Use of nitrous oxide in the treatment of major depressive disorder and treatment-resistant major depressive disorder: A systematic review and meta-analysis nitrous oxide in depressive disorders.

Major Depressive Disorder (MDD) has, as a conventional treatment, pharmacological therapy with selective monoamine reuptake inhibitors. However, the medication does not always have a rapid action for exacerbated cases, and moreover, it is estimated that 15 to 30% of patients do not respond effectively to conventional treatment, leading to 'treatment-resistant depressive mood disorder' (TRD). Thus, it is necessary to search for new therapeutic methods for exacerbated and resistant cases. The objective of the study was to evaluate the therapeutic effects of nitrous oxide (N2O) in patients with MDD and TRD. The study was characterized as a systematic review of randomized clinical trials. Search strategy was developed using the keywords "nitrous oxide," "treatment-resistant depression," "Depression disorder," and their synonyms, searched in the databases MEDLINE, EMBASE, LILACS, and American Psychological Association. Four articles were included in the systematic review, with two of them being utilized for the meta-analysis, which comprised a total of 23 patients with MDD and 86 with TRD. A standardized mean difference (SMD) for the HDRS score at 24 h of -2.36 was found, with a 95% confidence interval (CI) of -3.37 to -1.34 (p < 0.0001; I2 = 46%). For the evaluation of the score after one week, an SMD of -0.60, 95% CI of -1.13 to -0.07 (p = 0.03; I2 = 0%) was found. In conclusion, N2O has a rapid action for managing decompensated patients, with a potential therapeutic effect for TRD. However, more studies needed to determine N2O's effectiveness duration.

The role of intestinal microbiota on pre-eclampsia: Systematic review and meta-analysis.

AIM: To investigate differences between gut microbiota diversity and composition of healthy pregnant women and women with pre-eclampsia (PE). METHODS AND RESULTS: This is a systematic review and meta-analysis of the literature, in which the terms "pre-eclampsia", "gastrointestinal microbiome" and "pregnant women" were used to search MEDLINE (PubMed), BVS (LILACS and others), Embase (Elsevier) and Cochrane Library, including observational studies and case-control that investigated changes in the gut microbiota during pregnancy. Six studies were included, with 479 pregnant women. A significantly lower gut microbiota alpha diversity measured as the Shannon index was found in pregnant women with PE in comparison with healthy controls (SMD: -0.47; 95 %IC: -0.77 to -0.18; P = 0.02; I2 = 0 %; three studies, 179 participants), while no significant differences were found in the relative abundance of Bacteroidetes, Firmicutes, Actinobacteria, and Proteobacteria, despite significant differences reported in the individual studies. CONCLUSION: Pregnant women with PE have lower gut microbiome diversity, however, there is insufficient evidence to determine whether there are changes in gut microbiota composition. SIGNIFICANCE AND IMPACT OF THE STUDY: The gut microbiota can be a new treatment target to try to prevent changes in maternal bacterial proportions, aiming to reduce complications during pregnancy.

Effects of COVID-19 or vaccines for SARS-COV-2 on sperm parameters: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

This systematic review and meta-analysis assessed the effects of SARS-Cov-2 and mRNA vaccines on male reproduction. We conducted a comprehensive search using terms such as "COVID-19," "vaccine," and "sperm parameters" on various electronic databases, including MEDLINE (PubMed), BVS (LILACS and others), Embase (Elsevier), and Cochrane Library. We included observational studies, including cohort, case-control, and cross-sectional studies. Of the 2054 records initially identified, we carefully examined 47 full-text articles and excluded 26 articles for specific reasons, ultimately including 21 studies for our analysis. Among these, 16 studies focused on assessing seminal parameters in patients with COVID-19, while five studies investigated the effects of COVID vaccines on seminal parameters. A meta-analysis of seminal parameters in men before and after the COVID-19 pandemic revealed significant differences in seminal concentration, progressive motility, total motility, and normal morphology. These findings indicate a positive impact of the analyzed parameters before the onset of COVID-19. However, the quality of the evidence was considered low. In contrast, a meta-analysis of five studies evaluating seminal parameters before and after the SARS-Cov-2 vaccine did not show any significant differences in total motility. This analysis, involving 256 men from four studies, provided low-quality evidence, suggesting that mRNA vaccines do not affect male reproduction. Overall, our findings suggest that seminal parameters exhibit considerable variability depending on specific outcomes and the study design. However, based on available evidence, it appears that mRNA vaccines do not have detrimental effects on male reproductive function.