Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 18 de 18
Filtrar
1.
Adv Radiat Oncol ; 9(2): 101326, 2024 Feb.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38405314

RESUMEN

Purpose: The autosegmentation algorithm of Siemens Healthineers version VA 30 (AASH) (Siemens Healthineers, Erlangen, Germany) was trained and developed in the male pelvis, with no published data on its usability in the female pelvis. This is the first multi-institutional study to describe and evaluate an artificial intelligence algorithm for autosegmentation of the pelvic nodal region by gender. Methods and Materials: We retrospectively evaluated AASH pelvic nodal autosegmentation in both male and female patients treated at our network of institutions. The automated pelvic nodal contours generated by AASH were evaluated by 1 board-certified radiation oncologist. A 4-point scale was used for each nodal region contour: a score of 4 is clinically usable with minimal edits; a score of 3 requires minor edits (missing nodal contour region, cutting through vessels, or including bowel loops) in 3 or fewer computed tomography slices; a score of 2 requires major edits, as previously defined but in 4 or more computed tomography slices; and a score of 1 requires complete recontouring of the region. Pelvic nodal regions included the right and left side of the common iliac, external iliac, internal iliac, obturator, and midline presacral nodes. In addition, patients were graded based on their lowest nodal contour score. Statistical analysis was performed using Fisher exact tests and Yates-corrected χ2 tests. Results: Fifty-two female and 51 male patients were included in the study, representing a total of 468 and 447 pelvic nodal regions, respectively. Ninety-six percent and 99% of contours required minor edits at most (score of 3 or 4) for female and male patients, respectively (P = .004 using Fisher exact test; P = .007 using Yates correction). No nodal regions had a statistically significant difference in scores between female and male patients. The percentage of patients requiring no more than minor edits was 87% (45 patients) and 92% (47 patients) for female and male patients, respectively (P = .53 using Fisher exact test; P = .55 using Yates correction). Conclusions: AASH pelvic nodal autosegmentation performed very well in both male and female pelvic nodal regions, although with better male pelvic nodal autosegmentation. As autosegmentation becomes more widespread, it may be important to have equal representation from all sexes in training and validation of autosegmentation algorithms.

2.
Adv Radiat Oncol ; 9(3): 101408, 2024 Mar.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38304110

RESUMEN

Purpose: To maximize the therapeutic ratio, it is important to identify adverse prognostic features in men with prostate cancer, especially among those with intermediate risk disease, which represents a heterogeneous group. These men may benefit from treatment intensification. Prior studies have shown pretreatment mpMRI may predict biochemical failure in patients with intermediate and/or high-risk prostate cancer undergoing conventionally fractionated external beam radiation therapy and/or brachytherapy. This study aims to evaluate pretreatment mpMRI findings as a marker for outcome in patients undergoing stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT). Methods and Materials: We identified all patients treated at our institution with linear accelerator based SBRT to 3625 cGy in 5 fractions, with or without androgen deprivation therapy (ADT) from November 2015 to March 2021. All patients underwent pretreatment Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI). Posttreatment Prostate Specific Imaging (PSA) measurements were typically obtained 4 months after SBRT, followed by every 3 to 6 months thereafter. A 2 sample t test was used to compare preoperative mpMRI features with clinical outcomes. Results: One hundred twenty-three men were included in the study. Pretreatment MRI variables including median diameter of the largest intraprostatic lesion, median number of prostate lesions, and median maximal PI-RADS score, were each predictive of PSA nadir and time to PSA nadir (P < .0001). When separated by ADT treatment, this association remained for patients who were not treated with ADT (P < .001). In patients who received ADT, the pretreatment MRI variables were each significantly associated with time to PSA nadir (P < .01) but not with PSA nadir (P > 0.30). With a median follow-up time of 15.9 months (IQR: 8.5-23.3), only 3 patients (2.4%) experienced biochemical recurrence as defined by the Phoenix criteria. Conclusions: Our experience shows the significant ability of mpMRI for predicting PSA outcome in prostate cancer patients treated with SBRT with or without ADT. Since PSA nadir has been shown to correlate with biochemical failure, this information may help radiation oncologists better counsel their patients regarding outcome after SBRT and can help inform future studies regarding who may benefit from treatment intensification with, for example, ADT and/or boosts to dominant intraprostatic lesions.

