On the acceptance, commissioning, and quality assurance of electron FLASH units.

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: FLASH or ultra-high dose rate (UHDR) radiation therapy (RT) has gained attention in recent years for its ability to spare normal tissues relative to conventional dose rate (CDR) RT in various preclinical trials. However, clinical implementation of this promising treatment option has been limited because of the lack of availability of accelerators capable of delivering UHDR RT. Commercial options are finally reaching the market that produce electron beams with average dose rates of up to 1000 Gy/s. We established a framework for the acceptance, commissioning, and periodic quality assurance (QA) of electron FLASH units and present an example of commissioning. METHODS: A protocol for acceptance, commissioning, and QA of UHDR linear accelerators was established by combining and adapting standards and professional recommendations for standard linear accelerators based on the experience with UHDR at four clinical centers that use different UHDR devices. Non-standard dosimetric beam parameters considered included pulse width, pulse repetition frequency, dose per pulse, and instantaneous dose rate, together with recommendations on how to acquire these measurements. RESULTS: The 6- and 9-MeV beams of an UHDR electron device were commissioned by using this developed protocol. Measurements were acquired with a combination of ion chambers, beam current transformers (BCTs), and dose-rate-independent passive dosimeters. The unit was calibrated according to the concept of redundant dosimetry using a reference setup. CONCLUSION: This study provides detailed recommendations for the acceptance testing, commissioning, and routine QA of low-energy electron UHDR linear accelerators. The proposed framework is not limited to any specific unit, making it applicable to all existing eFLASH units in the market. Through practical insights and theoretical discourse, this document establishes a benchmark for the commissioning of UHDR devices for clinical use.

Artificial intelligence and radiotherapy: Evolution or revolution?

The integration of artificial intelligence, particularly deep learning algorithms, into radiotherapy represents a transformative shift in the field, enhancing accuracy, efficiency, and personalized care. This paper explores the multifaceted impact of artificial intelligence on radiotherapy, the evolution of the roles of radiation oncologists and medical physicists, and the associated practical challenges. The adoption of artificial intelligence promises to revolutionize the profession by automating repetitive tasks, improving diagnostic precision, and enabling adaptive radiotherapy. However, it also introduces significant risks, such as automation bias, verification failures, and the potential erosion of clinical skills. Ethical considerations, such as maintaining patient autonomy and addressing biases in artificial intelligence systems, are critical to ensuring the responsible use of artificial intelligence. Continuous training and development of robust quality assurance programs are required to mitigate these risks and maximize the benefits of artificial intelligence in radiotherapy.

Challenges and opportunities in the development and clinical implementation of artificial intelligence based synthetic computed tomography for magnetic resonance only radiotherapy.

Synthetic computed tomography (sCT) generated from magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) can serve as a substitute for planning CT in radiation therapy (RT), thereby removing registration uncertainties associated with multi-modality imaging pairing, reducing costs and patient radiation exposure. CE/FDA-approved sCT solutions are nowadays available for pelvis, brain, and head and neck, while more complex deep learning (DL) algorithms are under investigation for other anatomic sites. The main challenge in achieving a widespread clinical implementation of sCT lies in the absence of consensus on sCT commissioning and quality assurance (QA), resulting in variation of sCT approaches across different hospitals. To address this issue, a group of experts gathered at the ESTRO Physics Workshop 2022 to discuss the integration of sCT solutions into clinics and report the process and its outcomes. This position paper focuses on aspects of sCT development and commissioning, outlining key elements crucial for the safe implementation of an MRI-only RT workflow.

Automatic gross tumor volume segmentation with failure detection for safe implementation in locally advanced cervical cancer.

