Straight Leg Raise Cannot Replace Computed Tomography in the Detection of Spinal Column Fractures.

INTRODUCTION: An active straight leg raise (SLR) is a weight bearing test which assesses pain upon movement and a patient's ability to load their pelvis, lumbar, and thoracic spine. Since many stable patients undergo computed tomography (CT) scanning solely for spinal tenderness, our hypothesis is that performing active straight leg raising could effectively rule out lumbar and thoracic vertebral fractures. METHODS: Blunt trauma patients ≥18 years of age with Glasgow Coma Scale 15 presenting in hemodynamically stable condition were screened. Patients remaining in the supine position were asked to perform SLR at 12, 18, and 24 inches above the bed. The patient's ability to raise the leg, baseline pain, and pain at each level were assessed. Patients also underwent standard CT scanning of the chest, abdomen and pelvis. The clinical examination results were then matched post hoc with the official radiology reports. RESULTS: 99 patients were screened, 65 males and 34 females. Spinal fractures were present in 15/99 patients (16%). Mechanisms of injury included motor vehicle collision 51%, pedestrian struck 25%, fall1 9%, and other 4%. The median pain score of patients with and without significant spinal fractures at 12, 18, 24 inches was 7.5, 7, 6 and 5, 5, 4, respectively. At 24 inches, active SLR had sensitivity of 0.47, a specificity of 0.59, a positive predictive value of 0.17, and an negative predictive value of 0.86. CONCLUSIONS: Although SLR has been discussed as a useful adjunct to secondary survey and physical exam following blunt trauma, its positive and more importantly negative predictive value are insufficient to rule out spinal column fractures. Liberal indications for CT based upon mechanism and especially pain and tenderness are necessary to identify all thoraco-lumbar spine fractures.

Diversity in Plastic Surgery: Analysis of Representation of Sex and Ethnic Diversity in Plastic Surgery Residency Social Media Accounts.

BACKGROUND: Increasing health care diversity is critical to overcoming disparities. Plastic surgery has been working to improve diversity through various efforts, including social media movements like Diversify PRS and #ilooklikeasurgeon. Because residency programs' social media sites serve as a public symbol of the programs' values and can attract potential applicants, we sought to analyze such platforms for content highlighting sex and ethnic diversity. METHODS: Integrated plastic surgery residency programs during the 2020 to 2021 academic year were found on the American Council of Academic Plastic Surgeons website, and their associated social media accounts were identified. The authors reviewed each program's account for all posts published by November 8, 2021, for content promoting sex or ethnic diversity. Any hashtags related to diversity were also recorded. Nonparametric Mann-Whitney U and Kruskal-Wallis tests were used to compare percentages of total social media posts related to sex and ethnic diversity between programs (α = 0.05). RESULTS: Of 82 programs, 76 (92.7%) had active Instagram accounts, 29 (35.4%) had active Facebook accounts, and 29 (35.4%) had active Twitter accounts. Across all platforms, 19.0% of all posts were promoting sex diversity and 3.3% were promoting ethnic diversity. Of 4651 posts promoting sex diversity, 4067 (87.4%) highlighted women, 1017 (21.9%) featured all-women teams, 779 (16.7%) used sex diversity-related hashtags, and 300 (6.5%) included purposeful statements. Of 808 posts promoting ethnic diversity, 527 (65.2%) used ethnic diversity-related hashtags, 224 (27.7%) included purposeful statements, 199 (24.6%) mentioned ethnic background, and 36 (4.5%) used different skin-toned emojis. Programs did not vary in percentages of posts related to diversity by geographic region, ranking, accreditation length, or engagement rate. The percentage of posts promoting sex diversity was greater than that promoting ethnic diversity (P < 0.001). The most used diversity hashtag was #ilooklikeasurgeon. CONCLUSIONS: Despite the importance of increasing recruitment of trainees from diverse backgrounds to plastic surgery and the global reach of social media movements like #ilooklikeasurgeon, sex and ethnic diversity are still poorly promoted on residency social media accounts. Increasing such content is a simple yet powerful way to create a culture of inclusivity for all applicants.

A Social Media Analysis of Wellness Culture in Plastic Surgery Residency.

