Determinants of pain intensity and magnitude of incapability more than two years after arthroscopic Bankart repair for anterior shoulder instability.

Background: Individuals treated with arthroscopic Bankart repair after anterior shoulder dislocations experience varied discomfort and incapability. The aim of this study was to determine the relative association of mental health and physical health factors with 1) magnitude of capability and 2) pain intensity 2 or more years after surgery. Methods: This cross-sectional study evaluated 80 military patients that experienced one or more traumatic anterior shoulder dislocations a minimum of 2 years after arthroscopic Bankart repair without remplissage. We measured capability (Oxford Shoulder Instability Score), pain intensity using an 11-point ordinal scale, symptoms of anxiety (Generalized Anxiety Disorder-2 questionnaire), symptoms of depression (Patient Health Questionnaire-2), catastrophic thinking (Pain Catastrophizing Scale-4), and kinesiophobia (Tampa scale for kinesiophobia-4). We also identified preoperative presence of a Hill-Sachs lesion on radiographs and postoperative occurrence of subluxation or a dislocation episode. A negative binominal regression analysis sought factors associated with magnitude of incapability and pain intensity. Results: Greater incapability was strongly associated with both greater kinesiophobia (Regression Coefficient [RC] = -0.50; 95% confidence interval [CI] = -0.73 to -0.26; P ≤ .01) and repeat surgery (RC = -0.27; 95% CI = -0.41 to -0.13; P ≤ .01). Greater pain intensity was only strongly associated with greater kinesiophobia (RC = 0.25; 95% CI = 0.039 to 0.46; P = .021). Conclusion: The observation that greater unhelpful thinking is associated with greater pain intensity and greater magnitude of incapability after a Bankart repair for anterior shoulder instability, whereas pathophysiological factors such as glenoid bone loss were not, emphasizes the degree to which mindset is associated with musculoskeletal health.

A Systematic Review of Distinction of Colonization and Infection in Studies that Address C. Acnes and Shoulder Surgery.

BACKGROUND: After shoulder surgery, infection is often diagnosed in the absence of an inflammatory host response (purulence, sepsis). In the absence of inflammation, the more appropriate diagnoses may be colonization or contamination. We reviewed the available data regarding culture of Cutibacterium Acnes during primary and revision shoulder surgery and asked; 1. What is the prevalence of air, skin, and deep tissue colonization? 2. How often is an inflammatory host response associated with diagnosis of postoperative shoulder infection diagnosed on the basis of culture of C. Acnes? 3. Is there any relation between culture of C. Acnes and outcomes of shoulder surgery? METHODS: Three databases were searched for studies that address C. Acnes and colonization or infection related to shoulder surgery. We analyzed data from 80 studies addressing the rates of C. Acnes colonization/infection in patients undergoing shoulder surgery, evidence of an inflammatory host response, and relationship of C. Acnes culture to surgery outcomes. RESULTS: C. Acnes is often cultured in the air in the operating room (mean 10%), the skin before preparation (mean 47%), and deep tissue in primary shoulder arthroplasty (mean 29%), arthroscopy (mean 27%), and other shoulder surgery (mean 21%). C. Acnes was cultured from a mean of 39% of deep tissue samples during revision arthroplasty. C. Acnes was believed to be the causative organism of a high percentage of the infections diagnosed after surgery, 39% in primary shoulder arthroplasties, 53% in revisions, 55% in arthroscopic surgeries, and 44% in a mixture of shoulder surgeries. Infection was nearly always diagnosed in the absence of an inflammatory host response. Documented purulence and sepsis were not specifically ascribed to C. Acnes (rather than more virulent organisms such as S. Aureus). Diagnosis of infection, or unexpected positive culture, with C. Acnes during shoulder surgery is associated with outcomes comparable to shoulders with no bacterial growth. CONCLUSIONS: The evidence to date supports conceptualization of C. Acnes as a common commensal (colonization), and perhaps a frequent contaminant, and an uncommon cause of an inflammatory host response (infection). This is supported by the observations that 1) Unexpected positive culture for C. Acnes is not associated with adverse outcomes after shoulder surgery, and 2) Diagnosed infection with C. Acnes is associated with outcomes comparable to non-infected revision shoulder arthroplasty. We speculate that diagnosis of C. Acnes infection might represent an attempt to account for unexplained discomfort, incapability or stiffness after technically sound shoulder surgery. If so, the hypothesis that stiffness and pain are host responses to C. Acnes needs better experimental support.

