RESUMEN
Background and Objectives: To understand why patients with drug-resistant epilepsy (DRE) pursue invasive electrical brain stimulation (EBS). Methods: We interviewed patients with DRE (n = 20) and their caregivers about their experiences in pursuing EBS approximately 1 year post device implant. Inductive analysis was applied to identify key motivating factors. Results: The cohort included participants aged from teens to 50s with deep brain stimulation, vagus nerve stimulation, responsive neurostimulation, and chronic subthreshold cortical stimulation. Patients' motivations included (1) improved quality of life (2) intolerability of antiseizure medications, (3) desperation, and (4) patient-family dynamics. Both patients and caregivers described a desire to alleviate burdens of the other. Patient apprehensions about EBS focused on invasiveness and the presence of electrodes in the brain. Previous experiences with invasive monitoring and the ability to see hardware in person during clinical visits influenced patients' comfort in proceeding with EBS. Despite realistic expectations for modest and delayed benefits, patients held out hope for an exceptionally positive outcome. Discussion: Our findings describe the motivations and decision-making process for patients with DRE who pursue invasive EBS. Patients balance feelings of desperation, personal goals, frustration with medication side effects, fears about surgery, and potential pressure from concerned caregivers. These factors together with the sense that patients have exhausted therapeutic alternatives may explain the limited decisional ambivalence observed in this cohort. These themes highlight opportunities for epilepsy care teams to support patient decision-making processes.
RESUMEN
Botox (onabotulinumtoxinA) is a pharmaceutical approved by the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) for use in both cosmetic and therapeutic applications. Despite its increasing use worldwide, Botox carries a rare but potentially life-threatening risk of iatrogenic botulism. This condition, although treatable with antitoxin if promptly recognized, presents a diagnostic challenge to healthcare providers due to its rarity, lack of awareness, and diverse clinical presentations. Here, we present a case of iatrogenic botulism from Botox injections administered in Istanbul, Turkey, in a healthy 47-year-old female. Prompt administration of antitoxin led to remarkable clinical improvement. This case underscores the importance of vigilance among healthcare providers in recognizing and promptly treating iatrogenic botulism, particularly in patients with recent Botox use. Given that the majority of reported cases of iatrogenic botulism occur outside the United States, this case raises concerns about the need for stricter regulations and oversight of Botox administration worldwide.
RESUMEN
Study Design: The investigators designed and implemented a 20-year cross-sectional study using the National Electronic Injury Surveillance System database. Objective: The purpose of this study is to estimate and compare hospital admission (danger) rates between rugby and football of those who presented to the emergency department with head and neck injuries after playing these sports. Methods: The primary predictor variable was sport played. The primary outcome variable was danger, measured by hospital admission rates. Results: Over the past 20 years, there has been a trend of decreasing incidence of injuries presenting to the emergency department in both sports. There was no difference in the rate of hospital admission when comparing football and rugby (OR, 1.2; P = .1). Male gender was associated with an increased risk of admission. Other variables associated with hospital admission included white racial group, injury taking place in the fall, being either young (15-24 years old) or senior (65 years of age and over), and being injured at school or at a sport/recreational facility. Conclusions: There is no difference in danger as measured by admission rates between American football and rugby. There exists, however, several variables that are associated with admission when sustaining injury to the head and neck, when playing these two sports.
RESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Hypertension is a highly prevalent condition in the general population, conferring a high risk of significant morbidity and mortality. Associated with the condition are many well-characterized controllable and noncontrollable risk factors. This study aimed to identify the prevalence of hypertension in the outpatient podiatric medical clinic setting and to determine the relevance of hypertension risk factors in this setting. METHODS: A survey tool was created to characterize relevant risk factors, and systolic and diastolic blood pressures were recorded. Descriptive statistics were generated after conclusion of enrollment. Analysis was also performed to determine the relationship between individual risk factors and systolic blood pressure. RESULTS: Of the 176 patients, 56 (31.8%) had an incidentally high blood pressure at intake, including 18.5% of patients without a known history of hypertension and 38.5% with a known history of hypertension. Three risk factors were found to be significantly associated with increasing systolic blood pressure: weight (P = .022), stress level (P = .017), and presence of renal artery stenosis (P = .021). There was also a near-statistically significant inverse relationship between systolic blood pressure and amount of time spent exercising (P = .068). CONCLUSIONS: Overall, a relatively high prevalence of incidental hypertension was identified, including among patients not previously diagnosed as having hypertension. Consideration of risk factors and awareness of the prevalence of the condition can be useful for practitioners, even as they manage presenting podiatric medical concerns. Future investigations may consider interventional or preventive strategies in the outpatient clinic setting.
