2 = 0.96). On comparison, the mean difference with 95 % Confidence Interval of Xpert assay was -0.018 and -0.043 log10 IU/mL with Abbott and Roche assay, respectively. The overall sensitivity, specificity, negative predictive value, and positive predictive value of the Xpert assay was found 97.5 %, 100 %, 94.65 & 100 % respectively. CONCLUSION: Xpert HBV-VL assay which has a potential for near point of care molecular testing has shown excellent performance and found to be a reliable method for HBV DNA quantification.