Impact of time from symptom onset to puncture, and puncture to reperfusion, in endovascular therapy in the late time window (>6 hours).

Background- Increased times from symptom onset to puncture (TSOP) and from puncture to reperfusion (TPTR) are associated with worse outcome in ischemic stroke patients treated with endovascular therapy (EVT) in the early time window (<6 hours). However, these associations are less described in the late window (>6 hours), where patients may benefit from EVT because of a more favorable imaging profile (late window paradox). We sought to compare the effect of these timeframes between these two periods on efficacy and safety outcomes.Methods- The ETIS Registry (Endovascular Treatment in Ischemic Stroke) is an ongoing, prospective, observational study in 21 centers that perform EVT in France. We included adult patients with an anterior occlusion, successfully treated by EVT (mTICI 2b-3) between January 2015 and June 2023, with a known time of stroke onset. The cohort was divided into 2 groups according to the TSOP (≤6h vs >6h). Primary outcome was favorable outcome (modified Rankin Scale 0-2 at 90 days).Results- 7,516 patients were included, with 5,936 patients being treated ≤6h and 1,580 >6h. In the early window, TSOP and TPTR were associated with worse outcomes at 90 days (adjusted OR=0.68 per hour; 95%CI, 0.64-0.73; p<0.001 and aOR=0.92 per 10 minutes increment; 95%CI, 0.90-0.94, p<0.001, respectively). TSOP was not associated with worse outcomes at 90 days in the late window (p=0.955), but TPTR was associated with worse outcomes (aOR=0.91 per 10 minutes increment; 95%CI, 0.86-0.96, p=0.001), every 10 additional minutes in TPTR being associated with a 1.7% (95%CI, 0.6%-2.7%) decreased probability of favorable outcome.Conclusions- Only EVT procedural time is associated to unfavorable outcomes at 90 days in late window patients. These results highlight how the late window paradox may end at the start of EVT and underscore the need for timely management, particularly for the EVT, even for late window patients with a presumed more favorable imaging profile.

Endovascular treatment versus medical management for basilar artery occlusion with low-to-moderate symptoms (National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale < 10).

BACKGROUND: Patients with acute basilar artery occlusion (BAO) and low-to-moderate symptoms (National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale [NIHSS] < 10) are poorly represented in thrombectomy trials. Our objective is to compare thrombectomy and best medical management (BMT) in this population. METHODS: We compared data of all consecutive patients presenting with an initial NIHSS < 10 and acute symptomatic BAO included in two registries. The main outcome was the proportion of patients achieving a 3-months favorable outcome (mRS 0-2 or equal to the pre-stroke value). Secondary outcomes included the proportion of patients with an excellent outcome (mRS 0-1 or equal to pre-stroke value), overall mRs distribution (shift analysis) and mortality. Effect sizes for thrombectomy versus BMT alone were calculated using binary or ordinal logistic regression model before after considering confounders using the inverse probability of treatment weighting (IPTW) propensity score method. RESULTS: One hundred twenty-seven patients were included: sixty-four patients treated with thrombectomy (mean ± SD age: 63.4 ± 16.1) and sixty-three with BMT (mean ± SD age: 69.0 ± 14.3). There was no significant difference between groups for the rate of 3 month-favorable outcome or mortality. After propensity-score adjustment, thrombectomy was associated with a significantly higher chance of excellent outcome at 3 months (mRS 0-1 or equal to pre-stroke value; adjusted OR, 2.68; 95%CI, 1.04-6.90; p = 0.041). CONCLUSION: Our study suggests that thrombectomy in patients with low-to-moderate symptoms (NIHSS < 10) due to BAO does not improve the rate of favorable outcome but could lead to a higher chance of excellent outcome at 3 months.Trial Registration: ETIS Registry. http://www.clinicaltrials.govNCT03776877.

Functional Outcome and Hemorrhage Rates After Bridging Therapy With Tenecteplase or Alteplase in Patients With Large Ischemic Core.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: IV tenecteplase is an alternative to alteplase before mechanical thrombectomy (MT) in patients with large-vessel occlusion (LVO) ischemic stroke. Little data are available on its use in patients with large ischemic core. We aimed to compare the efficacy and safety of both thrombolytics in this population. METHODS: We conducted a retrospective analysis of patients with anterior circulation LVO strokes and diffusion-weighed imaging Alberta Stroke Program Early CT Score (DWI-ASPECTS) ≤5 treated with tenecteplase or alteplase before MT from the TETRIS (tenecteplase) and ETIS (alteplase) French multicenter registries. Primary outcome was reduced disability at 3 months (ordinal analysis of the modified Rankin scale [mRS]). Safety outcomes were 3-month mortality, parenchymal hematoma (PH), and symptomatic intracranial hemorrhage (sICH). We used propensity score overlap weighting to reduce baseline differences between treatment groups. RESULTS: We analyzed 647 patients (tenecteplase: n = 194; alteplase: n = 453; inclusion period 2015-2022). Median (interquartile range) age was 71 (57-81) years, with NIH Stroke Scale score 19 (16-22), DWI-ASPECTS 4 (3-5), and last seen well-to-IV thrombolysis and puncture times 165 minutes (130-226) and 260 minutes (203-349), respectively. After MT, the successful reperfusion rate was 83.1%. After propensity score overlap weighting, all baseline variables were well balanced between both treatment groups. Compared with patients treated with alteplase, patients treated with tenecteplase had better 3-month mRS (common odds ratio [OR] for reduced disability: 1.37, 1.01-1.87, p = 0.046) and lower 3-month mortality (OR 0.52, 0.33-0.81, p < 0.01). There were no significant differences between thrombolytics for PH (OR 0.84, 0.55-1.30, p = 0.44) and sICH incidence (OR 0.70, 0.42-1.18, p = 0.18). DISCUSSION: Our data are encouraging regarding the efficacy and reassuring regarding the safety of tenecteplase compared with that of alteplase in bridging therapy for patients with LVO strokes and a large ischemic core in routine clinical care. These results support its consideration as an alternative to alteplase in bridging therapy for patients with large ischemic cores. TRIALS REGISTRATION INFORMATION: NCT03776877 (ETIS registry) and NCT05534360 (TETRIS registry). CLASSIFICATION OF EVIDENCE: This study provides Class III evidence that patients with anterior circulation LVO stroke and DWI-ASPECTS ≤5 treated with tenecteplase vs alteplase before MT experienced better functional outcomes and lower mortality at 3 months.