Asunto(s)
Hipertensión , Pacientes Ambulatorios , Instituciones de Atención Ambulatoria , Presión Sanguínea , Humanos , Hipertensión/complicaciones , Hipertensión/epidemiología , PrevalenciaRESUMEN
Sex chromosome multisomies (SCMs) are genomic conditions with variable phenotypes that range from undetectable to requiring extensive clinical intervention. Currently, many individuals with SCMs are diagnosed in adolescence or adulthood based on physical symptoms related to pubertal development and infertility. Given the expansion of genetic testing in routine clinical practice, the diagnosing clinician is increasingly a primary care or family medicine provider. This study aims to help providers better understand the patient experience of receiving a diagnosis. We conducted a survey of individuals (n = 55) with SCMs using closed and open-ended questions. Open-response questions were qualitatively analyzed and are reported here with the descriptive results of the closed-ended questions. Most participants were diagnosed with 47,XXY (n = 51; 85.0%), identified as White race/ethnicity (n = 46; 88.5%), and were college graduates or higher (n = 29; 54.7%). Many participants reported dissatisfaction with the delivery of the diagnosis, expressing that it was rushed and their provider lacked detailed information about the condition. Participants were frustrated by the general lack of availability of high-quality informational resources from both medical and other sources at the time of diagnosis. Some participants also described the social and psychological impact of the diagnosis and how it was delivered. To the best of our knowledge, this is the largest survey of individuals diagnosed with SCMs, which is notable considering their prevalence and low diagnostic rate. Our findings provide patient-informed insight on how to improve the delivery of SCM diagnoses, especially delivery in a primary care setting, including the provision of up-to-date information and proactive referral to specialty care and counseling services.
Asunto(s)
COVID-19 , Aplicaciones Móviles , Telemedicina , Humanos , Salud Mental , Atención Dirigida al PacienteRESUMEN
Background: While use of artificial intelligence (AI) in healthcare is increasing, little is known about how patients view healthcare AI. Characterizing patient attitudes and beliefs about healthcare AI and the factors that lead to these attitudes can help ensure patient values are in close alignment with the implementation of these new technologies. Methods: We conducted 15 focus groups with adult patients who had a recent primary care visit at a large academic health center. Using modified grounded theory, focus-group data was analyzed for themes related to the formation of attitudes and beliefs about healthcare AI. Results: When evaluating AI in healthcare, we found that patients draw on a variety of factors to contextualize these new technologies including previous experiences of illness, interactions with health systems and established health technologies, comfort with other information technology, and other personal experiences. We found that these experiences informed normative and cultural beliefs about the values and goals of healthcare technologies that patients applied when engaging with AI. The results of this study form the basis for a theoretical framework for understanding patient orientation to applications of AI in healthcare, highlighting a number of specific social, health, and technological experiences that will likely shape patient opinions about future healthcare AI applications. Conclusions: Understanding the basis of patient attitudes and beliefs about healthcare AI is a crucial first step in effective patient engagement and education. The theoretical framework we present provides a foundation for future studies examining patient opinions about applications of AI in healthcare.
RESUMEN
PURPOSE: Ice hockey and field hockey are contact sports with the potential for injury, especially to the head and neck regions. The purpose of this study is to estimate and compare hospital admission (injury severity) between ice hockey and field hockey of those who presented to the emergency department with head and neck injuries. METHODS: The investigators designed and implemented a 20-year retrospective cohort study using the National Electronic Injury Surveillance System database. We included data related to ice hockey and field hockey injuries from January 2000 to December 2019 in this study. The primary predictor variable was sport played (ice hockey vs field hockey). Secondary predictor variables and covariates were derived from patient and injury characteristics. The primary outcome variable was hospital admission. Logistic regression was used to determine independent risk factors for the outcome variable. RESULTS: Our final sample was composed of 5,472 patients: 4,472 patients suffered head and neck injuries from ice hockey while the remaining 1,000 patients suffered head and neck injuries from field hockey. Players less than 18 years old were associated with 2.07-fold odds of admission (P < .01). Injury to the head (odds ratio [OR] = 14.339; 95% confidence interval [CI], 2.0 to 105.1; P < .01) and neck (OR = 89.260; 95% CI, 11.2 to 712.6; P < .01) were independently associated with an increased odds of admission. Relative to contusions/abrasions, players who suffered a concussion (OR = 141.637; 95% CI, 11.5 to 1,741.5; P < .01), fracture (OR = 155.434; 95% CI, 17.0 to 1,419.2; P < .01), internal organ injury (OR = 186.450; 95% CI, 15.5 to 2,236.8; P < .01), or hematoma (OR = 23.046; 95% CI, 1.2 to 442.5; P < .05) were all independently associated with an increased odds of admission. Ice hockey was not an independent risk factor for admission relative to field hockey. CONCLUSIONS: The findings of this study suggest that ice hockey was more associated with injuries to the head and neck as well as with concussions and internal organ injury compared to field hockey. However, ice hockey was not associated with increased risk of hospitalization relative to field hockey.
