Patient monitoring and follow-up in lentiviral clinical trials.

BACKGROUND: Lentiviral vectors are being used with increasing frequency in human clinical trials. We were the first to use lentiviral vectors in clinical trials in 2003. Our lentiviral vector encoded a long RNA antisense sequence to the HIV-1 envelope and was used in an ex vivo autologous setting to provide viral load control in HIV-1 positive subjects failing anti-HIV therapy. A total of 65 subjects have been treated in Phase 1 and Phase 2 trials in six institutions. METHODS: Good manufacturing practices (GMP) lots of the lentiviral vector used in our clinical trials were assayed for the presence of replication competent lentivirus (RCL). RCL assays were conducted at two stages. The first testing was performed on samples collected immediately following bulk harvest of the GMP product lot and consisted of 1 × 10(8) cells used in production. RCL assays were also performed on aliquots of the final fill of the vector by the inoculation of at least 5% of the GMP final fill volume into C8166 cells, passaged for at least ten passages and tested for RCL by p24 enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay and vesicular stomatitis virus-G envelope DNA. RESULTS: Following 263 infusions of autologous, transduced cells, no adverse events have been detected in these subjects, with some followed for more than 8 years following infusions. More than 4.3 × 10(12) VRX496 proviral copies were administered to these 65 subjects. CONCLUSIONS: Data from this small population suggest that there is no apparent risk for serious adverse events with the use of lentiviral vectors.

Antiviral effects of autologous CD4 T cells genetically modified with a conditionally replicating lentiviral vector expressing long antisense to HIV.

We report the safety and tolerability of 87 infusions of lentiviral vector­modified autologous CD4 T cells (VRX496-T; trade name, Lexgenleucel-T) in 17 HIV patients with well-controlled viremia. Antiviral effects were studied during analytic treatment interruption in a subset of 13 patients. VRX496-T was associated with a decrease in viral load set points in 6 of 8 subjects (P = .08). In addition, A → G transitions were enriched in HIV sequences after infusion, which is consistent with a model in which transduced CD4 T cells exert antisense-mediated genetic pressure on HIV during infection. Engraftment of vector-modified CD4 T cells was measured in gut-associated lymphoid tissue and was correlated with engraftment in blood. The engraftment half-life in the blood was approximately 5 weeks, with stable persistence in some patients for up to 5 years. Conditional replication of VRX496 was detected periodically through 1 year after infusion. No evidence of clonal selection of lentiviral vector­transduced T cells or integration enrichment near oncogenes was detected. This is the first demonstration that gene-modified cells can exert genetic pressure on HIV. We conclude that gene-modified T cells have the potential to decrease the fitness of HIV-1 and conditionally replicative lentiviral vectors have a promising safety profile in T cells.

Gene transfer in humans using a conditionally replicating lentiviral vector.

We report findings from a clinical evaluation of lentiviral vectors in a phase I open-label nonrandomized clinical trial for HIV. This trial evaluated the safety of a conditionally replicating HIV-1-derived vector expressing an antisense gene against the HIV envelope. Five subjects with chronic HIV infection who had failed to respond to at least two antiviral regimens were enrolled. A single i.v. infusion of gene-modified autologous CD4 T cells was well tolerated in all patients. Viral loads were stable, and one subject exhibited a sustained decrease in viral load. CD4 counts remained steady or increased in four subjects, and sustained gene transfer was observed. Self-limiting mobilization of the vector was observed in four of five patients. There is no evidence for insertional mutagenesis after 21-36 months of observation. Immune function improved in four subjects. Lentiviral vectors appear promising for gene transfer to humans.

Regulatory considerations for novel gene therapy products: a review of the process leading to the first clinical lentiviral vector.

This review is intended to exemplify the roles and responsibilities of the two agencies under the Department of Health and Human Services, the National Institutes of Health and the Food and Drug Administration, that have oversight for human gene transfer clinical protocols, as seen through our experience of bringing a first-in-its-class lentiviral vector to clinical trials. In response to the changing circumstances in gene therapy research between 1999 and 2002, the concerns of these agencies regarding gene therapy have been evolving. This review provides an overview of the major safety concerns regarding insertional oncogenesis, the generation of a replication- competent lentivirus (RCL), and vector mobilization thought to be related to lentiviral vectors, which had to be addressed during the regulatory review process before initiating the clinical trial. Specific monitoring assays to address these concerns were established to test for RCL generation, vector mobilization, persistence of vector-modified cells, and abnormal clonal expansion of modified cells. We hope to provide a basic understanding and appreciation of the regulatory process and major safety concerns, toward providing useful insight to those presently embarking on the development of clinical application of lentiviral vectors.