Genetic determinants of micronucleus formation in vivo.

Genomic instability arising from defective responses to DNA damage1 or mitotic chromosomal imbalances2 can lead to the sequestration of DNA in aberrant extranuclear structures called micronuclei (MN). Although MN are a hallmark of ageing and diseases associated with genomic instability, the catalogue of genetic players that regulate the generation of MN remains to be determined. Here we analyse 997 mouse mutant lines, revealing 145 genes whose loss significantly increases (n = 71) or decreases (n = 74) MN formation, including many genes whose orthologues are linked to human disease. We found that mice null for Dscc1, which showed the most significant increase in MN, also displayed a range of phenotypes characteristic of patients with cohesinopathy disorders. After validating the DSCC1-associated MN instability phenotype in human cells, we used genome-wide CRISPR-Cas9 screening to define synthetic lethal and synthetic rescue interactors. We found that the loss of SIRT1 can rescue phenotypes associated with DSCC1 loss in a manner paralleling restoration of protein acetylation of SMC3. Our study reveals factors involved in maintaining genomic stability and shows how this information can be used to identify mechanisms that are relevant to human disease biology1.

POT1 germline mutations but not TERT promoter mutations are implicated in melanoma susceptibility in a large cohort of Spanish melanoma families.

BACKGROUND: Germline mutations in telomere-related genes such as POT1 and TERT predispose individuals to familial melanoma. OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the prevalence of germline mutations in POT1 and TERT in a large cohort of Spanish melanoma-prone families (at least two affected first- or second-degree relatives). METHODS: Overall, 228 CDKN2A wild-type melanoma-prone families were included in the study. Screening of POT1 was performed in one affected person from each family and TERT was sequenced in one affected patient from 202 families (26 families were excluded owing to DNA exhaustion/degradation). TERT promoter sequencing was extended to an additional 30 families with CDKN2A mutation and 70 patients with sporadic multiple primary melanoma (MPM) with a family history of other cancers. RESULTS: We identified four families with potentially pathogenic POT1 germline mutations: a missense variant c.233T>C (p.Ile78Thr); a nonsense variant c.1030G>T (p.Glu344*); and two other variants, c.255G>A (r.125_255del) and c.1792G>A (r.1791_1792insAGTA, p.Asp598Serfs*22), which we confirmed disrupted POT1 mRNA splicing. A TERT promoter variant of unknown significance (c.-125C>A) was detected in a patient with MPM, but no germline mutations were detected in TERT promoter in cases of familial melanoma. CONCLUSIONS: Overall, 1·7% of our CDKN2A/CDK4-wild type Spanish melanoma-prone families carry probably damaging mutations in POT1. The frequency of TERT promoter germline mutations in families with melanoma in our population is extremely rare.

Jdp2 downregulates Trp53 transcription to promote leukaemogenesis in the context of Trp53 heterozygosity.

We performed a genetic screen in mice to identify candidate genes that are associated with leukaemogenesis in the context of Trp53 heterozygosity. To do this we generated Trp53 heterozygous mice carrying the T2/Onc transposon and SB11 transposase alleles to allow transposon-mediated insertional mutagenesis to occur. From the resulting leukaemias/lymphomas that developed in these mice, we identified nine loci that are potentially associated with tumour formation in the context of Trp53 heterozygosity, including AB041803 and the Jun dimerization protein 2 (Jdp2). We show that Jdp2 transcriptionally regulates the Trp53 promoter, via an atypical AP-1 site, and that Jdp2 expression negatively regulates Trp53 expression levels. This study is the first to identify a genetic mechanism for tumour formation in the context of Trp53 heterozygosity.