Asunto(s)
Traumatismos en Atletas , Conmoción Encefálica , Hockey , Traumatismos del Cuello , Adolescente , Traumatismos en Atletas/epidemiología , Traumatismos en Atletas/etiología , Conmoción Encefálica/complicaciones , Conmoción Encefálica/etiología , Hockey/lesiones , Humanos , Incidencia , Traumatismos del Cuello/epidemiología , Traumatismos del Cuello/etiología , Estudios RetrospectivosRESUMEN
PURPOSE: The primary purpose of this study is to estimate and compare the frequencies, types, and hospital admission rates of head and neck injuries in subjects who practice different martial art fighting styles, including karate, kung fu, kickboxing, taekwondo, judo, and jiu jitsu. METHODS: The investigators designed and implemented a 20-year cross-sectional study using the National Electronic Injury Surveillance System database. Information related to head and neck martial art injuries from January 2000 through December 2019 was included in this study. Study variables were obtained from both patient demographics and injury characteristics (date of injury, diagnosis, body part, type of martial art, and disposition). Patient and injury characteristics were compared through χ2 and independent sample tests. RESULTS: Taekwondo was the most likely type of martial art to lead to a head injury (P < .01), whereas jiu jitsu (P < .01) and judo (P < .01) were most likely to cause neck injuries. The type of martial art was not significantly associated with admission rates (P = .190); however, patients with head injuries were more likely to be admitted relative to patients who did not suffer head injuries (P < .05). Moreover, injuries secondary to judo were more likely to result in admissions relative to that of all other martial arts (P < .05). CONCLUSIONS: Judo was the most severe martial art during this time period as it led to the highest rate of hospital admissions. Karate injuries are most likely to occur in younger populations of fighters under the age of 18 years.
Asunto(s)
Traumatismos Craneocerebrales , Artes Marciales , Adolescente , Traumatismos Craneocerebrales/epidemiología , Traumatismos Craneocerebrales/etiología , Estudios Transversales , Humanos , Artes Marciales/lesionesRESUMEN
The aneurysmal bone cyst (ABC) is a benign, blood-filled bony lesion that notoriously affects the vertebral column and long bones of the body. Rarely, ABCs can manifest in the head and neck (HNABC). The purpose of this paper is to provide a comprehensive review of existing literature on HNABC. This review includes: case reports and case series on ABCs manifesting in the head and neck region published in the English language. All cases identified via PubMed were analyzed individually. Articles were included according to specified eligibility criteria. The total number of cases analyzed were 72 (39 case reports; 33 case series). The average age at the time of HNABC diagnosis was 19.1 years (range: 0.42-62 years). The ratio of prevalence by gender affected exhibited an even 1:1 male-to-female split. CT in combination with MRI proved to be the most prevalent imaging modality utilized (37.2%). HNABC was most commonly detected in the mandible (37.1%), followed by the sinus (14.3%) and cranium (11.4%). The most frequently employed single treatment modality was surgical excision (94.1%). 94.4% of patients were alive with no evidence of disease at follow-up, while 5.6% of patients exhibited disease at follow-up. The average follow-up period was 3.59 years (range: 0.17-17.0 years). Aneurysmal bone cyst of the head and neck region is a rare condition that should be considered in the differential diagnosis of bony, vascular lesions presenting in the aforementioned locations. Since aneurysmal bone cyst of the head and neck region can present as a rapidly growing, expansive and destructive lesion, it is crucial that clinicians are aware of this entity so that patients are accurately diagnosed and treated.
