Autophagy Inhibition to Augment mTOR Inhibition: a Phase I/II Trial of Everolimus and Hydroxychloroquine in Patients with Previously Treated Renal Cell Carcinoma.

PURPOSE: Everolimus inhibits the mTOR, activating cytoprotective autophagy. Hydroxychloroquine inhibits autophagy. On the basis of preclinical data demonstrating synergistic cytotoxicity when mTOR inhibitors are combined with an autophagy inhibitor, we launched a clinical trial of combined everolimus and hydroxychloroquine, to determine its safety and activity in patients with clear-cell renal cell carcinoma (ccRCC). PATIENTS AND METHODS: Three centers conducted a phase I/II trial of everolimus 10 mg daily and hydroxychloroquine in patients with advanced ccRCC. The objectives were to determine the MTD of hydroxychloroquine with daily everolimus, and to estimate the rate of 6-month progression-free survival (PFS) in patients with ccRCC receiving everolimus/hydroxychloroquine after 1-3 prior treatment regimens. Correlative studies to identify patient subpopulations that achieved the most benefit included population pharmacokinetics, measurement of autophagosomes by electron microscopy, and next-generation tumor sequencing. RESULTS: No dose-limiting toxicity was observed in the phase I trial. The recommended phase II dose of hydroxychloroquine 600 mg twice daily with everolimus was identified. Disease control [stable disease + partial response (PR)] occurred in 22 of 33 (67%) evaluable patients. PR was observed in 2 of 33 patients (6%). PFS ≥ 6 months was achieved in 15 of 33 (45%) of patients who achieved disease control. CONCLUSIONS: Combined hydroxychloroquine 600 mg twice daily with 10 mg daily everolimus was tolerable. The primary endpoint of >40% 6-month PFS rate was met. Hydroxychloroquine is a tolerable autophagy inhibitor in future RCC or other trials.

Combined MTOR and autophagy inhibition: phase I trial of hydroxychloroquine and temsirolimus in patients with advanced solid tumors and melanoma.

The combination of temsirolimus (TEM), an MTOR inhibitor, and hydroxychloroquine (HCQ), an autophagy inhibitor, augments cell death in preclinical models. This phase 1 dose-escalation study evaluated the maximum tolerated dose (MTD), safety, preliminary activity, pharmacokinetics, and pharmacodynamics of HCQ in combination with TEM in cancer patients. In the dose escalation portion, 27 patients with advanced solid malignancies were enrolled, followed by a cohort expansion at the top dose level in 12 patients with metastatic melanoma. The combination of HCQ and TEM was well tolerated, and grade 3 or 4 toxicity was limited to anorexia (7%), fatigue (7%), and nausea (7%). An MTD was not reached for HCQ, and the recommended phase II dose was HCQ 600 mg twice daily in combination with TEM 25 mg weekly. Other common grade 1 or 2 toxicities included fatigue, anorexia, nausea, stomatitis, rash, and weight loss. No responses were observed; however, 14/21 (67%) patients in the dose escalation and 14/19 (74%) patients with melanoma achieved stable disease. The median progression-free survival in 13 melanoma patients treated with HCQ 1200mg/d in combination with TEM was 3.5 mo. Novel 18-fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography (FDG-PET) measurements predicted clinical outcome and provided further evidence that the addition of HCQ to TEM produced metabolic stress on tumors in patients that experienced clinical benefit. Pharmacodynamic evidence of autophagy inhibition was evident in serial PBMC and tumor biopsies only in patients treated with 1200 mg daily HCQ. This study indicates that TEM and HCQ is safe and tolerable, modulates autophagy in patients, and has significant antitumor activity. Further studies combining MTOR and autophagy inhibitors in cancer patients are warranted.

Phase 1 and pharmacodynamic trial of everolimus in combination with cetuximab in patients with advanced cancer.

