RESUMEN
OBJECTIVES: Childhood-onset systemic lupus erythematosus (cSLE), representing 15%-20% of individuals with SLE, has been difficult to study globally due to differences between registries. This initiative, supported by Childhood Arthritis Rheumatology Research Alliance (CARRA) and Paediatric Rheumatology European Society (PReS), aims to create Core and Expanded cSLE Datasets to standardise and enhance research worldwide. METHODS: 21 international cSLE experts and 4 patients participated in a Delphi process (questionnaires, 2 topic-specific focus groups and 3 virtual consensus meetings) to create 2 standardised cSLE datasets. The Core cSLE Dataset was designed to include data essential to meaningful clinical research across many settings. The Expanded cSLE Dataset was designed for centres able to consistently collect data to address broader research questions. Final data items for the Core and Expanded datasets were determined by consensus defined as >80% agreement) using an adapted nominal group technique and voting. RESULTS: The resulting Core cSLE Dataset contains 46 items, including demographics, clinical features, laboratory results, medications and significant adverse events. The Expanded cSLE Dataset adds 26 additional items and includes patient-reported outcomes. Consensus was also achieved regarding the frequency and time points for data collection: baseline, quarterly follow-up visits, annually and flare visits. CONCLUSION: Standardised Core and Expanded cSLE Datasets for registry-based international cSLE research were defined through the consensus of global experts and patient/caregiver representatives, endorsed by CARRA and PReS. These datasets incorporate disease-specific and patient-specific features, optimised for diverse settings to facilitate international collaborative research for children and adolescents with SLE worldwide.
RESUMEN
In the past two decades, there has been a great deal of work aimed to devise diagnostic guidelines, classification criteria, and diagnostic scores for cytokine storm syndromes (CSSs). The most notable effort has been the large-scale multinational study that led to the development of the 2016 classification criteria for macrophage activation syndrome (MAS) complicating systemic juvenile idiopathic arthritis (JIA). Future studies should scrutinize the validity of the proposed criteria, particularly in systemic JIA patients treated with biologics, in children with subtle or incomplete forms of MAS, and in patients with MAS complicating other rheumatologic disorders. More generic CSS criteria are also available but often lack sensitivity and specificity in a wide variety of patient populations and CSSs of different etiologies. The coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19)-related lung disease led to an evolution of the concept of a "cytokine storm." Emerging and unsolved challenges in the diagnosis of the different forms of CSSs highlight the need for diagnostic tools and well-established classification criteria to enable timely recognition and correct classification of patients.
Asunto(s)
COVID-19 , Síndrome de Liberación de Citoquinas , Humanos , COVID-19/inmunología , COVID-19/diagnóstico , COVID-19/complicaciones , Síndrome de Liberación de Citoquinas/inmunología , Síndrome de Liberación de Citoquinas/diagnóstico , Síndrome de Liberación de Citoquinas/etiología , Síndrome de Activación Macrofágica/diagnóstico , Síndrome de Activación Macrofágica/clasificación , Síndrome de Activación Macrofágica/inmunología , Artritis Juvenil/diagnóstico , Artritis Juvenil/clasificación , Artritis Juvenil/inmunología , Artritis Juvenil/tratamiento farmacológico , SARS-CoV-2/inmunología , Niño , Citocinas/metabolismoRESUMEN
INTRODUCTION: Systemic juvenile idiopathic arthritis (sJIA), a multifaceted autoinflammatory disorder, can be complicated by life-threatening conditions such as macrophage activation syndrome (MAS) and interstitial lung disease (ILD). The management of these conditions presents a therapeutic challenge, underscoring the need for innovative treatment approaches. OBJECTIVES: to report the possible role of MAS825, a bispecific anti-IL1ß and IL-18 monoclonal antibody, in the treatment of multi-drug-resistant sJIA. METHODS: We report two patients affected by sJIA with severe and refractory MAS and high serum IL-18 levels, responding to dual blockade of IL-1ß and IL-18. RESULTS: The first patient is a 20-year-old man, presenting a severe MAS complicated by thrombotic microangiopathy, following SARS-CoV-2 infection. He was treated with MAS825, with quick improvement. Eighteen months later, the patient is still undergoing biweekly treatment with MAS825, associated with MTX, ciclosporin and low-dose glucocorticoids, maintaining good control over the systemic features of the disease.The second patient, a 10-year-old girl, presented a severe MAS case, complicated by posterior reversible encephalopathy syndrome (PRES), following an otomastoiditis. The MAS was not fully controlled despite treatment with IV high-dose glucocorticoids, anakinra and ciclosporin. She began biweekly MAS825, which led to a prompt amelioration of MAS parameters. After 10 months, the patient continues to receive MAS825 and is in complete remission. CONCLUSION: In light of the pivotal role of IL-1ß and IL-18 in sJIA, MAS and ILD, MAS825 might represent a possible valid and safe option in the treatment of drug-resistant sJIA, especially in the presence of high serum IL-18 levels.
