Asunto(s)
Fibrilación Atrial , Intervención Coronaria Percutánea , Antagonistas del Receptor Purinérgico P2Y , Humanos , Fibrilación Atrial/fisiopatología , Fibrilación Atrial/tratamiento farmacológico , Fibrilación Atrial/diagnóstico , Intervención Coronaria Percutánea/efectos adversos , Antagonistas del Receptor Purinérgico P2Y/uso terapéutico , Antagonistas del Receptor Purinérgico P2Y/efectos adversos , Resultado del Tratamiento , Factores de Riesgo , Inhibidores de Agregación Plaquetaria/uso terapéutico , Inhibidores de Agregación Plaquetaria/efectos adversos , Toma de Decisiones Clínicas , Enfermedad de la Arteria Coronaria/terapia , Enfermedad de la Arteria Coronaria/diagnóstico por imagen , Medición de Riesgo , Hemorragia/inducido químicamenteRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Periodic repolarization dynamics (PRD) is an electrocardiographic biomarker that captures repolarization instability in the low frequency spectrum and is believed to estimate the sympathetic effect on the ventricular myocardium. High PRD indicates an increased risk for postischemic sudden cardiac death (SCD). However, a direct link between PRD and proarrhythmogenic autonomic remodeling has not yet been shown. METHODS AND RESULTS: We investigated autonomic remodeling in pigs with myocardial infarction (MI)-related ischemic heart failure induced by balloon occlusion of the left anterior descending artery (n=17) compared with pigs without MI (n=11). Thirty days after MI, pigs demonstrated enhanced sympathetic innervation in the infarct area, border zone, and remote left ventricle paralleled by altered expression of autonomic marker genes/proteins. PRD was enhanced 30 days after MI compared with baseline (pre-MI versus post-MI: 1.75±0.30 deg2 versus 3.29±0.79 deg2, P<0.05) reflecting pronounced autonomic alterations on the level of the ventricular myocardium. Pigs with MI-related ventricular fibrillation and SCD had significantly higher pre-MI PRD than pigs without tachyarrhythmias, suggesting a potential role for PRD as a predictive biomarker for ischemia-related arrhythmias (no ventricular fibrillation versus ventricular fibrillation: 1.50±0.39 deg2 versus 3.18±0.53 deg2 [P<0.05]; no SCD versus SCD: 1.67±0.32 deg2 versus 3.91±0.63 deg2 [P<0.01]). CONCLUSIONS: We demonstrate that ischemic heart failure leads to significant proarrhythmogenic autonomic remodeling. The concomitant elevation of PRD levels in pigs with ischemic heart failure and pigs with MI-related ventricular fibrillation/SCD suggests PRD as a biomarker for autonomic remodeling and as a potential predictive biomarker for ventricular arrhythmias/survival in the context of MI.
Asunto(s)
Biomarcadores , Muerte Súbita Cardíaca , Modelos Animales de Enfermedad , Electrocardiografía , Infarto del Miocardio , Animales , Muerte Súbita Cardíaca/etiología , Infarto del Miocardio/fisiopatología , Infarto del Miocardio/complicaciones , Porcinos , Biomarcadores/sangre , Arritmias Cardíacas/fisiopatología , Arritmias Cardíacas/etiología , Fibrilación Ventricular/fisiopatología , Fibrilación Ventricular/etiología , Factores de Riesgo , Masculino , Remodelación Ventricular , Frecuencia Cardíaca/fisiología , Potenciales de Acción , Sistema Nervioso Simpático/fisiopatología , Sistema Nervioso Autónomo/fisiopatologíaRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Knowledge about atrial functional tricuspid regurgitation (afTR) in transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) patients is scarce. OBJECTIVES: The aim of the study was to analyze the association between the entity and the development of tricuspid regurgitation (TR) in patients undergoing TAVR for aortic stenosis and concomitant TR. METHODS: We analyzed patients undergoing TAVR for severe aortic stenosis from January 2013 to December 2020 and concomitant at least moderate TR at baseline. afTR was defined as enlargement of the right atrium in relation to the right ventricle. TR development after TAVR and 3-year all-cause mortality were evaluated. RESULTS: Out of 3,474 TAVR patients, we identified 420 patients with concomitant at least moderate TR. A total of 363 patients were included in the study, with 178 patients stratified in the afTR and 185 in the non-afTR group based on a receiver-operating characteristic curve cutoff of 1.132 of the right atrial/right ventricular area ratio. TR improvement after TAVR was observed in significantly less patients with afTR compared with non-afTR (31.1% vs 60.6%; P < 0.001). Multivariate regression analysis confirmed afTR as independent predictor for TR persistence (adjusted OR: 2.80; 95% CI: 1.66-4.76; P < 0.001). Moreover, afTR was associated with aggravation of TR after TAVR (17.0% vs 6.8%; P = 0.013). Three-year all-cause mortality was significantly higher in patients with persistence compared with patients with improvement of TR (P < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: In TAVR patients, afTR is an independent predictor for TR persistence. Moreover, TR persistence is associated with increased 3-year all-cause mortality.
