Apparent diffusion coefficient analysis of solid tissue helps distinguish borderline from invasive malignant adnexal masses rated O-RADS MRI 4.

PURPOSE: The purpose of this study was to evaluate the contribution of apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) analysis of the solid tissue of adnexal masses to optimize tumor characterization and possibly refine the risk stratification of the O-RADS MRI 4 category. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The EURAD cohort was retrospectively analyzed to select all patients with an adnexal mass with solid tissue and feasible ADC measurements. Two radiologists independently measured the ADC values of solid tissue, excluding necrotic areas, surrounding structures, and magnetic susceptibility artifacts. Significant differences in diffusion quantitative parameters in the overall population and according to the morphological aspect of solid tissue were analyzed to identify its impact on ADC reliability. Receiver operating characteristics curve (ROC) was used to determine the optimum cutoff of the ADC for distinguishing invasive from non-invasive tumors in the O-RADS MRI score 4 population. RESULTS: The final study population included 180 women with a mean age of 57 ± 15.5 (standard deviation) years; age range: 19-95 years) with 93 benign, 23 borderline, and 137 malignant masses. The median ADC values of solid tissue was greater in borderline masses (1.310 × 10-3 mm2/s (Q1, Q3: 1.152, 1.560 × 10-3 mm2/s) than in benign masses (1.035 × 10-3 mm2/s; Q1, Q3: 0.900, 1.560 × 10-3 mm2/s) (P= 0.002) and in benign tumors compared by comparison with invasive masses (0.850 × 10-3 mm2/s; Q1, Q3: 0.750, 0.990 × 10-3 mm2/s) (P < 0.001). Solid tissue corresponded to irregular septa or papillary projection in 18.6% (47/253), to a mural nodule or a mixed mass in 46.2% (117/253), and to a purely solid mass in 35.2% (89/253) of adnexal masses. In mixed masses or masses with mural nodule subgroup, invasive masses had a significantly lower ADC (0.830 × 10-3 mm2/s (Q1, Q3: 0.738, 0.960) than borderline (1.385; Q1, Q3: 1.300, 1.930) (P= 0.0012) and benign masses (P= 0.04). An ADC cutoff of 1.08 × 10-3 mm2/s yielded 71.4% sensitivity and 100% specificity for identifying invasive lesions in the mixed or mural nodule subgroup with an AUC of 0.92 (95% confidence interval: 0.76-0.99). CONCLUSION: ADC analysis of solid tissue of adnexal masses could help distinguish invasive masses within the O-RADS MRI 4 category, especially in mixed masses or those with mural nodule.

Surgical and Percutaneous Image-Guided Therapies of Abdominal Wall Endometriosis: A Systematic Review of Current Evidence.

OBJECTIVE: Despite various surgical and nonsurgical strategies for abdominal wall endometriosis, the lack of definitive guidance on optimal treatment choice leads to clinical uncertainty. This review scrutinizes the safety and efficacy of abdominal wall endometriosis treatments to aid in decision-making. DATA SOURCES: We performed a systematic literature review of PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane Library databases from 1947 until December 2023. METHODS OF STUDY SELECTION: A comprehensive literature search identified studies that assessed both surgical and nonsurgical interventions, including high-intensity focused ultrasound (HIFU), cryoablation, radiofrequency ablation, and microwave ablation. This review is registered in NIHR-PROSPERO (CRD 42023494969). Local tumor control (LTC), local pain relief (LPR), and adverse events (AE) were recorded. TABULATION, INTEGRATION, AND RESULTS: This review included 51 articles among 831 identified. All study designs were considered eligible for inclusion. A total of 2674 patients are included: 2219 patients (83%) undergoing surgery, and 455 (17%) undergoing percutaneous interventions (342 HIFU, 103 cryoablation, 1 radiofrequency ablation, 9 microwave ablation). Follow-up length was 18 months in median, ranging from 1 to 235 months. Overall LTC rates ranged from 86% to 100%. Surgical interventions consistently demonstrated the highest rate of LTC with a median rate of 100%, and LPR with a median rate of 98.2% (95% confidence interval [CI]: 93.9-97.7). HIFU showed median LTC and LPR rates, respectively of 95.65% (95% CI, 87.7-99.9) and 76.1% (95% CI, 61.8-90.4); and cryoablation of 85.7% (95% CI, 66.0-99.9) and 79.2% (95% CI, 67.4-91.03). Minor AE was reported after surgery in 17.5% of patients (225/1284) including 15.9% (199/1284) of mesh implantation; 76.4% (239/313) after HIFU; and 8.7% (9/103) after cryoablation. Severe AE was reported in 25 patients in the surgery group and 1 in the percutaneous group. CONCLUSION: The safety profile and efficacy of nonsurgical interventions support their clinical utility for management of abdominal wall endometriosis.