BACKGROUND: Burnout, "a psychological syndrome of emotional exhaustion, depersonalization, and reduced personal accomplishment", afflicts approximately one third of plastic surgery attending surgeons and residents. Burnout can be detrimental to resident training and patient outcomes. Therefore, cultivating wellness during residency is essential. In fact, the Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education requires residency programs to create learning and working environments that optimize faculty and resident wellness. With increasing social media use by plastic surgery residency programs, this study aimed to analyze their posts for wellness-related content. METHODS: Integrated plastic surgery residency programs were obtained from the American Council of Academic Plastic Surgeons Web site, and their associated social media accounts were identified. The authors reviewed all post images, captions, and comments made by the program's account, until July 3, 2021. Any hashtags relating to wellness were also recorded. RESULTS: Of 82 programs, 76 (92.7%) had active Instagram accounts, 31 (37.8%) had active Facebook accounts, and 30 (36.6%) had active Twitter accounts. Instagram had higher rates of engagement than Facebook and Twitter (P < 0.001). Across all platforms, the mean percent of total posts related to wellness was 18.87%. The most common wellness content showcased resident work-life balance (48.73%), followed by educational events incorporating wellness activities (27.61%), attention to physical health (17.71%), healthy work environments (5.29%), wellness-specific activities (3.25%), team building activities (2.40%), and images implying but not directly showing resident wellness (1.46%). Programs did not vary significantly in percentages of total posts related to wellness by geographic region, ranking, or accreditation length. In total, 1893 wellness-related hashtags were used on Instagram, 253 on Facebook, and 72 on Twitter. The most used wellness-related hashtag was #residentlife. Only 40.8% to 50.8% of posts using wellness hashtags met at least 1 wellness criterion. CONCLUSION: Despite the importance of burnout prevention during plastic surgery residency, less than a quarter of residency program social media content promote wellness. Social media can demonstrate how residency programs are incorporating wellness into their curricula, but whether residencies lack sufficient wellness initiatives or are not advertising such programming on their social media accounts remains to be studied.

Research Productivity of Integrated Plastic Surgery Residents: Does Reputation Matter?

INTRODUCTION: It is unknown whether the ranking of plastic surgery residency programs influences resident research output. This study aims to determine whether program reputation and other factors are associated with integrated plastic surgery resident academic productivity. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Programs were divided into four tiers based on Doximity reputation rankings. Residents from 2019 to 2020 were found through program websites and social media accounts. Works published during residency were identified through PubMed and Scopus from July 1 of each resident's intern year to August 10, 2020. Variables included resident demographics and medical school, residency reputation ranking, geographic region, and medical school affiliation. 'High research output' was defined as having ≥75th percentile of publications adjusted by training year. RESULTS: In total, 921 residents in 80 programs were identified. The median (IQR) number of total publications and original articles was 3 (1-6) and 2 (0-4), respectively. On multivariable analysis, residents in top-20 ranked programs (OR = 2.31, 95% CI [1.55; 3.43], P < 0.001) or from programs associated with top-20 medical schools (OR = 1.61, 95% CI [1.08; 2.41], P = 0.020) were more likely to have higher research output. On the other hand, coming from a top-50 in research medical school (OR = 1.80, 95% CI [1.31; 2.47], P < 0.001) or being in a program affiliated with a top-20 medical school (OR = 2.52, 95% CI [1.69; 3.78], P < 0.001) were associated with higher original article output. Gender and geographic location were not associated with higher research output. CONCLUSIONS: Program reputation and affiliated medical school research rankings are associated with research productivity during integrated plastic surgery residency. Applicants with a particular interest in research careers may consider this as they apply to residency.

Trends in Female Plastic Surgery Resident Authorship - Signs of Changing Times?

OBJECTIVE: Gender discrepancies exist in academia for leadership positions, advancement opportunities, and research. As of 2019, the ratio of total male-to-female attending plastic and reconstructive surgeons was 4.8:1. However, the ratio of male-to-female residents in integrated plastic surgery programs fell to 1.3:1, indicating rising female representation. With more balanced gender distributions of residents, the authors sought to determine whether this translates to greater equality of opportunities and achievements. Specifically, this study compares the academic productivity of male and female integrated plastic surgery residents. METHODS: A list of integrated plastic surgery residency programs was obtained from the Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education website and ranked by reputation using the Doximity Residency Navigator. Integrated plastic surgery residents from 2019 to 2020 were identified via program websites and social media accounts. Works published during residency were identified through PubMed and Scopus from July 1 of each resident's intern year through August 10, 2020. Demographic variables for residents, including training class and medical school, as well as for programs, including geographic region, Doximity ranking, and medical school affiliation, were collected. Medical schools were ranked according to US News by research. Research productivity was assessed through the number of total research articles with authorship position (first, second, or last), the number of articles published in plastic surgery journals with the highest impact factors (Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery and Aesthetic Surgery Journal), and H-indices. Chi-Squared tests and Mann-Whitney U-tests were used to make comparisons between male and female residents (α = 0.05). RESULTS: In total, 931 residents in 81 integrated plastic surgery programs were identified, including 534 (57.4%) male and 397 (42.6%) female residents. There were no differences between male and female residents in terms of training year or program geography. Female residents were more likely to come from a top-50 medical school than males (54.7% vs. 48.1%, p = 0.049). There were no significant differences in gender distribution of residents from top-20 programs or programs affiliated with a top-20 medical school. The median (IQR) number of publications in total, and for each gender, was 3 (1-6). There was no difference in the number of total publications by training year by gender, besides the second-year resident class where male residents had a median (IQR) of 2 (1-4) compared to 1 (0-3) (p = 0.028). Male and female residents did not differ with regards to authorship position or proportion of times publishing in top journals. The distribution of H-indices for male residents was slightly higher than female residents (p = 0.003), but the median (IQR) was the same at 3 (1-5). CONCLUSIONS: Currently, male and female integrated plastic surgery residents have similar levels of academic productivity. This suggests that female representation is slowly increasing along the pipeline in academia, representing a paradigm shift from previous trends of gender inequality in plastic surgery.