Subsidence after Trapeziometacarpal Arthroplasty.

PURPOSE: Surgeons sometimes ascribe inadequate comfort and capability after trapeziometacarpal (TMC) arthroplasty to movement of the trapezium toward the scaphoid (subsidence or reduced trapezial space height [TSH]). We asked the following: (1) What percentage of studies found a relationship between subsidence of the metacarpal toward the distal scaphoid and measures of grip strength, capability, pinch strength, pain intensity, or patient satisfaction after TMC arthroplasty and what study characteristics are associated with having notable correlation? (2) What study factors are associated with greater postoperative TSH? (3) What is the mean subsidence over time? METHODS: We conducted a systematic review by querying PubMed, Cochrane, and Web of Science databases from 1986 and onward. Using inclusion criteria of TMC arthroplasty inclusive of trapeziectomy, ligament reconstruction and tendon interposition, tendon interposition, and prosthetic arthroplasty and a measure of subsidence, 91 studies were identified. RESULTS: Seven of 31 study groups reported a correlation of subsidence with pinch strength, 5 of 21 with magnitude of incapability, 1 of 16 with grip strength, 2 of 20 with pain intensity, and none of 10 with satisfaction. Study factors associated with a relationship between subsidence and one of these measures included continents other than Europe. Among the 9 studies that measured TSH over time, the mean change in TSH was 5.0 mm ± 2.2 mm SD for visits less than 1 year after surgery and 5.5 mm ± SD 1.0 mm for visits 1 to 3.5 years after surgery. CONCLUSION: The observation that most studies find no relationship between radiographic subsidence of an average of 5 millimeters and levels of strength, capability, comfort, or satisfaction after TMC arthroplasty suggests that primary surgeries may not benefit from a focus on limiting subsidence and revision arthroplasty ought not be offered based on this radiographic measure.

Associations of Mental, Social and Pathophysiological factors with Pain Intensity and Capability in Patients with Shoulder Osteoarthritis Prior to Shoulder Arthroplasty: A Dutch Arthroplasty Register study.

BACKGROUND: Mounting evidence suggests that mental health accounts for greater variation in levels of comfort and capability than pathophysiology severity across a range of musculoskeletal conditions. Using nationwide Dutch Arthroplasty Register (LROI) data, we tested the null hypothesis that none of the available mental, social, and pathophysiological factors are associated with variation in levels of comfort and capability among people with shoulder osteoarthritis prior to arthroplasty. METHODS: We included all adult patients who underwent primary total shoulder arthroplasty for osteoarthritis in the period 2014-2021 with complete measures of shoulder specific capability (Oxford Shoulder Score), pain intensity (10-point Numeric Rating Scale), general wellbeing (the EQ-5D 3-L), the grade of pathophysiology (Walch classification) and categorized social health based on a social deprivation index. In total, 1342 patients with shoulder osteoarthritis preparing for shoulder arthroplasty were included in a regression analysis to seek factors associated with variation in levels of pain intensity and capability. RESULTS: Greater pain intensity at rest was associated with greater symptoms of anxiety and depression (Regression Coefficient [RC] = -0.41; 95% Confidence Interval [CI] = 0.17 to 0.64; P = <0.01), and women (RC = 0.38; 95% CI = 0.11 to 0.66; P = <0.01). Greater incapability was associated with greater symptoms of anxiety and depression (RC = -3.2; 95% CI = -4.0 to -2.4; P = <0.01), an ASA score of III and IV (RC = -3.1; 95% CI = -4.8 to -1.4; P = <0.01), older age (RC = -0.098; 95% CI = -0.15 to -0.047; P = <0.01), and women (RC = -3.9; 95% CI = -4.9 to -3.0; P = <0.01). Neither comfort nor capability were associated with Walch classification or social deprivation index. CONCLUSION: The confirmation that variation in levels of comfort and capability among people preparing for shoulder arthroplasty are associated with mindset rather than a measure of glenoid pathophysiology points to the potential benefits of addressing mental health in musculoskeletal health strategies.

Misinformation about upper extremity conditions in guidelines for clinicians.

The potential for reinforcement of unhelpful thinking and feelings of distress was present in half the sentences from the general description of the condition and management recommendation sections in three sources of information describing upper extremity conditions for clinicians.