Safety and efficacy of cryoablation of Soft-Tissue tumors.

OBJECTIVES: To assess the safety and efficacy of percutaneous cryoablation (CA) of soft-tissue tumors (desmoid tumors (DT), vascular malformations (VM), and abdominal wall endometriosis (AWE)). METHODS: This systematic review of studies published before January 2024 encompassed a detailed analysis of CA techniques and technical aspects for the treatment of soft-tissue tumors. Data concerning CA efficacy, complication rates, and other relevant metrics was extracted and included for analysis. RESULTS: The analysis included 27 studies totaling 554 CA procedures. For DT (13 studies, 393 sessions), CA showed an average pain reduction of 79 ± 17% (range: 57-100) and a lesion volume decrease of 71.5 ± 9.8% (range: 44-97). VM (4 studies, 58 sessions) had a 100% technical success rate and an average pain reduction of 72 ± 25% (range: 63-85). The average pain reduction for AWE (6 studies, 103 sessions) was 82 ± 13% (range: 62-100). Overall, the complication rate for CA was low, with minor adverse events (AE) in about 20% of patients and major events in less than 5% of patients. CONCLUSION: Showing substantial efficacy in pain reduction and lesion volume decrease, as well as low incidence of severe AE, CA presents as a highly effective and safe alternative for the treatment of soft-tissue tumors. ADVANCES IN KNOWLEDGE: CA is effective and safe in treating soft-tissue tumors, particularly DT, VM, and AWE.

Interventional Oncology: 2024 Update.

Interventional Oncology (IO) stands at the forefront of transformative cancer care, leveraging advanced imaging technologies and innovative interventions. This narrative review explores recent developments within IO, highlighting its potential impact facilitated by artificial intelligence (AI), personalized medicine and imaging innovations. The integration of AI in IO holds promise for accelerating tumour detection and characterization, guiding treatment strategies and refining predictive models. Imaging modalities, including functional MRI, PET and cone beam CT are reshaping imaging and precision. Navigation, fusion imaging, augmented reality and robotics have the potential to revolutionize procedural guidance and offer unparalleled accuracy. New developments are observed in embolization and ablative therapies. The pivotal role of genomics in treatment planning, targeted therapies and biomarkers for treatment response prediction underscore the personalization of IO. Quality of life assessment, minimizing side effects and long-term survivorship care emphasize patient-centred outcomes after IO treatment. The evolving landscape of IO training programs, simulation technologies and workforce competence ensures the field's adaptability. Despite barriers to adoption, synergy between interventional radiologists' proficiency and technological advancements hold promise in cancer care.

Reasons why it is time to change imaging guidelines on endometriosis.

In light of the rising number of patients referred for magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) due to suspected endometriosis and the high expectations of these patients, there is a need for new imaging guidelines to optimally protocol and indicate MRI and transvaginal ultrasonography (TVUS) examinations. This is crucial for accurately addressing the inquiries of gynecologists, encompassing complete mapping and preoperative staging, and facilitating effective communication with patients. In this context, the development of a standardized lexicon, as well as dedicated imaging classifications, is recommended to aid in the comprehensive management of patients. CLINICAL RELEVANCE STATEMENT: The radiologist should use a standardized lexicon and provide a score along with details about the specific compartments affected by endometriosis disease. This helps in offering clearer guidance to the surgeon. KEY POINTS: • An optimal staging is based on the combination of clinical examination, transvaginal US, and MRI. • MRI is able to detect location that is hidden at the beginning of a laparoscopic surgery and thus the need for dedicated MR classifications to correctly stage the disease. • Deep pelvic endometriosis index (dPEI) classification is externally validated and highly correlated with operating time, hospital stay, and postoperative complications.