Clinical and safety outcomes of acute stenting plus thrombectomy for carotid tandem lesions with large ischemic core.

BACKGROUND: We evaluated the clinical and safety outcomes of emergent carotid artery stenting (eCAS) plus endovascular thrombectomy (EVT) among patients with anterior tandem lesion (TL) and large ischemic core (LIC). METHODS: This retrospective study included consecutive stroke patients enrolled in the Endovascular Treatment in Ischemic Stroke Registry in France between January 2015 and June 2023. We compared the outcomes of carotid stenting vs no stenting in tandem lesion with pre-treatment LIC (Alberta Stroke Program Early CT Score (ASPECTS) 3-5) and stenting in tandem lesion vs thrombectomy alone for isolated intracranial occlusions with pre-treatment LIC. Primary outcome was a score of 0 to 3 on the modified Rankin scale (mRS) at 90 days. Multivariable mixed-effects logistic regression was performed. RESULTS: Among 218 tandem patients with LIC, 55 were treated with eCAS plus EVT. The eCAS group had higher odds of 90-day mRS 0-3 (adjusted Odds Ratio (aOR) 2.40, 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.10 to 5.21; p=0.027). There were no differences in the risk of any intracerebral hemorrhage (OR 1.41, 95% CI 0.69 to 2.86; p=0.346), parenchymal hematoma (aOR 1.216, 95% CI 0.49 to 3.02; p=0.675), symptomatic intracerebral hemorrhage (aOR 1.45, 95% CI 0.60 to 3.48; p=0.409), or 90-day mortality (aOR 0.74, 95% CI 0.33 to 1.68; p=0.472). eCAS was associated with a higher rate of carotid patency at day 1 (aOR 3.54, 95% CI 1.14 to 11.01; p=0.028). Safety outcomes were similar between EVT+eCAS group in TL-LIC and EVT alone group in isolated intracranial occlusions with LIC. CONCLUSION: eCAS appears to be a safe and effective strategy in patients with TL and LIC volume.

Trial of Thrombectomy for Stroke with a Large Infarct of Unrestricted Size.

BACKGROUND: The use of thrombectomy in patients with acute stroke and a large infarct of unrestricted size has not been well studied. METHODS: We assigned, in a 1:1 ratio, patients with proximal cerebral vessel occlusion in the anterior circulation and a large infarct (as defined by an Alberta Stroke Program Early Computed Tomographic Score of ≤5; values range from 0 to 10) detected on magnetic resonance imaging or computed tomography within 6.5 hours after symptom onset to undergo endovascular thrombectomy and receive medical care (thrombectomy group) or to receive medical care alone (control group). The primary outcome was the score on the modified Rankin scale at 90 days (scores range from 0 to 6, with higher scores indicating greater disability). The primary safety outcome was death from any cause at 90 days, and an ancillary safety outcome was symptomatic intracerebral hemorrhage. RESULTS: A total of 333 patients were assigned to either the thrombectomy group (166 patients) or the control group (167 patients); 9 were excluded from the analysis because of consent withdrawal or legal reasons. The trial was stopped early because results of similar trials favored thrombectomy. Approximately 35% of the patients received thrombolysis therapy. The median modified Rankin scale score at 90 days was 4 in the thrombectomy group and 6 in the control group (generalized odds ratio, 1.63; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.29 to 2.06; P<0.001). Death from any cause at 90 days occurred in 36.1% of the patients in the thrombectomy group and in 55.5% of those in the control group (adjusted relative risk, 0.65; 95% CI, 0.50 to 0.84), and the percentage of patients with symptomatic intracerebral hemorrhage was 9.6% and 5.7%, respectively (adjusted relative risk, 1.73; 95% CI, 0.78 to 4.68). Eleven procedure-related complications occurred in the thrombectomy group. CONCLUSIONS: In patients with acute stroke and a large infarct of unrestricted size, thrombectomy plus medical care resulted in better functional outcomes and lower mortality than medical care alone but led to a higher incidence of symptomatic intracerebral hemorrhage. (Funded by Montpellier University Hospital; LASTE ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT03811769.).

Tenecteplase versus Alteplase before thrombectomy: A comprehensive evaluation of clinical and angiographic impact: Insights from the ETIS registry.