Asunto(s)
Estenosis de la Válvula Aórtica , Reemplazo de la Válvula Aórtica Transcatéter , Insuficiencia de la Válvula Tricúspide , Humanos , Insuficiencia de la Válvula Tricúspide/diagnóstico por imagen , Reemplazo de la Válvula Aórtica Transcatéter/efectos adversos , Resultado del Tratamiento , Atrios Cardíacos , Estenosis de la Válvula Aórtica/diagnóstico por imagen , Estenosis de la Válvula Aórtica/cirugíaRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Periodic repolarization dynamics (PRD) is an electrocardiographic biomarker that quantifies low-frequency (LF) instabilities of repolarization. PRD is a strong predictor of mortality in patients with ischaemic and non-ischaemic cardiomyopathy. Until recently, two methods for calculating PRD have been proposed. The wavelet analysis has been widely tested and quantifies PRD in deg2 units by application of continuous wavelet transformation (PRDwavelet). The phase rectified signal averaging method (PRDPRSA) is an algebraic method, which quantifies PRD in deg. units. The correlation, as well as a conversion formula between the two methods remain unknown. METHOD: The first step for quantifying PRD is to calculate the beat-to-beat change in the direction of repolarization, called dT°. PRD is subsequently quantified by means of either wavelet or PRSA-analysis. We simulated 1.000.000 dT°-signals. For each simulated signal we calculated PRD using the wavelet and PRSA-method. We calculated the ratio between PRDwavelet and PRDPRSA for different values of dT° and RR-intervals and applied this ratio in a real-ECG validation cohort of 455 patients after myocardial infarction (MI). We finally calculated the correlation coefficient between real and calculated PRDwavelet. PRDwavelet was dichotomized at the established cut-off value of ≥5.75 deg2. RESULTS: The ratio between PRDwavelet and PRDPRSA increased with increasing heart-rate and mean dT°-values (p < 0.001 for both). The correlation coefficient between PRDwavelet and PRDPRSA in the validation cohort was 0.908 (95% CI 0.891-0.923), which significantly (p < 0.001) improved to 0.945 (95% CI 0.935-0.955) after applying the formula considering the ratio between PRDwavelet and PRDPRSA obtained from the simulation cohort. The calculated PRDwavelet correctly classified 98% of the patients as low-risk and 87% of the patients as high-risk and correctly identified 97% of high-risk patients, who died within the follow-up period. CONCLUSION: This is the first analytical investigation of the different methods used to calculate PRD using simulated and clinical data. In this article we propose a novel algorithm for converting PRDPRSA to the widely validated PRDwavelet, which could unify the calculation methods and cut-offs for PRD.
Asunto(s)
Electrocardiografía , Infarto del Miocardio , Humanos , Frecuencia Cardíaca , Procesamiento de Señales Asistido por ComputadorRESUMEN
AIMS: Clinical guidelines recommend de-escalation antiplatelet strategies to reduce bleeding risk in acute coronary syndrome (ACS) patients, albeit with a weak recommendation. This substudy of the TROPICAL-ACS trial aimed to determine the impact of body mass on the efficacy of a platelet function testing-guided de-escalation regimen in ACS patients after percutaneous coronary intervention. METHODS AND RESULTS: Patients were randomized to prasugrel (control group) or a platelet function testing-guided regimen with clopidogrel or prasugrel defined after 1-week clopidogrel. The primary endpoint was the net clinical benefit [cardiovascular death, myocardial infarction, stroke, or Bleeding Academic Research Consortium (BARC) 2-5 bleeding] for 12 months. Overweight was defined as a body mass index >25 kg/m2.Patients without overweight showed a significant net clinical benefit from the de-escalation strategy, while in overweight cases de-escalation was comparable to prasugrel treatment [hazard ratio (HR): 0.52; 95% confidence interval (CI): 0.31-0.88; P = 0.013 and HR: 0.95; 95% CI: 0.69-1.31, P = 0.717, P-non-inferiority = 0.03, respectively, P-interaction = 0.053]. The benefit of de-escalation in terms of the risk of bleeding or of the ischaemic events did not reach statistical significance. Bleeding events with de-escalation were less frequent in non-overweight patients but comparable in overweight patients (HR: 0.55; 95% CI: 0.30-1.03; P = 0.057 and HR: 0.95; 95% CI: 0.64-1.41, respectively, P-interaction = 0.147). Non-overweight patients had lower ischaemic event rates with de-escalation, while overweight cases had slightly less (HR: 0.47; 95% CI: 0.18-1.25; P = 0.128 and HR: 0.89; 95% CI: 0.53-1.50, respectively, P-interaction = 0.261). CONCLUSION: The strategy of guided dual antiplatelet therapy de-escalation was associated with a significant net clinical benefit in non-overweight patients, while the two strategies were equivalent in overweight patients.