RESUMEN
OBJECTIVE: To develop parent- and child-centered versions of the Juvenile Arthritis Disease Activity Score (JADAS) and to provide preliminary evidence of their validity. METHODS: Validation analyses were conducted on two large multinational datasets of patients with juvenile idiopathic arthritis (JIA) and included assessment of construct validity, internal consistency and structure, discriminative validity, responsiveness to change, and predictive validity. RESULTS: The parJADAS and patJADAS include four parent/patient-reported outcomes, each measured on a 0-10 scale: assessment of overall disease activity; rating of pain intensity; assessment of activity of joint disease; duration of morning stiffness. Both scores are calculated as the simple linear sum of the scores of their 4 components, which yields for both of them a global score of 0-40. The parJADAS and patJADAS demonstrated good construct validity, yielding high correlations with other JIA composite disease activity measures and moderate correlations with physician global rating and joint counts. Internal consistency was satisfactory, with Cronbach' s alpha > 0.80, and exploratory factor analysis showed that both indices are monodimensional. Both instruments discriminated well between different disease states, with discriminative ability being not affected by the presence of damage, proved able to predict important disease outcomes, and showed fair responsiveness to clinically important change, with standardized response mean of 0.71. CONCLUSION: Both parJADAS and patJADAS were found to possess good measurement properties and to serve as surrogate of physicians' evaluations. Regular home completion of the two instruments through digital technologies offers a suitable and pragmatic approach to deliver remote symptom monitoring and telehealth.
RESUMEN
OBJECTIVES: To examine the prevalence of temporomandibular disorders (TMD) in patients with juvenile fibromyalgia syndrome (JFS) and identify TMD characteristics specifically associated to JFS. METHODS: Signs and symptoms of TMD were assessed using a novel clinical tool specifically devised for children that consists of: 1. a self-report multiple-choice questionnaire; 2. a protocol for the clinical examination of the orofacial region. Multivariate logistic regression model was used to identify TMD features associated with JFS. RESULTS: Thirty JFS patients (median age 15.5 years) and 45 healthy controls (median age 15.0 years) were included in this cross-sectional study. Orofacial pain was reported by 26 of 30 JFS patients (86.7%) and by 3 of 45 controls (6.7%; p<0.001). Pain on TMJ palpation was present in 18 of 30 JFS patients (60%) and in 5 of 45 controls (11.1%; p<0.001). Median values of maximum spontaneous mouth opening, voluntary active opening and assisted passive opening were significantly higher in JFS patients than in controls. On multiple regression analysis spontaneous orofacial pain (OR: 21.0; p=0.005), diffuse tenderness on palpation of the masticatory muscles (OR: 14.9; p=0.026) and TMJ hypermobility (OR 1.42; p=0.008) were independently associated with JFS. CONCLUSIONS: The high prevalence of TMD in JFS highlights the need for a broader interdisciplinary evaluation of JFS patients. TMJ hypermobility, in addition to orofacial and masticatory muscle pain, is an important clue for the diagnosis of TMD in adolescents with JFS. Elucidating the link between these disorders will advance individualised management and improve treatment efficacy.