INTRODUCTION: Data on prior use of Tenecteplase versus Alteplase in acute stroke management by mechanical thrombectomy are controversial. Our primary objective was to make a comprehensive comparative assessment of clinical and angiographic efficacy and safety outcomes in a large prospective observational study. METHODS: We included stroke patients who were eligible for intravenous thrombolysis and endovascular thrombectomy between 2019 and 2021, from an ongoing registry in twenty comprehensive stroke centers in France. We divided patients into two groups based on the thrombolytic agent used (Alteplase vs Tenecteplase). We then compared their treatment times, and their angiographic (TICI scale), clinical (mRS at three months and sICH) and safety outcomes after controlling for potential confounders using propensity score methods. RESULTS: We evaluated 1131 patients having undergone thrombectomy for the final analysis, 250 received Tenecteplase and 881 Alteplase. Both groups were of the same median age (75 vs 74 respectively), and had the same baseline NIHSS score (16) and ASPECTS (8). There was no significant difference for First Pass Effect (OR 0.93, 95 % CI 0.76-1.14, p = 0.75), time required for reperfusion (OR 0.03, 95 % CI 0.09-0.16, p = 0.49), or for final reperfusion status. Clinically, functional independence at 90 days was similar in both groups (OR 0.82, 95 % CI 0.61-1.10, p = 0.18) with the same risk of sICH (OR 1.36, 95 % CI 0.77-2.41, p = 0.28). However, Tenecteplase patients had shorter imaging-to-groin puncture times (99 vs 142 min, p < 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: Tenecteplase showed no better clinical or angiographic impact on thrombectomy compared to Alteplase. Nevertheless, it appeared associated with a shorter thrombolysis-to-groin puncture time.

Comparison of rescue intracranial stenting versus best medical treatment alone in acute refractory large vessel occlusion: study protocol for the PISTAR multicenter randomized trial.

BACKGROUND: Mechanical thrombectomy (MT) has become a standard treatment for acute ischemic strokes (AIS). However, MT failure occurs in approximately 10-30% of cases, leading to severe repercussions (with mortality rates up to 40% according to observational data). Among the available rescue techniques, rescue intracranial stenting (RIS) appears as a promising option. OBJECTIVE: This trial is poised to demonstrate the superiority of RIS in addition to the best medical treatment (BMT) in comparison with BMT alone, in improving the functional outcomes at 3 months for patients experiencing an AIS due to a large vessel occlusion refractory to MT (rLVO). METHODS: Permanent Intracranial STenting for Acute Refractory large vessel occlusions (PISTAR) is a multicenter prospective randomized open, blinded endpoint trial conducted across 11 French University hospitals. Adult patients (≥18 years) with an acute intracranial occlusion refractory to standard MT techniques will be randomized 1:1 during the procedure to receive either RIS+BMT (intervention arm) or BMT alone (control arm). RESULTS: The primary outcome is the rate of good clinical outcome at 3 months defined as a modified Rankin Scale score ≤2 and evaluated by an independent assessor blinded to the randomization arm. Secondary outcomes include hemorrhagic complications, all adverse events, and death. The number of patients to be included is 346. Two interim analyses are planned with predefined stopping rules. CONCLUSION: The PISTAR trial is the first randomized controlled trial focusing on the benefit of RIS in rLVOs. If positive, this study will open new insights into the management of AIS. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: NCT06071091.

Safety and efficacy of platelet glycoprotein VI inhibition in acute ischaemic stroke (ACTIMIS): a randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled, phase 1b/2a trial.

BACKGROUND: Antagonists of glycoprotein VI-triggered platelet activation used in combination with recanalisation therapies are a promising therapeutic approach in acute ischaemic stroke. Glenzocimab is an antibody fragment that inhibits the action of platelet glycoprotein VI. We aimed to determine and assess the safety and efficacy of the optimal dose of glenzocimab in patients with acute ischaemic stroke eligible to receive alteplase with or without mechanical thrombectomy. METHODS: This randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled study with dose-escalation (1b) and dose-confirmation (2a) phases (ACTIMIS) was done in 26 stroke centres in six European countries. Participants were adults (≥18 years) with disabling acute ischaemic stroke with a National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale score of 6 or higher before alteplase administration. Patients were randomly assigned treatment using a central electronic procedure. Total administered dose at the end of the intravenous administration was 125 mg, 250 mg, 500 mg, and 1000 mg of glenzocimab or placebo in phase 1b and 1000 mg of glenzocimab or placebo in phase 2a. Treatment was initiated 4·5 h or earlier from stroke symptom onset in patients treated with alteplase with or without mechanical thrombectomy. The sponsor, study investigator and study staff, patients, and central laboratories were all masked to study treatment until database lock. Primary endpoints across both phases were safety, mortality, and intracranial haemorrhage (symptomatic, total, and fatal), assessed in all patients who received at least a partial dose of study medication (safety set). The trial is registered on ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT03803007, and is complete. FINDINGS: Between March 6, 2019, and June 27, 2021, 60 recruited patients were randomly assigned to 125 mg, 250 mg, 500 mg, or 1000 mg glenzocimab, or to placebo in phase 1b (n=12 per group) and were included in the safety analysis. Glenzocimab 1000 mg was well tolerated and selected as the phase 2a recommended dose; from Oct 2, 2020, to June 27, 2021, 106 patients were randomly assigned to glenzocimab 1000 mg (n=53) or placebo (n=53). One patient in the placebo group received glenzocimab in error and therefore 54 and 52, respectively, were included in the safety set. In phase 2a, the most frequent treatment-emergent adverse event was non-symptomatic haemorrhagic transformation, which occurred in 17 (31%) of 54 patients treated with glenzocimab and 26 (50%) of 52 patients treated with placebo. Symptomatic intracranial haemorrhage occurred in no patients treated with glenzocimab compared with five (10%) patients in the placebo group. All-cause deaths were lower with glenzocimab 1000 mg (four [7%] patients) than with placebo (11 [21%] patients). INTERPRETATION: Glenzocimab 1000 mg in addition to alteplase, with or without mechanical thrombectomy, was well tolerated, and might reduce serious adverse events, intracranial haemorrhage, and mortality. These findings support the need for future research into the potential therapeutic inhibition of glycoprotein VI with glenzocimab plus alteplase in patients with acute ischaemic stroke. FUNDING: Acticor Biotech.