BACKGROUND: Preclinical and clinical studies suggest mTOR (mammalian target of rapamycin) inhibitors may have metabolic and antiangiogenic effects, and synergize with epidermal growth factor pathway inhibitors. Therefore, a phase 1/pharmacodynamic trial of everolimus with cetuximab was performed. METHODS: A total of 29 patients were randomized to a run-in of oral everolimus (30, 50, or 70 mg) or cetuximab (400 mg/m(2) loading, 250 mg/m(2) maintenance) weekly, followed by the combination in this dose-escalation study. Primary endpoints were phase 2 dose and toxicity characterization. [(18)F]Fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography (FDG-PET) was performed as a pharmacodynamic marker of mTOR inhibition, and dynamic contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging (DCE-MRI) was performed as an indicator of tumor perfusion changes, at 3 time points. RESULTS: Everolimus and cetuximab were tolerable at full doses, with an expected toxicity profile. Dose-limiting toxicities in the everolimus 70 mg group included grade 3 skin toxicity in 2 patients, and mucositis in 1 patient. Of 16 patients evaluable for response, 5 had stable disease lasting 4 to 19 months. Mean change in maximum standardized uptake value (SUV(max)) for those treated initially with everolimus was -24% (2% to -54%), and with cetuximab was -5% (-23 to 36%). The K(trans) measured by DCE-MRI did not decrease, regardless of run-in drug. CONCLUSIONS: Everolimus and cetuximab can be safely administered at standard doses, and are associated with prolonged disease control. The recommended phase 2 dose of oral weekly everolimus is 70 mg in combination with standard cetuximab. Imaging studies reveal that metabolic inhibition by everolimus alone and in combination with cetuximab predominates over changes in tumor perfusion in this patient population.

Interaction of sorafenib and cytochrome P450 isoenzymes in patients with advanced melanoma: a phase I/II pharmacokinetic interaction study.

BACKGROUND: In vitro data indicate that the sorafenib is a moderate inhibitor of cytochrome P450 (CYP) enzymes, including CYP3A4, CYP2C19, and CYP2D6. This phase I/II study in patients with advanced melanoma evaluated the potential effect of sorafenib on the pharmacokinetics of midazolam, omeprazole, and dextromethorphan, specific substrates of CYP3A4, CYP2C19, and CYP2D6, respectively. METHODS: Twenty-one patients received sorafenib 400 mg twice daily for 28 consecutive days. On days 1 and 28, a cocktail containing midazolam 2 mg, omeprazole 20 mg, and dextromethorphan 30 mg was administered. Pharmacokinetic analyses were performed on day 1 without sorafenib and day 28 after steady-state sorafenib exposure; sorafenib pharmacokinetics were evaluated on day 28. We defined an interaction to be excluded if the 90% confidence interval of the ratio of all day 28:day 1 analyses fell within a range from 0.80 to 1.25. RESULTS: In all, 18 patients were evaluable. On day 28, area under the plasma concentration-time curve from time 0 to 12 h (AUC(0-12)) and maximum plasma concentration (C(max)) for sorafenib were 38.1 mg h/l and 4.9 mg/l, respectively. Day 28:day 1 ratios for AUC from time 0 extrapolated to infinity (AUC(0-inf)) and C(max) for midazolam were 0.85 and 0.98, respectively. Day 28:day 1 ratio for 5-OH-omeprazole:omeprazole plasma concentration at 3 h postdose was 1.26, slightly outside of the 0.80-1.25 range. Thus, an interaction could not be excluded, but is considered unlikely to be clinically significant. Day 28:day 1 ratio for dextromethorphan:dextrorphan concentration in urine was 0.94. Sorafenib had an acceptable safety profile. The most frequently observed grade 3-4 toxicities in cycle 1 included elevated lipase (19%) and hypertension (10%). CONCLUSIONS: In this patient population, our results demonstrate that exposures of probes of CYP3A4, CYP2D6, or CYP2C19 activity are potentially altered by administration of sorafenib at 400 mg twice daily. However, these differences are sufficiently small that a clinically significant inhibition or induction of these important drug metabolizing P450 isoenzymes is unlikely. Clinical and, where possible, drug level monitoring may still be appropriate for drugs of narrow therapeutic range co-administered with sorafenib.

Pharmacokinetic analysis of irinotecan plus bevacizumab in patients with advanced solid tumors.

