RESUMEN
OBJECTIVE: To provide healthcare professionals guidance on youth at risk for prolonged recovery and post-traumatic headache (PTH), and on pharmacologic and non-pharmacologic management of PTH due to concussion and mild traumatic brain injury. BACKGROUND: Headache is the most common persistent post-concussive symptom affecting 8% of youth for >3 months after concussion. Over the past decade, many studies have explored the treatment of PTH in youth, but there are no established guidelines. METHODS: This white paper is based on a synthesis of an updated systematic review of the literature on treatment of PTH and a narrative review of the literature on risk factors for prolonged recovery and health disparities. Results were interpreted by a group of expert providers in PTH in children and adolescents through collaboration of the PTH and pediatric special interest groups of the American Headache Society. RESULTS: Factors that consistently were associated with prolonged recovery from concussion and persistent PTH included female sex, a high number of acute symptoms, and adolescent age. Social determinants of health also likely play an important role in PTH and deserve consideration in the clinical and research settings. A total of 33 studies met the criteria for inclusion in the systematic review of PTH treatment in youth, although most were retrospective and of fair-to-poor quality. Treatment strategies included acute and preventive pharmacologic management, procedures, neuro-modulatory devices, physical therapy, physical activity, and behavioral health support. A collaborative care approach that includes a thoughtful combination of these management strategies is likely most effective. CONCLUSIONS: This white paper provides a roadmap for tailoring the treatment of PTH based on factors influencing prolonged headache, the timing of therapies, and therapies with the most evidence for treating PTH in youth. We also highlight research needed for developing more definitive guidelines on PTH management in youth.
RESUMEN
PURPOSE OF REVIEW: Headaches are common in children and adolescents. Treatments for debilitating migraine are often not FDA approved or lack evidence of efficacy for children. This narrative review looks at the evidence for acute and preventative pharmacologic and non-pharmacologic treatment of pediatric migraine, as well as reviewing any recent or ongoing clinical trials. RECENT FINDINGS: Studies have been published on pharmacological treatments for headache, as well as non-pharmacological treatments. Recent findings in pediatric migraine using onabotulinumtoxinA, calcitonin gene related peptide antagonists, interventional procedures, and devices are reviewed. Pharmacologic as well as non-pharmacologic approaches for the prevention and treatment of migraine show safety and efficacy data that is promising. These treatments should be incorporated in a multi-modal approach to the management of pediatric migraine. Continued studies, prospective and randomized, are needed to further assess these newer treatments for migraine in the pediatric setting.
Asunto(s)
Trastornos Migrañosos , Adolescente , Humanos , Niño , Estudios Prospectivos , Trastornos Migrañosos/tratamiento farmacológico , Trastornos Migrañosos/prevención & control , CefaleaRESUMEN
Background: Connective tissue disorders such as Ehlers-Danlos Syndrome (EDS) can affect collagen and elastin content and structure, including weakening of tissues and vasculature, thus contributing to multiple systemic manifestations. Prior research has successfully focused on peripheral life-threatening manifestations resulting in increased life expectancy, yet clinical observations have warranted investigation of neurological vulnerability, where little is known. Compromised brain tissues and cerebrovasculature could leave these patients vulnerable to mild traumatic brain injury (TBI), with increased severity and duration of post-concussive symptoms and delayed recovery. Clinical reports in adults indicate that higher severity of symptoms after a mild TBI, such as a concussion, can unmask connective tissues disorders leading toward diagnosis. This clinical case report is an example of a pediatric patient with presumed Ehlers-Danlos syndrome who demonstrates increased vulnerability to mild TBI/concussion. Patient: A pediatric female patient presents with unexplained lingering post-concussive symptoms, including trouble sleeping, nausea, frontal headaches, dizziness, visual changes, fatigue, and left-sided weakness more than 6 months post-mild concussion. Patient history of hypermobility, joint derangement, soft tissue mobility, and bruising suggests a potential diagnosis of Ehlers-Danlos syndrome, which may explain symptom severity and length of recovery. Discussion: This case is the first documented instance of increased vulnerability to TBI in a pediatric patient with presumed Ehlers-Danlos syndrome. It highlights the need for awareness and prevention of injury in this vulnerable patient population, suggests more targeted therapeutic intervention for recovery, and demonstrates the need for preclinical research evaluating the influence of genetic mutations associated with connective tissue disorders on the central nervous system.
RESUMEN
PURPOSE OF REVIEW: Headache disorders in children and adolescents are common. Among the different headache disorders, migraine and tension headache are highly prevalent and often debilitating. Pharmacological treatments for pediatric patients are often not approved or effective. Practice guidelines for prevention of pediatric headache and migraine are now incorporating information and recommendations regarding non-pharmacologic therapeutic options. Understanding the mechanism of action, safety, and efficacy of the non-pharmacologic as well as mindful-based therapeutic alternatives currently available for the management and treatment of headache and migraine may allow additional treatment alternatives for children with these conditions. RECENT FINDINGS: Studies have been published looking at non-pharmacologic treatments, and mindful-based approaches, namely relaxation, mindfulness meditation, yoga, and hypnosis as options for the treatment of headache and migraine, although there are few that examine these in children and adolescents. Several recent studies that have relevance to the care of children with headache and migraine are reviewed. Non-pharmacologic and mindful-based approaches for the prevention and treatment of headache and migraine in children show safety and efficacy data that is promising. Consider incorporating these multi-modal approaches into the therapeutic management strategies for the child or adolescent with headache and migraine. Additional prospective studies and/or randomized-controlled trials are necessary to further assess the efficacy and cost-effectiveness of these methods.