Safety and efficacy of adjunctive intra-arterial antithrombotic therapy during endovascular thrombectomy for acute ischemic stroke: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

BACKGROUND: Half of patients who achieve successful recanalization following endovascular thrombectomy (EVT) for acute ischemic stroke experience poor functional outcome. We aim to investigate whether the use of adjunctive intra-arterial antithrombotic therapy (AAT) during EVT is safe and efficacious compared with standard therapy (ST) of EVT with or without prior intravenous thrombolysis. METHODS: Electronic databases were searched (PubMed/MEDLINE, Embase, Cochrane Library) from 2010 until October 2023. Data were pooled using a random-effects model and reported according to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines. Risk of bias was assessed using ROBINS-I and ROB-2. The primary outcome was functional independence (modified Rankin Scale (mRS) 0-2) at 3 months. Secondary outcomes were successful recanalization (modified Thrombolysis In Cerebral Infarction (TICI) 2b-3), symptomatic intracranial hemorrhage (sICH), and 90-day mortality. RESULTS: 41 randomized and non-randomized studies met the eligibility criteria. Overall, 15 316 patients were included; 3296 patients were treated with AAT during EVT and 12 020 were treated with ST alone. Compared with ST, patients treated with AAT demonstrated higher odds of functional independence (46.5% AAT vs 42.6% ST; OR 1.22, 95% CI 1.07 to 1.40, P=0.004, I2=48%) and a lower likelihood of 90-day mortality (OR 0.71, 95% CI 0.61 to 0.83, P<0.0001, I2=20%). The rates of sICH (OR 1.00, 95% CI 0.82 to 1.22,P=0.97, I2=13%) and successful recanalization (OR 1.09, 95% CI 0.84 to 1.42, P=0.52, I2=76%) were not significantly different. CONCLUSION: The use of AAT during EVT may improve functional outcomes and reduce mortality rates compared with ST alone, without an increased risk of sICH. These findings should be interpreted with caution pending the results from ongoing phase III trials to establish the efficacy and safety of AAT during EVT.

MRI vs CT for Baseline Imaging Evaluation in Acute Large Artery Ischemic Stroke: A Subanalysis of the SWIFT-DIRECT Trial

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: Whether MRI or CT is preferable for the evaluation of patients with suspected stroke remains a matter of debate, given that the imaging modality acquired at baseline may be a relevant determinant of workflow delays and outcomes with it, in patients with stroke undergoing acute reperfusion therapies. METHODS: In this post hoc analysis of the SWIFT-DIRECT trial that investigated noninferiority of thrombectomy alone vs IV thrombolysis (IVT) + thrombectomy in patients with an acute ischemic anterior circulation large vessel occlusive stroke eligible to receive IVT within 4.5 hours after last seen well, we tested for a potential interaction between baseline imaging modality (MRI/MR-angiography [MRA] vs CT/CT-angiography [CTA]) and the effect of acute treatment (thrombectomy vs IVT + thrombectomy) on clinical and safety outcomes and procedural metrics (primary analysis). Moreover, we examined the association between baseline imaging modality and these outcomes using regression models adjusted for age, sex, baseline NIH Stroke Scale (NIHSS), occlusion location, and Alberta Stroke Program Early CT Score (ASPECTS) (secondary analysis). Endpoints included workflow times, the modified Rankin scale (mRS) score at 90 days, the rate of successful reperfusion, the odds for early neurologic deterioration within 24 hours, and the risk of symptomatic intracranial hemorrhage. The imaging modality acquired was chosen at the discretion of the treating physicians and commonly reflects center-specific standard procedures. RESULTS: Four hundred five of 408 patients enrolled in the SWIFT-DIRECT trial were included in this substudy. Two hundred (49.4%) patients underwent MRI/MRA, and 205 (50.6%) underwent CT/CTA. Patients with MRI/MRA had lower NIHSS scores (16 [interquartile range (IQR) 12-20] vs 18 [IQR 14-20], p = 0.012) and lower ASPECTS (8 [IQR 6-9] vs 8 [IQR 7-9], p = 0.021) compared with those with CT/CTA. In terms of the primary analysis, we found no evidence for an interaction between baseline imaging modality and the effect of IVT + thrombectomy vs thrombectomy alone. Regarding the secondary analysis, MRI/MRA acquisition was associated with workflow delays of approximately 20 minutes, higher odds of functional independence at 90 days (adjusted odds ratio [aOR] 1.65, 95% CI 1.07-2.56), and similar mortality rates (aOR 0.73, 95% CI 0.36-1.47) compared with CT/CTA. DISCUSSION: This post hoc analysis does not suggest treatment effect heterogeneity of IVT + thrombectomy vs thrombectomy alone in large artery stroke patients with different imaging modalities. There was no evidence that functional outcome at 90 days was less favorable following MRI/MRA at baseline compared with CT/CTA, despite significant workflow delays. TRIAL REGISTRATION INFORMATION: ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT03192332.