Background and Purpose: Automatic segmentation methods have greatly changed the RadioTherapy (RT) workflow, but still need to be extended to target volumes. In this paper, Deep Learning (DL) models were compared for Gross Tumor Volume (GTV) segmentation in locally advanced cervical cancer, and a novel investigation into failure detection was introduced by utilizing radiomic features. Methods and materials: We trained eight DL models (UNet, VNet, SegResNet, SegResNetVAE) for 2D and 3D segmentation. Ensembling individually trained models during cross-validation generated the final segmentation. To detect failures, binary classifiers were trained using radiomic features extracted from segmented GTVs as inputs, aiming to classify contours based on whether their Dice Similarity Coefficient ( DSC ) < T and DSC ⩾ T . Two distinct cohorts of T2-Weighted (T2W) pre-RT MR images captured in 2D sequences were used: one retrospective cohort consisting of 115 LACC patients from 30 scanners, and the other prospective cohort, comprising 51 patients from 7 scanners, used for testing. Results: Segmentation by 2D-SegResNet achieved the best DSC, Surface DSC ( SDSC 3 mm ), and 95th Hausdorff Distance (95HD): DSC = 0.72 ± 0.16, SDSC 3 mm =0.66 ± 0.17, and 95HD = 14.6 ± 9.0 mm without missing segmentation ( M =0) on the test cohort. Failure detection could generate precision ( P = 0.88 ), recall ( R = 0.75 ), F1-score ( F = 0.81 ), and accuracy ( A = 0.86 ) using Logistic Regression (LR) classifier on the test cohort with a threshold T = 0.67 on DSC values. Conclusions: Our study revealed that segmentation accuracy varies slightly among different DL methods, with 2D networks outperforming 3D networks in 2D MRI sequences. Doctors found the time-saving aspect advantageous. The proposed failure detection could guide doctors in sensitive cases.

Theragnostic Gadolinium-Based Nanoparticles Safely Augment X-ray Radiation Effects in Patients with Cervical Cancer.

Activated guided irradiation by X-ray (AGuIX) nanoparticles are gadolinium-based agents that have the dual benefit of mimicking the effects of a magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) contrast agent used in a clinical routine and enhancing the radiotherapeutic activity of conventional X-rays (for cancer treatment). This "theragnostic" action is explained on the one hand by the paramagnetic properties of gadolinium and on the other hand by the generation of high densities of secondary radiation following the interaction of ionizing radiation and high-Z atoms, which leads to enhanced radiation dose deposits within the tumors where the nanoparticles accumulate. Here, we report the results of a phase I trial that aimed to assess the safety and determine the optimal dose of AGuIX nanoparticles in combination with chemoradiation and brachytherapy in patients with locally advanced cervical cancer. AGuIX nanoparticles were administered intravenously and appropriately accumulated within tumors on a dose-dependent manner, as assessed by T1-weighted MRI, with a rapid urinary clearance of uncaught nanoparticles. We show that the observed tumor accumulation of the compounds can support precise delineation of functional target volumes at the time of brachytherapy based on gadolinium enhancement. AGuIX nanoparticles combined with chemoradiation appeared well tolerated among the 12 patients treated, with no dose-limiting toxicity observed. Treatment yielded excellent local control, with all patients achieving complete remission of the primary tumor. One patient had a distant tumor recurrence. These results demonstrate the clinical feasibility of using theranostic nanoparticles to augment the accuracy of MRI-based treatments while focally enhancing the radiation activity in tumors.

On the acceptance, commissioning, and quality assurance of electron FLASH units.

