Cemented vs. press-fit humeral stems: a matched cohort analysis at a mean follow-up of 10 years.

BACKGROUND: Although cementation of humeral stems has long been considered the gold standard for anatomic shoulder arthroplasty (aTSA), cementless, or press-fit, fixation offers a relatively cheaper and less demanding alternative, particularly in the setting of a revision procedure. However, this approach has been accompanied by concerns of implant loosening and high rates of radiolucency. In the present study, we performed a propensity-matched comparison of clinical and patient-reported outcomes between cemented and cementless fixation techniques for aTSA. We hypothesized that cemented fixation of the humeral component would have significantly better implant survival while providing comparable functional outcomes at final follow-up. METHODS: This study was a retrospective comparison of 50 shoulders undergoing aTSA: 25 using cemented humeral fixation vs. 25 using press-fit humeral fixation. Patients in the 2 groups were propensity matched according to age, sex, and preoperative American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons Standardized Shoulder Assessment Form (ASES) score. Primary outcome measures included range of motion (ROM) (forward elevation, external rotation, internal rotation), patient-reported outcomes (ASES, Simple Shoulder Test [SST], visual analog scale [VAS]), and implant survival. RESULTS: At baseline, the 2 fixation groups were similar in regard to age, sex, body mass index, preoperative ASES score, and surgical indication. Mean follow-up was 11.7 ± 4.95 years in the cemented cohort and 9.13 ± 3.77 years in the press-fit cohort (P = .045). Both groups demonstrated significant improvements postoperatively in all included ROM and patient-reported outcomes. However, press-fit patients reported significantly better VAS, ASES, and SST scores. Mean VAS pain score was 1.1 ± 1.8 in press-fit patients and 3.2 ± 3.0 in cemented patients (P = .005). The mean ASES score was 87.7 ± 12.4 in press-fit patients and 69.5 ± 22.7 in cemented patients (P = .002). Lastly, the mean SST score was 9.8 ± 3.1 in press-fit patients and 7.7 ± 3.7 in cemented patients (P = .040). Both fixation techniques provided lasting implant survivorship with only a single revision operation in each of the cohorts. CONCLUSION: Herein, we provide a propensity-matched, long-term comparison of patients receiving anatomic shoulder arthroplasty stratified according to humeral stem fixation technique. The results of this analysis illustrate that both types of humeral fixation techniques yield durable and significant improvements in shoulder function with similar rates of survival at 10 years of follow-up.

Mid-term outcomes following reverse total shoulder arthroplasty.

PURPOSE: The utilization of reverse total shoulder arthroplasty now exceeds the incidence of anatomic shoulder arthroplasty. Previous mid-to-long-term studies on rTSA have reported a decrease in shoulder function as follow-up increased. The purpose of this study was to provide data on mid-term outcomes and implant survival in a series focusing on reverse total shoulder arthroplasty. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Demographic information such as age at surgery, revision surgery status, BMI, and smoking status were recorded. The clinical endpoints measured in this study were range of motion scores (forward elevation, external rotation, internal rotation) and patient reported outcomes (VAS, ASES, SST). Radiographic variables captured included preoperative glenoid morphology, humeral lucency, and glenoid loosening. RESULTS: Fifty-six shoulders were included in this study. The overall mean age at surgery was 72.5 ± 7.2 years with an average follow-up time of 6.8 ± 3.5 years. The mean BMI was 28.1 ± 5.5. All measurements of range of motion saw significant and sustained improvements. Overall, forward elevation improved from 82° preoperatively to 133° postoperatively (p < 0.01). External rotation improved from 23° preoperatively to 36° (p < 0.01), while internal rotation improved from L3 to L1 (p = 0.05). ASES scores improved from 31 preoperatively to 70 postoperatively (p < 0.01). SST scores improved from 2 preoperatively to 7 (p < 0.01). VAS pain index scores improved from 6 to 2 following surgery (p < 0.01). Postoperative scapular notching was seen in 18 patients at final follow-up. Glenoid loosening was seen in 3 shoulders. Humeral loosening was seen in 18 shoulders. Tuberosity resorption was seen in 8 shoulders. The 5 year survival estimate was 98%, and the 10 year survival estimate was 83%. CONCLUSION: In this series, we found that rTSA provides mid-term improvements in range of motion in patients while reducing pain levels. When considered together, this demonstrates that most patients undergoing rTSA can have excellent use of their shoulder from age at surgery to end-of-life.

