Asunto(s)
Embolización Terapéutica , Embolización de la Arteria Uterina , Neoplasias Uterinas , Femenino , Humanos , Embolización de la Arteria Uterina/efectos adversos , Histerectomía/efectos adversos , Útero/irrigación sanguínea , Neoplasias Uterinas/cirugía , Embolización Terapéutica/efectos adversos , Resultado del TratamientoRESUMEN
OBJECTIVE: To ascertain the finding of future diagnosis of malignancy in women who undergo nonsurgical treatment for uterine fibroid disease with interventional radiology (IR) procedures. DESIGN: Mixed-methods retrospective cohort study. SETTING: Two tertiary care academic hospitals in Boston, Massachusetts. PATIENT(S): A total of 491 women who underwent radiologic intervention for fibroids between 2006 and 2016. INTERVENTION(S): Uterine artery embolization or high-intensity focused ultrasound ablation. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE(S): Subsequent surgical interventions and diagnosis of gynecologic malignancy after the IR procedure. RESULT(S): During the study period, 491 women underwent treatment of fibroids with IR procedures; follow-up information was available for 346 cases. The mean age was 45.3 ± 4.8 years, and 69.7% were between the ages of 40 and 49 years. Regarding ethnicity, 58.9% of patients were white, and 26.1% were black. The most common symptoms were abnormal uterine bleeding (87%), pelvic pressure (62.3%), and pelvic pain (60.9%). A total of 106 patients underwent subsequent surgical treatment of fibroids. Of the 346 patients who had follow-up, 4 (1.2%) were diagnosed with leiomyosarcoma after their interventional treatment for fibroids. An additional 2 cases of endometrial adenocarcinoma and 1 case of a premalignant lesion of the endometrium were noted. CONCLUSION(S): The proportion of patients who went on to be diagnosed with leiomyosarcoma after conservative IR treatments appears to be higher than previously reported. A thorough preprocedural workup and patient counseling regarding the possibility of underlying uterine malignancy should be undertaken.
Asunto(s)
Neoplasias de los Genitales Femeninos , Leiomioma , Leiomiosarcoma , Neoplasias Uterinas , Femenino , Humanos , Adulto , Persona de Mediana Edad , Estudios Retrospectivos , Radiología Intervencionista , Leiomioma/diagnóstico por imagen , Leiomioma/terapia , Neoplasias Uterinas/diagnóstico por imagen , Neoplasias Uterinas/cirugía , Resultado del TratamientoRESUMEN
PURPOSE: To review cases of uterine rupture and identify risk factors associated with adverse outcomes. METHODS: This study is a retrospective cohort of complete uterine ruptures diagnosed in a large hospital system in Massachusetts between 2004 and 2018. Baseline demographics, labor characteristics and outcomes of uterine rupture were collected from medical records. RESULTS: A total of 173 cases of uterine rupture were identified. There were 30 (17.3%) women with an unscarred uterus, while 142 (82.1%) had a scarred uterus. Adverse outcomes (n = 89, 51.4% of cases) included 26 (15.0%) hysterectomies, 55 (31.8%) blood transfusions, 18 (10.4%) bladder/ureteral injuries, 5 (2.9%) reoperations, 25 (14.5%) Apgar scores lower than 5 at 5 min and 9 (5.2%) perinatal deaths. Uterine rupture of a scarred uterus was associated with decreased risk of hemorrhage (OR 0.40, 95% CI 0.17-0.93), blood transfusion (OR 0.27, 95% CI 0.11-0.69), hysterectomy (OR 0.23, 95% CI 0.08-0.69) and any adverse outcome (OR 0.34, 95% CI 0.13-0.91) compared with unscarred rupture. Uterine rupture during vaginal delivery was associated with increased risk of transfusion (OR 6.55, 95% CI 1.53-28.05) and hysterectomy (OR 8.95, 95% CI 2.12-37.72) compared with emergent C-section. CONCLUSIONS: Although rare, uterine rupture is associated with adverse outcomes in over half of cases. Unscarred rupture and vaginal delivery demonstrate increased risk of adverse outcomes, highlighting the need for early diagnosis and operative intervention.