Impact of dental prosthetic treatment and patients' expectations on the seven domains and four-dimensional scale of the Oral Health Impact Profile.

BACKGROUND: Recently, recommendations were given for a new scoring of the Oral Health Impact Profile (OHIP). The original seven domain structure should be replaced by a four-dimensional scale. OBJECTIVES: To investigate the effect of dental prosthetic treatment on the seven domains and the four-dimensional scale of the OHIP-G49/53 questionnaire. METHODS: Seventy four patients were grouped according their pre- and post-treatment situation and the type of treatment they received. Patients completed the OHIP-G49/53 questionnaire before prosthetic treatment (T0), and at 1 week (T1), 3 months (T2) and 6 months (T3) after treatment. Treatment effects on the seven domains and the four dimensions of the OHIP scale were analysed, and the oral health-related quality of life (OHRQoL) was measured. Patients' expectations of their prosthetic treatment were also evaluated. Data were analysed using two-way Mixed ANOVA, regression analysis, and Cronbach's alpha test with a level of significance of α ≤ .017. RESULTS: OHRQoL significantly improved following prosthetic treatment compared with baseline. The largest improvement was found between T0 and T1 evaluations (all p ≤ .001). Unlike the seven-domain scale, the four OHIP dimensions demonstrated further significant improvements across the T1/T2/T3 evaluations (all p ≤ .017). Different pre-treatment findings had different treatment effects on the four OHIP dimensions and seven OHIP domains. Patients' expectations were mainly fulfilled. CONCLUSION: Compared with the seven-domain scale, the four dimensions showed significant follow-up changes, suggesting the four dimensions are suitable for evaluating treatment effects up to 6 months. Clinically meaningful effects of dental prosthetic treatment can be sensitively measured using the four-dimensional OHIP scale.

Impact of Missing Teeth on Oral-Health-Related Quality of Life: A Prospective Bicenter Clinical Trial.

PURPOSE: To investigate the effect of missing teeth on patients' oral health-related quality of life (OHRQoL). MATERIALS AND METHODS: A total of 151 patients participated in this prospective bicenter clinical study (mean age: 64.7 ± 10.5 years; 71 women). Four subgroups were defined based on the number of missing teeth. OHRQoL was assessed using the German version of the Oral Health Impact Profile-49/53 (OHIP-G49/53) and visual analog scale (VAS) questionnaires. The effect of missing teeth on OHIP (total and by dimension) and VAS scores before and after prosthetic treatment was investigated at baseline (T0), 1 week (T1), and 3 months (T2) after prosthetic treatment. Scores were analyzed using Kolmogorov-Smirnov, Kruskal-Wallis, and Mann-Whitney U tests. Correlations were assessed using Spearman rho correlation. The level of significance was set at P = .05. RESULTS: Initial OHIP and VAS scores were highest for patients with 11 to 28 missing teeth. Scores improved among all groups between T0 and T1/T2. After prosthetic rehabilitation (T1), improvements in total OHIP scores were greatest for patients with no missing teeth or with 11 to 28 missing teeth. Patients with no missing teeth or with 1 to 4 missing teeth before treatment had the lowest posttreatment OHIP scores. Total OHIP scores among the groups were in the same value range (P > .185). No direct correlation was found between the VAS and total OHIP scores. CONCLUSION: OHIP and VAS scores for OHRQoL were associated with the number of missing teeth. Prosthetic treatment resulted in improved OHRQoL and oral function among all groups. The use of a VAS yielded additional detailed information.

Validation of the German-language version of the Liverpool Oral Rehabilitation Questionnaire version 3 and evaluation of oral-health-related quality of life among patients with squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck.

The aim of this study was to translate the Liverpool Oral Rehabilitation Questionnaire version 3 (LORQv3) into German and validate this version in order to assess oral-health-related quality of life (OHRQoL) among head and neck cancer patients. This study was conducted at a German university clinic among patients who had completed therapy for squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck (HNSCC). The original English-language LORQv3 was translated into German according to the forward-backward approach. Validity and reliability were evaluated using further questionnaires related to OHRQoL and psychological impairments. Subgroups were built with reference to oral rehabilitation status and type of cancer therapy. Furthermore, OHRQoL was evaluated. Test-retest reliability was assessed by weighted kappa with a 10-14 day interval. Data were analysed by using Spearman's correlation and the following tests: Shapiro-Wilk, Kruskal-Wallis, Mann-Whitney U and Cronbach's alpha. The level of significance was set at α = 0.05. Analysis of the LORQv3 evaluations revealed excellent Cronbach's alpha and high test-retest reliability. Construct validity were supported by the data. LORQv3 summary score and domains were significantly affected by status of oral rehabilitation (p = 0.003, p = 0.008, p = 0.024) and treatment approach (p < 0.001, p = 0.025, p = 0.035). The German version of the LORQv3 showed high reliability and validity and an impaired OHRQoL of HNSCC patients. It can therefore be recommended for the assessment of OHRQoL.

The flexural strength of CAD/CAM polymer crowns and the effect of artificial ageing on the fracture resistance of CAD/CAM polymer and ceramic single crowns.

OBJECTIVES: The purpose of this study was to investigate the fracture resistance, flexural strength and Weibull modulus of an innovative CAD/CAM polymer and to compare its fracture resistance with that of glass ceramics. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A total of 32 (n = 16 IPS e.max CAD (LIDI); n = 16 LuxaCam Composite (LUXA)) first mandibular molar crowns were fabricated and cemented onto metal dies by use of luting composite. Half of the specimens were loaded until fracture without prior artificial ageing. The other half were subjected to thermal (5°/55 °C) and mechanical (1,200,000 cycles, 80 N) cycling before fracture loading. Scanning electron microscopy was used to analyse fracture behaviour. A three-point bending test of the flexural strength of LUXA was performed according to ISO 6872:2008. Data were analysed by means of the Kolmogorov-Smirnov test, Mann-Whitney U-test (p < 0.05) and Weibull statistical analysis. RESULTS: Initial fracture resistance of LIDI was significantly higher than that of LUXA. However, the initial fracture resistance of LIDI decreased significantly after artificial ageing. After ageing, fracture resistance was 1050.29 ± 325.08 N for LUXA and 1250.09 ± 32.53 N for LIDI. Three-point bending test yielded a mean flexural strength value for LUXA of 145.28 ± 18.21 MPa and a Weibull modulus of m = 9.51. CONCLUSIONS: Polymer-based material tested in this study had a lower fracture resistance than that of the glass-ceramic material. Fracture resistance and flexural strength of LuxaCam Composite are sufficient for use in the first molar region. CLINICAL RELEVANCE: The mechanical properties of this innovative polymer-based material indicate it can be used in the first molar region as a suitable alternative to glass ceramics. Further clinical studies are required to confirm this. The study presents an innovative material as an alternative to glassceramic for the clinical use in dentistry. The materials investigated were differently affected by artificial aging. Clinical use for patients with bruxism may be considered.