Is the feeling of 'weakness' associated with unhelpful thoughts or distress regarding symptoms?

This cross-sectional study looked for factors associated with feelings of weakness, level of capability and pain intensity in people seeking musculoskeletal speciality care for non-traumatic upper extremity conditions. A survey was conducted in 139 English-speaking adults, with 135 participants completing it. We found that greater intensity of feelings of weakness correlated with higher distress regarding symptoms and with older age. Lower level of capability was associated with greater intensity of feelings of weakness, greater distress regarding symptoms and older age. Higher pain intensity was associated with greater distress regarding symptoms and greater intensity of feelings of weakness. These findings suggest that the symptom of weakness may be a cue to explore potential distress about symptoms in addition to examining for actual weakness. This understanding could be a guide to a more compassionate approach to alleviate distress rather than focusing on neuromuscular pathophysiology alone, with the potential to reduce unnecessary tests and treatments.Level of evidence: IV.

Potential misinformation in large language model descriptions of upper extremity diseases.

When a large language model was prompted to discuss upper extremity conditions and correct instances of misinformation in responses, there was notable persistent misinformation, reinforcement of unhelpful thinking and reduction of independent management of one's health (agency).

Do Surgeons Experience Moral Dissonance When There Is Misalignment Between Evidence and Action? A Survey and Scenario-based Study.

BACKGROUND: Moral dissonance is the psychological discomfort associated with a mismatch between our moral values and potentially immoral actions. For instance, to limit moral dissonance, surgeons must develop a rationale that the potential for benefit from performing surgery is meaningfully greater than the inherent harm of surgery. Moral dissonance can also occur when a patient or one's surgeon peers encourage surgery for a given problem, even when the evidence suggests limited or no benefit over other options. Clinicians may not realize the degree to which moral dissonance can be a source of diminished joy in practice. Uncovering potential sources of moral dissonance can help inform efforts to help clinicians enjoy their work. QUESTIONS/PURPOSES: In a scenario-based experiment performed in an online survey format, we exposed musculoskeletal specialists to various types of patient and practice stressors to measure their association with moral dissonance and asked: (1) What factors are associated with the level of pressure surgeons feel to act contrary to the best evidence? (2) What factors are associated with the likelihood of offering surgery? METHODS: We performed a scenario-based experiment by inviting members of the Science of Variation Group (SOVG; an international collaborative of musculoskeletal surgeons that studies variation in care) to complete an online survey with randomized elements. The use of experimental techniques such as randomization to measure factors associated with specific ratings makes participation rate less important than diversity of opinion within the sample. A total of 114 SOVG musculoskeletal surgeons participated, which represents the typical number of participants from a total of about 200 who tend to participate in at least one experiment per year. Among the 114 participants, 94% (107) were men, 49% (56) practiced in the United States, and 82% (94) supervised trainees. Participants viewed 12 scenarios of upper extremity fractures for which surgery is optional (discretionary) based on consensus and current best evidence. In addition to a representative age, the scenario included randomized patient and practice factors that we posit could be sources of moral distress based on author consensus. Patient factors included potential sources of pressure (such as "The patient is convinced they want a specific treatment and will go to a different surgeon if they don't get it") or experiences of collaboration (such as "The patient is collaborative and involved in decisions"). Practice factors included circumstances of financial or reputational pressure (such as "The practice is putting pressure on you to generate more revenue") and factors of limited pressure (such as "Your income is not tied to revenue"). For each scenario, the participant was asked to rate both of the following statements on a scale from 0 to 100 anchored with "I don't feel it at all" at 0, "I feel it moderately" at 50, and "I feel it strongly" at 100: (1) pressure to act contrary to best evidence and (2) likelihood of offering surgery. Additional explanatory variables included surgeon factors: gender, years in practice, region, subspecialty, supervision of trainees, and practice setting (academic/nonacademic). We sought factors associated with pressure to act contrary to evidence and likelihood of offering surgery, accounting for potential confounding variables in multilevel mixed-effects linear regression models. RESULTS: Accounting for potential confounding variables, greater pressure to act contrary to best evidence was moderately associated with greater patient despair (regression coefficient [RC] 6 [95% confidence interval 2 to 9]; p = 0.001) and stronger patient preference (RC 4 [95% CI 0 to 8]; p = 0.03). Lower pressure to act contrary to evidence was moderately associated with surgeon income independent of revenue (RC -6 [95% CI -9 to -4]; p < 0.001) and no financial benefit to operative treatment (RC -6 [95% CI -8 to -3]; p < 0.001). Marketing concerns were the only factor associated with greater likelihood of offering surgery (RC 6 [95% CI 0 to 11]; p = 0.04). CONCLUSION: In this scenario-based survey experiment, patient distress and strong preferences and surgeon financial incentives were associated with greater surgeon feelings of moral dissonance when considering discretionary fracture surgery. CLINICAL RELEVANCE: To support enjoyment of the practice of musculoskeletal surgery, we recommend that surgeons, surgery practices, and surgery professional associations be intentional in both anticipating and developing strategies to ameliorate potential sources of moral dissonance in daily practice.