Evaluation of mechanical thrombectomy in acute ischemic stroke related to a distal arterial occlusion: A randomized controlled trial.

RATIONALE: Mechanical thrombectomy (MT) associated with the best medical treatment (BMT) has recently shown efficacy for the management of acute ischemic stroke (AIS) secondary to a large vessel occlusion. However, evidence is lacking regarding the benefit of MT for more distal occlusions. AIM: To evaluate the efficacy in terms of good clinical outcome at 3 months of MT associated with the BMT over the BMT alone in AIS related to a distal occlusion. METHODS: The DISCOUNT trial is a multicenter open-label randomized controlled trial involving French University hospitals. Adult patients (⩾18 years) with an AIS involving the anterior or posterior circulation secondary to a distal vessel occlusion within 6 h of symptom onset or within 24 h if no hyperintense signal on fluid attenuation inversion recovery acquisition will be randomized 1:1 to receive either MT associated with the BMT (experimental group) or BMT alone (control group). The number of patients to be included is 488. STUDY OUTCOMES: The primary outcome is the rate of good clinical outcome at 3 months defined as a modified Rankin scale (mRS) ⩽2 and evaluated by an independent assessor blinded to the intervention arm. Secondary outcomes include recanalization of the occluded vessel within 48 h, angiographic reperfusion in the experimental group, 3-month excellent clinical outcome (mRS ⩽ 1), all adverse events, and death. A cost utility analysis will estimate the incremental cost per quality-adjusted life year (QALY) gained. DISCUSSION: If positive, this study will open new insights in the management of AISs. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT05030142 registered on 1 September 2021.

Evaluation of acute mechanical revascularization in large stroke (ASPECTS ⩽5) and large vessel occlusion within 7 h of last-seen-well: The LASTE multicenter, randomized, clinical trial protocol.

RATIONALE: Mechanical thrombectomy (MT), the standard of care for acute ischemic stroke (AIS) secondary to large vessel occlusion (LVO), is generally not offered to patients with large baseline infarct (core). Recent studies demonstrated MT benefit in patients with anterior circulation stroke and large core (i.e. Alberta Stroke Program Early Computed Tomography Score, ASPECTS 3-5). However, its benefit in patients with the largest core (ASPECTS 0-2) remains unproven. AIM: To compare the efficacy and safety of MT plus best medical treatment (BMT) and of BMT alone in patients with ASPECTS 0-5 (baseline computed tomography (CT) or magnetic resonance imaging (MRI)) and anterior circulation LVO within 7 h of last-seen-well. SAMPLE SIZE ESTIMATE: To detect with a two-sided test at 5% significance level (80% power) a common odds ratio of 1.65 for 1-point reduction in the 90-day modified Rankin Scale (mRS) score in the MT + BMT arm versus BMT arm and to anticipate 10% of patients with missing primary endpoint, 450 patients are planned to be included by 36 centers in France, Spain, and the United States. METHODS AND DESIGN: LArge Stroke Therapy Evaluation (LASTE) is an international, multicenter, Prospectively Randomized into two parallel (1:1) arms, Open-label, with Blinded Endpoint (PROBE design) trial. Eligibility criteria are diagnosis of AIS within 6.5 h of last-seen-well (or negative fluid-attenuated inversion recovery (FLAIR) if unknown stroke onset time), ASPECTS 0-5 (ASPECTS 4-5 for ⩾80-year-old patients), and LVO in the anterior circulation (intracranial internal carotid artery (ICA) and M1 or M1-M2 segment of the middle cerebral artery (MCA)). STUDY OUTCOMES: The primary endpoint is the day-90 mRS score distribution (shift analysis) with mRS categories 5 and 6 coalesced into one category. Secondary endpoints include day-180 mRS score, rates of 90-day and 180-day mRS score = 0-2 and 0-3, rate of decompressive craniectomy, the National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale (NIHSS) score change, revascularization and infarct volume growth at 24 h, and quality of life at day 90 and 180. Safety outcomes (90-day all-cause mortality, procedural complications, symptomatic intracerebral hemorrhage, and early NIHSS score worsening) are recorded. A dynamic balanced randomization (1:1) is used to distribute eligible patients into the experimental arm and control arm, by incorporating the center and these pre-specified factors: baseline ASPECTS (0-3 vs 4-5), age (⩽70 vs >70 years), baseline NIHSS (<20 vs ⩾20), intravenous thrombolysis (no vs yes), admission mode (Drip-and-Ship vs Mothership), occlusion site (intracranial ICA vs MCA-M1 or M1-M2), intravenous fibrinolysis (no vs yes), and last-seen-well to randomization time (0-4.5 vs >4.5-6.5 h). DISCUSSION: The LASTE trial will determine MT efficacy and safety in patients with ASPECTS 0-5 and LVO in the anterior circulation. TRIAL REGISTRATION: LASTE Trial NCT03811769.

Effect of Bridging Thrombolysis on the Efficacy of Stent Retriever Thrombectomy Techniques : Insights from the SWIFT-DIRECT trial.