3.
J Appl Clin Med Phys ; 25(5): e14295, 2024 May.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38335253

RESUMEN

PURPOSE/OBJECTIVE: Field size limitations on Halcyon and Ethos treatment machines largely preclude use of the conventional monoisocentric three-field technique for breast/chest wall and regional lymph nodes. We present an alternative, IMRT-based planning approach that facilitates treatment on Halcyon and Ethos while preserving plan quality. MATERIALS/METHODS: Eight breast and regional node cases (four left-sided, four right-sided) were planned for an Ethos machine using a 15-17 field IMRT technique. Institutional plan quality metrics for CTV and PTV coverage and OAR sparing were assessed. Five plans (four right-sided, one left-sided) were also planned using a hybrid 3D multisocenter technique. CTV coverage and OAR sparing were compared to the IMRT plans. Eclipse scripting tools were developed to aid in beam placement and plan evaluation through a set of dosimetric scorecards, and both are shared publicly. RESULTS: On average, the IMRT plans achieved breast CTV and PTV coverage at 50 Gy of 97.9% and 95.7%, respectively. Supraclavicular CTV and PTV coverages at 45 Gy were 100% and 95.5%. Axillary lymph node CTV and PTV coverages at 45 Gy were 100% and 97.1%, and IMN CTV coverage at 45 Gy was 99.2%. Mean ipsilateral lung V20 Gy was 19.3%, and average mean heart dose was 1.6 Gy for right-sided cases and 3.0 Gy for left-sided. In comparison to the hybrid 3D plans, IMRT plans achieved higher breast and supraclavicular CTV coverage (99.9% vs. 98.6% and 99.9% vs. 93.4%), higher IMN coverage (99.6% vs. 78.2%), and lower ipsilateral lung V20 Gy (19.6% vs. 28.2%). CONCLUSION: Institutional plan quality benchmarks were achieved for all eight cases using the IMRT-based planning approach. The IMRT-based planning approach offered superior conformity and OAR sparing than a competing hybrid 3D approach.


Asunto(s)
Neoplasias de la Mama , Ganglios Linfáticos , Órganos en Riesgo , Dosificación Radioterapéutica , Planificación de la Radioterapia Asistida por Computador , Radioterapia de Intensidad Modulada , Pared Torácica , Humanos , Planificación de la Radioterapia Asistida por Computador/métodos , Radioterapia de Intensidad Modulada/métodos , Femenino , Pared Torácica/efectos de la radiación , Órganos en Riesgo/efectos de la radiación , Neoplasias de la Mama/radioterapia , Ganglios Linfáticos/efectos de la radiación
4.
Adv Radiat Oncol ; 8(6): 101295, 2023.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37457822

RESUMEN

Purpose: A scoring mechanism called the scorecard that objectively quantifies the dosimetric plan quality of pancreas stereotactic body radiation therapy treatment plans is introduced. Methods and Materials: A retrospective analysis of patients with pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma receiving stereotactic body radiation therapy at our institution between November 2019 and November 2020 was performed. Ten patients were identified. All patients were treated to 36 Gy in 5 fractions, and organs at risk (OARs) were constrained based on Alliance A021501. The scorecard awarded points for OAR doses lower than those cited in Alliance A021501. A team of 3 treatment planners and 2 radiation oncologists, including a physician resident without plan optimization experience, discussed the relative importance of the goals of the treatment plan and added additional metrics for OARs and plan quality indexes to create a more rigorous scoring mechanism. The scorecard for this study consisted of 42 metrics, each with a unique piecewise linear scoring function which is summed to calculate the total score (maximum possible score of 365). The scorecard-guided plan, the planning and optimization for which were done exclusively by the physician resident with no prior plan optimization experience, was compared with the clinical plan, the planning and optimization for which were done by expert dosimetrists, using the Sign test. Results: Scorecard-guided plans had, on average, higher total scores than those clinically delivered for each patient, averaging 280.1 for plans clinically delivered and 311.7 for plans made using the scorecard (P = .003). Additionally, for most metrics, the average score of each metric across all 10 patients was higher for scorecard-guided plans than for clinically delivered plans. The scorecard guided the planner toward higher coverage, conformality, and OAR sparing. Conclusions: A scorecard tool can help clarify the goals of a treatment plan and provide an objective method for comparing the results of different plans. Our study suggests that a completely novice treatment planner can use a scorecard to create treatment plans with enhanced coverage, conformality, and improved OAR sparing, which may have significant effects on both tumor control and toxicity. These tools, including the scorecard used in this study, have been made freely available.