Variation in Interpretation of Provocative Tests for Carpal Tunnel Syndrome.

PURPOSE: We studied variation in interpretation of specific symptoms during clinical tests for carpal tunnel syndrome to estimate the degree to which surgeons consider pain without paresthesia characteristic of median neuropathy. METHODS: We invited all upper-extremity surgeon members of the Science of Variation Group to complete a scenario-based experiment. Surgeons read 5-10 clinical vignettes of patients with variation in patient demographics and random variation in symptoms and signs as follows: primary symptoms (nighttime numbness and tingling, constant numbness and loss of sensibility, pain with activity), symptoms elicited by a provocative test (Phalen, Durkan, or Tinel) (tingling, pain), and location of symptoms elicited by the provocative test (index and middle fingers, thumb and index fingers, little and ring fingers, entire hand). RESULTS: Patient factors associated with surgeon interpretation of provocative tests as negative included pain rather than paresthesia during the Phalen, Durkan, or Tinel test and location of symptoms in the entire hand rather than the median nerve distribution. CONCLUSIONS: Specialists do not consider pain without paresthesia or a noncharacteristic symptom distribution as characteristic of carpal tunnel syndrome. CLINICAL RELEVANCE: Awareness that elicitation of pain with Phalen, Durkan, and Tinel tests is regarded by specialists as relatively uncharacteristic of median neuropathy can help limit the potential for both overdiagnosis and overtreatment of median neuropathy as well as underdiagnosis and undertreatment of mental and social health contributions to illness (notable correlates of the intensity and distribution of pain).

The Central Sensitization Inventory Measures Thoughts and Emotions.

To determine if the Central Sensitization Inventory questionnaire (CSI) functions as a mental health measure among a cross-section of people seeking musculoskeletal specialty care, we asked: (1) What is the association of CSI total score and item groupings identified in factor analysis with mental health measures? and (2) What is the association between specific CSI items that represent each factor well and specific mental health measures? One hundred and fifty-seven adults seeking specialty care for musculoskeletal symptoms completed the CSI, a measure of catastrophic thinking, and 3 measures of distress (symptoms of health anxiety, general anxiety, and depression). Exploratory factor analysis was used to identify item groupings. Exploratory factor analysis identified 4 item groupings (factors): (1) thoughts and feelings (mental health), accounting for 52% of the variation in the CSI, (2) urinary and visual symptoms (15%) (3) body aches (10%), and (4) jaw pain (8.1%). More than half the variation in both the CSI total score (51%) and the thoughts and feelings factor (57%) were accounted for by variation in measures of catastrophic thinking and distress. Specific items that account for large amounts of the variation in the CSI also had notable correlations with mental health measures. The strong relationship between the CSI and thoughts and emotions suggests that the CSI functions largely as a mental health measure. If the concept of central sensitization is to help people get and stay healthy, it will depend on evidence that central sensitization can be measured and quantified distinct from mental health.

Potential misinformation in websites on carpal tunnel syndrome.

Objective: We sought to evaluate the potential reinforcement of misconceptions in websites discussing carpal tunnel syndrome (CTS). Methods: After removing all cookies to limit personalization, we entered "carpal tunnel syndrome" into five search engines and collected the first 50 results displayed for each search. For each of the 105 unique websites, we recorded publication date, author background, and number of views. The prevalence of potential reinforcement and/or reorientation of misconceptions for each website was then scored using a rubric based on our interpretation of the best current evidence regarding CTS. The informational quality of websites was graded with the DISCERN instrument, a validated tool for assessing online health information. Results: Every website contained at least one potentially misleading statement in our opinion. The most common misconceptions reference "excessive motion" and "inflammation." Greater potential reinforcement of misinformation about CTS was associated with fewer page views and lower informational quality scores. Conclusions: Keeping in mind that this analysis is based on our interpretation of current best evidence, potential misinformation on websites addressing CTS is common and has the potential to increase symptom intensity and magnitude of incapability via reinforcement of unhelpful thoughts regarding symptoms. Innovation: The prevalence of patient-directed health information that can increase discomfort and incapability by reinforcing common unhelpful thoughts supports the need for innovations in how we develop, oversee, and evolve healthy online material.