The Utilization of YouTube as a Resource on Hair Loss Treatments.

INTRODUCTION: To the best of our knowledge, no previous studies have evaluated the quality of videos discussing hair loss treatments METHODS: YouTube was searched on December 10, 2019, using the relevance and view count filters for the following search terms: hair loss treatment, baldness, alopecia, male pattern baldness, and female pattern baldness. The DISCERN criterion for assessing consumer health information was used to evaluate each video. A score of 1 indicates a low overall video quality, whereas a 5 indicates a high-quality source of information for patients. The DISCERN treatment assessment is a validated tool to assess the quality of patient information about treatment choices. Two-sample t tests and Mann-Whitney U tests were used to determine significance. RESULTS: We analyzed 90 videos receiving a total of 108,240,496 views with a mean view count of 1,202,672 views per video (Table 1). Pharmaceuticals including minoxidil and finasteride were the most commonly mentioned treatment (30% of videos) followed by nutraceuticals (20%). YouTube influencers (Table 2) represented 37.8% of authors followed by companies/advertisers (15.6%). Seventeen videos (18.9%) included board-certified dermatologists. The mean DS overall was 2.66, and the mean DS for bias was 2.98. DISCUSSION: Our data demonstrate the extensive use of YouTube for hair loss treatment information. While YouTube can be a valuable resource for patients, videos are often biased and can misinform patients. Moreover, the lack of a central review process or governing body to validate claims made in videos can be a safety concern. EBM LEVEL V: This journal requires that authors assign a level of evidence to each article. For a full description of these Evidence-Based Medicine ratings, please refer to the Table of Contents or the online Instructions to Authors www.springer.com/00266 .

Integrative multiplatform molecular profiling of benign prostatic hyperplasia identifies distinct subtypes.

Benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH), a nonmalignant enlargement of the prostate, is among the most common diseases affecting aging men, but the underlying molecular features remain poorly understood, and therapeutic options are limited. Here we employ a comprehensive molecular investigation of BPH, including genomic, transcriptomic and epigenetic profiling. We find no evidence of neoplastic features in BPH: no evidence of driver genomic alterations, including low coding mutation rates, mutational signatures consistent with aging tissues, minimal copy number alterations, and no genomic rearrangements. At the epigenetic level, global hypermethylation is the dominant process. Integrating transcriptional and methylation signatures identifies two BPH subgroups with distinct clinical features and signaling pathways, validated in two independent cohorts. Finally, mTOR inhibitors emerge as a potential subtype-specific therapeutic option, and men exposed to mTOR inhibitors show a significant decrease in prostate size. We conclude that BPH consists of distinct molecular subgroups, with potential for subtype-specific precision therapy.

Association of Smoking and Death from Genitourinary Malignancies: Analysis of the National Longitudinal Mortality Study.

PURPOSE: We explored the association between tobacco use and genitourinary cancer specific survival in a contemporary, nationally representative sample of the United States civilian population. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A total of 493,282 participants in the National Longitudinal Mortality Study who provided detailed tobacco information from 1993 to 2005 were included in study. Our primary outcome was death from bladder, kidney or prostate cancer. Cause of death was determined from death certificates. Analyzed smoking parameters included smoking status at the time of the survey, age at the start of smoking and home smoking rules. Multivariable Cox regression models were used to assess associations of different smoking parameters with bladder, kidney and prostate cancer specific mortality. RESULTS: During a 5-year followup 5.6% of participants who had ever smoked died compared to 3.1% of those who had never smoked (p <0.0001). Of those who died of bladder, kidney and prostate cancer 62%, 58% and 62%, respectively, were ever smokers. On multivariable analysis ever smoking was associated with bladder and kidney cancer mortality (HR 1.92, 95% CI 1.25-2.97, and HR 1.54, 95% CI 1.01-2.34, respectively). Additionally, starting to smoke during teenage years and smoking at home were associated with bladder cancer specific mortality (HR 2.14, 95% CI 1.28-3.56 and HR 2.99, 95% CI 1.34-6.65) and kidney cancer specific mortality (HR 1.65, 95% CI 1.03-2.66 and HR 2.84, 95% CI 1.54-5.23, respectively). However, only everyday smoking was associated with an increased risk of prostate cancer mortality (HR 1.81, 95% CI 1.30-2.53). CONCLUSIONS: In a nationally representative study we confirmed the association between smoking intensity and mortality from genitourinary malignancies. Starting to smoke at a younger age and smoking at home conferred a significantly higher risk of death from bladder and kidney cancers.