Asunto(s)
Quistes Óseos Aneurismáticos , Quistes Óseos Aneurismáticos/diagnóstico , Quistes Óseos Aneurismáticos/epidemiología , Quistes Óseos Aneurismáticos/cirugía , Femenino , Cabeza , Humanos , Imagen por Resonancia Magnética , Masculino , Mandíbula/patología , CuelloRESUMEN
PURPOSE: The purpose of this paper is to describe a recent case of central giant cell granuloma (CGCG) that rapidly progressed post corticosteroid treatment while also providing a review of the existing literature on CGCG of the head and neck (HNCGCG), with particular emphasis on extra-mandibular and maxillary cases. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The investigators designed and implemented a 32-year review of literature, using the online databases: PubMed, Google Scholar, Medline, and Proquest. The total number of cases analyzed was 55 (42 case reports; 3 case series; 8 comparative studies; 1 retrospective cohort). CASE PRESENTATION: We present a case of a CGCG in a 10-year old male. The lesion originated in the right anterior mandibular body and progressed after corticosteroid treatment. Diagnosis was made using a combination of imaging and histology. A timely debulking procedure of the hemi-mandible was performed and there was no recurrence of the lesion at follow up. RESULTS: The average age at the time of diagnosis of CGCG was 27.5 years. HNCGCG was most commonly detected in the jaw (43.1%), but was also found in the temporal bone (33.3%). The most frequently employed treatment modality was complete surgical excision (76.9%). 93.2% of patients were alive with no evidence of disease at follow-up, while 6.8% of patients exhibited recurrence at follow-up. The median follow up was 13 months. CONCLUSION: It is important for clinicians to recognize that CGCGs are capable of manifesting outside of the jaw. CGCG should be considered in the differential diagnosis of non-odontogenic radiolucent lesions, especially in young patients. CGCGs also need to be distinguished from brown tumor of hyperparathyroidism (BTH) and giant cell tumors, which are histologically similar.
Asunto(s)
Granuloma de Células Gigantes , Enfermedades Mandibulares , Corticoesteroides/uso terapéutico , Niño , Granuloma de Células Gigantes/diagnóstico , Granuloma de Células Gigantes/patología , Granuloma de Células Gigantes/cirugía , Humanos , Masculino , Enfermedades Mandibulares/diagnóstico , Enfermedades Mandibulares/patología , Enfermedades Mandibulares/cirugía , Cuello/cirugía , Estudios RetrospectivosRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: The promise of artificial intelligence (AI) to transform health care is threatened by a tangle of challenges that emerge as new AI tools are introduced into clinical practice. AI tools with high accuracy, especially those that detect asymptomatic cases, may be hindered by barriers to adoption. Understanding provider needs and concerns is critical to inform implementation strategies that improve provider buy-in and adoption of AI tools in medicine. OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to describe provider perspectives on the adoption of an AI-enabled screening tool in primary care to inform effective integration and sustained use. METHODS: A qualitative study was conducted between December 2019 and February 2020 as part of a pragmatic randomized controlled trial at a large academic medical center in the United States. In all, 29 primary care providers were purposively sampled using a positive deviance approach for participation in semistructured focus groups after their use of the AI tool in the randomized controlled trial was complete. Focus group data were analyzed using a grounded theory approach; iterative analysis was conducted to identify codes and themes, which were synthesized into findings. RESULTS: Our findings revealed that providers understood the purpose and functionality of the AI tool and saw potential value for more accurate and faster diagnoses. However, successful adoption into routine patient care requires the smooth integration of the tool with clinical decision-making and existing workflow to address provider needs and preferences during implementation. To fulfill the AI tool's promise of clinical value, providers identified areas for improvement including integration with clinical decision-making, cost-effectiveness and resource allocation, provider training, workflow integration, care pathway coordination, and provider-patient communication. CONCLUSIONS: The implementation of AI-enabled tools in medicine can benefit from sensitivity to the nuanced context of care and provider needs to enable the useful adoption of AI tools at the point of care. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov NCT04000087; https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT04000087.
