Clinical validation of a semi-automated segmentation algorithm for target volume definition on planning CT and CBCT in stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT) for peripheral lung lesions.

INTRODUCTION: Stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT) is an ablative method for lung malignancies. Here, the definition of the gross target volume (GTV) is subject to interobserver variation. In this study, we aimed to evaluate the interobserver variability during SBRT and its dosimetric impact, as well as to introduce a semi-automated delineation tool for both planning computer tomography (P-CT) and cone beam CT (CBCT) to help to standardise GTV delineation and adaptive volume-change registration. METHODS: The interobserver variation of GTV manual contours from five physicians was analysed in 15 patients after lung SBRT on free breathing (FB) P-CT (n = 15) and CBCT (n = 90) before and after each fraction. The dosimetric impact from interobserver variations of GTV based on the original treatment plan was analysed. Next, the accuracy of an in-house easy-to-use semi-automated-segmentation algorithm for pulmonary lesions was compared with gold standard contours in FB P-CT and CBCT, as well as 4D P-CT of additional 10 patients. RESULTS: The interobserver variability in manual contours resulted in violations of dose coverage of the planning target volume (PTV), which, in turn, resulted in compromised tumour control probability in contours from four physicians. The validation of the semi-automated delineation algorithm using thorax phantom led to a highly reliable accuracy in defining GTVs. Comparing the unsupervised auto-contours with the gold standard delineation revealed high equal high concordance for FB P-CT, 4D P-CT and CBCT, with a DSC of 0.83, 0.76 and 0.8, respectively. The supervised use of the semi-automated delineation tool improved its accuracy, with DSCs of 0.86, 0.86 and 0.8 for FB P-CT, 4D P-CT and CBCT, respectively. The use of the algorithm was associated with a significantly shorter working time. The semi-automated delineation tool can accurately register volume changes in CBCTs. CONCLUSION: The segmentation algorithm provides a reliable, standardised and time-saving alternative for manual delineation in lung SBRT in P-CT and CBCT.

Body Composition as a Predictor of the Survival in Anal Cancer.

Background and aim: Sarcopenia and body composition parameters such as visceral and subcutaneous adipose tissue and visceral-to-subcutaneous adipose tissue ratio have been shown to be relevant biomarkers for prognosis in patients with different types of cancer. However, these findings have not been well studied in anal cancer to date. Therefore, the aim of this study was to evaluate the prognostic value of different body composition parameters in patients undergoing radiation therapy for the treatment of anal cancer with curative intent. Material and Methods: After approval by the institutional ethical committee, we retrospectively identified 81 patients in our local registry, who received radical intensity-modulated radiotherapy for the management of anal squamous cell cancer (ASCC). Clinical information, including body mass index (BMI), survival, and toxicities outcome, were retrieved from the local hospital registry. Based on the pre-therapeutic computer tomography (CT), we measured the total psoas muscle area, visceral adipose tissue area (VAT), subcutaneous adipose tissue area (SAT), and visceral-to-subcutaneous adipose tissue area ratio (VSR). In addition to the classical prognostic factors as T-stage, N-stage, gender, and treatment duration, we analyzed the impact of body composition on the prognosis in univariate and multivariate analyses. Results: Sarcopenia was not associated with increased mortality in anal cancer patients, whereas increased BMI (≥27 kg/m2) and VSR (≥0.45) were significantly associated with worsened overall survival and cancer-specific survival in both univariate and multivariate analyses. VSR-not BMI-was statistically higher in males. Sarcopenia and VSR ≥ 0.45 were associated with advanced T-stages. None of the body composition parameters resulted in a significant increase in treatment-related toxicities. Conclusion: BMI and visceral adiposity are independent prognostic factors for the survival of patients with anal cancer. Measurements to treat adiposity at the time of diagnosis may be needed to improve the survival outcomes for the affected patients.