Background & Purpose: FLASH or ultra-high dose rate (UHDR) radiation therapy (RT) has gained attention in recent years for its ability to spare normal tissues relative to conventional dose rate (CDR) RT in various preclinical trials. However, clinical implementation of this promising treatment option has been limited because of the lack of availability of accelerators capable of delivering UHDR RT. Commercial options are finally reaching the market that produce electron beams with average dose rates of up to 1000 Gy/s. We established a framework for the acceptance, commissioning, and periodic quality assurance (QA) of electron FLASH units and present an example of commissioning. Methods: A protocol for acceptance, commissioning, and QA of UHDR linear accelerators was established by combining and adapting standards and professional recommendations for standard linear accelerators based on the experience with UHDR at four clinical centers that use different UHDR devices. Non-standard dosimetric beam parameters considered included pulse width, pulse repetition frequency, dose per pulse, and instantaneous dose rate, together with recommendations on how to acquire these measurements. Results: The 6- and 9-MeV beams of an UHDR electron device were commissioned by using this developed protocol. Measurements were acquired with a combination of ion chambers, beam current transformers (BCTs), and dose-rate-independent passive dosimeters. The unit was calibrated according to the concept of redundant dosimetry using a reference setup. Conclusions: This study provides detailed recommendations for the acceptance testing, commissioning, and routine QA of low-energy electron UHDR linear accelerators. The proposed framework is not limited to any specific unit, making it applicable to all existing eFLASH units in the market. Through practical insights and theoretical discourse, this document establishes a benchmark for the commissioning of UHDR devices for clinical use.

Radiation Doses Received by Major Organs at Risk in Children and Young Adolescents Treated for Cancer with External Beam Radiation Therapy: A Large-scale Study from 12 European Countries.

PURPOSE: Childhood cancer survivors, in particular those treated with radiation therapy, are at high risk of long-term iatrogenic events. The prediction of risk of such events is mainly based on the knowledge of the radiation dose received to healthy organs and tissues during treatment of childhood cancer diagnosed decades ago. We aimed to set up a standardized organ dose table to help former patients and clinicians in charge of long-term follow-up clinics. METHODS AND MATERIALS: We performed whole body dosimetric reconstruction for 2646 patients from 12 European countries treated between 1941 and 2006 (median, 1976). Most plannings were 2- or 3-dimensional. A total of 46% of patients were treated using Cobalt 60, and 41%, using a linear accelerator. The median prescribed dose was 27.2 Gy (IQ1-IQ3, 17.6-40.0 Gy). A patient-specific voxel-based anthropomorphic phantom with more than 200 anatomic structures or substructures delineated as a surrogate of each subject's anatomy was used. The radiation therapy was simulated with a treatment planning system based on available treatment information. The radiation dose received by any organ of the body was estimated by extending the treatment planning system dose calculation to the whole body, by type and localization of childhood cancer. RESULTS: The integral dose and normal tissue doses to most of the 23 considered organs increased between the 1950s and 1970s and decreased or plateaued thereafter. Whatever the organ considered, the type of childhood cancer explained most of the variability in organ dose. The country of treatment explained only a small part of the variability. CONCLUSIONS: The detailed dose estimates provide very useful information for former patients or clinicians who have only limited knowledge about radiation therapy protocols or techniques, but who know the type and site of childhood cancer, sex, age, and year of treatment. This will allow better prediction of the long-term risk of iatrogenic events and better referral to long-term follow-up clinics.

LymphoDose: a lymphocyte dose estimation framework-application to brain radiotherapy.