BACKGROUND: There are little available data regarding the influence of intravenous thrombolysis (IVT) on the efficacy of different first line endovascular treatment (EVT) techniques. METHODS: We used the dataset of the SWIFT-DIRECT trial which randomized 408 patients to IVT + EVT or EVT alone at 48 international sites. The protocol required the use of a stent retriever (SR), but concomitant use of a balloon guide catheter (BGC) and/or distal aspiration (DA) catheter was left to the discretion of the operators. Four first line techniques were applied in the study population: SR, SR + BGC, SR + DA, SR + DA + BGC. To assess whether the effect of allocation to IVT + EVT versus EVT alone was modified by the first line technique, interaction models were fitted for predefined outcomes. The primary outcome was first pass mTICI 2c­3 reperfusion (FPR). RESULTS: This study included 385 patients of whom 172 were treated with SR + DA, 121 with SR + DA + BGC, 57 with SR + BGC and 35 with SR. There was no evidence that the effect of IVT + EVT versus EVT alone would be modified by the choice of first line technique; however, allocation to IVT + EVT increased the odds of FPR by a factor of 1.68 (95% confidence interval, CI 1.11-2.54). CONCLUSION: This post hoc analysis does not suggest treatment effect heterogeneity of IVT + EVT vs EVT alone in different stent retriever techniques but provides evidence for increased FPR if bridging IVT is administered before stent retriever thrombectomy.

Clinical, imaging, and management features of symptomatic carotid web: Insight from CAROWEB registry.

BACKGROUND: Although carotid web (CaW) is increasingly diagnosed as a cause of cryptogenic stroke, data are still limited to monocentric small sample cohort. To broaden knowledge on symptomatic CaW, CAROWEB registry has been recently implemented. AIMS: In a large cohort of symptomatic CaW patients, we described epidemiologic characteristics, admission clinical and imaging features, and the current management including the secondary preventive strategy choice made in comprehensive French Stroke Units. METHODS: CAROWEB is an ongoing French observational multicenter registry enrolling consecutive CaW patients diagnosed after an ipsilateral ischemic stroke (IS) or transient ischemic attack (TIA). Submitted cases were validated by two experienced neurologist and neuroradiologist. Clinical, imaging, and management features were collected for this study. RESULTS: Between June 2019 and December 2021, 244 cases were submitted by 14 centers, 42 rejected, and 202 included (IS, 91.6%; TIA, 7.9%; retinal infarction, 0.5%; mean age, 50.8 ± 12.2 years; female, 62.9%; Caucasian, 47.5%; Afro-Caribbean, 20.3%). IS patients showed median (interquartile range (IQR)) admission National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale (NIHSS) score, 8 (2-15); intracranial artery occlusion, 71.8%; ipsilateral chronic cerebral infarction (CCI), 16.3%; and reperfusion treatment, 57.3%. CaW was not identified during the mechanical thrombectomy procedure in 30 of 85 (35.3%) patients. Secondary prevention was invasive in 55.6% (stenting, n = 80; surgery, n = 30). In multivariable analysis, the invasive therapeutic option was associated with ipsilateral CCI (odds ratio (OR): 4.24 (1.27-14.2), p = 0.019) and inversely associated with risk factors (OR: 0.47 (0.24-0.91), p = 0.025) and admission NIHSS score (OR: 0.93 (0.89-0.97), p = 0.001). CONCLUSION: CaW must be considered in all ethnic groups including Caucasians. Secondary prevention is heterogeneous in large French Stroke Centers. The absence of risk factors, milder severity strokes, and ipsilateral CCI were predictive variables of secondary invasive treatment. The high rate of invasive treatment suggests that medical treatment alone is deemed ineffective to avoid recurrence and emphasize the need of randomized trials.

Intravenous Thrombolysis before Complete Angiographic Reperfusion: Beyond Angiographic Assessment to Target Microvascular Obstruction?

OBJECTIVE: Recent data have suggested that ineffective tissue reperfusion despite successful angiographic reperfusion was partly responsible for unfavorable outcomes after endovascular therapy (EVT) and might be modulated by intravenous thrombolysis (IVT) use before EVT. To specifically decipher the effect played by IVT before EVT, we compared the clinical and safety outcomes of patients who experienced a complete reperfusion at the end of EVT according to IVT use before EVT. METHODS: The Endovascular Treatment in Ischemic Stroke (ETIS) registry is an ongoing, prospective, observational study at 21 centers that perform EVT in France. Patients were included if they had an anterior large vessel occlusion of the intracranial internal carotid artery or middle cerebral artery (M1/M2 segments) and complete reperfusion (expanded Thrombolysis in Cerebral Infarction score = 3) with EVT within 6 hours, between January 2015 and December 2021. The cohort was divided into two groups according to IVT use before EVT, and propensity score matching (PSM) was used to balance the two groups. Primary outcome was the shift in the degree of disability as measured by the modified Rankin Scale (mRS) at 90 days. Secondary outcomes included favorable outcome (mRS 0-2) at 90 days. Safety outcomes included symptomatic intracranial hemorrhage and 90-day mortality. Outcomes were estimated with multivariate logistic models adjusted for age, National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale, Alberta Stroke Program Early CT Score, and time from symptom onset to puncture. RESULTS: Among 5,429 patients included in the ETIS registry, 1,093 were included in the study, including 651 patients with complete recanalization treated with IVT before EVT. After PSM, 488 patients treated with IVT before EVT were compared to 337 patients without IVT. In the matched cohort analysis, the IVT+EVT group had a favorable shift in the overall mRS score distribution (adjusted odds ratio [aOR] = 1.41, 95% confidence interval [CI] = 1.04-1.91, p = 0.023) and higher rates of favorable outcome (61.1% vs 48.7%, aOR = 1.49, 95% CI = 1.02-2.20, p = 0.041) at 90 days compared with the EVT alone group. Rates of symptomatic intracerebral hemorrhage were comparable between both groups (6.0% vs 4.3%, aOR = 1.16, 95% CI = 0.53-2.54, p = 0.709). INTERPRETATION: In clinical practice, even after complete angiographic reperfusion by EVT, prior IVT use improves clinical outcomes of patients without increasing bleeding risk. ANN NEUROL 2024;95:762-773.