A Brief Mind-body Intervention Is Feasible and May Prevent Persistent Pain After Acute Orthopaedic Traumas: A Randomized Controlled Trial.

BACKGROUND: Approximately 20% to 50% of patients develop persistent pain after traumatic orthopaedic injuries. Psychosocial factors are an important predictor of persistent pain; however, there are no evidence-based, mind-body interventions to prevent persistent pain for this patient population. QUESTIONS/PURPOSES: (1) Does the Toolkit for Optimal Recovery after Injury (TOR) achieve a priori feasibility benchmarks in a multisite randomized control trial (RCT)? (2) Does TOR demonstrate a preliminary effect in improving pain, as well as physical and emotional function? METHODS: This pilot RCT of TOR versus a minimally enhanced usual care comparison group (MEUC) was conducted among 195 adults with an acute orthopaedic traumatic injury at risk for persistent pain at four geographically diverse Level 1 trauma centers between October 2021 to August 2023. Fifty percent (97 of 195) of participants were randomized to TOR (mean age 43 ± 17 years; 67% [65 of 97] women) and 50% (98) to MEUC (mean age 45 ± 16 years; 67% [66 of 98] women). In TOR, 24% (23 of 97) of patients were lost to follow-up, whereas in the MEUC, 17% (17 of 98) were lost. At 4 weeks, 78% (76 of 97) of patients in TOR and 95% (93 of 98) in the MEUC completed the assessments; by 12 weeks, 76% (74 of 97) of patients in TOR and 83% (81 of 98) in the MEUC completed the assessments (all participants were still included in the analysis consistent with an intention-to-treat approach). The TOR has four weekly video-administered sessions that teach pain coping skills. The MEUC is an educational pamphlet. Both were delivered in addition to usual care. Primary outcomes were feasibility of recruitment (the percentage of patients who met study criteria and enrolled) and data collection, appropriateness of treatment (the percent of participants in TOR who score above the midpoint on the Credibility and Expectancy Scale), acceptability (the percentage of patients in TOR who attend at least three of four sessions), and treatment satisfaction (the percent of participants in TOR who score above the midpoint on the Client Satisfaction Scale). Secondary outcomes included additional feasibility (including collecting data on narcotics and rescue medications and adverse events), fidelity (whether the intervention was delivered as planned) and acceptability metrics (patients and staff), pain (numeric rating scale), physical function (Short Musculoskeletal Function Assessment questionnaire [SMFA], PROMIS), emotional function (PTSD [PTSD Checklist], depression [Center for Epidemiologic Study of Depression]), and intervention targets (pain catastrophizing, pain anxiety, coping, and mindfulness). Assessments occurred at baseline, 4 and 12 weeks. RESULTS: Several outcomes exceeded a priori benchmarks: feasibility of recruitment (89% [210 of 235] of eligible participants consented), appropriateness (TOR: 73% [66 of 90] scored > midpoint on the Credibility and Expectancy Scale), data collection (79% [154 of 195] completed all surveys), satisfaction (TOR: 99% [75 of 76] > midpoint on the Client Satisfaction Scale), and acceptability (TOR: 73% [71 of 97] attended all four sessions). Participation in TOR, compared with the MEUC, was associated with improvement from baseline to postintervention and from baseline to follow-up in physical function (SMFA, baseline to post: -7 [95% CI -11 to -4]; p < 0.001; baseline to follow-up: -6 [95% CI -11 to -1]; p = 0.02), PROMIS (PROMIS-PF, baseline to follow-up: 2 [95% CI 0 to 4]; p = 0.045), pain at rest (baseline to post: -1.2 [95% CI -1.7 to -0.6]; p < 0.001; baseline to follow-up: -1 [95% CI -1.7 to -0.3]; p = 0.003), activity (baseline to post: -0.7 [95% CI -1.3 to -0.1]; p = 0.03; baseline to follow-up: -0.8 [95% CI -1.6 to -0.1]; p = 0.04), depressive symptoms (baseline to post: -6 [95% CI -9 to -3]; p < 0.001; baseline to follow-up: -5 [95% CI -9 to -2]; p < 0.002), and posttraumatic symptoms (baseline to post: -4 [95% CI -7 to 0]; p = 0.03; baseline to follow-up: -5 [95% CI -9 to -1]; p = 0.01). Improvements were generally clinically important and sustained or continued through the 3 months of follow-up (that is, above the minimum clinically important different [MCID] of 7 for the SMFA, the MCID of 3.6 for PROMIS, the MCID of 2 for pain at rest and pain during activity, the MCID of more than 10% change in depressive symptoms, and the MCID of 10 for posttraumatic symptoms). There were treatment-dependent improvements in pain catastrophizing, pain anxiety, coping, and mindfulness. CONCLUSION: TOR was feasible and potentially efficacious in preventing persistent pain among patients with an acute orthopaedic traumatic injury. Using TOR in clinical practice may prevent persistent pain after orthopaedic traumatic injury. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level I, therapeutic study.