5.
BJU Int ; 124(5): 768-774, 2019 11.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31141307

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVES: To determine the rate of Gleason Grade Group (GGG) upgrading in African-American (AA) men with a prior diagnosis of low-grade prostate cancer (GGG 1 or GGG 2) on 12-core systematic biopsy (SB) after multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging (mpMRI) and fusion biopsy (FB); and whether AA men who continued active surveillance (AS) after mpMRI and FB fared differently than a predominantly Caucasian (non-AA) population. PATIENTS AND METHODS: A database of men who had undergone mpMRI and FB was queried to determine rates of upgrading by FB amongst men deemed to be AS candidates based on SB prior to referral. After FB, Kaplan-Meier curves were generated for AA men and non-AA men who then elected AS. The time to GGG upgrading and time continuing AS were compared using the log-rank test. RESULTS: AA men referred with GGG 1 disease on previous SB were upgraded to GGG ≥3 by FB more often than non-AA men, 22.2% vs 12.7% (P = 0.01). A total of 32 AA men and 258 non-AA men then continued AS, with a median (interquartile range) follow-up of 39.19 (24.24-56.41) months. The median time to progression was 59.7 and 60.5 months, respectively (P = 0.26). The median time continuing AS was 61.9 months and not reached, respectively (P = 0.80). CONCLUSIONS: AA men were more likely to be upgraded from GGG 1 on SB to GGG ≥3 on initial FB; however, AA and non-AA men on AS subsequently progressed at similar rates following mpMRI and FB. A greater tendency for SB to underestimate tumour grade in AA men may explain prior studies that have shown AA men to be at higher risk of progression during AS.


Asunto(s)
Negro o Afroamericano , Biopsia Guiada por Imagen/métodos , Imágenes de Resonancia Magnética Multiparamétrica/métodos , Neoplasias de la Próstata , Anciano , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Próstata/diagnóstico por imagen , Próstata/patología , Neoplasias de la Próstata/diagnóstico por imagen , Neoplasias de la Próstata/mortalidad , Neoplasias de la Próstata/patología , Estudios Retrospectivos , Espera Vigilante
6.
Urol Oncol ; 37(6): 352.e25-352.e30, 2019 06.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31000430

RESUMEN

INTRODUCTION: Using multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging (mpMRI), we sought to preoperatively characterize prostate cancer (PCa) in the setting of antiandrogen plus androgen deprivation therapy (AA-ADT) prior to robotic-assisted radical prostatectomy (RARP). We present our preliminary findings regarding mpMRI depiction of changes of disease staging features and lesion appearance in treated prostate. METHODS: Prior to RARP, men received 6 months of enzalutamide and goserelin. mpMRI consisting of T2 weighted, b = 2,000 diffusion weighted imaging, apparent diffusion coefficient mapping, and dynamic contrast enhancement sequences was acquired before and after neoadjuvant therapy. Custom MRI-based prostate molds were printed to directly compare mpMRI findings to H&E whole-mount pathology as part of a phase II clinical trial (NCT02430480). RESULTS: Twenty men underwent imaging and RARP after a regimen of AA-ADT. Positive predictive values for post-AA-ADT mpMRI diagnosis of extraprostatic extension, seminal vesicle invasion, organ-confined disease, and biopsy-confirmed PCa lesions were 71%, 80%, 80%, and 85%, respectively. Post-treatment mpMRI correctly staged disease in 15/20 (75%) cases with 17/20 (85%) correctly identified as organ-confined or not. Of those incorrectly staged, 2 were falsely positive for higher stage features and 1 was falsely negative. Post-AA-ADT T2 weighted sequences best depicted presence of PCa lesions as compared to diffusion weighted imaging and dynamic contrast enhancement sequences. CONCLUSION: mpMRI proved reliable in detecting lesion changes after antiandrogen therapy corresponding to PCa pathology. Therefore, mpMRI of treated prostates may be helpful for assessing men for surgical planning and staging.


Asunto(s)
Imágenes de Resonancia Magnética Multiparamétrica , Prostatectomía/métodos , Neoplasias de la Próstata/patología , Neoplasias de la Próstata/cirugía , Procedimientos Quirúrgicos Robotizados , Anciano , Antagonistas de Andrógenos/uso terapéutico , Antineoplásicos Hormonales/uso terapéutico , Benzamidas , Goserelina/uso terapéutico , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Estadificación de Neoplasias/métodos , Nitrilos , Feniltiohidantoína/análogos & derivados , Feniltiohidantoína/uso terapéutico , Periodo Preoperatorio , Neoplasias de la Próstata/diagnóstico por imagen , Neoplasias de la Próstata/tratamiento farmacológico
7.
Urol Oncol ; 37(6): 356.e1-356.e7, 2019 06.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30902489

