Topical Moisturizer Meaningfully Reduces Disease Severity in Atopic Patients With Xerosis.

BACKGROUND: Repairing the epidermal barrier is critically important in atopic dermatitis (AD), but the effect of moisturizer on quality of life (QOL) is not well characterized.  Objective: To assess whether the use of a moisturizer improves QOL in atopic patients with xerosis.  Methods: Thirty-five (35) adults with xerosis and AD received a moisturizer designed for AD to apply daily for three months. Adherence was assessed with electronic monitors. Quality of life (QOL) was assessed with the Dermatology Life Quality Index (DLQI) at baseline and follow-up.  Results: Mean adherence to the moisturizer was 46%. Dryness improved from 1.9 at baseline to 1.4 at follow-up (P=0.02). DLQI improved from 3.3 at baseline to 1.5 at 3 months (P=0.005). The "feeling self-conscious or embarrassed due to their skin condition" DLQI item improved from 0.79 at baseline to 0.14 at 3 months (P=0.0009).  Conclusion: Moisturizers are the foundation of AD treatment. Even non-medicated topical emollients can improve QOL in patients with AD.  J Drugs Dermatol. 2023;22(12):e51-e52.     doi:10.36849/JDD.7036e.

Topical Ivermectin Is Associated With Improved Erythematotelangiectatic, Papulopustular, and Phymatous Rosacea in a Secondary Analysis.

Rosacea has variable clinical presentation consisting of four overlapping phenotypes: erythematotelangiectatic, papulopustular, phymatous, and ocular.1 Rosacea's pathogenesis involves increased cutaneous density of Demodex folliculorum mites, which drive inflammation through activation of Toll-like receptor-2.1,2 Thus, topical ivermectin (IVM) 1.0% cream's anti-inflammatory and acaricidal activity provides an effective and targeted treatment for moderate-to-severe rosacea. However, literature assessing IVM is limited to efficacy in treating the papulopustular presentation, limiting generalizability.1,3,4 Although our primary endpoint was to assess patient adherence, the objective of this secondary analysis was to assess IVM efficacy in rosacea, regardless of clinical presentation.

Could red and near-infrared emitting fabric technology improve the severity of psoriasis, polymorphous light eruption, and alopecia areata?

AIM: Low-level light therapy (LLLT) may offer an adjunctive therapeutic tool for inflammatory skin conditions. This pilot study assessed the efficacy of a red/near-infrared (NIR)-emitting fabric for psoriasis, polymorphous light eruption (PMLE), and alopecia areata (AA). METHODS: Fourteen patients (five with psoriasis, five with PMLE, and four with AA) were instructed to wear a red/NIR-emitting (Lumiton®) garment during the 12-week study. Efficacy was assessed subjectively by patient-reported improvement and objectively by the redness, thickness, and scale of elbow psoriasis plaques, the frequency of PMLE flares, and the Severity of Alopecia Tool (SALT) score. RESULTS: Three patients with psoriasis completed the study while two self-discontinued. The three patients who completed the study noted improvement and two had improvements in lesion redness, thickness, or scale, while one was clinically stable. Three patients with PMLE completed the study, and none had a disease flare during the study period. Three patients with AA completed the study: two reported disease improvement and all three had an improved SALT score. CONCLUSION: Use of a wellness apparel that emits red and NIR light may be associated with improved disease severity in patients with mild elbow psoriasis, PMLE, and limited AA. Limitations of this study include continuation on topical, intralesional, or systemic medications and small sample size.

The Patient-Physician Relationship and Adherence: Observations From a Clinical Study.

Improved patient-physician relationships (PPR) are associated with better patient satisfaction and disease outcomes, however, there is limited literature assessing how PPR affects adherence in dermatology. We recruited 30 subjects with a clinical diagnosis of rosacea. Subjects were instructed to use ivermectin 1% cream once daily for 3 months and adherence was measured using the Medication Event Monitoring System cap. The Patient-Doctor Relationship Questionnaire (PDRQ-9), a validated questionnaire assessing patients’ perceived strength of the relationship with their doctor, was completed. Mean adherence for all subjects over three months of the study was 62%. PDRQ-9 scores positively correlated with adherence rates for 3 months of treatment (r(26)=0.52; P=0.006). The perceived strength of the PPR may have a role in patients’ adherence to their medications. Improving the PPR, through empathy and effective communication, may facilitate better medication adherence and treatment outcomes. Perche PO, Singh R, Cook MK, et al. The patient-physician relationship and adherence: observations from a clinical study. J Drugs Dermatol. 2023;22(8):838-839. doi:10.36849/JDD.7103.