PURPOSE: The purpose of this study was to evaluate the effect of bevacizumab on the pharmacokinetics (PK) of irinotecan and its active metabolite. Exploratory analyses of the impact of variability in uridine diphosphate glucuronosyltransferase 1A (UGT1A) genes on irinotecan metabolism and toxicity were conducted. METHODS: This was an open-labeled, fixed-sequence study of bevacizumab with FOLFIRI (irinotecan, leucovorin, and infusional 5-fluorouracil). Pharmacokinetic assessments were conducted in cycles 1 and 3. RESULTS: Forty-five subjects were enrolled. No difference in dose-normalized AUC(0-last) for irinotecan and SN-38 between irinotecan administered alone or in combination with bevacizumab was identified. Leukopenia was associated with higher exposure to both irinotecan and SN-38. UGT1A1 polymorphisms were associated with variability in irinotecan PK. Gastrointestinal toxicity was associated with UGT1A6 genotype. No other associations between UGT1A genotypes and toxicity were detected. CONCLUSION: Bevacizumab does not affect irinotecan PK when administered concurrently. A variety of pharmacogenetic relationships may influence the pharmacokinetics of irinotecan and its toxicity.

A phase I trial of the oral, multikinase inhibitor sorafenib in combination with carboplatin and paclitaxel.

PURPOSE: This study evaluated the safety, maximum tolerated dose, pharmacokinetics, and antitumor activity of sorafenib, a multikinase inhibitor, combined with paclitaxel and carboplatin in patients with solid tumors. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Thirty-nine patients with advanced cancer (24 with melanoma) received oral sorafenib 100, 200, or 400 mg twice daily on days 2 to 19 of a 21-day cycle. All patients received carboplatin corresponding to AUC6 and 225 mg/m(2) paclitaxel on day 1. Pharmacokinetic analyses were done for sorafenib on days 2 and 19 of cycle 1 and for paclitaxel on day 1 of cycles 1 and 2. Pretreatment tumor samples from 17 melanoma patients were analyzed for BRAF mutations. RESULTS: Sorafenib was well tolerated at the doses evaluated. The most frequent severe adverse events were hematologic toxicities (grade 3 or 4 in 33 patients, 85%). Twenty-seven (69%) patients had sorafenib-related adverse events, the most frequent of which were dermatologic events (26 patients, 67%). Exposure to paclitaxel was not altered by intervening treatment with sorafenib. Treatment with sorafenib, paclitaxel, and carboplatin resulted in one complete response and nine partial responses, all among patients with melanoma. There was no correlation between BRAF mutational status and treatment responses in patients with melanoma. CONCLUSIONS: The recommended phase II doses are oral 400 mg twice daily sorafenib, carboplatin at an AUC6 dose, and 225 mg/m(2) paclitaxel. The tumor responses observed with this combined regimen in patients with melanoma warrant further investigation.

Phase II trial of sorafenib in advanced thyroid cancer.

PURPOSE: Given the molecular pathophysiology of thyroid cancer and the spectrum of kinases inhibited by sorafenib, including Raf kinase, vascular endothelial growth factor receptors, platelet-derived growth factor receptor, and RET tyrosine kinases, we conducted an open-label phase II trial to determine the efficacy of sorafenib in patients with advanced thyroid carcinoma. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Eligible patients with metastatic, iodine-refractory thyroid carcinoma received sorafenib 400 mg orally twice daily. Responses were measured radiographically every 2 to 3 months. The study end points included response rate, progression-free survival (PFS), and best response by Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors. RESULTS: Thirty patients were entered onto the study and treated for a minimum of 16 weeks. Seven patients (23%; 95% CI, 0.10 to 0.42) had a partial response lasting 18+ to 84 weeks. Sixteen patients (53%; 95% CI, 0.34 to 0.72) had stable disease lasting 14 to 89+ weeks. Seventeen (95%) of 19 patients for whom serial thyroglobulin levels were available showed a marked and rapid response in thyroglobulin levels with a mean decrease of 70%. The median PFS was 79 weeks. Toxicity was consistent with other sorafenib trials, although a single patient died of liver failure that was likely treatment related. CONCLUSION: Sorafenib has clinically relevant antitumor activity in patients with metastatic, iodine-refractory thyroid carcinoma, with an overall clinical benefit rate (partial response + stable disease) of 77%, median PFS of 79 weeks, and an overall acceptable safety profile. These results represent a significant advance over chemotherapy in both response rate and PFS and support further investigation of this agent in these patients.

A phase I, dose escalation trial of ZD0473, a novel platinum analogue, in combination with gemcitabine.

