RESUMEN
Objetivos: Analisar e comparar o índice de satisfação profissional (ISP) de enfermeiros do bloco cirúrgico (BC). Método: Estudo de campo, comparativo e quantitativo que utilizou o ISP na avaliação da autonomia, interação, remuneração, normas organizacionais, status profissional e requisitos do trabalho de enfermeiros atuantes do BC de um hospital privado de São Paulo. Resultados: Dos 49 enfermeiros da amostra, 39 atuavam em centro cirúrgico (CC) e sala de recuperação pós-anestésica (SRPA) e 10 no centro de material e esterilização (CME). A interação foi o componente de maior importância, e o status profissional, o de menor, no entanto status profissional obteve o maior nível de satisfação, e requisitos do trabalho, o menor. O ISP foi 11,04 (baixo nível), considerando possível variação entre 0,9 e 37,1. Houve diferença significante para interação, com maior satisfação dos enfermeiros do CC/SRPA em comparação com os do CME. Conclusão: A satisfação profissional de enfermeiros do BC avaliada pelo ISP foi baixa. Conhecer os fatores que influenciam nesse índice é importante, pois a satisfação interfere diretamente na qualidade da assistência, previne doenças ocupacionais, além de ser indicador de resultados no processo de trabalho.
Objectives: To analyze and compare the professional satisfaction index (PSI) of surgical block (SB) nurses. Method: Comparative and quantitative field study that used the PSI in the evaluation of autonomy, interaction, compensation, organizational standards, professional status and work requirements of nurses working in the SB of a private hospital in São Paulo. Results: Of the 49 nurses in the sample, 39 worked in the operating room (OR) and post-anesthesia recovery room (PARR) and 10 worked in the material and sterilization center (MSC). Interaction was the most important component, and professional status was the least important. However, professional status obtained the highest level of satisfaction, while work requirements received the lowest. The PSI was 11.04 (low level), considering possible variation between 0.9 and 37.1. There was a significant difference for interaction, with greater satisfaction of OR/PARR nurses compared to MSC nurses. Conclusion: Professional satisfaction of SB nurses assessed by PSI was low. It is important to have knowledge of the factors that influence this index, as satisfaction directly interferes in the quality of care and prevents occupational diseases, besides being an indicator of results in the work process.
Objetivos: analizar y comparar el índice de satisfacción profesional (ISP) de las enfermeras en el quirófano. Método: Estudio de campo, comparativo y cuantitativo que utilizó el ISP en la evaluación de autonomía, interacción, remuneración, normas organizacionales, estatus profesional y requisitos de trabajo de enfermeras que trabajan en el BC de un hospital privado en São Paulo. Resultados: De las 49 enfermeras de la muestra, 39 trabajaron en el centro quirúrgico (CQ) y la sala de recuperación postanestésica (SRPA) y 10 en el centro de material y esterilización (CME). La interacción fue el componente más importante, y el estado profesional, el más bajo, sin embargo, el estado profesional obtuvo el mayor nivel de satisfacción y los requisitos laborales, el más bajo. El ISP fue 11.04 (nivel bajo), considerando una posible variación entre 0.9 y 37.1. Hubo una diferencia significativa en la interacción, con una mayor satisfacción de las enfermeras de CQ/SRPA en comparación con las de CME. Conclusión: La satisfacción profesional de las enfermeras de quirófano evaluadas por el ISP fue baja. Es importante conocer los factores que influyen en este índice, ya que la satisfacción interfiere directamente con la calidad de la atención, previene enfermedades ocupacionales, además de ser un indicador de resultados en el proceso de trabajo.
Asunto(s)
Humanos , Enfermería de Quirófano , Calidad de la Atención de Salud , Condiciones de Trabajo , Enfermería Perioperatoria , Periodo de Recuperación de la Anestesia , EsterilizaciónRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Stress levels are evident among health professionals. However, there are few studies on sensory-based self-care aimed at stress management, self-esteem and subjective well-being in this group of professionals. OBJECTIVE: To assess the impact of a self-care intervention mediated by the senses on the stress levels, self-esteem and well-being of health professionals in a hospital environment. METHODS: A total of 93 health professionals participated in an unblinded clinical trial, randomized into four groups: 1) control (no intervention); 2) Monosensory-daily body moisturizing (DBM) with odorless cream; 3) Bisensory-DBM with scented cream; 4) Multisensory-DBM with scented cream associated with audiovisual material. Participants answered specific questionnaires to assess stress, self-esteem and well-being and cortisol samples were collected at baseline, 15 and 30 days following intervention, and at the 30-day follow-up. RESULTS: Self-care was characterized as neglected, with most participants reporting inadequate hours of sleep (74%), irregular physical activity (68%), and inadequate nutrition (45%). Compared to the other groups, the Bisensory group had lower stress on all three assessments (p = 0.017; 0.012; 0.036), a life satisfaction 8% higher at follow-up than at baseline (95% CI: 2% to 15%, p = 0.016), a 10% increase in positive affect (95% CI: 2% to 19%, p = 0.011) and a 12% reduction in negative affect (95% CI: 3% to 21% less, p = 0.014) after 30 days. The Multisensory group showed improvement in self-esteem (p = 0.012) and reduced cortisol (p = 0.036) after 30 days of intervention. The control group showed no changes in the variables studied, except for cortisol: an increase at the 15-day evaluation (denoting higher risk for stress, p = 0.009) and a reduction at follow-up (p = 0.028), which was nevertheless within normal levels. TRIAL REGISTRATION: Clinicaltrials.gov NCT02406755.