Asunto(s)
Dolor Facial , Fibromialgia , Dimensión del Dolor , Trastornos de la Articulación Temporomandibular , Humanos , Fibromialgia/epidemiología , Fibromialgia/diagnóstico , Fibromialgia/fisiopatología , Adolescente , Dolor Facial/epidemiología , Dolor Facial/diagnóstico , Dolor Facial/fisiopatología , Dolor Facial/etiología , Femenino , Trastornos de la Articulación Temporomandibular/epidemiología , Trastornos de la Articulación Temporomandibular/diagnóstico , Trastornos de la Articulación Temporomandibular/fisiopatología , Prevalencia , Masculino , Estudios Transversales , Niño , Estudios de Casos y Controles , Modelos Logísticos , Valor Predictivo de las Pruebas , Palpación , Análisis Multivariante , Encuestas y Cuestionarios , Factores de Edad , Oportunidad Relativa , Articulación Temporomandibular/fisiopatología , Autoinforme , Factores de RiesgoRESUMEN
OBJECTIVE: To assess current treatment in macrophage activation syndrome (MAS) worldwide and to highlight any areas of major heterogeneity of practice. METHODS: A systematic literature search was performed in both Embase and PubMed databases. Paper screening was done by two independent teams based on agreed criteria. Data extraction was standardized following the PICO framework. A panel of experts assessed paper validity, using the Joanna Briggs Institute appraisal tools and category of evidence (CoE) according to EULAR procedure. RESULTS: Fifty-seven papers were finally included (80% retrospective case-series), describing 1148 patients with MAS: 889 systemic juvenile idiopathic arthritis (sJIA), 137 systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE), 69 Kawasaki disease (KD) and 53 other rheumatologic conditions. Fourteen and 11 studies specified data on MAS associated to SLE and KD, respectively. All papers mentioned glucocorticoids (GCs), mostly methylprednisolone and prednisolone (90%); dexamethasone was used in 7% of patients. Ciclosporin was reported in a wide range of patients according to different cohorts. Anakinra was used in 179 MAS patients, with a favourable outcome in 83% of sJIA-MAS. Etoposide was described by 11 studies, mainly as part of HLH-94/04 protocol. Emapalumab was the only medication tested in a clinical trial in 14 sJIA-MAS, with 93% of MAS remission. Ruxolitinib was the most reported JAK-inhibitor in MAS. CONCLUSION: High-dose GCs together with IL-1 and IFNγ inhibitors have shown efficacy in MAS, especially in sJIA-associated MAS. However, global level of evidence on MAS treatment, especially in other conditions, is still poor and requires standardized studies to be confirmed.
RESUMEN
Current HLH-2004-based diagnostic criteria for familial hemophagocytic lymphohistiocytosis (FHL) are based on expert opinion. Here we performed a case-control study to test and possibly improve these clinical criteria. We also developed two complementary expert opinion-based diagnostic strategies for FHL in patients with signs/symptoms suggestive of HLH, based on genetic and cellular cytotoxicity assays. The cases (n=366) were children <16 years with verified familial and/or genetic FHL (n=341) or Griscelli syndrome type 2 (GS2) (n=25); 276 from the HLH-94/HLH-2004 databases and 90 from the Italian HLH Registry. All fulfilled the HLH-94/HLH-2004 patient inclusion criteria. Controls were 374 children with systemic-onset juvenile idiopathic arthritis (sJIA) and 329+361 children in two cohorts with febrile infections that could be confused with HLH and sepsis, respectively. To provide complete data sets, multiple imputations were performed. The optimal model, based on the number of diagnostic criteria fulfilled from 17 variables studied, reveled almost similar diagnostic thresholds as the existing criteria, with accuracy 99.1% (sensitivity 97.1%; specificity 99.5%). Notably, assessment of the original HLH-2004 criteria revealed accuracy 97.4% (sensitivity 99.0%; specificity 97.1%). Since cellular cytotoxicity assays here constitute a separate diagnostic strategy, HLH-2004 criteria without NK-cell function was also studied which showed accuracy 99.0% (sensitivity 96.2%; specificity 99.5%). Thus, we conclude that the HLH-2004 criteria (without NK-cell function) have significant validity in their current form when tested against severe infections or sJIA. It is important to exclude underlying malignancies and atypical infections. In addition, complementary cellular and genetic diagnostic guidelines can facilitate necessary confirmation of clinical diagnosis.