Evaluating Resource Utilization for In-Person and Virtual Joint Classes in Total Joint Arthroplasty: An Analysis of Attendance Patterns at a Large Metropolitan Health System.

BACKGROUND: Provider-run "joint classes" educate total joint arthroplasty (TJA) patients on how to best prepare for surgery and maximize recovery. There is no research on potential healthcare inequities in the context of joint classes or on the impact of the recent shift toward telehealth due to coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19). Using data from a large metropolitan health system, we aimed to (1) identify demographic patterns in prepandemic joint class attendance and (2) understand the impact of telehealth on attendance. METHODS: We included data on 3,090 TJA patients from three centers, each with a separately operated joint class. Attendance patterns were assessed prepandemic and after the resumption of elective surgeries when classes transitioned to telehealth. Statistical testing included standardized differences (SD > 0.1 indicates significance) and a multivariate linear regression. RESULTS: The in-person and telehealth attendance rates were 69.9% and 69.2%, respectively. Joint class attendance was significantly higher for non-White, Hispanic, non-English primary language, Medicaid, and Medicare patients (all SD > 0.1). Age was a determinant of attendance for telehealth (SD > 0.1) but not for in-person (SD = 0.04). Contrastingly, physical distance from hospital was significant for in-person (SD > 0.1) but not for telehealth (SD = 0.06). On a multivariate analysis, distance from hospital (P < .05) and telehealth (P < .0001) were predictors of failed class attendance. CONCLUSION: This work highlights the relative importance of joint classes in specific subgroups of patients. Although telehealth attendance was lower, telehealth alleviated barriers to access related to physical distance but increased barriers for older patients. These results can guide providers on preoperative education and the implementation of telehealth.

Risk Factors for 30- and 90-Day Readmissions Due To Surgical Site Infection Following Posterior Lumbar Fusion.

STUDY DESIGN: This was a retrospective cohort study. OBJECTIVE: Identify the independent risk factors for 30- and 90-day readmission because of surgical site infection (SSI) in patients undergoing elective posterior lumbar fusion (PLF). SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA: SSI is a significant cause of morbidity in the 30- and 90-day windows after hospital discharge. There remains a gap in the literature on independent risk factors for readmission because of SSI after PLF procedures. In addition, readmission for SSI after spine surgery beyond the 30-day postoperative period has not been well studied. METHODS: A retrospective analysis was performed on data from the 2012 to 2014 Healthcare Cost and Utilization Project Nationwide Readmissions Database. The authors identified 65,121 patients who underwent PLF. There were 191 patients (0.30%) readmitted with a diagnosis of SSI in the 30-day readmission window, and 283 (0.43%) patients readmitted with a diagnosis of SSI in the 90-day window. Baseline patient demographics and medical comorbidities were assessed. Bivariate and multivariate analyses were performed to examine the independent risk factors for readmission because of SSI. RESULTS: In the 30-day window after discharge, this study identified patients with liver disease, uncomplicated diabetes, deficiency anemia, depression, psychosis, renal failure, obesity, and Medicaid or Medicare insurance as higher risk patients for unplanned readmission with a diagnosis of SSI. The study identified the same risk factors in the 90-day window with the addition of diabetes with chronic complications, chronic pulmonary disease, and pulmonary circulation disease. CONCLUSIONS: Independent risk factors for readmission because of SSI included liver disease, uncomplicated diabetes, obesity, and Medicaid insurance status. These findings suggest that additional intervention in the perioperative workup for patients with these risk factors may be necessary to lower unplanned readmission because of SSI after PLF surgery.

A Comparison of the Elixhauser and Charlson Comorbidity Indices: Predicting In-Hospital Complications Following Anterior Lumbar Interbody Fusions.