Objective. Severe radiation-induced lymphopenia occurs in 40% of patients treated for primary brain tumors and is an independent risk factor of poor survival outcomes. We developed anin-silicoframework that estimates the radiation doses received by lymphocytes during volumetric modulated arc therapy brain irradiation.Approach. We implemented a simulation consisting of two interconnected compartmental models describing the slow recirculation of lymphocytes between lymphoid organs (M1) and the bloodstream (M2). We used dosimetry data from 33 patients treated with chemo-radiation for glioblastoma to compare three cases of the model, corresponding to different physical and biological scenarios: (H1) lymphocytes circulation only in the bloodstream i.e. circulation inM2only; (H2) lymphocytes recirculation between lymphoid organs i.e. circulation inM1andM2interconnected; (H3) lymphocytes recirculation between lymphoid organs and deep-learning computed out-of-field (OOF) dose to head and neck (H&N) lymphoid structures. A sensitivity analysis of the model's parameters was also performed.Main results. For H1, H2 and H3 cases respectively, the irradiated fraction of lymphocytes was 99.8 ± 0.7%, 40.4 ± 10.2% et 97.6 ± 2.5%, and the average dose to irradiated pool was 309.9 ± 74.7 mGy, 52.6 ± 21.1 mGy and 265.6 ± 48.5 mGy. The recirculation process considered in the H2 case implied that irradiated lymphocytes were irradiated in the field only 1.58 ± 0.91 times on average after treatment. The OOF irradiation of H&N lymphoid structures considered in H3 was an important contribution to lymphocytes dose. In all cases, the estimated doses are low compared with lymphocytes radiosensitivity, and other mechanisms could explain high prevalence of RIL in patients with brain tumors.Significance. Our framework is the first to take into account OOF doses and recirculation in lymphocyte dose assessment during brain irradiation. Our results demonstrate the need to clarify the indirect effects of irradiation on lymphopenia, in order to potentiate the combination of radio-immunotherapy or the abscopal effect.

Translational Frontiers and Clinical Opportunities of Immunologically Fitted Radiotherapy.

Ionizing radiation can have a wide range of impacts on tumor-immune interactions, which are being studied with the greatest interest and at an accelerating pace by the medical community. Despite its undeniable immunostimulatory potential, it clearly appears that radiotherapy as it is prescribed and delivered nowadays often alters the host's immunity toward a suboptimal state. This may impair the full recovery of a sustained and efficient antitumor immunosurveillance posttreatment. An emerging concept is arising from this awareness and consists of reconsidering the way of designing radiation treatment planning, notably by taking into account the individualized risks of deleterious radio-induced immune alteration that can be deciphered from the planned beam trajectory through lymphocyte-rich organs. In this review, we critically appraise key aspects to consider while planning immunologically fitted radiotherapy, including the challenges linked to the identification of new dose constraints to immune-rich structures. We also discuss how pharmacologic immunomodulation could be advantageously used in combination with radiotherapy to compensate for the radio-induced loss, for example, with (i) agonists of interleukin (IL)2, IL4, IL7, IL9, IL15, or IL21, similarly to G-CSF being used for the prophylaxis of severe chemo-induced neutropenia, or with (ii) myeloid-derived suppressive cell blockers.

Deep-Learning for Rapid Estimation of the Out-of-Field Dose in External Beam Photon Radiation Therapy - A Proof of Concept.

PURPOSE: The dose deposited outside of the treatment field during external photon beam radiation therapy treatment, also known as out-of-field dose, is the subject of extensive study as it may be associated with a higher risk of developing a second cancer and could have deleterious effects on the immune system that compromise the efficiency of combined radio-immunotherapy treatments. Out-of-field dose estimation tools developed today in research, including Monte Carlo simulations and analytical methods, are not suited to the requirements of clinical implementation because of their lack of versatility and their cumbersome application. We propose a proof of concept based on deep learning for out-of-field dose map estimation that addresses these limitations. METHODS AND MATERIALS: For this purpose, a 3D U-Net, considering as inputs the in-field dose, as computed by the treatment planning system, and the patient's anatomy, was trained to predict out-of-field dose maps. The cohort used for learning and performance evaluation included 3151 pediatric patients from the FCCSS database, treated in 5 clinical centers, whose whole-body dose maps were previously estimated with an empirical analytical method. The test set, composed of 433 patients, was split into 5 subdata sets, each containing patients treated with devices unseen during the training phase. Root mean square deviation evaluated only on nonzero voxels located in the out-of-field areas was computed as performance metric. RESULTS: Root mean square deviations of 0.28 and 0.41 cGy/Gy were obtained for the training and validation data sets, respectively. Values of 0.27, 0.26, 0.28, 0.30, and 0.45 cGy/Gy were achieved for the 6 MV linear accelerator, 16 MV linear accelerator, Alcyon cobalt irradiator, Mobiletron cobalt irradiator, and betatron device test sets, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: This proof-of-concept approach using a convolutional neural network has demonstrated unprecedented generalizability for this task, although it remains limited, and brings us closer to an implementation compatible with clinical routine.