RESUMEN
OBJECTIVES: To develop and validate classification criteria for axial disease in youth with juvenile spondyloarthritis (SpA; AxJSpA). METHODS: This international initiative consisted of four phases: 1) Item generation; 2) Item reduction; 3) Criteria development; and 4) Validation of the AxJSpA criteria by an independent team of experts in an internationally representative Validation cohort. RESULTS: These criteria are intended to be used on youth with a physician diagnosis of juvenile SpA and for whom axial disease is suspected. Item generation consisted of a systematic literature review and a free-listing exercise using input from international physicians and collectively resulted in 108 items. After the item reduction exercise and expert panel input, 37 items remained for further consideration. The final AxJSpA criteria domains included: imaging: active inflammation, imaging: structural lesions, pain chronicity, pain pattern, pain location, stiffness, and genetics. The most heavily weighted domains were active inflammation and structural lesions on imaging. Imaging typical of sacroiliitis was deemed necessary, but not sufficient, to classify a youth with AxJSpA. The threshold for classification of AxJSpA was a score of ≥55 (out of 100). When tested in the validation data set, the final criteria had a specificity of 97.5% (95% CI: 91.4-99.7), sensitivity of 64.3% (95% CI: 54.9-73.1) and Area Under the Receiver Operating Characteristic (AUROC) curve of 0.81 (95% CI: 0.76-0.86). CONCLUSIONS: The new AxJSpA classification criteria require an entry criterion, physician diagnosis of juvenile SpA, and include seven weighted domains. The AxJSpA classification criteria are validated and designed to identify participants for research studies.
Asunto(s)
Pediatría , Reumatología , Medios de Comunicación Sociales , Humanos , Reumatología/educación , Pediatría/educación , NiñoRESUMEN
OBJECTIVES: The aim of the study was to establish an international multicenter registry to collect data on patients with Multisystem Inflammatory Syndrome in Children (MIS-C), in order to highlight a relationship between clinical presentation, age of onset and geographical distribution on the clinical outcome. STUDY DESIGN: Multicenter retrospective study involving different international societies for rare immunological disorders.1009 patients diagnosed with MIS-C between March and September 2022, from 48 centers and 22 countries were collected. Five age groups (<1, 1-4, 5-11, 12-16, >16 years) and four geographic macro-areas, Western Europe, Central-Eastern Europe, Latin America, Asian-African resource-limited countries (LRC), were identified. RESULTS: Time to referral was significantly higher in LRC. Intensive anti-inflammatory treatment, including biologics, respiratory support and mechanic ventilation were more frequently used in older children and in European countries. The mortality rate was higher in very young children (<1 year), in older patients (>16 years of age) and in LRC. Multivariate analysis identified the residence in LRC, presence of severe cardiac involvement, renal hypertension, lymphopenia and non-use of heparin prophylaxis, as the factors most strongly associated with unfavorable outcomes. CONCLUSIONS: The stratification of patients by age and geographic macro-area provided insights into the clinical presentation, treatment and outcome of MIS-C. The mortality and sequelae rates exhibited a correlation with the age and geographical areas. Patients admitted and treated in LRC displayed more severe outcomes, possibly due to delays in hospital admission and limited access to biologic drugs and to intensive care facilities.