OBJECTIVE: The Elixhauser Comorbidity Index (ECI) and Charlson Comorbidity Index (CCI) are commonly used measures that use administrative data to characterize a patient's comorbidity burden. The purpose of this study was to compare the ability of these measures to predict outcomes following anterior lumbar interbody fusion. METHODS: The National Inpatient Sample was queried for all ALIF procedures between 2013 and 2014. The area under the receiver operating curve (AUC) was used to compare the ECI and CCI in their ability to predict postoperative complications when incorporated into a base model containing age, sex, race, and primary payer. Percent superiority was computed using AUC values for ECI, CCI, and base models. RESULTS: A total of 43,930 hospitalizations were included in this study. The ECI was superior to the CCI and baseline models in predicting minor (AUC 71 vs. 0.66, P < 0.0001) and major (AUC 0.74 vs. 0.67, P < 0.0001) complications. When evaluating individual complications, the ECI was superior to the CCI in predicting airway complications (65% superior, AUC 0.85 vs. 0.72, P = 0.0001); hemorrhagic anemia (83% superior, AUC 0.71 vs. 0.66, P < 0.0001); myocardial infarction (76% superior, AUC 0.86 vs. 0.67, P < 0.0001); cardiac arrest (75% superior, AUC 0.85 vs. 0.67, P < 0.0001); pulmonary embolism (105% superior, AUC 0.91 vs. 0.71, P < 0.0001); and urinary tract infection (43% superior, AUC 0.76 vs. 0.73, P = 0.046). CONCLUSIONS: The ECI was superior to the CCI in predicting 6 of the 15 complications analyzed in this study. Combined with previous results, the ECI may be a better predictive model in spine surgery.

Elixhauser Comorbidity Measure is Superior to Charlson Comorbidity Index In-Predicting Hospital Complications Following Elective Posterior Cervical Decompression and Fusion.

OBJECTIVE: The predictive ability of Elixhauser Comorbidity Index (ECI) and Charlson Comorbidity Index (CCI) have been compared in orthopedic and gastrointestinal surgery; however, their predictive ability for complications secondary to spine surgery and posterior cervical decompression and fusion (PCDF) specifically is understudied. This study examines the predictive ability of the ECI and CCI for complications and morbidity following PCDF. METHODS: ECI and CCI were retrospectively computed for all PCDF cases in the National Inpatient Sample database from 2013 to 2014 and complications or morbidity were identified. C-statistics were used to analyze ECI and CCI predictive ability in a range of complications and compared with a base comorbidity model that included age, sex, race, and primary payer. RESULTS: PCDF was performed in 46,700 hospitalizations between 2013 and 2014. The complications for which ECI was found to be a significantly better predictor included airway complications (69.16% superior to CCI), hemorrhagic anemia (79.04% superior), cardiac arrest (72.39% superior), pulmonary embolism (83.01% superior), sepsis (62.44% superior), septic shock (78.90% superior), urinary tract infection (63.53% superior), death (74.28% superior), any minor complication (75% superior), any major complication (133% superior), and any complication at all (63.72% superior). The complications for which neither the ECI Index nor the CCI proved superior were acute kidney injury, myocardial infarction, cerebrovascular accident, deep vein thrombosis, pneumonia, wound dehiscence, and superficial surgical-site infection following PCDF. CONCLUSIONS: ECI showed superior predictive ability to the CCI in predicting 8 of the 18 complications that were analyzed and inferior in none.

Predicting In-Hospital Complications After Anterior Cervical Discectomy and Fusion: A Comparison of the Elixhauser and Charlson Comorbidity Indices.