ASPECTS evolution after endovascular successful reperfusion in the early and extended time window.

BACKGROUND: The Alberta Stroke Program Early CT scan Score (ASPECTS) is a reliable imaging biomarker of infarct extent on admission but the value of 24-hour ASPECTS evolution in day-to-day practice is not well studied, especially after successful reperfusion. We aimed to assess the association between ASPECTS evolution after successful reperfusion with functional and safety outcomes, as well as to identify the predictors of ASPECTS evolution. METHODS: We used data from an ongoing prospective multicenter registry. Stroke patients with anterior circulation large vessel occlusion treated with endovascular therapy (EVT) and achieved successful reperfusion (modified thrombolysis in cerebral ischemia (mTICI) 2b-3) were included. ASPECTS evolution was defined as one or more point decrease in ASPECTS at 24 hours. RESULTS: A total of 2366 patients were enrolled. In a fully adjusted model, ASPECTS evolution was associated with lower odds of favorable outcome (modified Rankin Scale (mRS) score 0-2) at 90 days (adjusted odds ratio (aOR) = 0.46; 95% confidence interval (CI) = 0.37-0.57). In addition, ASPECTS evolution was a predictor of excellent outcome (90-day mRS 0-1) (aOR = 0.52; 95% CI = 0.49-0.57), early neurological improvement (aOR = 0.42; 95% CI = 0.35-0.51), and parenchymal hemorrhage (aOR = 2.64; 95% CI, 2.03-3.44). Stroke severity, admission ASPECTS, total number of passes, complete reperfusion (mTICI 3 vs. mTICI 2b-2c) and good collaterals emerged as predictors of ASPECTS evolution. CONCLUSION: ASPECTS evolution is a strong predictor of functional and safety outcomes after successful endovascular therapy. Higher number of EVT attempts and incomplete reperfusion are associated with ASPECTS evolution at day 1.

Effects of weather conditions on endovascular treatment case volume for patients with ischemic stroke.

BACKGROUND: Weather conditions have been shown to influence the occurrence of cardiovascular events. We tested the hypothesis that weather parameters may be associated with variations of case volume of endovascular treatment (EVT) for acute ischemic stroke. METHODS: Individual data from the ETIS (Endovascular Treatment in Ischemic Stroke) French national registry were matched to local weather stations. Meteorological parameters (rainfall, humidity, atmospheric pressure, air temperature) were gathered from national online resources. Weather readings and EVT case volumes were annually standardized per weather station and EVT center, and their associations tested with non-parametric univariable and generalized linear statistical models. RESULTS: Between 2015 and 2021, 9913 EVT procedures addressed by 135 primary stroke units were matched to weather conditions. The mean daily case volume per center was 0.41 [StDev 0.33], and there was a median of 0.84 procedures daily linked to a weather station [StDev 0.47]. We found lower atmospheric pressure (ß estimate -0.04; 95%CI[-0.07;-0.03], p<0.001), higher humidity (ß estimate 0.07; 95%CI [0.05;0.09], p<0.001) and lower temperatures (ß estimate -0.08; 95%CI[-0.10;-0.06], p<0.001) to be associated with higher standardized EVT daily case volumes. These associations were stable when testing them across strata of binned EVT standardized case volumes. CONCLUSIONS: Our study suggests that lower ambient temperature, lower atmospheric pressure, and higher air humidity are associated with significantly more daily EVT cases in a European temperate country. These results may provide insight into both system of care optimization at times of climate change and intracranial LVO pathophysiology. REGISTRATION-URL: https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT03776877.

Successful Thrombectomy Improves Functional Outcome in Tandem Occlusions with a Large Ischemic Core.