Asunto(s)
Edad de Inicio , COVID-19 , Sistema de Registros , SARS-CoV-2 , Síndrome de Respuesta Inflamatoria Sistémica , Humanos , Niño , COVID-19/epidemiología , COVID-19/mortalidad , COVID-19/complicaciones , Preescolar , Femenino , Masculino , Lactante , Adolescente , Estudios Retrospectivos , Síndrome de Respuesta Inflamatoria Sistémica/epidemiología , Síndrome de Respuesta Inflamatoria Sistémica/diagnóstico , Síndrome de Respuesta Inflamatoria Sistémica/terapia , Europa (Continente)/epidemiología , Recién NacidoAsunto(s)
Azetidinas , Purinas , Pirazoles , Sulfonamidas , Humanos , Pirazoles/uso terapéutico , Azetidinas/uso terapéutico , Sulfonamidas/uso terapéutico , Purinas/uso terapéutico , Masculino , Femenino , Niño , Preescolar , MutaciónRESUMEN
Deposition of autoantibodies in glomeruli is a key factor in the development of lupus nephritis (LN). For a long time, anti-dsDNA and anti-C1q antibodies were thought to be the main cause of the kidney damage. However, recent studies have shown that the list of autoantibidies that have renal tropism and deposit in the kidney in LN is increasing and the link between anti-dsDNA and renal pathology is weak due to potential confounders. Aspecific bindings of dsDNA with cationic antibodies and of anti-dsDNA with several renal antigens such as actinin, laminin, entactin, and annexinA2 raised doubts about the specific target of these antibodies in the kidney. Moreover, the isotype of anti-dsDNA in SLE and LN has never received adequate interest until the recent observation that IgG2 are preponderant over IgG1, IgG3 and IgG4. Based on the above background, recent studies investigated the involvement of anti-dsDNA IgG2 and of other antibodies in LN. It was concluded that circulating anti-dsDNA IgG2 levels do not distinguish between LN versus non-renal SLE, and, in patients with LN, their levels do not change over time. Circulating levels of other antibodies such as anti-ENO1 and anti-H2 IgG2 were, instead, higher in LN vs non-renal SLE at the time of diagnosis and decreased following therapies. Finally, new classes of renal antibodies that potentially modify the anti-inflammatory response in the kidney are emerging as new co-actors in the pathogenetic scenario. They have been defined as 'second wave antibodies' for the link with detoxifying mechanisms limiting the oxidative stress in glomeruli that are classically stimulated in a second phase of inflammation. These findings have important clinical implications that may modify the laboratory approach to LN. Serum levels of anti-ENO1 and anti-H2 IgG2 should be measured in the follow up of patients for designing the length of therapies and identify those patients who respond to treatments. Anti-SOD2 could help to monitor and potentiate the anti-inflammatory response in the kidney.
Asunto(s)
Autoanticuerpos , Nefritis Lúpica , Nefritis Lúpica/inmunología , Nefritis Lúpica/diagnóstico , Humanos , Autoanticuerpos/inmunología , Autoanticuerpos/sangre , Animales , Anticuerpos Antinucleares/inmunología , Anticuerpos Antinucleares/sangre , Inmunoglobulina G/inmunología , Inmunoglobulina G/sangre , Autoantígenos/inmunologíaRESUMEN
In the past two decades, the treatment of juvenile idiopathic arthritis (JIA) has evolved markedly, owing to the availability of a growing number of novel, potent and relatively safe therapeutic agents and the shift of management strategies towards early achievement of disease remission. However, JIA encompasses a heterogeneous group of diseases that require distinct treatment approaches. Furthermore, some old drugs, such as methotrexate, sulfasalazine and intraarticular glucocorticoids, still maintain an important therapeutic role. In the past 5 years, information on the efficacy and safety of drug therapies for JIA has been further enriched through the accomplishment of several randomized controlled trials of newer biologic and synthetic targeted DMARDs. In addition, a more rational therapeutic approach has been fostered by the promulgation of therapeutic recommendations and guidelines. A multinational collaborative effort has led to the development of the recommendations for the treat-to-target strategy in JIA. There is currently increasing interest in establishing the optimal time and modality for discontinuation of treatment in children with JIA who achieve sustained clinical remission. The aim of this Review is to summarize the current evidence and discuss the therapeutic approaches to the management of non-systemic phenotypes of JIA, including oligoarthritis, polyarthritis, enthesitis-related arthritis and psoriatic arthritis.