Redefining the role of pulsed-dose-rate brachytherapy in cervical cancer treatment using a preplanned approach.

INTRODUCTION: This study aims to determine predictive factors for cervical cancer patients who would benefit more from high-dose-rate (HDR) or pulsed-dose-rate (PDR) brachytherapy. METHODS: The sample included 50 patients treated with brachytherapy following external radiochemotherapy. PDR plans were compared to HDR preplans, with a focus on patients who may benefit from PDR using preplan metrics and clinical variables. The expected clinical effect was quantified using a tumor control probability model. RESULTS: Results showed PDR plans with 60 pulses to be optimal for achieving target clinical goals for D90CTVHR. A CTVHR volume of >67.5cc and/or D90CTVHR dose on the HDR preplan of <31.1 Gy was the strongest indicator for patient selection who would gain >3% increase in TCP with PDR. The process showed 96% accuracy, 88% sensitivity, and 98% specificity. Only 16% of patients showed a relevant benefit from PDR over HDR, with a mean D90CTVHR of 7 Gy higher and a mean TCP at 3 years of 4.8% higher for PDR. The benefit of PDR is highly influenced by the choice of alpha/beta ratio and repair halftime. CONCLUSION: A small subset of cervical cancer patients may gain from PDR over HDR. CTVHR volume and preplan D90CTVHR doses may be useful in selecting patients for PDR brachytherapy.

A common [18F]-FDG PET radiomic signature to predict survival in patients with HPV-induced cancers.

Locally advanced cervical cancer (LACC) and anal and oropharyngeal squamous cell carcinoma (ASCC and OPSCC) are mostly caused by oncogenic human papillomaviruses (HPV). In this paper, we developed machine learning (ML) models based on clinical, biological, and radiomic features extracted from pre-treatment fluorine-18-fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography ([18F]-FDG PET) images to predict the survival of patients with HPV-induced cancers. For this purpose, cohorts from five institutions were used: two cohorts of patients treated for LACC including 104 patients from Gustave Roussy Campus Cancer (Center 1) and 90 patients from Leeds Teaching Hospitals NHS Trust (Center 2), two datasets of patients treated for ASCC composed of 66 patients from Institut du Cancer de Montpellier (Center 3) and 67 patients from Oslo University Hospital (Center 4), and one dataset of 45 OPSCC patients from the University Hospital of Zurich (Center 5). Radiomic features were extracted from baseline [18F]-FDG PET images. The ComBat technique was applied to mitigate intra-scanner variability. A modified consensus nested cross-validation for feature selection and hyperparameter tuning was applied on four ML models to predict progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) using harmonized imaging features and/or clinical and biological variables as inputs. Each model was trained and optimized on Center 1 and Center 3 cohorts and tested on Center 2, Center 4, and Center 5 cohorts. The radiomic-based CoxNet model achieved C-index values of 0.75 and 0.78 for PFS and 0.76, 0.74, and 0.75 for OS on the test sets. Radiomic feature-based models had superior performance compared to the bioclinical ones, and combining radiomic and bioclinical variables did not improve the performances. Metabolic tumor volume (MTV)-based models obtained lower C-index values for a majority of the tested configurations but quite equivalent performance in terms of time-dependent AUCs (td-AUC). The results demonstrate the possibility of identifying common PET-based image signatures for predicting the response of patients with induced HPV pathology, validated on multi-center multiconstructor data.

Radio-induced lymphopenia in the era of anti-cancer immunotherapy.

