Everolimus- versus sirolimus-eluting stents for the treatment of unprotected left main coronary artery stenosis (results from the EXCELLENT registry).

BACKGROUND: Data concerning the results of 2nd generation DES in the treatment of unprotected left main coronary artery (ULMCA) stenosis are limited. The aim of this study was to evaluate the efficacy and safety of stenting with everolimus- (EES) with sirolimus-eluting stent (SES) for the treatment of ULMCA stenosis in the "real world" setting. METHODS: In this multi-center all-comer registry, a total of 275 patients with ULMCA stenosis were analyzed; 160 receiving EES and 115 receiving SES. The primary endpoint was major adverse cardiac events (MACE), defined as death, myocardial infarction, and ischemia-driven target vessel revascularization at 1 year. RESULTS: Baseline characteristics were similar between the two stent groups. At 1 year, the rate of MACE was comparable between the two groups (7.5% for EES vs. 13.9% for SES, HR: 0.55 [0.26-1.17], p = 0.117). However, after multivariable or propensity score adjustment, the risk of MACE was significantly lower for EES compared with that for SES (multivariable adjusted HR: 0.42 [0.19-0.92], p = 0.030; propensity score-adjusted HR: 0.43 [0.20-0.95], p = 0.037). These results were mainly driven from the numerically lower rate of repeat revascularization in the EES group (2.5% for EES vs. 7.0% for SES, p = 0.096). As for hard endpoint (death or myocardial infarction) and stent thrombosis, no differences were found between the 2 groups. CONCLUSIONS: In a large cohort of patients receiving ULMCA stenting, the MACE rate was numerically lower in the EES compared with that in the SES (statistically significant only after adjustment), which was mainly driven by significantly lower rates of repeat revascularization.

Periodic variation and its effect on management and prognosis of Korean patients with acute myocardial infarction.

BACKGROUND: The characteristics of the periodic variation in acute myocardial infarction (AMI) and the subsequent effect on management and prognosis have not been fully investigated in a large number of Asian populations. METHODS AND RESULTS: From a prospective, observational multicenter online registry, 4,573 patients diagnosed as AMI in Korea from January to December 2006 were included. The highest incidence of AMI was between 8 a.m. and noon. The number of cases was highest in the winter and lowest in the autumn (13.6 vs 11.4 patients per day, P<0.001). Patients with symptom onset during working hours had a shorter time to first medical contact (203+/-288 min) compared with out-of-hours onset (230+/-288 min, P=0.003). In patients who underwent primary angioplasty, out-of hours symptom onset was associated with a greater time delay in both the patient's and the medical facility's response (door-to-balloon time out-of hours vs working hours: 101+/-54 min vs 84+/-44 min, P<0.001). In patients with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction, symptoms to first medical contact showed a significant relationship to in-hospital mortality (for every 10 min of symptoms to first medical contact, odds ratio 1.006, 95% confidence interval 1.001-1.012, P=0.018) CONCLUSIONS: Circadian and periodic variation in AMI exists in Korean patients, which resulted in different patient behavior, hospital management and outcomes.

Intensive pharmacologic treatment in patients with acute non ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction who did not undergo percutaneous coronary intervention.

BACKGROUND: The aim of this study was to assess the impact of more aggressive pharmacological treatment on short-term clinical outcomes in patients with acute non ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (NSTEMI) who do not undergo percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). METHODS AND RESULTS: The 924 NSTEMI patients treated with early conservative strategy (69.2+/-12.5 years, 637 males) in 50 hospitals that were high-volume centers with facilities for primary PCI were recruited to the Korean Acute Myocardial Infarction Registry (KAMIR) from November 2005 to August 2007. For all patients, the pharmacotherapy index based on the use of drugs during hospital stay was assessed (range of points 0-10). Primary endpoint was the combined in-hospital mortality and morbidity and major adverse cardiac events during 1 month of clinical follow-up. Of the patients, data from 847 who were followed-up for 1 month after discharge were analyzed. The rate of the primary endpoint decreased with an increase of the pharmacotherapy index and this result was similar in the low- and high-risk groups. In the multivariate analysis, low pharmacotherapy index (

Clinical safety of drug-eluting stents in the Korea acute myocardial infarction registry.

BACKGROUND: Percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) with drug-eluting stents (DES) may be useful in patients with acute myocardial infarction (AMI), but safety issues still need to be solved. This study was undertaken to investigate the incidence of major adverse cardiac events (MACE) and stent thrombosis in DES-implanted AMI patients in real-life clinical practice. METHODS AND RESULTS: On-line registry of AMI cases at the web site www.kamir.or.kr has been performed in 41 primary PCI centers in Korea and between November 2005 and September 2006, 1,541 surviving patients who had been implanted with either Cypher or Taxus stents were enrolled for analysis during a 6-month clinical follow-up. There were 2 groups: group I [834 patients, 61.9+/-11.9 years: sirolimus-eluting stent (Cypher)], group II [707 patients, 62.9+/-12.0 years: paclitaxel-eluting stent (Taxus)]. At both 1 and 6 months the incidence of MACE was not significantly different between the 2 groups. There were 17 cases of stent thrombosis, but the incidence of stent thrombosis was not significantly different between the 2 groups (group I:II=9 (1.1%):8 (1.1%), p=1.000). The stent type, length, number, lesion complexity and diabetes were not significant for the incidence of MACE or stent thrombosis after adjustment. CONCLUSION: MACE and stent thrombosis rates did not differ between 2 types of DES identified in Korea Acute Myocardial Infarction Registry (KAMIR). DES can be used in patients with AMI with a relatively low 6-month MACE rate.

An elevated value of C-reactive protein is the only predictive factor of restenosis after percutaneous coronary intervention.

BACKGROUND: The current techniques for percutaneous coronary interventions (PCI) remain limited by restenosis. Recent studies have provided evidence of inflammation playing a role in the pathogenesis of cardiovascular disease. METHODS: Whether inflammatory markers are predictors of subsequent restenosis were prospectively tested in 272 consecutive patients with angiographically proven coronary artery disease. Patients having undergone PCI at Chonnam National University Hospital, between Sept. 1999 and Mar. 2001, were divided into two groups according to the occurrence of restenosis on a follow-up coronary angiogram: Group I were patients with restenosis (n = 99, 59.5 +/- 10.8 years, M:F = 77:22) and Group II were those without restenosis (n = 173, 58.8 +/- 10.2 years, M:F = 131:42). The IgG seropositivity, cytomegalovirus (CMV) titers, C. pneumoniae. H. pylori and levels of C-reactive protein (CRP) were compared between the two groups. RESULTS: There were no statistical differences in the seropositivity of the CMV IgG C. pneumoniae IgG and H. pylori IgG between the two groups (Groups I vs. II: 100 vs. 100%, 24.7 vs. 25.7% and 62.2 vs. 63.7%, respectively). Of the angiographic parameters, a low Thrombolysis in Myocardial Infarction (TIMI) flow (TIMI 0 or 1) was more common in Group I than Group II (p = 0.038). The patients with an elevated CRP (> 0.5 mg/dL) were more common in Group I than Group II (57.6 vs. 36.4%, p = 0.001), with the CRP values being higher in Group I than Group II (3.3 +/- 5.8 vs. 1.3 +/- 2.6 mg/dL, p = 0.001). According to a multiple logistic regression analysis, the CRP was the only predictor of restenosis, with an odds ratio of 2.1169 (95% C.I. 1.2062-3.7154, p = 0.009). CONCLUSION: The CRP value is the most important predictor of restenosis after PCI.