Perception of accountability decreases with age: observations from a clinical study of patients with rosacea.

Patient adherence to medications usually increases with age, however, it can also be impacted by other factors. Accountability is a psychosocial construct that is defined as the expectation for an individual to account for their actions. Accountability may also influence patients' motivation to adhere to their treatments. We assessed the relationship between age and perception of accountability as well as efficacy of interventions to improve accountability in a clinical study of 30 rosacea patients. Accountability was assessed using the validated Accountability Measurement Tool. Interventions to improve accountability included a digital interaction group and a digital skin analysis group. All patients were given ivermectin cream 1% and informed to apply it daily for 3-months. There was a negative association between age and AMT scores in all intervention groups, including the control group. Younger patients have a baseline greater perception of accountability that responded more to our interventions.

Comparison of two devices for facial skin analysis.

BACKGROUND: The use of quantitative measures to assess patients' skin has turned the subjective nature of dermatology into an objective one. These measures allow for more accurate diagnosis and improved monitoring of diseases. While there are many skin analysis devices available, they often require specific equipment to function and can be costly, limiting their clinical use. AIMS: The aim of our study was to compare a new skin analysis device that is easy to incorporate into dermatologic practice to a standard validated device. METHODS: We recruited 50 patients from dermatology clinics and analyzed their skin with two facial analysis systems: an online application that can be downloaded on either an iPad or iPhone, and a computer-based analysis system that utilizes a facial imaging photobooth. Scores were recorded and compared between the two devices for the following five skin characteristics; "spots," "wrinkles," "redness," "texture," and "pores." RESULTS: The tablet and the computer analysis system had an agreement rate of 67.7%. The highest agreement was in assessing texture (72.0%) and pores (68.2%). The lowest agreeance was in assessing redness (64%) and wrinkles (67%). When assessing the relationship between patients' raw score for wrinkles and their age, there was a strong correlation with the tablet (r = 0.79, p < 0.0001) compared with the computer system (r = 0.26, p < 0.06). CONCLUSIONS: The application utilized in our study may serve as a cost-effective and clinic friendly tool to assess patients' skin. It produces similar results to other skin analysis devices and may be more sensitive in detecting and quantifying wrinkles.

Initial validation of a new device for facial skin analysis.

The field of dermatology is met with many subjective analysis methods. Due to the relative nature of subjective analysis methods, objective analysis methods with greater accuracy and reliability were developed. Many of these devices are either inaccessible to patients without being a part of a clinical trial, bulky, or costly. However, with the advances in artificial intelligence and handheld devices, measurement methods have become simplified. The purpose of our study was to validate an objective skin analysis software available on a handheld device by comparing it to a board-certified dermatologist's assessment. Participants of various ages and skin types were analyzed with the facial analysis system on an iPad Pro. The same photographs were ranked by a physician based on 14 common skin characteristics. The facial analysis system and the physician's rankings had a good agreement rate of 69%. The greatest agreement rates were with the assessment of erythema (83.7%) and wrinkles (81.6%) and the lowest with oiliness (53.1%). The analysis system's high re-test reliability and good agreement rates with physician assessment support its potential use in the clinical setting.

A Comparison of Alternative Medicine Users and Non-Users in Patients With Hidradenitis Suppurativa.

BACKGROUND: Hidradenitis suppurativa patients often seek non-prescription therapies. OBJECTIVE: To determine the prevalence of alternative medicine use and characterize the differences between patients who report using alternative medications versus those who do not. METHODS: We surveyed 67 patients with hidradenitis suppurativa regarding demographics, alternative medicine use, disease severity, and quality of life. RESULTS: 25 (37.2%) of the HS subjects reported alternative medicine use. Alternative medicine users tended to be younger (36.7 vs 40.8 years), have a shorter time since diagnosis (12.6 vs14.6 years), and reported worse quality of life (14.1 vs 11.0) than non-users. These differences were not statistically significant. LIMITATIONS: Limitations included a small sample size. CONCLUSION: Alternative medicine use among patients with hidradenitis is common regardless of disease severity; even mild disease may drive patients to seek alternative treatment. J Drugs Dermatol. 2021;20(10):1072-1074. doi:10.36849/JDD.6046.