Asunto(s)
Antirreumáticos , Artritis Juvenil , Artritis Psoriásica , Niño , Humanos , Artritis Juvenil/tratamiento farmacológico , Antirreumáticos/uso terapéutico , Metotrexato/uso terapéutico , Sulfasalazina/uso terapéutico , Artritis Psoriásica/tratamiento farmacológico , Resultado del TratamientoRESUMEN
OBJECTIVES: To develop and validate the cut-offs in the Juvenile DermatoMyositis Activity Index (JDMAI) to distinguish the states of inactive disease (ID), low disease activity (LDA), moderate disease activity (MDA) and high disease activity (HDA) in children with juvenile dermatomyositis (JDM). METHODS: For cut-off definition, data from 139 patients included in a randomised clinical trial were used. Among the six versions of the JDMAI, JDMA1 (score range 0-40) and JDMAI2 (score range 0-39) were selected. Optimal cut-offs were determined against external criteria by calculating different percentiles of score distribution and through receiver operating characteristic curve analysis. External criteria included the modified Pediatric Rheumatology International Trials Organization (PRINTO) criteria for clinically ID in JDM (for ID) and PRINTO levels of improvement in the clinical trial (for LDA and HDA). MDA cut-offs were set at the score interval between LDA and HDA cut-offs. Cut-off validation was conducted by assessing construct and discriminative ability in two cohorts including a total of 488 JDM patients. RESULTS: The calculated JDMAI1 cut-offs were ≤2.4 for ID, ≤6.6 for LDA, 6.7-11 for MDA and >11 for HDA. The calculated JDMAI2 cut-offs were ≤5.2 for ID, ≤8.5 for LDA, 8.6-11.3 for MDA and >11.3 for HDA. The cut-offs discriminated strongly among disease activity states defined subjectively by caring physicians and parents, parents' satisfaction or non-satisfaction with illness outcome, levels of pain, fatigue, physical functional impairment and physical well-being. CONCLUSIONS: Both JDMAI1 and JDMAI2 cut-offs revealed good metrologic properties in validation analyses and are, therefore, suited for application in clinical practice and research.
Asunto(s)
Dermatomiositis , Médicos , Reumatología , Niño , Humanos , Dermatomiositis/diagnóstico , Curva ROC , Índice de Severidad de la Enfermedad , Ensayos Clínicos Controlados Aleatorios como AsuntoRESUMEN
OBJECTIVE: The main aim of this study was to define the best treatment option for multisystem inflammatory syndrome in children (MIS-C) and to analyse the role of anakinra. METHODS: This is a multicentre retrospective cohort study. Patients were treated according to the attending physician's decision. The patients were divided into four groups on the basis of the first treatment at time of admittance: (i) IVIG, (ii) IVIG and methylprednisolone (≤2 mg/kg/day), (iii) IVIG with high-dose methylprednisolone (>2 mg/kg/day) and (iv) anakinra with or without IVIG and/or methylprednisolone. Primary outcomes were defined as the presence of at least one of the following features: death, the failure of initial treatment, meaning the need for additional treatment for clinical worsening and cardiac involvement at the end of follow-up. RESULTS: Two hundred thirty-nine patients were recruited. At univariate analysis, persistent heart involvement at discharge was more frequent in those not receiving anakinra as initial treatment (3/21 vs 66/189; P = 0.047). After comparisons between the four treatment regimens, adjusting for the propensity score, we observed that early treatment with anakinra was associated with a lower probability of developing persistent heart disease at the end of follow-up (odds ratio: 0.6; 95% CI: 0.4-1.0). CONCLUSION: We report that early treatment with anakinra is safe and very effective in patients with severe MIS-C. In addition, our study suggests that early treatment with anakinra is the most favourable option for patients with a higher risk of developing a severe disease outcome.