Asunto(s)
Síndrome Coronario Agudo , Humanos , Clorhidrato de Prasugrel/efectos adversos , Clopidogrel , Síndrome Coronario Agudo/terapia , Inhibidores de Agregación Plaquetaria/efectos adversos , Sobrepeso/inducido químicamente , Sobrepeso/tratamiento farmacológico , Hemorragia/inducido químicamente , Isquemia/tratamiento farmacológicoRESUMEN
AIMS: Dual-antiplatelet therapy (DAPT) with aspirin and a potent P2Y12 inhibitor is the standard treatment for patients with acute coronary syndrome (ACS) undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). De-escalation of the potent P2Y12 inhibtor is an appealing concept to balance the ischaemic and bleeding risks after PCI. An individual patient data meta-analysis was performed to compare de-escalation versus standard DAPT in patients with ACS. METHODS AND RESULTS: Electronic databases, including PubMed, Embase, and the Cochrane database, were searched to identify randomised clinical trials (RCTs) comparing the de-escalation strategy with the standard DAPT after PCI in patients with ACS. Individual patient-level data were collected from the relevant trials. The co-primary endpoints of interest were the ischaemic composite endpoint (a composite of cardiac death, myocardial infarction, and cerebrovascular events) and bleeding endpoint (any bleeding) at 1-year post-PCI. Four RCTs (the TROPICAL-ACS, POPular Genetics, HOST-REDUCE-POLYTECH-ACS, and TALOS-AMI trials) including 10 133 patients were analysed. The ischaemic endpoint was significantly lower in the patients assigned to the de-escalation strategy than in those assigned to the standard strategy (2.3% vs. 3.0%, hazard ratio [HR] 0.761, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.597-0.972, log rank P = 0.029). Bleeding was also significantly lower in the de-escalation strategy group (6.5% vs. 9.1%, HR 0.701, 95% CI 0.606-0.811, log rank P < 0.001). No significant intergroup differences were observed in terms of all-cause death and major bleeding events. Subgroup analyses revealed that compared to guided de-escalation, unguided de-escalation had a significantly larger impact on bleeding endpoint reduction (P for interaction = 0.007); no intergroup differences were observed for the ischaemic endpoints. CONCLUSION: In this individual patient data meta-analysis, DAPT-based de-escalation was associated with both decreased ischaemic and bleeding endpoints. Reduction in bleeding endpoints was more prominent for the unguided than the guided de-escalation strategy. STUDY REGISTRATION NUMBER: This study was registered in the PROSPERO (ID: CRD42021245477).
Asunto(s)
Síndrome Coronario Agudo , Intervención Coronaria Percutánea , Humanos , Inhibidores de Agregación Plaquetaria/efectos adversos , Síndrome Coronario Agudo/terapia , Clopidogrel/uso terapéutico , Clorhidrato de Prasugrel/uso terapéutico , Terapia Antiplaquetaria Doble , Hemorragia/inducido químicamente , Intervención Coronaria Percutánea/efectos adversos , Resultado del TratamientoRESUMEN
AIM: The aim of this study was to analyse the predictive value of CTA-determined tricuspid annular dilatation (TAD) on the persistence of tricuspid regurgitation (TR) in patients undergoing transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) for severe aortic stenosis (AS) and concomitant at least moderate TR. METHODS AND RESULTS: 288 consecutive patients treated with TAVR due to severe AS and concomitant at least moderate TR at baseline were included in the analysis. As cutoff for TAD, the median value of the CTA-determined, to the body surface area-normalized tricuspid annulus diameter (25.2 mm/m2) was used. TAD had no impact on procedural characteristics or outcomes, including procedural death and technical or device failure according to the Valve Academic Research Consortium 3 criteria. However, the primary outcome of the study-TR persistence after TAVR was significantly more frequent in patients with compared to patients without TAD (odds ratio 2.60, 95% confidence interval 1.33-5.16, p < 0.01). Multivariable logistic regression analysis, adjusting for clinical and echocardiographic baseline characteristics, which are known to influence aetiology or severity of TR, confirmed TAD as an independent predictor of TR persistence after TAVR (adjusted odds ratio 2.30, 95% confidence interval 1.20-4.46, p = 0.01). Moreover, 2 year all-cause mortality was significantly higher in patients with persistence or without change of TR compared to patients with TR improvement (log-rank p < 0.01). CONCLUSION: In patients undergoing TAVR for severe AS and concomitant at least moderate TR at baseline, TAD is a predictor of TR persistence, which is associated with increased 2-year all-cause mortality.
