High efficiency particulate air filters and heat & moisture exchanger filters increase positive end-expiratory pressure in helmet continuous positive airway pressure: A bench-top study.

BACKGROUND: Helmet continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP) has been widely used during the COVID-19 pandemic. Specific filters (i.e. High Efficiency Particulate Air filter: HEPA; Heat & Moisture Exchanger Filter: HMEF) were used to prevent Sars-CoV2 environmental dispersion and were connected to the CPAP helmet. However, HEPA and HMEF filters may act as resistors to expiratory gas flow and increase the levels of pressure within the hood. METHODS: In a bench-top study, we investigated the levels of airway pressure generated by different HEPA and HMEF filters connected to the CPAP helmet in the absence of a Positive End Expiratory Pressure (PEEP) valve and with two levels of PEEP (5 and 10 cmH2O). All steps were performed using 3 increasing levels of gas flow (60, 80, 100 L/min). RESULTS: The use of 8 different commercially available filters significantly increased the pressure within the hood of the CPAP helmet with or without the use of PEEP valves. On average, the increase of pressure above the set PEEP ranged from 3 cmH2O to 10 cmH2O across gas flow rates of 60 to 100 L/min. The measure of airway pressure was highly correlated between the laboratory pressure transducer and the Helmet manometer. Bias with 95% Confidence Interval of Bias between the devices was 0.7 (-2.06; 0.66) cmH2O. CONCLUSIONS: The use of HEPA and HMEF filters placed before the PEEP valve at the expiratory port of the CPAP helmet significantly increase the levels of airway pressure compared to the set level of PEEP. The manometer can detect accurately the airway pressure in the presence of HEPA and HMEF filters in the helmet CPAP and its use should considered.

The effect of recanalization on long-term neurological outcome after cerebral venous thrombosis.

Essentials The role of cerebral venous thrombosis (CVT) recanalization on neurologic outcome is still debated. We studied a large cohort of 508 CVT patients with 419 patient years of radiological follow-up. Recanalization rate is high during the first months after CVT and neurologic outcome is favorable. High recanalization grade of CVT independently predicts good neurological outcome. SUMMARY: Background Studies with limited sample size and with discordant results described the recanalization time-course of cerebral venous thrombosis (CVT). The neurological outcome after a first episode of CVT is good, but the role of recanalization on neurological dependence is still debated. Objectives The aim of the study is to assess the recanalization rate after cerebral venous thrombosis (CVT) and its prognostic role in long-term neurological outcome. Patients/Methods In a retrospective observational multicenter cohort study, patients with an acute first episode of CVT with at least one available imaging test during follow-up were enrolled. Patency status of the vessels was categorized as complete, partial or not recanalized. Neurological outcome was defined using the modified Rankin scale (mRS) as good (mRS = 0-1) or poor (mRS = 2-6). Results Five-hundred and eight patients (median [IQR] age, 39 [28.5-49] years; 26% male) were included. Complete or partial recanalization was not differently represented in patients undergoing scans at different periods of time (from 28-day to 3 month-period up to a 1-3 year-period). mRS at the time of follow-up imaging was available in 483 patients; 92.8% of them had a mRS of 0-1. CVT recanalization (odds ratio [OR], 2.56; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.59-4.13) was positively associated, whereas cancer (OR, 0.29; 95% CI, 0.09-0.88), and personal history of venous thromboembolism (VTE) (OR, 0.36; 95% CI, 0.14-0.92) were negatively associated as independent predictors of favorable (mRS = 0-1) outcome at follow-up. Conclusions Most patients with a first CVT had complete or partial recanalization at follow-up. Recanalization was independently associated with a favorable neurological outcome.

Low-dose aspirin for in vitro fertilization or intracytoplasmic sperm injection: a systematic review and a meta-analysis of the literature.

BACKGROUND: It was hypothesized that low-dose aspirin could improve implantation rates in subsequent pregnancies in women undergoing in vitro fertilization (IVF)/intracytoplasmic sperm injection (ICSI). Previous studies have shown inconclusive results or focused on surrogate endpoints. We therefore conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis of the literature investigating the effect of low-dose aspirin on hard outcomes, including live birth rate, pregnancy rate and miscarriage. METHODS: MEDLINE and EMBASE databases were searched up to November 2011. Randomized controlled trials comparing low-dose aspirin with placebo/no treatment in IVF/ICSI women were included. Pooled odds ratios (ORs) and 95%confidence intervals (CIs) were calculated. RESULTS: Seventeen studies with 6403 patients were included. The use of aspirin did not improve live birth pregnancy rate compared with placebo or no treatment (1.08; 95% CI, 0.90, 1.29). Pregnancy rates were significantly increased in patients randomized to low-dose aspirin (OR, 1.19; 95% CI, 1.01, 1.39), but miscarriage rates were not (OR, 1.18; 95% CI, 0.82, 1.68). Results of sensitivity analyses including high-quality studies did not show statistically significant differences in all considered endpoints. CONCLUSIONS: The results of this study do not show a substantial efficacy of aspirin inwomen undergoing IVF/ICSI and do not support the use of low-dose aspirin to improve the success of IVF/ICSI in terms of pregnancy outcomes. Further high-quality studies evaluating the possible efficacy of aspirin in selected groups of patients are warranted.