Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 5 de 5
Filtrar
Más filtros












Base de datos
Intervalo de año de publicación
1.
Kans J Med ; 17: 51-56, 2024.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38859992

RESUMEN

Introduction: The topic of childhood vaccinations has become increasingly contentious, sparking debate, and creating challenging decisions for parents. This study aimed to explore the factors influencing COVID-19 vaccination decisions for parents of unvaccinated children and identify the most common reasons for not vaccinating children against COVID-19 in the U.S. Methods: Authors analyzed data from Phase 3.7, Week 53 of the United States Census Bureau's Household Pulse Survey (N = 68,504), collected from January 4 to January 16, 2023. Standard descriptive statistics and adjusted odds ratio (aOR) were used to analyze the data. Results: The top three reasons for vaccine hesitancy were concerns about side effects, lack of trust in the vaccine, and the perception that children in the household were not part of a high-risk group. Among respondents, nearly 87% (n = 59,363) reported receiving a COVID- 19 vaccination, and these individuals were more inclined to vaccinate their children across all age groups studied. Additionally, participants with higher levels of education (bachelor's degree or higher) were more likely to vaccinate their children against COVID-19 (aOR = 5.79; 95% CI, 5.43-6.17; p <0.001). Conclusions: Findings from the study suggest that some parents are still concerned about the COVID-19 vaccine and are hesitant to vaccinate their children against the disease. Information and insights from this study allow for a greater understanding of how parents are making this decision nearly three years after the pandemic officially began. Further studies are needed to determine how other factors, such as geographical location, also may affect parental COVID-19 vaccination hesitancy.

3.
Kans J Med ; 16: 234-236, 2023.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37791030

RESUMEN

Introduction: Encounters for preoperative assessments are common within primary care offices, so it is imperative that family medicine residents learn how to perform preoperative evaluations. We assessed family medicine residents' knowledge of preoperative evaluation in preparation for surgery by providing a pre- and post-test alongside a didactic seminar. Methods: A didactic seminar on preoperative evaluations was presented at a family medicine resident didactics session by two senior anesthesiology residents. A 16-question, multiple choice test was used as both a pre-test and post-test to assess family medicine residents' knowledge. Results: A total of 31 participants took the pre-test (residents = 24; medical students = 7), and 30 participants took the post-test (residents = 23; medical students = 7). Mean scores and standard deviations were calculated for both tests with an average score of 37.50% ± 10.58% and 45.42% ± 11.12% on the pre- and post-test, respectively. Using the Kruskal-Wallis test, residents showed a significant improvement in test scores following the didactic presentation (p = 0.041), while overall results (residents and medical students) also reported a significant difference (p = 0.004). Conclusions: Our results demonstrated that educating family medicine residents and medical students on preoperative evaluation showed significant, quantifiable gains in knowledge following a brief didactic presentation. Given the current gap between guidelines and practice, our results emphasize the need for a formal medical school and residency-based curriculum related to preoperative patient evaluation.

4.
Am Fam Physician ; 107(3): 264-272, 2023 03.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36920819

RESUMEN

Polycystic ovary syndrome (PCOS) is the most common endocrinopathy affecting women of childbearing age. Its complex pathophysiology includes genetic and environmental factors that contribute to insulin resistance in patients with this disease. The diagnosis of PCOS is primarily clinical, based on the presence of at least two of the three Rotterdam criteria: oligoanovulation, hyperandrogenism, and polycystic ovaries on ultrasonography. PCOS is often associated with hirsutism, acne, anovulatory menstruation, dysglycemia, dyslipidemia, obesity, and increased risk of cardiovascular disease and hormone-sensitive malignancies (e.g., at least a twofold increased risk of endometrial cancer). Lifestyle modification, including caloric restriction and increased physical activity, is the foundation of therapy. Subsequent management decisions depend on the patient's desire for pregnancy. In patients who do not want to become pregnant, oral contraceptives are first-line therapy for menstrual irregularities and dermatologic complications such as hirsutism and acne. Antiandrogens such as spironolactone are often added to oral contraceptives as second-line agents. In patients who want to become pregnant, first-line therapy is letrozole for ovulation induction. Metformin added to lifestyle management is first-line therapy for patients with metabolic complications such as insulin resistance. Patients with PCOS are at increased risk of depression and obstructive sleep apnea, and screening is recommended.


Asunto(s)
Acné Vulgar , Hiperandrogenismo , Resistencia a la Insulina , Síndrome del Ovario Poliquístico , Embarazo , Humanos , Femenino , Síndrome del Ovario Poliquístico/complicaciones , Síndrome del Ovario Poliquístico/diagnóstico , Síndrome del Ovario Poliquístico/terapia , Hirsutismo/diagnóstico , Hirsutismo/etiología , Hirsutismo/terapia , Hiperandrogenismo/diagnóstico , Hiperandrogenismo/etiología , Hiperandrogenismo/terapia , Anticonceptivos Orales/uso terapéutico , Acné Vulgar/diagnóstico , Acné Vulgar/etiología , Acné Vulgar/terapia
5.
Kans J Med ; 14: 51-52, 2021.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33654545
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA
...