PURPOSE: To develop a combination regimen for clinical testing, we performed a dose escalation study of ZD0473 in combination with gemcitabine. ZD0473 is a novel platinum analogue with an aliphatic cyclic carrier ligand. In vitro and in vivo studies suggest that it possesses a different spectrum of antitumor activity from cisplatin and carboplatin. In single-agent studies of ZD0473, myelosuppression was the predominant toxicity and responses wer observed. METHODS: In this combination phase I trial, 36 patients with advanced cancer were accrued to four dose levels, with doses of ZD0473 and gemcitabine ranging from 60 to 120 mg/m2 and 600 to 750 mg/m2, respectively ZD0473 was administered on day 1 and gemcitabine was given on days 1 and 8 of a 21-day cycle. RESULTS: Hematologic toxicity was dose-limiting. Grade 3 and 4 thrombocytopenia and neutropenia occurred during 60% and 41% of all cycles. Nonhematologic toxicities were mild and reversible. Two partial responses and 19 patients with stable disease were observed. CONCLUSIONS: The recommended phase II doses are 90 mg/m2 of ZD0473 and 750 mg/m2 of gemcitabine for lightly pretreated patients and 600 mg/m2 for heavily pretreated patients. The combination of ZD0473 and gemcitabine is associated with dose-dependent thrombocytopenia and neutropenia as well as having promising clinical activity.

Phase I combination trial of gemcitabine, paclitaxel, and carboplatin in patients with advanced malignancy.

PURPOSE: We performed a phase I trial of carboplatin and paclitaxel in combination with gemcitabine in order to determine the tolerability of this triplet. METHODS: Enrolled in the study were 26 patients with advanced cancer, most with non-small cell lung cancer. The patients received escalating doses of carboplatin and paclitaxel on day 1 and gemcitabine (30-min infusion) on days 1, 8, and 15 of a 28-day treatment cycle. The doses of each drug ranged from an area under the concentration-time curve (AUC) of 5 to 6 for carboplatin, 135 to 175 mg/m(2) for paclitaxel, and 300 to 1000 mg/m(2) for gemcitabine. RESULTS: Hematologic toxicity was the most commonly observed toxicity and was dose-limiting. During the first cycle at the recommended phase II dose, there were two instances of grade 4 neutropenia and one instance of grade 4 thrombocytopenia among six patients, none of which was dose-limiting. Cumulative hematologic toxicity emerged in subsequent cycles. Non-hematologic toxicities were mild. Five patients, all with previously untreated non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC), had a partial response. Nine patients with NSCLC or upper gastrointestinal malignancies experienced stable disease. CONCLUSIONS: Based on significant neutropenia and thrombocytopenia, the regimen recommended for further study consists of carboplatin AUC 5, paclitaxel 175 mg/m(2), and gemcitabine 1000 mg/m(2) on a 28-day cycle. The antitumor activity noted suggests that further investigation of this well-tolerated combination in specific tumor types, especially NSCLC, is warranted.

Phase I and pharmacokinetic trial of the proapoptotic sulindac analog CP-461 in patients with advanced cancer.

CP-461 is a member of a class of novel proapoptotic drugs that specifically inhibit cyclic GMP phosphodiesterases but not cyclooxygenase-1 or -2. CP-461 inhibits the growth of a broad range of human tumor cell lines in vitro at micromolar concentrations and selectively induces apoptosis in cancer cell lines but not normal cells. Preclinical studies revealed good oral bioavailability and no toxicity in dogs and rats at single doses up to 500 mg/kg. In a Phase I trial, 21 patients with a range of solid tumors and good performance status received CP-461 p.o. twice daily for 28 consecutive days. Cycles were repeated without a treatment-free interval. CP-461 doses ranged from 100 to 800 mg/day. Therapy was well tolerated overall, and a maximum tolerated dose was not reached. Grade 3 asymptomatic aspartate aminotransferase/alanine aminotransferase elevation in 1 patient treated at 800 mg/day was the only dose-limiting toxicity. No hematologic toxicity was noted. Peak plasma concentrations occurred between 1 and 2 h after dosing, and doses above 200 mg/day exceeded the known in vitro EC(50) (1-2 micro M) for apoptosis in cancer cells. No drug was detectable after 24 h of administration, and the terminal half-life was 6.7 h. The area under the plasma concentration-time curve was dose-proportional from 200 to 800 mg/day. Four patients exhibited disease stability after two cycles of treatment. CP-461 is minimally toxic at doses up to 800 mg/day when administered p.o. on a twice-daily schedule.