Polyetheretherketone Polymer Transpedicular Vertebral System to Treat Vertebral Compression Fracture: A Multicentre Pilot Study of Feasibility and Safety.

OBJECTIVES: To prospectively evaluate the feasibility and safety of a polyetheretherketone (PEEK) polymer transpedicular vertebral system to treat vertebral compression fracture (VCF). METHODS: Nine consecutive patients (4 men and 5 women; median age 59 [interquartile range: 58-64 years]) were included. The procedure duration, length of hospital stay, and complications were reported. Visual analog scale (VAS) and the Oswestry disability index (ODI) for pain and disability were assessed before and at 2, 6, and 12-month after the procedure. RESULTS: The procedure was technically feasible in all patients. The median procedural time was 64 minutes [45-94]. Only minor adverse events were reported (5 clinically asymptomatic cement leakages) but no severe complications. No post procedural adjacent fracture was reported during follow-up (median: 193 days [147-279]). The median VAS score decreased from 55 mm [50-70] before the procedure to 25 mm [5-30] at 2-month (P = .0003) and 30 mm [15-40] at 6-month follow-up (P = .14). The median ODI decreased from 23% [19-26] before the procedure to 12% [10-14] at 2-month (P = .03) and 12% [9-20] at 6-month follow-up (P = .47). CONCLUSION: Percutaneous transpedicular fixation of VCF by PEEK implants appears feasible and safe.

O-RADS MRI risk stratification system: pearls and pitfalls.

In 2021, the American College of Radiology (ACR) Ovarian-Adnexal Reporting and Data System (O-RADS) MRI Committee developed a risk stratification system and lexicon for assessing adnexal lesions using MRI. Like the BI-RADS classification, O-RADS MRI provides a standardized language for communication between radiologists and clinicians. It is essential for radiologists to be familiar with the O-RADS algorithmic approach to avoid misclassifications. Training, like that offered by International Ovarian Tumor Analysis (IOTA), is essential to ensure accurate and consistent application of the O-RADS MRI system. Tools such as the O-RADS MRI calculator aim to ensure an algorithmic approach. This review highlights the key teaching points, pearls, and pitfalls when using the O-RADS MRI risk stratification system.Critical relevance statement This article highlights the pearls and pitfalls of using the O-RADS MRI scoring system in clinical practice.Key points• Solid tissue is described as displaying post- contrast enhancement.• Endosalpingeal folds, fimbriated end of the tube, smooth wall, or septa are not solid tissue.• Low-risk TIC has no shoulder or plateau. An intermediate-risk TIC has a shoulder and plateau, though the shoulder is less steep compared to outer myometrium.

O-RADS MRI scoring system has the potential to reduce the frequency of avoidable adnexal surgery.

OBJECTIVE: To assess the potential impact of the O-RADS MRI score on the decision-making process for the management of adnexal masses. METHODS: EURAD database (prospective, European observational, multicenter study) was queried to identify asymptomatic women without history of infertility included between March 1st and March 31st 2018, with available surgical pathology or clinical findings at 2-year clinical follow-up. Blinded to final diagnosis, we stratified patients into five categories according to the O-RADS MRI score (absent i.e. non adnexal, benign, probably benign, indeterminate, probably malignant). Prospective management was compared to theoretical management according to the score established as following: those with presumed benign masses (scored O-RADS MRI 2 or 3) (follow-up recommended) and those with presumed malignant masses (scored O-RADS MRI 4 or 5) (surgery recommended). RESULTS: The accuracy of the score for assessing the origin of the mass was of 97.2 % (564/580, CI95% 0.96-0.98) and was of 92.0 % (484/526) for categorizing lesions with a negative predictive value of 98.1 % (415/423, CI95% 0.96-0.99). Theoretical management using the score would have spared surgery in 229 patients (87.1 %, 229/263) with benign lesions and malignancy would have been missed in 6 borderline and 2 invasive cases. In patients with a presumed benign mass using O-RADS MRI score, recommending surgery for lesions >= 100 mm would miss only 4/77 (4.8 %) malignant adnexal tumors instead of 8 (50 % decrease). CONCLUSION: The use of O-RADS MRI scoring system could drastically reduce the number of asymptomatic patients undergoing avoidable surgery.