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVES: To study the short and intermediate surgical, renal functional, and oncologic outcomes of multiplex partial nephrectomy (mPN) and standard partial nephrectomy (sPN) in the setting of a solitary kidney. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Review of a prospectively maintained database of patients undergoing solitary kidney partial nephrectomy at our institution was performed. Patients were stratified into 2 cohorts: mPN-where 3 or more renal tumors were resected and sPN-where 1 or 2 tumors were resected. Perioperative, renal functional, and oncological outcomes were compared. RESULTS: Ninety-three patients with a solitary kidney underwent a total of 121 surgical procedures; 43 (35.5%) were sPN and 78 (64.4%) were mPN. The total and major (Clavien Grade III and IV) complication rates between sPN and mPN were similar (57.1% vs. 70.1%, P = 0.2; 31.0% vs. 35.1%, P = 0.3). At 12 months post-op, the percentage of patients with eGFR > 45 was similar in each group (sPN 87.0%, mPN 73.7%; P = 0.2), and long-term hemodialysis rates were 4.7% and 6.4%, respectively. Completion nephrectomy was performed in 2.3% of sPN and 2.6% of mPN. At a median follow-up of 40.1 months, the metastasis rate was 8.6% in the sPN group and 4.1% in the mPN group (P = 0.4). CONCLUSIONS: Partial nephrectomy in the setting of a solitary kidney can effectively preserve renal function. The renal functional and oncologic outcomes were similar in sPN and mPN, with low hemodialysis rates and complication rates within the expected range of these operations. Three or more tumors in a solitary kidney should not be a contraindication for nephron sparing surgery.


Asunto(s)
Neoplasias Renales/complicaciones , Neoplasias Renales/cirugía , Nefrectomía/métodos , Riñón Único/complicaciones , Adulto , Anciano , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , National Cancer Institute (U.S.) , Estudios Retrospectivos , Resultado del Tratamiento , Estados Unidos
8.
Radiology ; 290(3): 709-719, 2019 03.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30667329

RESUMEN

Purpose To evaluate MRI features associated with pathologically defined extraprostatic extension (EPE) of prostate cancer and to propose an MRI grading system for pathologic EPE. Materials and Methods In this prospective study, consecutive male study participants underwent preoperative 3.0-T MRI from June 2007 to March 2017 followed by robotic-assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy. An MRI-based EPE grading system was defined as follows: curvilinear contact length of 1.5 cm or capsular bulge and irregularity were grade 1, both features were grade 2, and frank capsular breach were grade 3. Multivariable logistic regression and decision curve analyses were performed to compare the MRI grade model and clinical parameters (prostate-specific antigen, Gleason score) for pathologic EPE prediction by using the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) value. Results Among 553 study participants, the mean age was 60 years ± 8 (standard deviation); the median prostate-specific antigen value was 6.3 ng/mL. A total of 125 of 553 (22%) participants had pathologic EPE at radical prostatectomy. Detection of pathologic EPE, defined as number of pathologic EPEs divided by number of participants with individual MRI features, was as follows: curvilinear contact length, 88 of 208 (42%); capsular bulge and irregularity, 78 of 175 (45%); and EPE visible at MRI, 37 of 56 (66%). For MRI, grades 1, 2, and 3 for detection of pathologic EPE were 18 of 74 (24%), 39 of 102 (38%), and 37 of 56 (66%), respectively. Clinical features plus the MRI-based EPE grading system (prostate-specific antigen, International Society of Urological Pathology stage, MRI grade) predicted pathologic EPE better than did MRI grade alone (AUC, 0.81 vs 0.77, respectively; P < .001). Conclusion Higher MRI-based extraprostatic extension (EPE) grading categories were associated with a greater risk of pathologic EPE. Clinical features plus MRI grading had the highest diagnostic performance for prediction of pathologic EPE. © RSNA, 2019 Online supplemental material is available for this article. See also the editorial by Eberhardt in this issue.


Asunto(s)
Imágenes de Resonancia Magnética Multiparamétrica , Neoplasias de la Próstata/diagnóstico por imagen , Neoplasias de la Próstata/patología , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Clasificación del Tumor , Estudios Prospectivos , Antígeno Prostático Específico/sangre , Prostatectomía , Neoplasias de la Próstata/cirugía , Riesgo , Procedimientos Quirúrgicos Robotizados
9.
World J Urol ; 37(2): 235-241, 2019 Feb.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29785491