Asunto(s)
Estenosis de la Válvula Aórtica , Reemplazo de la Válvula Aórtica Transcatéter , Insuficiencia de la Válvula Tricúspide , Humanos , Reemplazo de la Válvula Aórtica Transcatéter/métodos , Insuficiencia de la Válvula Tricúspide/diagnóstico , Insuficiencia de la Válvula Tricúspide/etiología , Dilatación/efectos adversos , Resultado del Tratamiento , Estenosis de la Válvula Aórtica/diagnóstico , Estenosis de la Válvula Aórtica/cirugía , Estenosis de la Válvula Aórtica/complicaciones , Estudios Retrospectivos , Válvula Aórtica/diagnóstico por imagen , Válvula Aórtica/cirugía , Índice de Severidad de la EnfermedadRESUMEN
Background Published randomized controlled trials are underpowered for binary clinical end points to assess the safety and efficacy of renin-angiotensin system inhibitors (RASi) in adults with COVID-19. We therefore performed a meta-analysis to assess the safety and efficacy of RASi in adults with COVID-19. Methods and Results MEDLINE, EMBASE, ClinicalTrials.gov, and the Cochrane Controlled Trial Register were searched for randomized controlled trials that randomly assigned patients with COVID-19 to RASi continuation/commencement versus no RASi therapy. The primary outcome was all-cause mortality at ≤30 days. A total of 14 randomized controlled trials met the inclusion criteria and enrolled 1838 participants (aged 59 years, 58% men, mean follow-up 26 days). Of the trials, 11 contributed data. We found no effect of RASi versus control on all-cause mortality (7.2% versus 7.5%; relative risk [RR], 0.95; [95% CI, 0.69-1.30]) either overall or in subgroups defined by COVID-19 severity or trial type. Network meta-analysis identified no difference between angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors versus angiotensin II receptor blockers. RASi users had a nonsignificant reduction in acute myocardial infarction (2.1% versus 3.6%; RR, 0.59; [95% CI, 0.33-1.06]), but increased risk of acute kidney injury (7.0% versus 3.6%; RR, 1.82; [95% CI, 1.05-3.16]), in trials that initiated and continued RASi. There was no increase in need for dialysis or differences in congestive cardiac failure, cerebrovascular events, venous thromboembolism, hospitalization, intensive care admission, inotropes, or mechanical ventilation. Conclusions This meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials evaluating angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors/angiotensin II receptor blockers versus control in patients with COVID-19 found no difference in all-cause mortality, a borderline decrease in myocardial infarction, and an increased risk of acute kidney injury with RASi. Our findings provide strong evidence that RASi can be used safely in patients with COVID-19.
Asunto(s)
Lesión Renal Aguda , COVID-19 , Hipertensión , Infarto del Miocardio , Lesión Renal Aguda/inducido químicamente , Adulto , Antagonistas de Receptores de Angiotensina/farmacología , Antagonistas de Receptores de Angiotensina/uso terapéutico , Inhibidores de la Enzima Convertidora de Angiotensina/efectos adversos , Antihipertensivos/uso terapéutico , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Infarto del Miocardio/tratamiento farmacológico , Ensayos Clínicos Controlados Aleatorios como Asunto , Sistema Renina-AngiotensinaRESUMEN
Digital smart devices have the capability of detecting atrial fibrillation (AF), but the efficacy of this type of digital screening has not been directly compared to usual care for detection of treatment-relevant AF. In the eBRAVE-AF trial ( NCT04250220 ), we randomly assigned 5,551 policyholders of a German health insurance company who were free of AF at baseline (age 65 years (median; interquartile range (11) years, 31% females)) to digital screening (n = 2,860) or usual care (n = 2,691). In this siteless trial, for digital screening, participants used a certified app on their own smartphones to screen for irregularities in their pulse waves. Abnormal findings were evaluated by 14-day external electrocardiogram (ECG) loop recorders. The primary endpoint was newly diagnosed AF within 6 months treated with oral anti-coagulation by an independent physician not involved in the study. After 6 months, participants were invited to cross-over for a second study phase with reverse assignment for secondary analyses. The primary endpoint of the trial was met, as digital screening more than doubled the detection rate of treatment-relevant AF in both phases of the trial, with odds ratios of 2.12 (95% confidence interval (CI), 1.19-3.76; P = 0.010) and 2.75 (95% CI, 1.42-5.34; P = 0.003) in the first and second phases, respectively. This digital screening technology provides substantial benefits in detecting AF compared to usual care and has the potential for broad applicability due to its wide availability on ordinary smartphones. Future studies are needed to test whether digital screening for AF leads to better treatment outcomes.
