Futile reperfusion of endovascular treatment for acute anterior circulation large vessel occlusion in the ANGEL-ACT registry.

BACKGROUND: Some patients with large vessel occlusion (LVO) still cannot achieve functional independence despite successful reperfusion after endovascular treatment (EVT), named futile reperfusion. We aimed to explore the incidence and predictors of futile reperfusion of EVT for anterior circulation LVO in the Chinese population based on a nationwide prospective multicenter registry. METHODS: We selected patients from the ANGEL-ACT (Endovascular Treatment Key Technique and Emergency Workflow Improvement of Acute Ischemic Stroke) registry. Successful reperfusion was defined as modified Treatment In Cerebral Ischemia (mTICI) 2b-3 after EVT, and functional independence was defined as 90-day modified Rankin Scale (mRS) 0-2. A multivariable regression model was performed to identify the independent predictors of futile reperfusion in anterior circulation LVO patients. RESULTS: A total of 1158 anterior circulation LVO patients were included in our study. 600 of the 1158 patients (51.8%) suffered futile reperfusion. Age ≥69 (adjusted OR (aOR) 1.69, 95% CI 1.21 to 2.35, P=0.002), baseline National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale (NIHSS) ≥14 (aOR 2.36, 95% CI 1.71 to 3.27, P<0.001), baseline serum glucose ≥6.5 mmol/L (aOR 1.73, 95% CI 1.27 to 2.36, P=0.001), drip and ship (aOR 1.56, 95% CI 1.11 to 2.18, P=0.011), and general anesthesia (aOR 2.28, 95% CI 1.66 to 3.14, P<0.001) were associated with a high risk of futile reperfusion in the anterior LVO patients after EVT, whereas baseline Alberta Stroke Program Early CT Score (ASPECTS) ≥8 (aOR 0.65, 95% CI 0.47 to 0.91, P=0.011) and complete reperfusion (aOR 0.62, 95% CI 0.43 to 0.89, P=0.010) were associated with a low risk of futile reperfusion in the anterior LVO patients after EVT. CONCLUSIONS: In the ANGEL-ACT registry, 51.8% of anterior circulation LVO patients suffered futile reperfusion after EVT. Age ≥69 years, baseline NIHSS ≥14, baseline serum glucose ≥6.5 mmol/L, drip and ship, general anesthesia, baseline ASPECTS <8, and incomplete reperfusion were the independent predictors of futile reperfusion.

Safety and efficacy of oral antiplatelet for patients who had acute ischaemic stroke undergoing endovascular therapy.

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: To investigate the safety and efficacy of oral antiplatelet therapy (APT) for patients who had acute ischaemic stroke (AIS), receiving endovascular therapy (EVT). METHODS: Patients were divided into non-APT group and APT (single APT or dual APT (DAPT)) group. The safety and efficacy endpoints at 3-month follow-up were symptomatic intracranial haemorrhage (sICH), recanalisation rate, clinical outcome and mortality. RESULTS: Among 915 patients who had AIS, those in APT group (n=199) showed shorter puncture-to-recanalisation time, lower frequency of intravenous thrombolysis and more use of tirofiban compared with those in non-antiplatelet group (n=716) (p<0.05 for all). Oral APT was found to be associated with superior clinical outcome compared with non-APT (APT (44.2%) versus non-APT (41.1%)), adjusted OR=2.605, 95% CI 1.244 to 5.455, p=0.011). DAPT showed superior clinical outcome compared with non-APT (DAPT (56.5%) versus non-APT (41.1%), adjusted OR=5.405, 95% CI 1.614 to 18.102, p=0.006) and lower risk of mortality at 3-month follow-up (DAPT (4.8%) versus non-DAPT (17.7%), adjusted OR=0.008, 95% CI 0.000 to 0.441, p=0.019). There was no significant difference in sICH between the two groups. CONCLUSIONS: Oral APT prior to undergoing EVT is safe and may accompany with superior clinical outcomes. DAPT may associate with superior clinical outcomes and lower risk of mortality.

Anatomical mechanism of spontaneous recovery in regions caudal to thoracic spinal cord injury lesions in rats.

BACKGROUND: The nerve fibre circuits around a lesion play a major role in the spontaneous recovery process after spinal cord hemisection in rats. The aim of the present study was to answer the following question: in the re-control process, do all spinal cord nerves below the lesion site participate, or do the spinal cord nerves of only one vertebral segment have a role in repair? METHODS: First we made a T7 spinal cord hemisection in 50 rats. Eight weeks later, they were divided into three groups based on distinct second operations at T7: ipsilateral hemisection operation, contralateral hemisection, or transection. We then tested recovery of hindlimbs for another eight weeks. The first step was to confirm the lesion had role or not in the spontaneous recovery process. Secondly, we performed T7 spinal cord hemisections in 125 rats. Eight weeks later, we performed a second single hemisection on the ipsilateral side at T8-T12 and then tested hindlimb recovery for another six weeks. RESULTS: In the first part, the Basso, Beattie, Bresnahan (BBB) scores and the electrophysiology tests of both hindlimbs weren't significantly different after the second hemisection of the ipsilateral side. In the second part, the closer the second hemisection was to T12, the more substantial the resulting impairment in BBB score tests and prolonged latency periods. CONCLUSIONS: The nerve regeneration from the lesion area after hemisection has no effect on spontaneous recovery of the spinal cord. Repair is carried out by all vertebrae caudal and ipsilateral to the lesion, with T12 being most important.