Radiation-induced lymphopenia (RIL) is characterized by a significant decrease in the absolute number of lymphocytes circulating in the blood after radiotherapy. With the major shift in cancer management initiated by cancer immunotherapy (IT), the reduction of incidence of RIL appears today as an extremely promising way of potentiating the synergy between radiotherapy and immunotherapy. However, the causes of RIL and mechanisms involved are still poorly understood. Improving our knowledge on RIL is therefore essential to limit it and thus improve the quality of care delivered to patients. The objective of this review is to provide a global view of RIL from a clinical point of view, with particular emphasis on recent knowledge and avenues explored to explain RIL and especially its depletion and remission kinetics. An opening on treatment concepts to be rethought is conducted in the context of combined RT/IT treatments.

Analytical models for external photon beam radiotherapy out-of-field dose calculation: a scoping review.

A growing body of scientific evidence indicates that exposure to low dose ionizing radiation (< 2 Gy) is associated with a higher risk of developing radio-induced cancer. Additionally, it has been shown to have significant impacts on both innate and adaptive immune responses. As a result, the evaluation of the low doses inevitably delivered outside the treatment fields (out-of-field dose) in photon radiotherapy is a topic that is regaining interest at a pivotal moment in radiotherapy. In this work, we proposed a scoping review in order to identify evidence of strengths and limitations of available analytical models for out-of-field dose calculation in external photon beam radiotherapy for the purpose of implementation in clinical routine. Papers published between 1988 and 2022 proposing a novel analytical model that estimated at least one component of the out-of-field dose for photon external radiotherapy were included. Models focusing on electrons, protons and Monte-Carlo methods were excluded. The methodological quality and potential limitations of each model were analyzed to assess their generalizability. Twenty-one published papers were selected for analysis, of which 14 proposed multi-compartment models, demonstrating that research efforts are directed towards an increasingly detailed description of the underlying physical phenomena. Our synthesis revealed great inhomogeneities in practices, in particular in the acquisition of experimental data and the standardization of measurements, in the choice of metrics used for the evaluation of model performance and even in the definition of regions considered out-of-the-field, which makes quantitative comparisons impossible. We therefore propose to clarify some key concepts. The analytical methods do not seem to be easily suitable for massive use in clinical routine, due to the inevitable cumbersome nature of their implementation. Currently, there is no consensus on a mathematical formalism that comprehensively describes the out-of-field dose in external photon radiotherapy, partly due to the complex interactions between a large number of influencing factors. Out-of-field dose calculation models based on neural networks could be promising tools to overcome these limitations and thus favor a transfer to the clinic, but the lack of sufficiently large and heterogeneous data sets is the main obstacle.

Clinical transfer of AGuIX®-based radiation treatments for locally advanced cervical cancer: MR quantification and in vitro insights in the NANOCOL clinical trial framework.

Clinical trials incorporating metallic nanoparticles (NPs) have recently begun. Radiotherapy planning does not take into account NPs concentrations observed in the patients' target volumes. In the framework of the NANOCOL clinical trial including patients treated for locally advanced cervical cancers, this study proposes a complete method to evaluate the radiation-induced biological effects of NPs. For this, calibration phantom was developed and MRI sequences with variable flip angles were acquired. This process allowed the quantification of NPs in the tumor of 4 patients, which was compared to the results of mass spectrometry obtained from 3 patient biopsies. The concentration of the NPs was reproduced in 3D cell models. Based on clonogenic assays, the radio-enhancement effects were quantified for radiotherapy and brachytherapy, and the impact in terms of local control was evaluated. T1 signal change in GTVs revealed NPs accumulation ∼12.4 µmol/L, in agreement with mass spectrometry. Radio-enhancement effects of about 15 % at 2 Gy were found for both modalities, with a positive impact on local tumor control. Even if further follow-up of patients in this and subsequent clinical trials will be necessary to assess the reliability of this proof of concept, this study opens the way to the integration of a dose modulation factor to better take into account the impact of NPs in radiotherapy treatment.