OBJECTIVE: The objective of this study was to determine the ability of the Elixhauser Comorbidity Index (ECI) and Charlson Comorbidity Index (CCI) to predict postoperative complications after anterior cervical discectomy and fusion (ACDF). METHODS: This was a retrospective study of ACDF hospitalizations in the National Inpatient Sample from 2013 to 2014. The ECI and CCI were calculated, and patients who experienced postoperative complications were identified. The ability of these indexes to predict complications was compared using the c statistic (area under the receiver operating characteristic curve [AUC]). In addition, the CCI and ECI were compared with a base model that included age, sex, race, and primary payer. RESULTS: A total of 261,780 patients were included. Patients who experienced a complication were more often male (P < 0.0001) and older (P < 0.0001). They also had a higher comorbidity burden as assessed by both the ECI (P < 0.0001) and the CCI (P < 0.0001). The ECI was superior in predicting airway complications (AUC, 0.81 vs. 0.75; P < 0.0001), hemorrhagic anemia (AUC, 0.67 vs. 0.63; P = 0.0015), pulmonary embolism (AUC, 0.91 vs. 0.77; P < 0.0001), wound dehiscence (AUC, 0.80 vs. 0.55; P = 0.0080), sepsis (AUC, 0.87 vs. 0.82; P = 0.0001), and septic shock (AUC, 0.94 vs. 0.83; P < 0.0001). The CCI was not found to be superior to the ECI for predicting any complications. Both were excellent for predicting mortality (ECI AUC, 0.87; CCI AUC, 0.90). CONCLUSIONS: The ECI was superior to the CCI in predicting 6 of 15 complications in this study. Both are excellent tools for predicting mortality after ACDF.

The Effects of Preoperative Steroid Therapy on Perioperative Morbidity and Mortality After Adult Spinal Deformity Surgery.

STUDY DESIGN: Retrospective cohort analysis. OBJECTIVES: To identify the effects of preoperative steroid therapy on 30-day perioperative complications after adult spinal deformity (ASD) surgery. SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA: Chronic steroid therapy has demonstrated therapeutic effects in the treatment of various medical conditions but is also known to be associated with surgical complications. There remains a gap in the literature regarding the impact of chronic steroid therapy in predisposing patients to perioperative complications after elective surgery for ASD. METHODS: We performed a retrospective analysis of data from the 2008-2015 American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Program (ACS-NSQIP) database. Patients were divided into two groups based on preoperative steroid therapy. Differences in baseline patient characteristics, comorbidities, and operative variables were assessed. Univariate analysis was performed to compare the incidence of perioperative complications. Multivariate stepwise logistic regression models were then used to adjust for baseline patient and operative variables in order to identify perioperative complications that were associated with preoperative steroid therapy. RESULTS: We identified 7,936 patients who underwent surgery for ASD, of which 418 (5.3%) were on preoperative steroid therapy. Preoperative steroid therapy was an independent risk factor for four perioperative complications, including mortality (odds ratio [OR] 2.42, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.30, 4.51; p = .005), wound dehiscence (OR 3.12, 95% CI 1.45, 6.70; p = .004), deep vein thrombosis (DVT) (OR 2.10, 95% CI 1.24, 3.55; p = .006), and blood transfusion (OR 1.34, 95% CI 1.08, 1.66; p < .007). CONCLUSIONS: Patients on preoperative steroid therapy are at increased risk of 30-day mortality, wound dehiscence, DVT, and blood transfusion after surgery for ASD. An interdisciplinary approach to the perioperative management of steroid regimens is critical. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level III.

The Effects of Preoperative Steroid Therapy on Perioperative Complications After Elective Anterior Lumbar Fusion.

OBJECTIVE: To examine the effects of chronic preoperative steroid therapy on 30-day perioperative complications after anterior lumbar fusion (ALF). METHODS: We retrospectively analyzed data from the American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Program between 2008 and 2015. Adult patients who underwent ALF were included and divided into 2 groups: steroids and no steroids. We compared baseline patient demographics, comorbidities, and operative variables between these 2 groups and then performed a multivariate regression analysis to determine complications that were independently associated with chronic steroid therapy. We also performed a subgroup analysis of the steroid group to identify additional risk factors that further predispose these patients to postoperative complications. RESULTS: A total of 9483 patients were included, of whom 289 (3.0%) were on chronic steroid therapy. Univariate analysis showed that chronic steroid use was independently associated with 4 perioperative complications, including deep surgical site infection (odds ratio [OR], 2.78; confidence interval [CI], 1.09-7.10; P = 0.033), pulmonary complications (OR, 1.98; CI, 1.02-3.86; P = 0.044), blood transfusion (OR, 1.60; CI, 1.15-2.23; P = 0.005), and extended length of stay (OR, 1.58; CI, 1.17-2.16; P = 0.003). In patients on chronic steroid therapy, pulmonary comorbidity and extended operative time were additional risk factors that further predisposed to perioperative complications, including deep surgical site infection, blood transfusion, and extended length of stay. CONCLUSIONS: Chronic preoperative steroid therapy is associated with perioperative complications after ALF. Decisions about the discontinuing or holding steroid therapy preoperatively should be determined through an interdisciplinary approach between the medical and surgical teams.