RESUMEN

INTRODUCTION: Multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging (mpMRI) has improved clinicians' ability to detect clinically significant prostate cancer (csPCa). Combining or fusing these images with the real-time imaging of transrectal ultrasound (TRUS) allows urologists to better sample lesions with a targeted biopsy (Tbx) leading to the detection of greater rates of csPCa and decreased rates of low-risk PCa. In this review, we evaluate the technical aspects of the mpMRI-guided Tbx procedure to identify possible sources of error and provide clinical context to a negative Tbx. METHODS: A literature search was conducted of possible reasons for false-negative TBx. This includes discussion on false-positive mpMRI findings, termed "PCa mimics," that may incorrectly suggest high likelihood of csPCa as well as errors during Tbx resulting in inexact image fusion or biopsy needle placement. RESULTS: Despite the strong negative predictive value associated with Tbx, concerns of missed disease often remain, especially with MR-visible lesions. This raises questions about what to do next after a negative Tbx result. Potential sources of error can arise from each step in the targeted biopsy process ranging from "PCa mimics" or technical errors during mpMRI acquisition to failure to properly register MRI and TRUS images on a fusion biopsy platform to technical or anatomic limits on needle placement accuracy. CONCLUSIONS: A better understanding of these potential pitfalls in the mpMRI-guided Tbx procedure will aid interpretation of a negative Tbx, identify areas for improving technical proficiency, and improve both physician understanding of negative Tbx and patient-management options.


Asunto(s)
Próstata/patología , Neoplasias de la Próstata/patología , Errores Diagnósticos/prevención & control , Reacciones Falso Negativas , Humanos , Biopsia Guiada por Imagen , Imagen por Resonancia Magnética , Masculino , Próstata/diagnóstico por imagen , Neoplasias de la Próstata/diagnóstico por imagen , Ultrasonografía/métodos
10.
J Urol ; 201(1): 84-90, 2019 01.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30577395

RESUMEN

PURPOSE: Active surveillance has gained acceptance as an alternative to definitive therapy in many men with prostate cancer. Confirmatory biopsies to assess the appropriateness of active surveillance are routinely performed and negative biopsies are regarded as a favorable prognostic indicator. We sought to determine the prognostic implications of negative multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging-transrectal ultrasound guided fusion biopsy consisting of extended sextant, systematic biopsy plus multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging guided targeted biopsy of suspicious lesions on magnetic resonance imaging. MATERIALS AND METHODS: All patients referred with Gleason Grade Group 1 or 2 prostate cancer based on systematic biopsy performed elsewhere underwent confirmatory fusion biopsy. Patients who continued on active surveillance after a positive or a negative fusion biopsy were followed. The baseline characteristics of the biopsy negative and positive cases were compared. Cox regression analysis was used to determine the prognostic significance of a negative fusion biopsy. Kaplan-Meier survival curves were used to estimate Grade Group progression with time. RESULTS: Of the 542 patients referred with Grade Group 1 (466) or Grade Group 2 (76) cancer 111 (20.5%) had a negative fusion biopsy. A total of 60 vs 122 patients with a negative vs a positive fusion biopsy were followed on active surveillance with a median time to Grade Group progression of 74.3 and 44.6 months, respectively (p <0.01). Negative fusion biopsy was associated with a reduced risk of Grade Group progression (HR 0.41, 95% CI 0.22-0.77, p <0.01). CONCLUSIONS: A negative confirmatory fusion biopsy confers a favorable prognosis for Grade Group progression. These results can be used when counseling patients about the risk of progression and for planning future followup and biopsies in patients on active surveillance.


Asunto(s)
Imagen por Resonancia Magnética/métodos , Neoplasias de la Próstata/diagnóstico por imagen , Ultrasonografía Intervencional/métodos , Espera Vigilante , Anciano , Progresión de la Enfermedad , Humanos , Biopsia Guiada por Imagen/métodos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Clasificación del Tumor , Pronóstico , Estudios Prospectivos , Próstata/diagnóstico por imagen , Próstata/patología , Neoplasias de la Próstata/patología , Estudios Retrospectivos
11.
Transl Androl Urol ; 7(5): 844-854, 2018 Oct.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30456187