Radiomics to evaluate interlesion heterogeneity and to predict lesion response and patient outcomes using a validated signature of CD8 cells in advanced melanoma patients treated with anti-PD1 immunotherapy.

PURPOSE: While there is still a significant need to identify potential biomarkers that can predict which patients are most likely to respond to immunotherapy treatments, radiomic approaches have shown promising results. The objectives of this study were to evaluate whether a previously validated radiomics signature of CD8 T-cells could predict progressions at a lesion level and whether the spatial heterogeneity of this radiomics score could be used at a patient level to assess the clinical response and survival of melanoma patients. METHODS: Clinical data from patients with advanced melanoma treated in our center with immunotherapy were retrieved. Radiomic features were extracted and the CD8 radiomics signature was applied. A progressive lesion was defined by an increase in lesion size of 20% or more. Dispersion metrics of the radiomics signature were estimated to evaluate the impact of interlesion heterogeneity on patient's response. Fine-tuned cut-offs for predicting overall survival were evaluated after splitting data into training and test sets. RESULTS: A total of 136 patients were included in this study, with 1120 segmented lesions at baseline, and 1052 lesions at first evaluation. A low CD8 radiomics score at baseline was associated with a significantly higher risk of lesion progression (AUC=0.55, p=0.0091), especially for lesions larger than >1 mL (AUC=0.59 overall, p=0.0035, with AUC=0.75, p=0.002 for subcutaneous lesions, AUC=0.68, p=0.01, for liver lesions and AUC=0.62, p=0.03 for nodes). The least infiltrated lesion according to the radiomics score of CD8 T-cells was positively associated with overall survival (training set HR=0.31, p=0.00062, test set HR=0.28, p=0.016), which remained significant in a multivariate analysis including clinical and biological variables. CONCLUSIONS: These results confirm the predictive value at a lesion level of the biologically inspired CD8 radiomics score in melanoma patients treated with anti-PD1-based immunotherapy and may be interesting to assess the disease spatial heterogeneity to evaluate the patient prognosis with potential clinical implication such as tumor selection for focal ablative therapies.

Imaging approaches and radiomics: toward a new era of ultraprecision radioimmunotherapy?

Strong rationale and a growing number of preclinical and clinical studies support combining radiotherapy and immunotherapy to improve patient outcomes. However, several critical questions remain, such as the identification of patients who will benefit from immunotherapy and the identification of the best modalities of treatment to optimize patient response. Imaging biomarkers and radiomics have recently emerged as promising tools for the non-invasive assessment of the whole disease of the patient, allowing comprehensive analysis of the tumor microenvironment, the spatial heterogeneity of the disease and its temporal changes. This review presents the potential applications of medical imaging and the challenges to address, in order to help clinicians choose the optimal modalities of both radiotherapy and immunotherapy, to predict patient's outcomes and to assess response to these promising combinations.

AutoComBat: a generic method for harmonizing MRI-based radiomic features.

The use of multicentric data is becoming essential for developing generalizable radiomic signatures. In particular, Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI) data used in brain oncology are often heterogeneous in terms of scanners and acquisitions, which significantly impact quantitative radiomic features. Various methods have been proposed to decrease dependency, including methods acting directly on MR images, i.e., based on the application of several preprocessing steps before feature extraction or the ComBat method, which harmonizes radiomic features themselves. The ComBat method used for radiomics may be misleading and presents some limitations, such as the need to know the labels associated with the "batch effect". In addition, a statistically representative sample is required and the applicability of a signature whose batch label is not present in the train set is not possible. This work aimed to compare a priori and a posteriori radiomic harmonization methods and propose a code adaptation to be machine learning compatible. Furthermore, we have developed AutoComBat, which aims to automatically determine the batch labels, using either MRI metadata or quality metrics as inputs of the proposed constrained clustering. A heterogeneous dataset consisting of high and low-grade gliomas coming from eight different centers was considered. The different methods were compared based on their ability to decrease relative standard deviation of radiomic features extracted from white matter and on their performance on a classification task using different machine learning models. ComBat and AutoComBat using image-derived quality metrics as inputs for batch assignment and preprocessing methods presented promising results on white matter harmonization, but with no clear consensus for all MR images. Preprocessing showed the best results on the T1w-gd images for the grading task. For T2w-flair, AutoComBat, using either metadata plus quality metrics or metadata alone as inputs, performs better than the conventional ComBat, highlighting its potential for data harmonization. Our results are MRI weighting, feature class and task dependent and require further investigations on other datasets.