Asunto(s)
Trastornos Migrañosos , Atención Plena , Cefalea de Tipo Tensional , Adolescente , Niño , Cefalea/terapia , Humanos , Trastornos Migrañosos/terapia , Estudios ProspectivosRESUMEN
PURPOSE OF REVIEW: Episodic migraine is very common in children and adolescents, seen by primary care and specialists. In kids, this can greatly affect quality of life, including significant disability, specifically in terms of missed school and other activities. The goal of this paper is to give an overview of the most up-to-date thoughts on episodic migraine in the pediatric population. RECENT FINDINGS: Current options for both abortive and preventative treatments in kids, as well as specific non-pharmacological and lifestyle management recommendations for children, will be reviewed, as well as options for status migrainosus in the pediatric patient. Migraine pathophysiology is similar in adults and children with episodic migraine, but the approach to the management needs to be modified and adjusted in kids. Recognizing the impact on quality of life especially with regard to school and knowing appropriate treatment options can improve treatment and decrease the disability from this disorder.
Asunto(s)
Trastornos Migrañosos/diagnóstico , Trastornos Migrañosos/terapia , Adolescente , Adulto , Niño , Humanos , Estilo de Vida , Calidad de Vida , Ensayos Clínicos Controlados Aleatorios como AsuntoRESUMEN
Migraine is a condition that is common in the pediatric and adolescent population. Among children with migraine, visual aura can consist of either negative or positive features or both. Reports of sensory auras can also be elicited with a careful history. The understanding of the types of aura, as well as their relation to the more typical features of migraine, are discussed. The similar phenomena of visual snow and Alice in Wonderland syndrome in children are also described in detail.
Asunto(s)
Síndrome de Alicia en el País de las Maravillas/complicaciones , Migraña con Aura/complicaciones , Trastornos de la Visión/complicaciones , Niño , Femenino , HumanosRESUMEN
Children and adolescents can experience significant disability from frequent migraine. A number of tools have been developed to help quantify the impact of migraine in this population. Many preventative medications used in adults are routinely used to prevent migraines in children, although there has been less rigorous study. This article reviews the indications and evidence for the use of migraine preventatives, such as antidepressants, antihypertensives, anticonvulsants, antihistamines, and botulinum toxin, in this population.
Asunto(s)
Trastornos Migrañosos/diagnóstico , Trastornos Migrañosos/prevención & control , Profilaxis Pre-Exposición/métodos , Adolescente , Anticonvulsivantes/administración & dosificación , Antidepresivos/administración & dosificación , Antihipertensivos/administración & dosificación , Niño , Antagonistas de los Receptores Histamínicos/administración & dosificación , Humanos , PediatríaRESUMEN
We report a previously healthy 15 year old girl with acute onset of unilateral visual loss consistent with a diagnosis of monosymptomatic optic neuritis. Her symptoms responded well to the use of high-dose intravenous methylprednisolone. With very brief follow-up (2 months) she has had no subsequent difficulties. However, testing was positive for the presence of anti-aquaporin-4 antibodies in both serum and cerebrospinal fluid, which have been associated with neuromyelitis optica (NMO). While NMO antibodies lack complete sensitivity, there is high degree of specificity. Our patient does not meet currently accepted diagnostic criteria for NMO, but is likely at high-risk to develop myelitis or recurrent optic neuritis. There are no evidence-based guidelines for whether this patient should undergo disease-modifying treatment. Based upon the high-risk for clinical relapse, we have recommended immunosuppressive therapy with rituximab (anti-B cell monoclonal antibodies). While randomized trials for patients with this clinical scenario are unlikely, observational studies of a cohort of such patients would provide better guidance on the natural history and merits of disease-modifying therapy.
Asunto(s)
Neuromielitis Óptica/diagnóstico , Trastornos de la Visión/diagnóstico , Adolescente , Diagnóstico Diferencial , Potenciales Evocados Visuales , Ojo/patología , Femenino , Lateralidad Funcional , Humanos , Imagen por Resonancia Magnética , Neuromielitis Óptica/patología , Neuromielitis Óptica/fisiopatología , Trastornos de la Visión/tratamiento farmacológico , Trastornos de la Visión/patología , Trastornos de la Visión/fisiopatologíaRESUMEN
Lacosamide is a new antiepileptic drug that is currently approved by the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) for adults 17 years or older for partial-onset seizures. The authors reviewed 21 pediatric patients (<17 years) with various seizure types who were started on oral lacosamide as part of a prospective add-on study as adjunctive therapy for refractory epilepsy. Five patients were excluded due to less than 3 months of meaningful follow-up. Maintenance dosages used ranged from 2.4 to 19.4 mg/kg/d. Eight of 16 (50%) patients had greater than 50% reduction in seizure frequency with adjunctive lacosamide therapy. Eight (50%) patients had generalized epilepsy including 4 with Lennox-Gastaut syndrome. Lacosamide was effective therapy for most seizure types but was particularly effective for partial-onset seizures. Lacosamide was effective in treating 5 of 8 (62.5%) localization-related epilepsies but only 2 of 8 (25%) generalized epilepsies, both Lennox-Gastaut syndrome patients with greater than 90% seizure reduction. None of these very refractory patients remained seizure free.