RESUMEN

Several imaging modalities exist for the investigation of prostate cancer (PCa). From ultrasound to computed tomography (CT) and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), the role of imaging in detecting lesion foci, staging, and localizing disease after biochemical recurrence (BCR) is expanding. However, many of the conventional imaging modalities are suboptimal, particularly in the detection of metastasis. Positron emission tomography (PET) has recently emerged as a promising tool in PCa management. The ability to develop radiolabeled tracers for functional imaging based on characteristics of PCa cells can potentially provide more insight into management by utilizing key features of those cells, such as metabolic activity, increased proliferation, and receptor expression. 18-flurodeoxyglucose (FDG) is one of the earliest tracers used in PET imaging that takes advantage of increased metabolism of glucose. Its role in PCa has been somewhat limited due to poor resolution and confounders including noise resulting from the proximity of the prostate to the bladder. Choline, a precursor molecule for a major component of the cell membrane, phosphatidylcholine, shows increased uptake in cells with rapid proliferation. When compared to metabolic based imaging techniques with FDG, choline PET/CT was superior. Nevertheless, choline PET/CT was not equivocal to MRI in detection of local disease, but was superior to conventional imaging in localizing metastasis and lymph node metastasis (LNM). Fluciclovine is another novel marker that utilizes the increased proliferation seen in tumor cells. Studies have shown it to be superior to choline PET/CT in PCa management, particularly in patients with BCR. As with choline PET/CT, studies that have assessed the impact of fluciclovine on clinical practice have highlighted the impact of these new tracers on clinical decision making. Most recently, the newest molecular probe targeting prostate specific membrane antigen (PSMA) was developed. It offers higher detection rates compared to choline PET/CT and conventional imaging modalities and has shown promise in LNM and BCR. With the wide range of available PET tracers, this review aims to highlight the role of each in lesion foci detection, primary staging, disease recurrence and explore the potential clinical impact.

12.
Diagn Interv Radiol ; 24(5): 316-320, 2018 Sep.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30211685

RESUMEN

PURPOSE: In the era of multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging (mpMRI) of the prostate gland, incidental findings are occasionally discovered on imaging. We aimed to report our experience of detecting incidental bladder cancers on mpMRI of the prostate in asymptomatic patients without irritative voiding symptoms or microscopic or gross hematuria. METHODS: A retrospective review was performed on a prospectively maintained database of all men who underwent prostate mpMRI at our institution from 2012 to 2018. Patients who were found to have incidental bladder lesions were identified and baseline demographics, imaging and histopathologic data were recorded. All patients with incidental bladder lesion detection on mpMRI, not attributable to extension of prostate cancer, underwent cystoscopy in addition to a biopsy and/or transurethral resection of bladder tumor (TURBT) if warranted on cystoscopy. RESULTS: There were 3147 prostate mpMRIs performed during this period and 25 cases (0.8%) of incidental bladder lesions were detected. These patients did not have any presenting symptoms such as gross or microscopic hematuria to prompt bladder lesion workup. The largest diameter of incidentally discovered bladder lesions ranged from 0.4 cm to 1.7 cm. Of the 25 cases of incidental bladder lesions, five were suspected to be due to prostate cancer invasion into the bladder. Only two of these five patients underwent biopsy, which confirmed prostate adenocarcinoma in both cases. Of the 20 patients without suspected prostate cancer invasion of the bladder, four had no suspicious lesions on cystoscopy to warrant a biopsy. The remaining 16 patients had bladder lesions seen on cystoscopy and underwent a biopsy and/or TURBT. Three of these patients had benign features on pathology (urachal remnant, amyloidosis and inflammation) and the remaining 13 had stage Ta urothelial carcinoma. Seven of these patients had low-grade Ta tumors and six had high-grade Ta tumors. All patients were treated with standard management of TURBT with or without intravesical BCG. There have been no reported cases of recurrence or progression in any of the patients in our cohort at the median follow-up of 26 months (interquartile range,19-40 months). CONCLUSION: mpMRI of the prostate may yield incidental findings, such as small bladder tumors. Awareness of the possibility of incidental bladder lesions is important as 65% of lesions reported in the bladder, not attributable to extension of prostate cancer, proved to be bladder cancer. This may allow for early intervention for asymptomatic patients with undetected bladder cancer prior to disease progression.


Asunto(s)
Imagen por Resonancia Magnética/métodos , Próstata/diagnóstico por imagen , Neoplasias de la Próstata/diagnóstico por imagen , Neoplasias de la Vejiga Urinaria/diagnóstico por imagen , Administración Intravesical , Anciano , Enfermedades Asintomáticas/epidemiología , Concienciación , Cistoscopía/métodos , Humanos , Hallazgos Incidentales , Imagen por Resonancia Magnética/normas , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Invasividad Neoplásica/patología , Estudios Prospectivos , Próstata/patología , Neoplasias de la Próstata/patología , Estudios Retrospectivos , Tasa de Supervivencia , Neoplasias de la Vejiga Urinaria/patología , Neoplasias de la Vejiga Urinaria/cirugía
13.
J Urol ; 200(5): 1114-1121, 2018 11.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29940248