Is topical treatment effective for psoriasis in patients who failed topical treatment?

Objectives: To determine if resistance to topical treatments can be overcome under conditions promoting adherence.Materials and Methods: Twelve psoriasis patients treated with topical 0.25% desoximetasone spray were randomized to either twice daily phone call reminders or no phone call and were treated for 2 weeks. Pruritus Visual Analog Scale (VAS), Psoriasis Area and Severity Index (PASI), Total Lesion Severity Score (TLSS), and, Investigator Global Assessment (IGA) assessed disease severity.Results: Most subjects improved in most scoring parameters. 100%, 91.7%, 83.3%, and 58.3% had improvements in itching, PASI, TLSS, and IGA, respectively.Conclusions: While our sample size was small and treatment duration short, the effect size of topical treatment was large under conditions designed to promote adherence.

Adherence to topical treatment can improve treatment-resistant moderate psoriasis.

Most patients with psoriasis have limited disease that should be manageable with topical treatment. However, psoriasis often is resistant to topical treatment. The aim of our study was to determine if patients using psoriasis-resistant topical treatments can be effectively treated with topicals under conditions promoting adherence. During this open-label, randomized, single-center clinical study, 12 patients with moderate psoriasis that previously failed topical treatment were selected and treated with desoximetasone spray 0.25% for 2 weeks. Six patients were randomized to receive twice-daily telephone call reminders to further encourage good adherence. Disease severity was assessed by the visual analog scale for pruritus, psoriasis area and severity index (PASI), total lesion severity score (TLSS), and investigator global assessment (IGA). At the end of the study, most patients improved in most scores. Therefore, apparent resistance to topical treatment often is due to poor adherence and can be overcome, at least over the short term.

Patients preferences for different corticosteroid vehicles are highly variable.

Introduction: Topical corticosteroids, available in an array of vehicles are used to control a variety of inflammatory skin diseases. Patients preferences for different vehicles may affect their willingness to use treatment. We assess corticosteroid vehicle preference and potential impact of topical characteristics on adherence and quality of life in patients with psoriasis.Methods: Subjects with psoriasis were recruited from Wake Forest University Dermatology Clinic. Subjects sampled desoximetasone 0.25% spray, betamethasone valerate 0.1% cream, triamcinolone acetonide 0.1% ointment, fluocinonide 0.05% gel, betamethasone valerate 0.1% lotion, clobetasol propionate 0.05% foam, and fluocinonide 0.05% solution in a predetermined randomized order. Subjects completed a Vehicle Preference Measure, Determinants of Adherence Measure, and a Determinants of Quality of Life Measure.Results: Patients preferences for the various products were highly variable. Regarding Determinants of Adherence, patients perception of absorption of the medication was ranked as 'quite important/extremely important' by 85% of total subjects. A majority of patients rated medication side effects as 'quite important/extremely important' when asked to consider topical characteristics effect on quality of life.Discussion: There was wide variation in patient preference for topical medication vehicles used for treating psoriasis. Several vehicle characteristics were considered important to adherence. Given the marked variation in vehicle preference, topical treatment should be individualized according to patients preferences.

Emotional Well-Being Is Impaired in Hidradenitis Suppurativa Patients.

BACKGROUND: Hidradenitis suppurativa (HS) is a chronic inflammatory condition. OBJECTIVE: To measure emotional well-being in HS patients and compare to other populations, assess if there is an effect of disease severity on emotional well-being, and determine if emotional well-being is correlated with quality of life and depression. METHODS: A total of 153 HS subjects were recruited, and 66 Positive and Negative Affect Schedule (PANAS) surveys assessing emotional well-being were completed. Norms for comparison populations (disease-free undergraduates and adults) were used. A validated self-assessment tool was used to determine disease severity. Subjects completed the Patient Health Questionnaire-9 (PHQ-9) and Dermatology Life Quality Index (DLQI) to examine depression and quality of life, respectively. RESULTS: HS subjects had lower positive affect than undergraduates and higher negative affect than adults. There were no differences in PANAS scores by Hurley stage (p > 0.05). PANAS scores for HS subjects correlated with worse quality of life (r = 0.66, p < 0.00001) and depression (r = 0.74, p < 0.00001). CONCLUSION: HS patients have poor emotional well-being. PANAS scores correlated with worse quality of life and depression. Providing appropriate resources and treatments may be beneficial for HS patients.