Asunto(s)
Fibrilación Atrial , Fibrilación Atrial/diagnóstico , Fibrilación Atrial/tratamiento farmacológico , Niño , Atención a la Salud , Electrocardiografía , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Tamizaje Masivo , Teléfono InteligenteAsunto(s)
Tratamiento Farmacológico de COVID-19 , Hipertensión , Antagonistas de Receptores de Angiotensina/farmacología , Antagonistas de Receptores de Angiotensina/uso terapéutico , Antihipertensivos/farmacología , Antihipertensivos/uso terapéutico , Humanos , Hipertensión/tratamiento farmacológico , Sistema Renina-Angiotensina , SARS-CoV-2RESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Angiographic evidence of cardiac allograft vasculopathy (CAVangio) is a major limiting factor to survival after heart transplantation (HTx). Prevention of CAVangio is therefore most relevant. Whether modifiable risk factors could be targeted for the prevention of fibrotic plaques, that are common and related to CAVangio, is not clear. METHODS AND RESULTS: In a cohort of 74 consecutive HTx patients (median post-transplant interval 9.2 [4.1-15.5] years), we used the high resolution of optical coherence tomography (OCT) to quantify angulation parameters (maximal and mean arc) and plaque load (mean arc*relative plaque length) of fibrotic plaques. Mean arc was defined as the mean value of all angulation measurements per patient. We assessed the association between cardiovascular risk factors and OCT findings. Linear regression analysis showed a significant association of TG/HDL-c with mean fibrotic arc (12.7 [3.9-21.5], p = 0.006) and fibrotic plaque load (2298 [617-3979], p = 0.009) after adjustment for recipient age and sex. We used the median value of fibrotic plaque load to define high fibrotic plaque load. In binary logistic regression analysis, TG/HDL-c (odds ratio [OR] 1.81 with 95% CI [1.09-3.03], p = 0.02) and Lp(a) (OR 1.02 [1.00-1.05], p = 0.02) were associated with high fibrotic plaque load. Multivariable logistic regression analysis confirmed Lp(a) as significant predictor of high fibrotic plaque load (OR 1.03 [1.01-1.05], p = 0.02). CONCLUSION: TG/HDL-c ratio, a surrogate of insulin resistance syndrome, and Lp(a) were significantly associated with fibrotic plaque in HTx patients. Insulin resistance syndrome and Lp(a) might therefore represent additional targets for CAV prevention.
Asunto(s)
Enfermedad de la Arteria Coronaria , Trasplante de Corazón , Resistencia a la Insulina , Síndrome Metabólico , Placa Aterosclerótica , Aloinjertos , Enfermedad de la Arteria Coronaria/diagnóstico por imagen , Enfermedad de la Arteria Coronaria/epidemiología , Fibrosis , Trasplante de Corazón/efectos adversos , Humanos , Síndrome Metabólico/complicaciones , Placa Aterosclerótica/complicaciones , Tomografía de Coherencia Óptica/métodosRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: There is no consensus on the most efficient catheter ablation (CA) strategy for patients with atrial fibrillation (AF). The objective of this study was to compare the efficacy and safety of different CA strategies for AF ablation through network meta-analysis (NMA). METHODS: A systematic search of PubMed, Web of Science, and CENTRAL was performed up to October 5th, 2020. Randomized controlled trials (RCT) comparing different CA approaches were included. Efficacy was defined as arrhythmia recurrence after CA and safety as any reported complication related to the procedure during a minimum follow-up time of 6 months. RESULTS: In total, 67 RCTs (n = 9871) comparing 19 different CA strategies were included. The risk of recurrence was significantly decreased compared to pulmonary vein isolation (PVI) alone for PVI with renal denervation (RR: 0.60, CI: 0.38-0.94), PVI with ganglia-plexi ablation (RR: 0.62, CI: 0.41-0.94), PVI with additional ablation lines (RR: 0.8, CI: 0.68-0.95) and PVI in combination with bi-atrial modification (RR: 0.32, CI: 0.11-0.88). Strategies including PVI appeared superior to non-PVI strategies such as electrogram-based approaches. No significant differences in safety were observed. CONCLUSIONS: This NMA showed that PVI in combination with additional CA strategies, such as autonomic modulation and additional lines, seem to increase the efficacy of PVI alone. These strategies can be considered in treating patients with AF, since, additionally, no differences in safety were observed. This study provides decision-makers with comprehensive and comparative evidence about the efficacy and safety of different CA strategies. SYSTEMATIC REVIEW REGISTRATION: PROSPERO registry number: CRD42020169494 .