BACKGROUND: Emergent stenting in tandem occlusions and mechanical thrombectomy (MT) of acute ischemic stroke related to large vessel occlusion (LVO-AIS) with a large core are tested independently. We aim to assess the impact of reperfusion with MT in patients with LVO-AIS with a large core and a tandem occlusion and to compare the safety of reperfusion between large core with tandem and nontandem occlusions in current practice. METHODS: We analyzed data of all consecutive patients included in the prospective Endovascular Treatment in Ischemic Stroke Registry in France between January 2015 and March 2023 who presented with a pretreatment ASPECTS (Alberta Stroke Program Early CT Score) of 0-5 and angiographically proven tandem occlusion. The primary end point was a favorable outcome defined by a modified Rankin Scale (mRS) score of 0-3 at 90 days. RESULTS: Among 262 included patients with a tandem occlusion and ASPECTS 0-5, 203 patients (77.5%) had a successful reperfusion (modified Thrombolysis in Cerebral Infarction grade 2b-3). Reperfused patients had a favorable shift in the overall mRS score distribution (adjusted odds ratio [aOR], 1.57 [1.22-2.03]; P < 0.001), higher rates of mRS score 0-3 (aOR, 7.03 [2.60-19.01]; P < 0.001) and mRS score 0-2 at 90 days (aOR, 3.85 [1.39-10.68]; P = 0.009) compared with nonreperfused. There was a trend between the occurrence of successful reperfusion and a decreased rate of symptomatic intracranial hemorrhage (aOR, 0.5 [0.22-1.13]; P = 0.096). Similar safety outcomes were observed after large core reperfusion in tandem and nontandem occlusions. CONCLUSIONS: Successful reperfusion was associated with a higher rate of favorable outcome in large core LVO-AIS with a tandem occlusion, with a safety profile similar to nontandem occlusion.

Thrombectomy with or without Intravenous Thrombolytics in Basilar Artery Occlusion.

OBJECTIVE: Two randomized trials demonstrated the benefit of endovascular therapy (EVT) in patients suffering from a stroke due to a basilar artery occlusion (BAO). However, intravenous thrombolytic (IVT) use before EVT was low in these trials, questioning the added value of this treatment in this setting. We sought to investigate the efficacy and safety of EVT alone compared to IVT + EVT in stroke patients with a BAO. METHODS: We analyzed data from the Endovascular Treatment in Ischemic Stroke registry, a prospective, observational, multicenter study of acute ischemic stroke patients treated with EVT in 21 centers in France between 1 January 2015 and 31 December 2021. We included patients with BAO and/or intracranial vertebral artery occlusion and compared patients treated with EVT alone versus IVT + EVT after propensity score (PS) matching. Variables selected for the PS were pre-stroke mRS, dyslipidemia, diabetes, anticoagulation, admission mode, baseline NIHSS and ASPECTS, type of anesthesia, and time from symptom onset to puncture. Efficacy outcomes were good functional outcome (modified Rankin Scale [mRS] 0-3) and functional independence (mRS 0-2) at 90 days. Safety outcomes were symptomatic intracranial hemorrhages and all-cause mortality at 90 days. RESULTS: Among 385 patients, 243 (134 EVT alone and 109 IVT + EVT) were included after PS matching. There was no difference between EVT alone and IVT + EVT regarding good functional outcome (adjusted odd ratio [aOR] labeling = 1.27, 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.68-2.37, p = 0.45) and functional independence (aOR = 1.50, 95% CI, 0.79-2.85, p = 0.21). Symptomatic intracranial hemorrhage and all-cause mortality were also similar between the two groups (aOR = 0.42, 95% CI, 0.10-1.79, p = 0.24 and aOR = 0.56, 95% CI, 0.29-1.10, p = 0.09, respectively). INTERPRETATION: In this PS matching analysis, EVT alone seemed to lead to similar neurological recovery than IVT + EVT, with comparable safety profile. However, given our sample size and the observational nature of this study, further studies are needed to confirm these findings. ANN NEUROL 2023;94:596-604.

Evaluation of acute mechanical revascularization in minor stroke (NIHSS score ⩽ 5) and large vessel occlusion: The MOSTE multicenter, randomized, clinical trial protocol.

RATIONALE: Mechanical thrombectomy (MT) has become the standard of care for patients with acute ischemic stroke secondary to large vessel occlusion (LVO) of the anterior circulation. Conversely, its benefit in patients with National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale (NIHSS) score ⩽ 5 is unproven. AIM: To demonstrate the superiority of immediate MT plus best medical treatment (BMT) compared to BMT (with secondary MT in case of deterioration) for increasing the rate of modified Rankin Scale (mRS) score ⩽ 1 at 90 days after minor stroke (NIHSS score ⩽ 5) and anterior circulation LVO. SAMPLE SIZE ESTIMATES: To detect an absolute increase of 10% (80% power) in the 90-day mRS score = 0-1 rate in the MT + BMT group, by assuming an mRS score = 0-1 rate of 60% in the BMT group and by considering two interim efficacy/futility analyses (after study completion by 274 and 548 patients), 824 patients must be included by 36 centers in France, Spain, and the USA. METHODS AND DESIGN: MOSTE is an international, multicenter, prospectively randomized into two parallel (1:1) arms, open-label, with blinded endpoint trial. Eligibility criteria are diagnosis of acute ischemic stroke within 23 h of last-seen-well, NIHSS score ⩽ 5, and LVO in the anterior circulation (intracranial internal carotid artery, M1 or M1-M2 segment of the middle cerebral artery). STUDY OUTCOMES: The primary endpoint is the rate of excellent outcome at day 90 (mRS score = 0-1). Secondary endpoints include the rates of 90-day mRS score = 0-2 and score = 0, NIHSS score change, secondary MT, revascularization and infarct volume growth at 24 h, and quality of life and cognitive function at day 90. Safety outcomes (90-day all-cause mortality, procedural complications, symptomatic intracerebral hemorrhage, and rapid NIHSS score worsening) are recorded. DISCUSSION: The MOSTE trial will determine MT efficacy and safety in patients with minor stroke and LVO in the anterior circulation. TRIAL REGISTRATION: MOSTE Trial. NCT03796468.