Validation of a Hidradenitis Suppurativa Self-Assessment Tool.

BACKGROUND: Hidradenitis suppurativa (HS) is a debilitating dermatologic condition presenting with recurrent abscesses. While there are multiple scales to determine HS severity, none are designed for self-administration. A validated severity self-assessment tool may facilitate survey research and improve communication by allowing patients to objectively report their HS severity between clinic visits. OBJECTIVES: The purpose of this study was to assess a self-administered HS measure. METHODS: An HS self-assessment tool (HSSA) with 10 photographs of different Hurley stages was developed. The tool was administered to patients diagnosed with HS who visited the Wake Forest Baptist Health dermatology clinic over a span of 2 months. Physician-administered Hurley stage was recorded to determine criterion validity. To assess test-retest reliability of the measure, patients completed the HSSA again at least 30 minutes after the first completion. RESULTS: Twenty-four patients completed the measure, and 20 of these patients completed it twice. Agreement between physician-determined Hurley stage and self-determined Hurley stage was 66.7% with a weighted kappa of 0.57 (95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.30-0.84). The weighted kappa for agreement between patients' initial and second completion of the HSSA was 0.81 (95% CI: 0.64-0.99). CONCLUSIONS: The self-administered measure provides moderate agreement with physician-determined Hurley stage and good test-retest reliability.

Psoriasis and Atopic Dermatitis "Resistant" to Topical Treatment Responds Rapidly to Topical Desoximetasone Spray.

PURPOSE:: Topical corticosteroids (TS) are a treatment for atopic dermatitis (AD) and psoriasis (Ps). We assessed whether use of a TS under conditions designed to enhance adherence would be effective in patients who "failed" TS in the outpatient setting. METHODS:: Individuals with treatment-resistant Ps or AD were recruited (AD, n = 12; Ps, n = 12). Six participants were randomized to each of 2 groups of desoximetasone 0.25% spray alone (n = 6) or desoximetasone spray plus twice-daily phone call reminders to use the medication. Disease severity was assessed. RESULTS:: In treatment-resistant Ps patients, desoximetasone spray, with reminders, resulted in statistically significant improvement in all outcome measures. In treatment-resistant AD patients, there was statistically significant improvement in some assessments. Despite the very small sample size and short evaluation time, statistically significant changes were detected in this cohort. This is evidence of the large effect size of TS for Ps and AD when the treatment is used. CONCLUSIONS:: Patients with "treatment-resistant" Ps and AD generally responded well to the use of desoximetasone spray in the trial setting. This may be due to better adherence in the study environment or patients' preference for the spray vehicle. Patient reminders contributed to improved clinical outcomes in Ps and AD patients with "treatment-resistant" disease.

Topical corticosteroids for treatment-resistant atopic dermatitis.

Although topical corticosteroids are the mainstay of treatment of atopic dermatitis (AD), these medications may lose efficacy over time, a phenomenon known as tachyphylaxis. However, the underlying mechanism for tachyphylaxis may be due to lack of treatment adherence rather than loss of efficacy of topical corticosteroids. In this study, we aimed to determine if AD patients who were previously unsuccessfully treated with topical corticosteroids would respond to desoximetasone spray 0.25% under conditions designed to promote good adherence over a 7-day period. At baseline, patients were randomized to receive either twice-daily telephone calls to discuss treatment adherence (intervention group) or no telephone calls (control group) during the study period. The patients improved rapidly. In most patients, treatment-resistant AD is most likely due to poor adherence to treatment rather than loss of drug responsiveness.

A Pilot Study Characterizing Factors in Adherence to Cutaneous Lupus Treatment.

Cutaneous lupus erythematosus (CLE) is an autoimmune skin disease that manifests as scarring, dyspigmentation, erythema, and pain. Topical corticosteroids are a mainstay of treatment. Irritation, messiness, and tediousness may deter use. Thus, nonadherence, rather than nonresponse, can result in treatment failure. Prior adherence studies were limited to systemic lupus erythematosus. We performed a single-center, open-label pilot study to assess adherence to topical medication in patients with CLE. CLE adherence to topical medications is suboptimal and declines over time. Shorter treatment duration and greater patient perception of disease severity may contribute to higher adherence. Improving adherence to existing treatments could be as or more valuable than new therapies for the disease.