Asunto(s)
Fibrilación Atrial , Ablación por Catéter , Venas Pulmonares , Fibrilación Atrial/cirugía , Ablación por Catéter/métodos , Humanos , Metaanálisis en Red , Venas Pulmonares/cirugía , Ensayos Clínicos Controlados Aleatorios como Asunto , Sistema de RegistrosRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Cardiac autonomic dysfunction after myocardial infarction identifies patients at high risk despite only moderately reduced left ventricular ejection fraction. We aimed to show that telemedical monitoring with implantable cardiac monitors in these patients can improve early detection of subclinical but prognostically relevant arrhythmic events. METHODS: We did a prospective investigator-initiated, randomised, multicentre, open-label, diagnostic trial at 33 centres in Germany and Austria. Survivors of acute myocardial infarction with left ventricular ejection fraction of 36-50% had biosignal analysis for assessment of cardiac autonomic function. Patients with abnormal periodic repolarisation dynamics (≥5·75 deg2) or abnormal deceleration capacity (≤2·5 ms) were randomly assigned (1:1) to telemedical monitoring with implantable cardiac monitors or conventional follow-up. Primary endpoint was time to detection of serious arrhythmic events defined by atrial fibrillation 6 min or longer, atrioventricular block class IIb or higher and fast non-sustained (>187 beats per min; ≥40 beats) or sustained ventricular tachycardia or fibrillation. This study is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT02594488. FINDINGS: Between May 12, 2016, and July 20, 2020, 1305 individuals were screened and 400 patients at high risk were randomly assigned (median age 64 years [IQR 57-73]); left ventricular ejection fraction 45% [40-48]) to telemedical monitoring with implantable cardiac monitors (implantable cardiac monitor group; n=201) or conventional follow-up (control group; n=199). During median follow-up of 21 months, serious arrhythmic events were detected in 60 (30%) patients of the implantable cardiac monitor group and 12 (6%) patients of the control group (hazard ratio 6·33 [IQR 3·40-11·78]; p<0·001). An improved detection rate by implantable cardiac monitors was observed for all types of serious arrhythmic events: atrial fibrillation 6 min or longer (47 [23%] patients vs 11 [6%] patients; p<0·001), atrioventricular block class IIb or higher (14 [7%] vs 0; p<0·001) and ventricular tachycardia or ventricular fibrillation (nine [4%] patients vs two [1%] patients; p=0·054). INTERPRETATION: In patients at high risk after myocardial infarction and cardiac autonomic dysfunction but only moderately reduced left ventricular ejection fraction, telemedical monitoring with implantable cardiac monitors was highly effective in early detection of subclinical, prognostically relevant serious arrhythmic events. FUNDING: German Centre for Cardiovascular Research (DZHK) and Medtronic Bakken Research Center.