A Small Number of Surgeons Perform the Large Majority of Uncommon Nerve Decompression Procedures.

BACKGROUND: Notable surgeon-to-surgeon variation in rates of uncommon surgery can reflect appropriate concentration of expertise with technically difficult or risky procedures that address problematic impairment due to objective pathophysiology. Examples include vascularized tissue transfer or transplantation to address complex tissue loss and release of bony elbow ankylosis. Perhaps more problematic is notable variation in straightforward, discretionary surgeries intended to alleviate pain, offered in the absence of objectively measurable pathophysiology, and without experimental evidence of benefit over placebo and other nonspecific effects. Evidence of concentration of this type of surgery in the hands of a few surgeons might point to inordinate influence of surgeon opinions on patient behavior. A study of variation in operations for upper extremity peripheral mononeuropathy has the potential to uncover potentially problematic variation. There are billing codes specific to common surgeries that can benefit patients with objectively verifiable neuropathies. And there are billing codes that represent less common nerve decompression surgeries that in many cases are offered in the absence of both objective evidence of pathophysiology as well as experimental evidence that surgery alleviates pain better than simulated surgery. QUESTIONS/PURPOSES: We asked the following questions: (1) Among surgeons who billed a mean of at least 10 carpal tunnel releases (CTRs) per year in patients with Medicare insurance in the United States, how many also performed at least one less common peripheral nerve release and cubital tunnel release (CubTR) per year? (2) Among surgeons who billed a mean of at least one less common peripheral nerve release or CubTR on average per year, what is the median and range of the number of less common peripheral nerve releases and CubTRs and the relative proportion of these compared with CTRs per year? (3) Are there any differences in gender, specialty, and number of CTRs and CubTRs between surgeons who performed at least one less common nerve decompression and surgeons who, on average, performed none? METHODS: Using the Medicare Physician & Other Practitioners - by Provider and Service database, we identified surgeons who perform a minimum of 10 CTRs per year. Because this database has all surgeries billed to Medicare performed in any setting by individual surgeons, it is well suited to the study of surgeon-specific operative rates among Medicare patients. Among 7259 clinicians who billed one or more nerve procedure to Medicare between January 2013 and December 2019, we excluded 120 nonsurgical clinicians, 47 podiatrists, and 1561 clinicians who billed procedures as an organization. Among the remaining 5531 surgeons, 5439 performed at least 10 CTRs on average per year, which we considered representative of surgeons who include nerve decompression surgery as a part of their practice. Among these 5439 surgeons, we calculated the mean number of CTRs, CubTRs, and less common peripheral nerve releases (including decompression of a digital nerve, nerve in hand or wrist, ulnar nerve at the wrist, brachial plexus, and unspecified nerve) per year between 2013 and 2019. Decompression of the median nerve at the carpal tunnel, the ulnar nerve at the cubital tunnel, and, much less frequently, the ulnar nerve at the wrist typically addresses measurable neuropathy. The other nerve releases are often performed for illnesses characterized by pain that are defined, in part, by the absence of experimentally verifiable pathophysiology such as radial tunnel and pronator (or lacertus) syndromes. We counted the number of surgeons who billed an average of at least one less common peripheral nerve release and CubTR per year; the median and range of the number of less common nerve releases and CubTRs and their relative proportion among those subsets of surgeons; and differences in the number of surgeons who performed one or none less common surgery by gender, specialty, and volume of CTR/CubTR surgery. RESULTS: Of 5439 surgeons who performed a mean of at least 10 CTRs per year, 2% (93) performed a mean of at least one less common peripheral nerve release per year among patients on Medicare, 14% (775) at least one CubTR, and 1% (47) performed both. Surgeons who performed a mean of at least one less common peripheral nerve release per year performed a median (IQR) of 7 (3 to 17) per year (with a maximum of 153 per year), representing approximately one less common peripheral nerve release for every five CTRs. Sixty-five percent (4076 of 6272) of all less common nerve procedures were performed by the top 20 billing surgeons. Gender was not associated with doing one or more uncommon nerve releases (women 1% [6 of 413], men 2% [87 of 5026]; p = 0.84), but specialty was, with plastic surgeons leading (6% [20 of 340] compared with 1% [73 of 5087] for other types of surgeons; p < 0.001). CONCLUSION: The observation that a relatively small number of surgeons perform a large majority of the surgery for nerve syndromes conceptualized as accounting for arm pain suggests that most surgeons are cautious about ascribing pain to conceptual nerve compression syndromes and offering surgery. CLINICAL RELEVANCE: An approach to surgical care founded on ethical principles regards this type of notable variation as a signal of inordinate influence of surgeon opinion on patient behavior, suggesting that professional conduct may be supported by safeguards such as checklists that help guide patients to choices consistent with their values unclouded by surgeon beliefs, false hope, and common misconceptions.

