Randomized Comparison of Hypochlorous Acid With 5% Sulfamylon Solution as Topical Therapy Following Skin Grafting.

Objective: Infections are a serious complication of thermal injury. Excision and grafting have led to a decrease in incidence, but to ensure successful skin grafting, antimicrobial irrigants are frequently utilized to prevent infection. A safe, efficacious, and cost-effective irrigant capable of preventing infections would be a valuable adjunctive therapy. The objectives of this study were to determine whether the test article was noninferior to current therapy in controlling infection and reducing postoperative pain in patients with skin graft. Methods: Patients with burns requiring skin grafting were randomized to hypochlorous acid or 5% Sulfamylon solution as topical dressings postoperatively. Inclusion criteria included thermal injury 20% or more total body surface area requiring excision and autografting, and age 18 years or more. Exclusion criteria included pregnant females, chlorine sensitivity, and electrical/chemical/cold injuries. The following outcomes were assessed: patient demographics, graft viability, infection, pain score, narcotic usage, adverse events, and cost. Results: Treatment groups were demographically equivalent. There were no differences in adverse or serious adverse events between the 2 groups. Graft viability and infection rate were equivalent between the 2 groups. In addition, pain scores and narcotic usage were similar. Hypochlorous acid was significantly less expensive than 5% Sulfamylon solution. Conclusions: Hypochlorous acid demonstrated equivalent efficacy and safety compared with 5% Sulfamylon when used as the postoperative topical dressing for skin grafts. Hypochlorous acid was more cost-effective. This pilot study was limited by its small sample size. However, hypochlorous acid shows promise as a topical wound dressing and further study with larger groups is warranted.

Topical growth factors and wound contraction in the rat: Part II. Platelet-derived growth factor and wound contraction in normal and steroid-impaired rats.

The wound contraction model described in Part I was used to study topically applied, recombinant platelet-derived growth factor (rPDGF-BB) and wound contraction in normal and steroid-impaired rats. Circular wounds 4 cm in size were made on the dorsum of the rats with halothane anesthesia. Five groups of 20 normal rats each were treated with the vehicle alone and four concentrations of rPDGF-BB (0.5, 1.0, 3.0, and 10.0 micrograms/ml). Four groups of 20 steroid-impaired rats each were treated with the vehicle alone and three concentrations of rPDGF-BB (0.5, 1.0, and 3.0 micrograms/ml). The wounds were dressed with 2 x 2 gauze, Adaptic, 4 x 4 gauze, and Tubigrip. The investigators were blinded to the treatments until the completion of the experiment, and the treatments were applied in random order. Dressings were changed every 2 to 3 days for 14 days and the wound areas were determined, expressed as a fraction of the original, and plotted versus time. The areas under the curves and the means of the fraction open each day were compared between groups using Student's t-test. The treatment with 3.0-micrograms/ml rPDGF-BB accelerated the rate of wound contraction in the steroid-impaired animals (p less than 0.05).

Topical growth factors and wound contraction in the rat: Part I. Literature review and definition of the rat model.

The isolation and production of growth factors and the observation that a platelet extract will promote wound healing in chronic wounds has led to an interest in the study of growth factors and wound healing. We wished to study the effect of platelet-derived growth factor on wound contraction. However, because studies of growth factors and wound contraction are quite recent, we could find only two models described in the literature and neither seemed ideal. Both used small wounds, which are difficult to measure, anesthetics with slow induction and recovery and which are difficult to titrate, and no dressings, which permits the animals to lick the wounds and possibly introduce other growth factors. We therefore reviewed wound contraction models used for other studies. In particular, we reviewed the animal used, anesthetic, wound size and shape, dressing methods, scab treatment, and measurement and comparison techniques. We then combined features of many of them into a model that solves the problems listed and permits the study of topically applied growth factors and wound contraction. The composite model to be described uses a large, circular wound on the rat, halothane anesthesia, and flexible, Tubigrip dressings.