Asunto(s)
Arritmias Cardíacas/diagnóstico , Monitoreo Fisiológico/métodos , Infarto del Miocardio/complicaciones , Infarto del Miocardio/fisiopatología , Medición de Riesgo/métodos , Telemedicina/métodos , Anciano , Austria , Femenino , Alemania , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Estudios ProspectivosRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Identification of patients with nonischemic cardiomyopathy who may benefit from prophylactic implantation of a cardioverter-defibrillator. We hypothesized that periodic repolarization dynamics (PRD), a marker of repolarization instability associated with sympathetic activity, could be used to identify patients who will benefit from prophylactic implantable cardioverter defibrillator (ICD) implantation. METHODS: We performed a post hoc analysis of DANISH (Danish ICD Study in Patients With Dilated Cardiomyopathy), in which patients with nonischemic cardiomyopathy, left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) ≤35%, and elevated NT-proBNP (N-terminal probrain natriuretic peptides) were randomized to ICD implantation or control group. Patients were included in the PRD substudy if they had a 24-hour Holter monitor recording at baseline with technically acceptable ECG signals during the night hours (00:00-06:00). PRD was assessed using wavelet analysis according to previously validated methods. The primary end point was all-cause mortality. Cox regression models were adjusted for age, sex, NT-proBNP, estimated glomerular filtration rate, LVEF, atrial fibrillation, ventricular pacing, diabetes, cardiac resynchronization therapy, and mean heart rate. We proposed PRD ≥10 deg2 as an exploratory cut-off value for ICD implantation. RESULTS: A total of 748 of the 1116 patients in DANISH qualified for the PRD substudy. During a mean follow-up period of 5.1±2.0 years, 82 of 385 patients died in the ICD group and 85 of 363 patients died in the control group (P=0.40). In Cox regression analysis, PRD was independently associated with mortality (hazard ratio [HR], 1.28 [95% CI, 1.09-1.50] per SD increase; P=0.003). PRD was significantly associated with mortality in the control group (HR, 1.51 [95% CI, 1.25-1.81]; P<0.001) but not in the ICD group (HR, 1.04 [95% CI, 0.83-1.54]; P=0.71). There was a significant interaction between PRD and the effect of ICD implantation on mortality (P=0.008), with patients with higher PRD having greater benefit in terms of mortality reduction. ICD implantation was associated with an absolute mortality reduction of 17.5% in the 280 patients with PRD ≥10 deg2 (HR, 0.54 [95% CI, 0.34-0.84]; P=0.006; number needed to treat=6), but not in the 468 patients with PRD <10 deg2 (HR, 1.17 [95% CI, 0.77-1.78]; P=0.46; P for interaction=0.01). CONCLUSIONS: Increased PRD identified patients with nonischemic cardiomyopathy in whom prophylactic ICD implantation led to significant mortality reduction.
Asunto(s)
Fibrilación Atrial , Cardiomiopatías , Desfibriladores Implantables , Cardiomiopatías/diagnóstico , Cardiomiopatías/terapia , Muerte Súbita Cardíaca/prevención & control , Dinamarca/epidemiología , Humanos , Volumen Sistólico , Función Ventricular IzquierdaRESUMEN
Current guidelines recommend opportunistic screening for subclinical atrial fibrillation (AF) taking advantage of e-health-based technologies. However, the efficacy of a fully scalable e-health-based strategy for AF detection in a head-to-head comparison with routine symptom-based screening is unknown. eBRAVE-AF is an investigator-initiated, digital, prospective, randomized, siteless, open-label, cross-over study to evaluate an e-health-based strategy for detection of AF in a real-world setting. 67,488 policyholders of a large German health insurance company (Versicherungskammer Bayern, Germany) selected by age ≥ 50 years and a CHA2DS2-VASc score ≥ 1 (females ≥2) are invited to participate. Subjects with known AF or on treatment with oral anticoagulation are excluded. After obtaining electronic informed consent, at least 4,400 participants will be randomly assigned to an e-health-based screening strategy or routine symptom-based screening. The e-health-based strategy consists of repetitive one-minute photoplethysmographic (PPG) pulse wave assessments using a certified smartphone app (Preventicus Heartbeats, Preventicus, Jena, Germany), followed by a confirmatory 14-day ECG patch (CardioMem CM 100 XT, Getemed, Teltow, Germany) in case of abnormal findings. After 6 months, participants are crossed over to the other study arm. Primary endpoint is the incidence of newly diagnosed AF leading to oral anticoagulation indicated by an independent physician. Clinical follow-up will be at least 12 months. In both groups, follow-up is performed by 4-week app-based questionnaires, personal contact in case of abnormal findings, and matching with claim-based insurance data and medical reports. At time of writing enrollment is completed. First results are expected to be available in mid-2021.