Upper Extremity Surgeon Recommendations for Imaging Do Not Correspond with Imaging Appropriateness Guidelines.

Background: Utilization of magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and computed tomography (CT) increases annually, raising concerns about overuse. Imaging appropriateness guidelines have the potential to standardize decisions regarding imaging based on best evidence, which might reduce unhelpful or potentially misleading imaging. We studied expert use of advanced imaging for musculoskeletal illness compared to published appropriateness recommendations. Methods: First, 15 imaging guidelines with recommendations for advanced imaging of the upper extremity were collated. Next, members of the Science of Variation Group (SOVG) were invited to participate in a survey of 11 patient scenarios of common upper extremity illnesses and asked whether they would recommend MRI or CT. Guideline recommendations for imaging were compared with surgeon recommendations using Fisher's exact tests. We used Fleiss' kappa to measure the interobserver agreement among surgeons. Results: For the 11 scenarios, most imaging appropriateness guidelines suggested that MRI or CT is useful, while most surgeons (n = 108) felt it was not. There was no correlation between surgeons and guidelines recommendations for imaging (ρ = 0.28; p = 0.40). There was slight agreement among surgeons regarding imaging recommendations (kappa: 0.17; 95% confidence interval: 0.023-0.32). Conclusion: The available imaging appropriateness guidelines appear to be too permissive and therefore seem to have limited clinical utility for upper extremity surgeons. The notable surgeon-to-surgeon variation (unreliability) in recommendations for advanced imaging in this and other studies suggests a role for strategies to ensure that patient decisions about imaging are consistent with their values (what matters most to them) and not unduly influenced by patient misconceptions about imaging or by surgeon beliefs and habits. Level Of Evidence: II, diagnostic.

Potential Misinformation in the Official Disability Guidelines About the Diagnosis and Treatment of Rotator Cuff Tendinopathy.

OBJECTIVE: We selected statements in the Official Disability Guidelines that had the potential to reinforce misconceptions regarding symptoms from rotator cuff tendinopathy. These statements were revised and presented with the original statement to specialists. METHODS: Twelve statements regarding rotator cuff tendinopathy were identified as deviating from principles based on ethics, values, and the evidence regarding both pathophysiology and human illness behavior. One hundred fifteen upper extremity surgeons reviewed both original and revised versions of the statements and indicated their preference. RESULTS: We found that upper extremity surgeons preferred 3 revised statements, 4 Official Disability Guidelines statements, and 5 were rated as neutral between the 2 statements. CONCLUSIONS: Statements revised for evidence, ethics, and healthy mindset were not preferred by specialists, which may indicate limited awareness about how negative thoughts and distressing symptoms impact human illness.