RESUMEN

PURPOSE: The relative value of rigid or elastic registration during magnetic resonance imaging/ultrasound fusion guided prostate biopsy has been poorly studied. We compared registration errors (the distance between a region of interest and fiducial markers) between rigid and elastic registration during fusion guided prostate biopsy using a prostate phantom model. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Four gold fiducial markers visible on magnetic resonance imaging and ultrasound were placed throughout 1 phantom prostate model. The phantom underwent magnetic resonance imaging and the fiducial markers were labeled as regions of interest. An experienced user and a novice user of fusion guided prostate biopsy targeted regions of interest and then the corresponding fiducial markers on ultrasound after rigid and then elastic registration. Registration errors were compared. RESULTS: A total of 224 registration error measurements were recorded. Overall elastic registration did not provide significantly improved registration error over rigid registration (mean ± SD 4.87 ± 3.50 vs 4.11 ± 2.09 mm, p = 0.05). However, lesions near the edge of the phantom showed increased registration errors when using elastic registration (5.70 ± 3.43 vs 3.23 ± 1.68 mm, p = 0.03). Compared to the novice user the experienced user reported decreased registration error with rigid registration (3.25 ± 1.49 vs 4.98 ± 2.10 mm, p <0.01) and elastic registration (3.94 ± 2.61 vs 6.07 ± 4.16 mm, p <0.01). CONCLUSIONS: We found no difference in registration errors between rigid and elastic registration overall but rigid registration decreased the registration error of targets near the prostate edge. Additionally, operator experience reduced registration errors regardless of the registration method. Therefore, elastic registration algorithms cannot serve as a replacement for attention to detail during the registration process and anatomical landmarks indicating accurate registration when beginning the procedure and before targeting each region of interest.


Asunto(s)
Diagnóstico por Imagen de Elasticidad/métodos , Imagenología Tridimensional/métodos , Próstata/patología , Neoplasias de la Próstata/diagnóstico por imagen , Ultrasonografía Intervencional/métodos , Algoritmos , Diagnóstico por Imagen de Elasticidad/instrumentación , Estudios de Factibilidad , Marcadores Fiduciales , Humanos , Biopsia Guiada por Imagen/métodos , Imagenología Tridimensional/instrumentación , Masculino , Fantasmas de Imagen , Próstata/diagnóstico por imagen , Neoplasias de la Próstata/patología , Ultrasonografía Intervencional/instrumentación
14.
J Urol ; 200(5): 1041-1047, 2018 11.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29852182

RESUMEN

PURPOSE: We examined the additional value of preoperative prostate multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging and transrectal ultrasound/multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging fusion guided targeted biopsy when performed in combination with clinical nomograms to predict adverse pathology at radical prostatectomy. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We identified all patients who underwent 3 Tesla multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging prior to fusion biopsy and radical prostatectomy. The Partin and the MSKCC (Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center) preradical prostatectomy nomograms were applied to estimate the probability of organ confined disease, extraprostatic extension, seminal vesicle invasion and lymph node involvement using transrectal ultrasound guided systematic biopsy and transrectal ultrasound/multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging fusion guided targeted biopsy Gleason scores. With radical prostatectomy pathology as the gold standard we developed multivariable logistic regression models based on these nomograms before and after adding multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging to assess any additional predictive ability. RESULTS: A total of 532 patients were included in study. When multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging findings were added to the systematic biopsy based MSKCC nomogram, the AUC increased by 0.10 for organ confined disease (p <0.001), 0.10 for extraprostatic extension (p = 0.003), 0.09 for seminal vesicle invasion (p = 0.011) and 0.06 for lymph node involvement (p = 0.120). Using Gleason scores derived from targeted biopsy compared to systematic biopsy provided an additional predictive value of organ confined disease (Δ AUC 0.07, p = 0.003) and extraprostatic extension (Δ AUC 0.07, p = 0.048) at radical prostatectomy with the MSKCC nomogram. Similar results were obtained using the Partin nomogram. CONCLUSIONS: Magnetic resonance imaging alone or in addition to standard clinical nomograms provides significant additional predictive ability of adverse pathology at the time of radical prostatectomy. This information can be greatly beneficial to urologists for preoperative planning and for counseling patients regarding the risks of future therapy.


