Eagle syndrome: An updated review.

Background: This work aims to review the current literature and our experience on vascular Eagle syndrome (ES) that can present misleading clinical presentations and better understand the possible therapeutic strategies. Methods: We reviewed the existing literature on PubMed from January 1, 2017, to December 31, 2022, including the sequential keywords "vascular AND Eagle syndrome," "vascular AND styloid syndrome," "vascular AND elongated styloid process," "vascular AND stylocarotid syndrome," and "Eagle syndrome AND carotid artery dissection." Results: 38 vascular ES cases, including our experience, were analyzed. The most frequent clinical onset was hemiparesis (n 21, 57%), but other regular clinical presentations were aphasia, loss of consciousness, amaurosis, headache, or a combination of the latter. Massive oral bleeding was reported only once in the literature before our case. Twelve patients were treated with only antiplatelet therapy, either single or double. Nine patients were treated with anticoagulation therapy only. In 14 patients, a carotid artery stent was used, associated with anticoagulation or antiplatelet therapy. In 17 cases, a styloid process (SP) resection was performed. Conclusion: ES has many clinical presentations, and carotid artery dissection resulting in oral bleeding seems rare. Literature results and our experience make us believe that when dealing with vascular ES, the best treatment strategy is endovascular internal carotid artery stenting with antiplatelet therapy, followed by surgical removal of the elongated SP to prevent stent fracture.

Modified percutaneous biopsy of the spine: improvement of the technique.

PURPOSE: Biopsy of the spine can be performed by open surgery or percutaneous needle sampling. The first has the highest diagnostic yield while the second is a less invasive procedure with lower rate of complications and shorter hospitalization time. We described a modified technique of percutaneous biopsy using semi-rigid grasping forceps that may offer the advantages of both, open and minimally invasive surgery. METHODS: Thirty consecutive patients with spinal lesions requiring biopsy were admitted to Neurosurgical Unit of Belcolle Hospital (Viterbo, Italy) from January 2017 to September 2021. There was a suspicion of spondylodiscitis in 25 cases and of tumor in 5 cases. Percutanous trans-pedicular spine biopsy has been performed using this new semi-rigid grasping forceps. Combining the opening width, jaw length and full 360° rotation, the device allows a wide and precise sampling. RESULTS: Sampling was sufficient in all cases (100%); tumors was observed in 5 cases (16.7%%) with a percentage of definitive histopathologic diagnosis of 100% (n = 5); among the remaining patients histological examination yielded a diagnosis of spinal infection in 25 cases (100%), and microbiologic culture provided an aetiologic diagnosis in 23 cases (92%). All procedures were well tolerated, and no postoperative complications were observed. Levels involved included: thoracic (T5-T9) in 8 cases, thoracolumbar junction (T10-L2) in 12 cases and lumbar (L3-L5) in 10 cases. CONCLUSIONS: Percutaneous biopsy with the semi-rigid grasping forceps is a safe and effective procedure that can be used for diagnosis of both infectious and tumor lesions of the spine. It allows to obtain a larger specimen volume and to use a multidirectional trajectory for sampling, resulting in a minimally invasive technique with strong ability to yield etiologic diagnosis.

Intraoperative MRI versus intraoperative ultrasound in pediatric brain tumor surgery: is expensive better than cheap? A review of the literature.

PURPOSE: The extent of brain tumor resection (EOR) is a fundamental prognostic factor in pediatric neuro-oncology in association with the histology. In general, resection aims at gross total resection (GTR). Intraoperative imaging like intraoperative US (iOUS) and MRI have been developed in order to find any tumoral remnant but with different costs. Aim of our work is to review the current literature in order to better understand the differences between costs and efficacy of MRI and iOUS to evaluate tumor remnants intraoperatively. METHODS: We reviewed the existing literature on PubMed until 31st December 2021 including the sequential keywords "intraoperative ultrasound and pediatric brain tumors", "iUS and pediatric brain tumors", "intraoperative magnetic resonance AND pediatric brain tumors", and "intraoperative MRI AND pediatric brain tumors. RESULTS: A total of 300 papers were screened through analysis of title and abstract; 254 were excluded. After selection, a total of 23 articles were used for this systematic review. Among the 929 patients described, a total of 349(38%) of the cases required an additional resection after an iMRI scan. GTR was measured on 794 patients (data of 69 patients lost), and it was achieved in 552(70%) patients. In case of iOUS, GTR was estimated in 291 out of 379 (77%) cases. This finding was confirmed at the post-operative MRI in 256(68%) cases. CONCLUSIONS: The analysis of the available literature demonstrates that expensive equipment does not always mean better. In fact, for the majority of pediatric brain tumors, iOUS is comparable to iMRI in estimating the EOR.