Asunto(s)
Enfermedades Asintomáticas/epidemiología , Fibrilación Atrial , Aplicaciones Móviles , Monitoreo Ambulatorio , Telemedicina , Fibrilación Atrial/complicaciones , Fibrilación Atrial/diagnóstico , Fibrilación Atrial/tratamiento farmacológico , Fibrilación Atrial/epidemiología , Estudios Cruzados , Femenino , Alemania/epidemiología , Humanos , Seguro de Salud/estadística & datos numéricos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Monitoreo Ambulatorio/instrumentación , Monitoreo Ambulatorio/métodos , Ensayos Clínicos Controlados Aleatorios como Asunto/métodos , Teléfono Inteligente , Telemedicina/instrumentación , Telemedicina/métodosRESUMEN
Purpose: Silent brain infarcts (SBI) are frequently detected in patients with atrial fibrillation (AF), but it is unknown whether SBI are linked to autonomic dysfunction. We aimed to explore the association of autonomic dysfunction with SBI in AF patients. Methods: 1,358 AF patients without prior stroke or TIA underwent brain MRI and 5-min resting ECG. We divided our cohort into AF patients who presented in sinus rhythm (SR-group, n = 816) or AF (AF-group, n = 542). HRV triangular index (HRVI), standard deviation of normal-to-normal intervals, mean heart rate, root mean square root of successive differences of normal-to-normal intervals, 5-min total power and power in the low frequency, high frequency and very low frequency range were calculated. Primary outcome was presence of SBI in the SR group, defined as large non-cortical or cortical infarcts. Secondary outcomes were SBI volumes and topography. Results: Mean age was 72 ± 9 years, 27% were female. SBI were detected in 10.5% of the SR group and in 19.9% of the AF group (p < 0.001). HRVI <15 was the only HRV parameter associated with the presence of SBI after adjustment for clinical covariates in the SR group [odds ratio (OR) 1.67; 95% confidence interval (CI): 1.03-2.70; p = 0.037]. HRVI <15 was associated with larger brain infarct volumes [ß (95% CI) -0.47 (-0.84; -0.09), p = 0.016] in the SR group and was more frequently observed in patients with right- than left-hemispheric SBI (p = 0.017). Conclusion: Impaired HRVI is associated with SBI in AF patients. AF patients with autonomic dysfunction might undergo systematic brain MRI screening to initiate intensified medical treatment. Clinical Trials Gov Identifier: NCT02105844.
RESUMEN
BACKGROUND: SARS-CoV-2 entry in human cells depends on angiotensin-converting enzyme 2, which can be upregulated by inhibitors of the renin-angiotensin system (RAS). We aimed to test our hypothesis that discontinuation of chronic treatment with ACE-inhibitors (ACEIs) or angiotensin II receptor blockers (ARBs) mitigates the course o\f recent-onset COVID-19. METHODS: ACEI-COVID was a parallel group, randomised, controlled, open-label trial done at 35 centres in Austria and Germany. Patients aged 18 years and older were enrolled if they presented with recent symptomatic SARS-CoV-2 infection and were chronically treated with ACEIs or ARBs. Patients were randomly assigned 1:1 to discontinuation or continuation of RAS inhibition for 30 days. Primary outcome was the maximum sequential organ failure assessment (SOFA) score within 30 days, where death was scored with the maximum achievable SOFA score. Secondary endpoints were area under the death-adjusted SOFA score (AUCSOFA), mean SOFA score, admission to the intensive care unit, mechanical ventilation, and death. Analyses were done on a modified intention-to-treat basis. This trial is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT04353596. FINDINGS: Between April 20, 2020, and Jan 20, 2021, 204 patients (median age 75 years [IQR 66-80], 37% females) were randomly assigned to discontinue (n=104) or continue (n=100) RAS inhibition. Within 30 days, eight (8%) of 104 died in the discontinuation group and 12 (12%) of 100 patients died in the continuation group (p=0·42). There was no significant difference in the primary endpoint between the discontinuation and continuation group (median [IQR] maximum SOFA score 0·00 (0·00-2·00) vs 1·00 (0·00-3·00); p=0·12). Discontinuation was associated with a significantly lower AUCSOFA (0·00 [0·00-9·25] vs 3·50 [0·00-23·50]; p=0·040), mean SOFA score (0·00 [0·00-0·31] vs 0·12 [0·00-0·78]; p=0·040), and 30-day SOFA score (0·00 [10-90th percentile, 0·00-1·20] vs 0·00 [0·00-24·00]; p=0·023). At 30 days, 11 (11%) in the discontinuation group and 23 (23%) in the continuation group had signs of organ dysfunction (SOFA score ≥1) or were dead (p=0·017). There were no significant differences for mechanical ventilation (10 (10%) vs 8 (8%), p=0·87) and admission to intensive care unit (20 [19%] vs 18 [18%], p=0·96) between the discontinuation and continuation group. INTERPRETATION: Discontinuation of RAS-inhibition in COVID-19 had no significant effect on the maximum severity of COVID-19 but may lead to a faster and better recovery. The decision to continue or discontinue should be made on an individual basis, considering the risk profile, the indication for RAS inhibition, and the availability of alternative therapies and outpatient monitoring options. FUNDING: Austrian Science Fund and German Center for Cardiovascular Research.