Asunto(s)
Imagen por Resonancia Magnética/métodos , Nomogramas , Próstata/patología , Neoplasias de la Próstata/diagnóstico por imagen , Anciano , Biopsia con Aguja Gruesa/métodos , Biopsia con Aguja Gruesa/normas , Estudios de Factibilidad , Humanos , Procesamiento de Imagen Asistido por Computador/métodos , Biopsia Guiada por Imagen/métodos , Biopsia Guiada por Imagen/normas , Imagen por Resonancia Magnética/instrumentación , Imagen por Resonancia Magnética Intervencional/métodos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Clasificación del Tumor , Valor Predictivo de las Pruebas , Cuidados Preoperatorios , Estudios Prospectivos , Próstata/diagnóstico por imagen , Neoplasias de la Próstata/patología , Estudios Retrospectivos , Medición de Riesgo/métodos , Ultrasonografía Intervencional/métodos
15.
Gland Surg ; 7(2): 166-187, 2018 Apr.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29770311

RESUMEN

Multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging (mpMRI) of the prostate has allowed clinicians to better visualize and target suspicious lesions during biopsy. Targeted prostate biopsies give a more accurate representation of the true cancer volume and stage so that appropriate treatment or active surveillance can be selected. Advances in technology have led to the development of MRI and ultrasound fusion platforms used for targeted biopsies, monitoring cancer progression, and more recently for the application of focal therapy. Lesions visualized on mpMRI can be targeted for ablation with a variety of energy sources employed under both local and general anesthesia. Focal ablation may offer an alternative option for treating prostate cancer as compared to the well-established interventions of whole-gland radiation or prostatectomy. Focal ablation may also be an option for patients on active surveillance who wish to be even more "active" in their surveillance. In this review, we describe the advancements and development of fusion biopsies, the rationale behind focal therapy, and introduce focal ablative techniques for indolent prostate cancers ("super-active surveillance"), including cryoablation and focal laser ablation (FLA) and the subsequent MRI/biopsy surveillance.

16.
Urology ; 118: e3-e4, 2018 Aug.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29729367

RESUMEN

Anastomotic stricture is a well-known complication of the urinary diversion that accompanies radical cystectomy. Management options range from endoscopic procedures to open surgeries, with a subset of the latter employing bowel as the interposing segment. In this report, we describe a rare patient, who successfully underwent a "Reverse 7" procedure, bypassing strictures at both anastomotic junctions between ureters and neobladder.


Asunto(s)
Anastomosis Quirúrgica , Cistectomía/efectos adversos , Complicaciones Posoperatorias , Obstrucción Ureteral , Ureteroscopía , Derivación Urinaria/efectos adversos , Anciano , Anastomosis Quirúrgica/efectos adversos , Anastomosis Quirúrgica/métodos , Cistectomía/métodos , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Complicaciones Posoperatorias/diagnóstico , Complicaciones Posoperatorias/etiología , Tomografía Computarizada por Rayos X/métodos , Obstrucción Ureteral/diagnóstico , Obstrucción Ureteral/etiología , Obstrucción Ureteral/cirugía , Ureteroscopía/efectos adversos , Ureteroscopía/métodos , Vejiga Urinaria/diagnóstico por imagen , Neoplasias de la Vejiga Urinaria/cirugía , Derivación Urinaria/métodos
17.
Can J Urol ; 25(2): 9281-9283, 2018 04.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29680007

RESUMEN

Prostate Imaging Reporting and Data System version 2 (PI-RADS v2) identifies prostate cancer on the basis of multiparametric MRI (mpMRI). As an assessment tool, it correctly predicts clinically significant cancer in the vast majority of cases. In this light, we report a rare patient, for whom a PI-RADS 5 lesion vanished over the course of 13 months.


Asunto(s)
Imagen de Difusión por Resonancia Magnética/métodos , Antígeno Prostático Específico/sangre , Neoplasias de la Próstata/diagnóstico por imagen , Neoplasias de la Próstata/patología , Remisión Espontánea , Biopsia con Aguja , Estudios de Seguimiento , Humanos , Inmunohistoquímica , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Invasividad Neoplásica/patología , Estadificación de Neoplasias , Neoplasias de la Próstata/sangre , Medición de Riesgo , Espera Vigilante
18.
Indian J Urol ; 34(1): 11-19, 2018.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29343907

RESUMEN

INTRODUCTION: Nonmuscle invasive bladder cancer (NMIBC) remains a very challenging disease to treat with high rates of recurrence and progression associated with current therapies. Recent technological and biological advances have led to the development of novel agents in NMIBC therapy. METHODS: We reviewed existing literature as well as currently active and recently completed clinical trials in NMIBC by querying PubMed.gov and clinicaltrials.gov. RESULTS: A wide variety of new therapies in NMIBC treatment are currently being developed, utilizing recent developments in the understanding of immune therapies and cancer biology. CONCLUSION: The ongoing efforts to develop new therapeutic approaches for NMIBC look very promising and are continuing to evolve.

SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA