Serum hepatitis B core-related antigen is more accurate than hepatitis B surface antigen to identify inactive carriers, regardless of hepatitis B virus genotype.

OBJECTIVES: To investigate whether hepatitis B surface antigen (HBsAg) and hepatitis B core-related antigen (HBcrAg) levels are useful to identify inactive carriers among HBeAg-negative patients infected by different hepatitis B virus (HBV) genotypes. METHODS: In all, 202 consecutive HBeAg-negative patients with chronic hepatitis B, 135 inactive carriers and 67 with HBV activity, were prospectively followed for 1 year. RESULTS: In HBeAg-negative patients, HBsAg levels differed across the different genotypes (p <0.001). The highest levels were observed in genotypes F or H (4.2 ± 0.6 logIU/mL), followed by genotype E (3.4 ± 1.1 logIU/mL), genotype A (3.4 ± 0.8 logIU/mL), and the lowest in genotype D (2.7 ± 1.1 logIU/mL). Variations in HBsAg levels were similar in inactive carriers and patients with HBV activity. HBsAg <3 logIU/mL showed good performance for identifying genotype D inactive carriers: 76% of genotype D inactive carriers met this cut-off versus ≤31% for genotypes A, E, F or H. However, in patients with genotype A, HBsAg levels ≤3.7 logIU/mL better classified inactive carriers. The combination of a single measurement of HBcrAg ≤3 logU/mL plus HBV DNA ≤2000 IU/mL yielded a positive predictive value and diagnostic accuracy >85% in all HBV genotypes, except genotype H or F, with values of 62.5% and 72.7%, respectively, for the two parameters. CONCLUSIONS: HBsAg levels varied across genotypes in HBeAg-negative patients. HBsAg levels <3 logIU/mL were only useful for identifying genotype D inactive carriers. A single HBcrAg measurement ≤3 logU/mL plus HBV DNA ≤2000 IU/mL was highly accurate for identifying inactive carriers, regardless of their HBV genotype.

High HCV subtype heterogeneity in a chronically infected general population revealed by high-resolution hepatitis C virus subtyping.

OBJECTIVES: This study aimed to characterize the chronically infected general hepatitis C virus (HCV) population in Barcelona using a highly sensitive subtyping method that can identify the 67 recognized HCV subtypes and diagnose mixed infection by various genotypes/subtypes in a single individual. The resulting information has implications for selecting optimal direct-acting antiviral (DAA) treatment for each patient and establishing public healthcare policies in our setting. METHODS: Consecutive HCV patients (treatment-naïve or interferon-based failures) attending Vall d'Hebron Hospital outpatient clinics from February 2015 to May 2016 (N=1473) were included in the study. Patient samples were characterized using HCV subtyping by next-generation ultra-deep pyrosequencing. RESULTS: The following genotypes (G) were found: G1 (1126/1473 (76.4%)), G4 (145/1473 (9.8%)), G3 (135/1473 (9.2%)), G2 (51/1473 (3.5%)), and G5 (1/1473 (0.1%)). Twenty-two subtypes were seen: 1b (790/1473 (53.6%)), 1a (332/1473 (22.5%)), 3a (133/1473 (9.0%)), 4d (105/1473 (7.1%)), 4a (29/1473 (2.0%)), and 2c (25/1473 (1.7%)), with 16 low-prevalence subtypes accounting for the remaining 3.0% (44/1473). There was a worrisome 1.0% (15/1473) of mixed infections. G2 (51/1473 (3.5%)) showed a high level of heterogeneity. Analyses by age groups showed a predominance of G1b over G1a (428/506 (84.6%) vs. 24/506 (4.7%)) in patients born before 1950 (N=506/1473), and similar percentages of these subtypes in those born between 1951 and 1975 (N=834/1473) (315/834, 37.8% vs. 266/834, 31.9%) and after 1976 (N=133/1473) (47/133, 35.3% vs. 42/133, 31.6%). CONCLUSIONS: Subtype distribution showed a higher level of heterogeneity than was expected, particularly for G2. Prevalence of mixed infections was around 1%. HCV subtype distribution related to patient age group suggested that patients born from 1936 to 1975 in our setting should undergo screening for the infection. Next-generation sequencing enabled better classification of candidates for DAA-based treatment.

Effectiveness and safety of sofosbuvir-based regimens plus an NS5A inhibitor for patients with HCV genotype 3 infection and cirrhosis. Results of a multicenter real-life cohort.

Patients with HCV genotype 3 (GT3) infection and cirrhosis are currently the most difficult to cure. We report our experience with sofosbuvir+daclatasvir (SOF+DCV) or sofosbuvir/ledipasvir (SOF/LDV), with or without ribavirin (RBV) in clinical practice in this population. This was a multicenter observational study including cirrhotic patients infected by HCV GT3, treated with sofosbuvir plus an NS5A inhibitor (May 2014-October 2015). In total, 208 patients were included: 98 (47%) treatment-experienced, 42 (20%) decompensated and 55 (27%) MELD score >10. In 131 (63%), treatment was SOF+DCV and in 77 (37%), SOF/LDV. Overall, 86% received RBV. RBV addition and extension to 24 weeks was higher in the SOF/LDV group (95% vs 80%, P=.002 and 83% vs 72%, P=.044, respectively). A higher percentage of decompensated patients were treated with DCV than LDV (25% vs 12%, P=.013). Overall, SVR12 was 93.8% (195/208): 94% with SOF+DCV and 93.5% with SOF/LDV. SVR12 was achieved in 90.5% of decompensated patients. Eleven treatment failures: 10 relapses and one breakthrough. RBV addition did not improve SVR (RR: 1.08; P=.919). The single factor associated with failure to achieve SVR was platelet count <75×10E9/mL (RR: 3.50, P=.019). In patients with MELD <10, type of NS5A inhibitor did not impact on SVR12 (94% vs 97%; adjusted RR: 0.49). Thirteen patients (6.3%) had serious adverse events, including three deaths (1.4%) and one therapy discontinuation (0.5%), higher in decompensated patients (16.7% vs 3.6%, P<.006). In patients with GT3 infection and cirrhosis, SVR12 rates were high with both SOF+DCV and SOF/LDV, with few serious adverse events.

Hepatitis C virus genotype 4: Genotype 1's little brother.

Treatment for hepatitis C virus genotype 4 infection has undergone a major advance over the past 5 years with the emergence of direct-acting antiviral agents. Previously, genotype 4 treatment had been limited to the combination of pegylated interferon and ribavirin, with low rates of sustained virological response. The combinations of new direct-acting agents have resulted in a radical improvement in hepatitis C therapy. Much of the currently available efficacy and safety information in the treatment of genotype 4 has been extrapolated through the results of genotype 1. In this report, we review the efficacy and safety data obtained in recent studies focusing on genotype 4 patients, including special populations, such as those with decompensated cirrhosis.

Therapy for hepatitis C genotype 3: moving forward.

Until recently, the standard of care for hepatitis C virus genotype 3 infection was response-guided therapy with pegylated interferon plus ribavirin for 16 to 48 or 72 weeks. The introduction of sofosbuvir plus ribavirin has revolutionized hepatitis C virus therapy. Nowadays, the recommend treatment regimen is a combination of sofosbuvir and a weight-based ribavirin dose for 24 weeks. For easy to treat patients (e.g. naïve or previously treated patients without cirrhosis), this combination achieves high sustained virologic response rates and is well tolerated. However, in treatment-experienced patients with cirrhosis, sustained virologic response is lower due to unknown reasons. The combination of two direct-acting antiviral agents, sofosbuvir and daclatasvir, for 12 weeks is also associated with low sustained virologic response rates in this special population, for whom new drugs and different strategies are now under evaluation. Currently, the high cost of all these drugs limits access to treatment in many countries.

Neurological opportunistic infections and neurological immune reconstitution syndrome: impact of one decade of highly active antiretroviral treatment in a tertiary hospital.

BACKGROUND: Despite the reported decrease in the incidence and mortality rates of central nervous system (CNS) infections after the introduction of highly active antiretroviral therapy (HAART), few studies have focused on the global incidence and the relationship of these diseases with immune reconstitution inflammatory syndrome (IRIS) in the developed world. METHODS: A descriptive cohort study of all consecutive adult HIV-infected patients with CNS opportunistic infections diagnosed between 2000 and 2010 in a tertiary hospital in Spain was carried out. Demographic, clinical, laboratory, and microbiological data were recorded. Patients were followed up until death or loss to follow-up or until 30 July 2011, when the study finished. The significance of differences in the incidence rate between early and late HAART periods was determined using the Mantel-Haenszel test. Survival distribution was estimated using the Kaplan-Meier method. RESULTS: A total of 110 cases of CNS infections were diagnosed. The incidence of CNS opportunistic infections decreased from 9 cases per 1000 HIV-infected patients per year in the early HAART period to 3.8 in the late HAART period (P = 0.04). Overall, the estimated mean survival time was 58.8 months (95% confidence interval 47.1-70.6 months). Of the 110 patients, 18 (16.4%) met the criteria of IRIS, 10 (55.6%) were paradoxical and eight (44.4%) were unmasking. IRIS was not associated with a higher mortality rate. CONCLUSIONS: The annual incidence of CNS infections decreased progressively during the period of study. The mortality rate associated with these diseases remains high despite HAART. The development of IRIS associated with neurological infections had no influence on prognosis.

Evaluation of progressive multifocal leukoencephalopathy treatments in a Spanish cohort of HIV-infected patients: do protease inhibitors improve survival regardless of central nervous system penetration-effectiveness (CPE) score?

OBJECTIVES: The aim of the study was to investigate whether survival after progressive multifocal leukoencephalopathy (PML) diagnosis in HIV-1-infected patients was associated with central nervous system penetration-effectiveness (CPE) score and the presence or absence of protease inhibitors in the treatment regimen. METHODS: In the absence of treatments demonstrated to be effective for PML in HIV-1-infected patients and in the light of the controversy surrounding the use of CPE scores to make decisions on treatment after diagnosis, we determined whether there were differences in survival at 1 year depending on the type and characteristics of treatment. A multicentre retrospective observational study including three Spanish hospitals was carried out for the period from 1 January 1994 to 31 December 2009. Patients with a PML diagnosis were included in the study if they were symptomatic and met at least two of the following three criteria: (1) compatible radiological findings; (2) a positive polymerase chain reaction for John Cunningham virus (JCV) in the cerebrospinal fluid (CSF); (3) an absence of findings suggesting another infection in the central nervous system, after general CSF cultures for virus, bacteria and mycobacteria. RESULTS: A total of 98 patients were included in the study; 24.5% were diagnosed in the period 1994-1999, 39.8% in 2000-2004 and 35.7% in 2005-2009. The median follow-up time was 363 days (interquartile range 108-1946 days). The median CD4 count was 76 cells/uL (interquartile range 30-166 cells/uL) and 62% of patients had an HIV viral load >50 HIV-1 RNA copies/ml. Thirty-eight per cent of patients received high-penetrance treatment, and 58% received treatment that included protease inhibitors. In the analysis of survival at 1 year, a higher CPE score did not result in an improvement in survival, but the presence of protease inhibitors in the regimen was associated with a statistically significant (P = 0.03) reduction in mortality (hazard ratio 0.40; 95% confidence interval 0.18-0.91). CONCLUSIONS: We consider that the lower mortality observed in the protease inhibitor group may be clinically relevant, and, if this is the case, a treatment based on protease inhibitors may be indicated for patients diagnosed with PML.

Hyperkalemic distal renal tubular acidosis caused by immunosuppressant treatment with tacrolimus in a liver transplant patient: case report.

Nephrotoxicity is one of the most common side effects of long-term immunosuppressive therapy with calcineurin inhibitors. We describe a case of distal renal tubular acidosis secondary to tacrolimus administration. A 43-year-old man with end-stage liver disease due to hepatitis C and B virus infections and alcoholic cirrhosis received a liver transplantation under immunosuppressive treatment with tacrolimus and mycophenolate mofetil. In the postoperative period, the patient developed hyperkalemic hyperchloremic metabolic acidosis, with a normal serum anion gap and a positive urinary anion gap, suggesting distal renal tubular acidosis. We excluded other causes of hyperkalemia. Administration of intravenous bicarbonate, loop diuretics, and oral resin exchanger corrected the acidosis and potassium levels. Distal renal tubular acidosis is one of several types of nephrotoxicity induced by tacrolimus treatment, resulting from inhibition of potassium secretion in the collecting duct. Treatment to correct the acidosis and hyperkalemia should be promptly initiated, and the tacrolimus dose adjusted when possible.