Quantitative assessment of radionuclide production yields in in-beam and offline PET measurements at different proton irradiation facilities.

Objective. Reliable radionuclide production yield data are a prerequisite for positron-emission-tomography (PET) basedin vivoproton treatment verification. In this context, activation data acquired at two different treatment facilities with different imaging systems were analyzed to provide experimentally determined radionuclide yields in thick targets and were compared with each other to investigate the impact of the respective imaging technique.Approach.Homogeneous thick targets (PMMA, gelatine, and graphite) were irradiated with mono-energetic proton pencil-beams at two distinct energies. Material activation was measured (i)in-beamduring and after beam delivery with a double-head prototype PET camera and (ii)offlineshortly after beam delivery with a commercial full-ring PET/CT scanner. Integral as well as depth-resolvedß+-emitter yields were determined for the dominant positron-emitting radionuclides11C,15O,13N and (in-beamonly)10C.In-beamdata were used to investigate the qualitative impact of different monitoring time schemes on activity depth profiles and their quantitative impact on count rates and total activity.Main results.Production yields measured with thein-beamcamera were comparable to or higher compared to respectiveofflineresults. Depth profiles of radionuclide-specific yields obtained from thedouble-headcamera showed qualitative differences to data acquired with thefull-ringcamera with a more convex profile shape. Considerable impact of the imaging timing scheme on the activity profile was observed for gelatine only with a range variation of up to 3.5 mm. Evaluation of the coincidence rate and the total number of observed events in the considered workflows confirmed a strongly decreasing rate in targets with a large oxygen fraction.Significance. The observed quantitative and qualitative differences between the datasets underline the importance of a thorough system commissioning. Due to the lack of reliable cross-section data, in-house phantom measurements are still considered a gold standard for careful characterization of the system response and to ensure a reliable beam range verification.

COMBING: Clustering in Oncology for Mathematical and Biological Identification of Novel Gene Signatures.

Precision medicine is a paradigm shift in healthcare relying heavily on genomics data. However, the complexity of biological interactions, the large number of genes as well as the lack of comparisons on the analysis of data, remain a tremendous bottleneck regarding clinical adoption. In this paper, we introduce a novel, automatic and unsupervised framework to discover low-dimensional gene biomarkers. Our method is based on the LP-Stability algorithm, a high dimensional center-based unsupervised clustering algorithm. It offers modularity as concerns metric functions and scalability, while being able to automatically determine the best number of clusters. Our evaluation includes both mathematical and biological criteria to define a quantitative metric. The recovered signature is applied to a variety of biological tasks, including screening of biological pathways and functions, and characterization relevance on tumor types and subtypes. Quantitative comparisons among different distance metrics, commonly used clustering methods and a referential gene signature used in the literature, confirm state of the art performance of our approach. In particular, our signature, based on 27 genes, reports at least 30 times better mathematical significance (average Dunn's Index) and 25% better biological significance (average Enrichment in Protein-Protein Interaction) than those produced by other referential clustering methods. Finally, our signature reports promising results on distinguishing immune inflammatory and immune desert tumors, while reporting a high balanced accuracy of 92% on tumor types classification and averaged balanced accuracy of 68% on tumor subtypes classification, which represents, respectively 7% and 9% higher performance compared to the referential signature.