Risk Factors Associated with 30-Day Mortality After Open Reduction and Internal Fixation of Vertebral Fractures.

OBJECTIVE: Few studies have examined the outcomes of open reduction and internal fixation of vertebral fractures. The purpose of this study was to determine patient-related and surgery-related risk factors associated with 30-day postoperative mortality after open reduction and internal fixation (ORIF) of cervical, thoracic, and lumbar vertebral fractures. METHODS: This was a retrospective cohort study of data from the 2010-2014 ACS-NSQIP database. Adult patients who underwent ORIF of vertebral fractures in the cervical, thoracic, or lumbar spine were included. Patients were divided into 2 groups on the basis of the occurrence of 30-day postoperative mortality. A univariate analysis was performed to compare baseline patient characteristics, comorbidities, operative variables, and 30-day postoperative complications between the mortality and nonmortality groups. A subsequent multivariate regression analysis adjusting for patient and operative factors was then performed to identify independent risk factors for 30-day mortality. RESULTS: A total of 900 patients who underwent vertebral ORIF were included. The overall 30-day postoperative mortality rate was 1.56%. The mortality group had a higher incidence of pneumonia, pulmonary complications, cardiac complications, blood transfusion, sepsis, and prolonged hospitalization. Multivariate regression analysis identified pulmonary comorbidity and diabetes as independent predictors of 30-day mortality following ORIF of vertebral fractures. CONCLUSIONS: Pulmonary comorbidity and diabetes were found to be independent risk factors for 30-day mortality after ORIF of vertebral fractures. Recognizing these risk factors is important in preoperative risk stratification, perioperative care, and patient counseling.

Risk Factors for Perioperative Complications in Morbidly Obese Patients Undergoing Elective Posterior Lumbar Fusion.

STUDY DESIGN: Retrospective cohort study. OBJECTIVES: The prevalence of obesity-related low back pain and degenerative disc disease is on the rise. Past studies have demonstrated that obesity is associated with higher perioperative complication rates, but there remains a gap in the literature regarding additional risk factors that further predispose this already high-risk patient population to poor surgical outcomes following elective posterior lumbar fusion (PLF). The aim of the study is to identify independent risk factors for poor 30-day perioperative outcomes in morbidly obese patients undergoing elective PLF. METHODS: We identified 22 909 patients in the American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Program database who underwent elective PLF. There were 1861 morbidly obese patients. Baseline patient demographics and medical comorbidities were collected. Univariate analysis was performed to compare perioperative complication rates between non-morbidly obese and morbidly obese patients. The 5 most common complications in the morbidly obese group were then selected for multivariate regression analysis to identify independent risk factors for poor 30-day outcomes. RESULTS: Morbidly obese patients had a higher perioperative complication rate. The 5 most common complications were prolonged hospitalization, blood transfusion, readmission, wound complications, and reoperation. Independent risk factors for these complications were age ≥65 years, super obesity (ie, BMI > 48.6), chronic steroid use, American Society of Anesthesiology classification ≥3, poor functional status, long length of fusion ≥4 levels, and extended operative time (ie, operative time ≥318 minutes). CONCLUSIONS: Morbidly obese patients are at higher risk of perioperative complications following elective PLF. Modifiable risk factors for the most common complications are obesity and preoperative steroid use.

Primary Versus Revision Discectomy for Adults With Herniated Nucleus Pulposus: A Propensity Score-Matched Multicenter Study.