O-RADS MRI to classify adnexal tumors: from clinical problem to daily use.

Eighteen to 35% of adnexal masses remain non-classified following ultrasonography, leading to unnecessary surgeries and inappropriate management. This finding led to the conclusion that ultrasonography was insufficient to accurately assess adnexal masses and that a standardized MRI criteria could improve these patients' management. The aim of this work is to present the different steps from the identification of the clinical issue to the daily use of a score and its inclusion in the latest international guidelines. The different steps were the following: (1) preliminary work to formalize the issue, (2) physiopathological analysis and finding dynamic parameters relevant to increase MRI performances, (3) construction and internal validation of a score to predict the nature of the lesion, (4) external multicentric validation (the EURAD study) of the score named O-RADS MRI, and (5) communication and education work to spread its use and inclusion in guidelines. Future steps will include studies at patients' levels and a cost-efficiency analysis. Critical relevance statement We present translating radiological research into a clinical application based on a step-by-step structured and systematic approach methodology to validate MR imaging for the characterization of adnexal mass with the ultimate step of incorporation in the latest worldwide guidelines of the O-RADS MRI reporting system that allows to distinguish benign from malignant ovarian masses with a sensitivity and specificity higher than 90%. Key points • The initial diagnostic test accuracy studies show the limitation of a preoperative assessment of adnexal masses using solely ultrasonography.• The technical developments (DCE/DWI) were investigated with the value of dynamic MRI to accurately predict the nature of benign or malignant lesions to improve management.• The first developing score named ADNEX MR Score was constructed using multiple easily assessed criteria on MRI to classify indeterminate adnexal lesions following ultrasonography.• The multicentric adnexal study externally validated the score creating the O-RADS MR score and leading to its inclusion for daily use in international guidelines.

O-RADS scoring system for adnexal lesions: Diagnostic performance on TVUS performed by an expert sonographer and MRI.

RATIONALE AND OBJECTIVE: To determine the diagnostic performance of transvaginal ultrasound (TVUS) performed by an US specialist and MRI based on the O-RADS scoring system. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Between March 5th 2013 and December 31st 2021, 227 patients, referred to our center, underwent TVUS and pelvic MRI for characterization of an adnexal lesion proven by surgery or two years of negative follow-up. All lesions were classified according to O-RADS US and O-RADS MRI risk scoring systems. Imaging data were then correlated with histopathological diagnosis or negative follow-up for 2 years. RESULTS: The prevalence of malignancy was 11.1%. Sensitivity of O-RADS US / O-RADS MRI were respectively of 83.3%/83.3% and specificity was 73.2%/92.9% (p < 0.001). O-RADS MRI was more accurate than O-RADS US even when performed by an US specialist (p < 0.001). When MRI was used after US, 51 lesions were reclassified correctly by MRI and only 4 lesions incorrectly reclassified. Most of the lesions (49/51) rated O-RADS US 4 or 5 and reclassified correctly by MRI were benign, mainly including cystadenomas or cystadenofibromas. Only 4 lesions were misclassified by MRI but correctly classified by ultrasound. CONCLUSION: Our study suggests that MR imaging has equally high sensitivity but higher specificity than TVUS for the characterization of adnexal lesions based on O-RADS scoring system. MRI should be the recommended second-line technique when a mass is discovered during TVUS and is rated O-RADS 4 and 5 over than TVUS by an US specialist.