Asunto(s)
COVID-19/complicaciones , Inmunoglobulinas Intravenosas , Proteína Antagonista del Receptor de Interleucina 1 , Síndrome de Respuesta Inflamatoria Sistémica , Niño , Humanos , Proteína Antagonista del Receptor de Interleucina 1/uso terapéutico , Estudios Retrospectivos , Gravedad del Paciente , MetilprednisolonaRESUMEN
INTRODUCTION: Much has been written and spoken about telemedicine since about two decades including an article in this journal at the start of the pandemic. It took a global catastrophe to enforce its usage across the world in various medical specialties. Telemedicine however remains unstructured, unregulated and lacks uniformity. DISCUSSION: This article highlights the practical learnings and opinions of the authors who provided over two thousand video consults and asynchronous telemedicine services through the entire pandemic. It includes lessons learnt from emerging economies where pediatric rheumatologists are scarce. Pediatric rheumatology, which relies heavily on history, musculoskeletal and skin examination is aptly suited to exploit telemedicine in its synchronous and asynchronous forms. Pediatric tele rheumatology could temporarily address the shortage and uneven distribution of specialists in vast parts of the globe, besides serving as a method of triage and shared care with the primary physician. Reduction of direct and indirect costs and family/primary physician education are additional benefits. There also exist challenges for all stakeholders and it is important to address the latter. CONCLUSION: The learnings of the pandemic suggest a vital role for telemedicine in the practice of pediatric rheumatology. This is a fertile area for research and consensus building by international and national pediatric societies and issue position statements like some adult bodies already have. The authors speculate a hybrid system of care in the not-so-distant future.
Asunto(s)
Reumatología , Telemedicina , Adulto , Humanos , Niño , Derivación y ConsultaRESUMEN
Background: The treatment of multisystem inflammatory syndrome in children unresponsive to first-line therapies (IVIG and/or steroids) is challenging. The effectiveness of IL-1 receptor antagonist, anakinra, is debated. Patients and methods: We conducted an anonymous retrospective multicenter study on MIS-C patients treated with anakinra in Italy from January 2020 to February 2021. Our study outcomes included the percentage of patients who required further therapeutic step-up, the percentage of patients who experienced fever resolution within 24â h and a reduction of CRP by half within 48â h, and the percentage of patients who developed Coronary Artery Anomalies (CAA) during follow-up. Results: 35 cases of MIS-C were treated in 10 hospitals. Of these, 13 patients started anakinra while in the ICU, and 22 patients started anakinra in other wards. 25 patients (71.4%) were treated with corticosteroids at a starting dose 2-30â mg/Kg/day plus IVIG (2â g/Kg), 10 patients (28.6%) received only corticosteroids without IVIG. Anakinra was administered intravenously to all patients in Group A (mean dose 8â mg/Kg/day), and subcutaneously in Group B (mean dose 4â mg/Kg/day). Only two patients required further treatment step-up and no patients developed CAA after receiving anakinra. The most commonly observed side effect was an increase in ALT, occurring in 17.1% of patients. Conclusions: In this retrospective cohort of severe MIS-C patients treated with anakinra we report favorable clinical outcomes with a low incidence of side effects. The simultaneous use of steroids ± IVIG in these patients hinders definitive conclusions regarding the need of IL-1 inhibition in MIS-C treatment.
RESUMEN
PURPOSE OF REVIEW: To summarize the current evidence on the adoption of the treat-to-target (T2T) strategy in pediatric rheumatic diseases (PRD). RECENT FINDINGS: The recent advances in the management of PRD have markedly increased the ability to achieve disease remission. Complete disease quiescence is regarded as the ideal therapeutic goal because its attainment leads to lesser long-term damage and physical disability, and to optimization of quality of life. Studies in adult rheumatic diseases have shown that patient outcomes are improved if complete suppression of the inflammatory process is aimed for by frequent adjustments of therapy according to quantitative indices. This approach, which underlies the T2T concept, has been applied in strategic trials in rheumatoid arthritis (RA). Furthermore, recommendations for the T2T have been issued for RA and other adult rheumatic diseases. There is currently a growing interest for the introduction of T2T in PRD, and recommendations for treating juvenile idiopathic arthritis (JIA) to target were promulgated. A similar initiative has been undertaken for childhood-onset systemic lupus erythematosus. Preliminary therapeutic studies have explored the T2T design in JIA. The T2T strategy is a modern therapeutic approach that holds the promise of improving the outcomes in patients with PRD.