RESUMEN
The primary aim of this review is to identify the relationship between Epstein-Barr virus (EBV) and prognosis in extranodal natural killer/T-cell lymphoma (ENKTL). Additionally, a literature review of ENKTL was carried out. The investigators designed and implemented a 21-year literature review using the online databases PubMed and Google Scholar. The total number of cases analyzed was 153 (64 case reports; one comparative study; one systematic review). Information related to ENKTL from July 1999 to February 2021 was included in the study. Study variables included: patient demographics, tumor classification, screening modalities, tumor characteristics, symptomatology, treatment, and prognosis. The average age at diagnosis was 50.9 years (range: 4-90 years). Patients of Asian ethnicity were most commonly affected, and there was a 1.6:1 male to female ratio. ENKTL was most frequently detected in the head and neck region, and 53.1% of cases metastasized. Of all head and neck cases, the nose was the most affected location. Immunohistochemistry positivity included: EBV (32.0%), CD2 (96.6%), CD3ϵ (81.7%), CD43 (91.7%), CD56 (86.4%), Granzyme (97.1%), Perforin (90.9%), TIA-1 (97.8%), p53 (33.3%). The most frequently employed single treatment modality was chemotherapy alone, and 34.2% of patients expired within five years of diagnosis. The average follow-up period was 16.51 months (range: 0.25-66 months). EBV was significantly associated with metastatic ENKTL (χ2 = 4.36; CV = 3.84; p = 0.037). We found no association between EBV and ENKTL prognosis (χ2 = 17.2; CV = 21.0; p = 0.14).
RESUMEN
While there is significant enthusiasm in the medical community about the use of artificial intelligence (AI) technologies in healthcare, few research studies have sought to assess patient perspectives on these technologies. We conducted 15 focus groups examining patient views of diverse applications of AI in healthcare. Our results indicate that patients have multiple concerns, including concerns related to the safety of AI, threats to patient choice, potential increases in healthcare costs, data-source bias, and data security. We also found that patient acceptance of AI is contingent on mitigating these possible harms. Our results highlight an array of patient concerns that may limit enthusiasm for applications of AI in healthcare. Proactively addressing these concerns is critical for the flourishing of ethical innovation and ensuring the long-term success of AI applications in healthcare.
RESUMEN
Arteriovenous malformations (AVM) are abnormal connections between arteries and veins without a capillary bed, creating high- and low-flow areas that are prone to bleeding. Uterine AVMs can be congenital or acquired with an incidence of 0.1%. Acquired cases are usually caused by uterine instrumentation, trauma, infection, or gestational trophoblastic disease. Patients typically present with sudden onset of heavy vaginal bleeding. Diagnosis is made using angiography, ultrasound, computerized tomography, or magnetic resonance imaging. After patients are stabilized, management depends on their desire for future fertility and may include hysterectomy or endovascular embolization. We present the case of a 16-year-old G1P0010 female with recurrent vaginal bleeding caused by a uterine AVM. To preserve the patient's fertility, a selective embolization approach was employed using microcoils and gel foam. This case highlights a unique treatment option for uterine AVMs in patients who desire fertility preservation. Additionally, we review the diagnostic imaging and treatment options for uterine AVMs.
RESUMEN
Severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) or COVID-19 is the virus responsible for the 2019 global pandemic. Pulmonary complications of COVID-19 are well established in the literature. However, the virus causes numerous extrapulmonary manifestations, notably acute aortic occlusion (AAO). COVID-19 creates a hypercoagulable state via the upregulation of numerous procoagulant cytokines in endothelial cells of blood vessels. We present a case of a 63-year-old patient without a previous history of prothrombotic disorders who developed AAO in the distal abdominal aorta and bilateral common iliac arteries after contracting COVID-19. The patient was a poor surgical candidate and was treated with fibrinolytics that were administered via an EkoSonic™ Endovascular System (EKOS) catheter using a bilateral transfemoral approach. This case highlights a unique treatment option for non-surgical candidates with AAO.
RESUMEN
Osteochondroma is the most common benign tumor of bone that often produces no symptoms unless the enlarged mass affects nearby structures. Rarely, Horner syndrome can be caused by an osteochondroma. A five-year-old female with a past medical history of seizure-like activity presented to the emergency department on three separate occasions within one month. She exhibited neurological deficits, including miosis and ptosis, resulting in the diagnosis of Horner syndrome. Computerized tomography (CT) demonstrated a calcified and ossified lesion arising from the right first rib and transverse process that was suspicious for an osteochondroma or chondrosarcoma with neuroblastoma lower on the differential diagnosis. Given the patient's escalating clinical symptomatology and suspicious features of the lesion, a CT guided-bone biopsy was performed. Pathology revealed an osteochondroma that was eventually resected by neurologic and orthopedic surgeries. In this case report, we review the sympathetic innervation to the head, eye, and neck, the most common etiologies of Horner syndrome, and elucidate imaging modalities useful for diagnosing osteochondroma. Horner syndrome secondary to osteochondroma of the first rib has been documented only once before.