RESUMEN
INTRODUCTION: This study describes our experience implementing a connected prescription software (NetSIG, Terascop) for molecular pathology exams. MATERIAL AND METHODS: NetSIG was set up for liquid biopsies and tissue testing. After registration and activation of regional pathology laboratories, NetSIG was implemented for external then internal prescriptions. RESULTS: NetSIG allows users to follow up on all prescriptions on the website, to interact through messages and to consult reports after validation. External set up was quick (3-4 months) and comprehensive (>70%). Prescriptions were made by physicians or more often by secretaries or referring pathologists. Internal prescriptions were made by pathologists then registered in NetSIG by our secretaries. This deployment strategy has resulted in very good completeness of prescriptions (>90%). DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSION: Connected prescriptions made this complex circuit more fluid and facilitated the redistribution of different administrative and technical tasks. The number of phone calls decreased sharply. Half of the prescriptions were made by pathologists and half by oncologists (physicians or secretaries). The mean dearchiving duration for blocks was one day. Mean forwarding of blocks was 2.5 days. Mean turnaround time was 8 days for targeted techniques and 13 days for Next Generation Sequencing. Physicians appreciated the interactivity of the software and the fact that they could consult it on a smartphone.
RESUMEN
AIMS: Idylla epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) is a fast and fully automated mutation assay that is easy to implement. However, under the Biocartis-recommended technical conditions, tissue sections are directly introduced into the cartridge, at the risk of exhausting the tumour sample. In this study, we evaluate the performance of Idylla EGFR on extracted DNA and discuss its place within the global non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) screening strategy. METHODS: 577 comparative tests between Idylla EGFR on extracted DNA and next-generation sequencing (NGS) were performed across two centres. RESULTS: Preanalytical thresholds were established (20% tumour cell content, 50 ng DNA input) and challenged prospectively in routine practice. 16.8% of samples referred for screening were considered non eligible for Idylla EGFR testing. Due to discordant by design cases, Idylla EGFR sensitivity was 86.9% for currently actionable EGFR mutations. Idylla EGFR specificity was 100% in first-line screening. NGS was always feasible on the same DNA. CONCLUSION: Idylla EGFR on extracted DNA is feasible and enables tumour material to be saved compared with tissue section use. It is not necessary to replace the analytical thresholds of the Biocartis algorithm. Due to both the limits of the mutational repertoire and the high increase of targetable genes in NSCLC, the use of Idylla EGFR should be restricted to clinical emergency situations accompanied by NGS.