STUDY DESIGN: Retrospective propensity score matched analysis. OBJECTIVE: To compare the incidence of any 30-day perioperative complication following primary and revision discectomy for lumbar disc herniation. METHODS: The American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Program (ACS-NSQIP) was used to identify patients undergoing primary or revision lumbar discectomy from 2005 to 2012. Propensity score matching was performed to create matched pairs of primary and revision discectomy cases for analysis. Univariate analysis was then performed to compare 30-day morbidity and mortality between propensity score-matched pairs. RESULTS: We identified 4730 cases of primary discectomy performed through a minimally invasive or open approach and 649 revision discectomy cases. Baseline patient characteristics and comorbidities were compared and then propensity score-matched adjustments were made to create 649 matched pairs of primary and revision cases. On univariate analysis, there were no significant differences in 30-day perioperative outcomes between the 2 groups. CONCLUSION: While there were no significant differences in 30-day perioperative complications between patients undergoing primary lumbar discectomy and those undergoing revision lumbar discectomy, this finding should be interpreted with caution since the ACS-NSQIP database lacks functional and pain outcomes, and also does not include dural tear or durotomy as a complication. Future large-scale and long-term prospective studies including these variables are needed to better understand the outcomes and complications following primary versus revision discectomy for lumbar disc herniation.

The Effects of Chronic Preoperative Steroid Therapy on Perioperative Complications Following Elective Posterior Lumbar Fusion.

STUDY DESIGN: Retrospective cohort study. OBJECTIVES: Chronic steroid therapy is used in the treatment of various inflammatory and autoimmune conditions, but it is known to be associated with adverse effects. There remains a gap in the literature regarding the role of chronic steroid therapy in predisposing patients to perioperative complications following elective posterior lumbar fusion (PLF). We aimed to identify the effects of chronic preoperative steroid therapy on 30-day perioperative complications in patients undergoing PLF. METHODS: A retrospective analysis was performed using the 2011-2014 American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Program (ACS-NSQIP) database. We identified 22 903 patients who underwent elective PLF. There were 849 patients (3.7%) who received chronic preoperative steroid therapy. Univariate and multivariate analyses were performed to examine steroid therapy as an independent risk factor for 30-day perioperative complications. A subgroup analysis of patients on chronic steroid therapy was then performed to identify additional patient characteristics that further increased the risk for perioperative complications. RESULTS: Chronic preoperative steroid therapy was an independent risk factor for 7 perioperative complications, including superficial surgical site infection (SSI), deep SSI, wound dehiscence, urinary tract infection, pulmonary embolism, nonhome discharge, and readmission. Subgroup analysis demonstrated that morbid obesity further predisposed patients on chronic steroid therapy to an increased risk of superficial SSI and wound dehiscence. CONCLUSIONS: Patients on chronic preoperative steroid therapy are at increased risk of multiple perioperative complications following elective PLF, particularly surgical site complications and venous thromboembolic events. This risk is further elevated in patients who are morbidly obese.

Converting Light Energy to Chemical Energy: A New Catalytic Approach for Sustainable Environmental Remediation.

We report a synthetic approach to form cubic Cu2O/Pd composite structures and demonstrate their use as photocatalytic materials for tandem catalysis. Pd nanoparticles were deposited onto Cu2O cubes, and their tandem catalytic reactivity was studied via the reductive dehalogenation of polychlorinated biphenyls. The Pd content of the materials was gradually increased to examine its influence on particle morphology and catalytic performance. Materials were prepared at different Pd amounts and demonstrated a range of tandem catalytic reactivity. H2 was generated via photocatalytic proton reduction initiated by Cu2O, followed by Pd-catalyzed dehalogenation using in situ generated H2. The results indicate that material morphology and composition and substrate steric effects play important roles in controlling the overall reaction rate. Additionally, analysis of the postreacted materials revealed that a small number of the cubes had become hollow during the photodechlorination reaction. Such findings offer important insights regarding photocatalytic active sites and mechanisms, providing a pathway toward converting light-based energy to chemical energy for sustainable catalytic reactions not typically driven via light.