Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 3 de 3
Filtrar
Más filtros












Base de datos
Intervalo de año de publicación
1.
Orthop Traumatol Surg Res ; 107(6): 102835, 2021 10.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33524630

RESUMEN

INTRODUCTION: Talar fracture is rare. Treatment is surgical for neck and/or body fractures with displacement. The aims of the present study were to collect epidemiological data on talar fractures, and to assess the impact of trauma via various functional scores and radiographic impact in the medium term. HYPOTHESIS: Displaced talar fracture shows negative medium-term functional and radiological/clinical impact. MATERIAL AND METHODS: A multicenter retrospective study was performed with a minimum follow-up of 12 months post-trauma. Inclusion criteria included radiographic assessment at a minimum 12 months post-trauma and data on 3 functional scores: SF12, AOFAS and FAAM. 225 patients were initially included, 81 of whom had follow-up with functional and radiological/clinical assessment. RESULTS: Fracture reduction was anatomic in 61% of cases when CT was performed; reduction quality was independent of approach (p>0.05). 45% of patients showed subtalar osteoarthritis at a mean 2 years, significantly related to reduction defect (p<0.05). Mean AOFAS score was acceptable, at 74/100. Factors for functional prognosis comprised: reduction quality, hindfoot alignment, subtalar osteoarthritis, and talar osteonecrosis with dome collapse. DISCUSSION: Talar fracture led to late complications with socioeconomic impact. Subtalar osteoarthritis affects almost half of patients within some months of trauma. Optimal reduction is the key to fair progression. Postoperative CT assessment now seems mandatory. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: IV; multicenter retrospective study.


Asunto(s)
Fracturas Óseas , Osteonecrosis , Astrágalo , Fijación Interna de Fracturas , Fracturas Óseas/diagnóstico por imagen , Fracturas Óseas/epidemiología , Fracturas Óseas/cirugía , Humanos , Estudios Retrospectivos , Astrágalo/diagnóstico por imagen , Astrágalo/cirugía , Resultado del Tratamiento
2.
Orthop Traumatol Surg Res ; 106(5): 789-796, 2020 Sep.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32376202

RESUMEN

INTRODUCTION: Bone defects are challenging to treat surgically. The primary objective of our study was to compare the union rate and time to union between the tibia and femur when using the induced membrane technique. The secondary objective was to document how failures were managed. MATERIAL AND METHODS: This retrospective, single-center study involved 33 patients (23 men, 10 women) who were older than 18 years of age. They were treated surgically for a leg fracture or long bone nonunion (22 tibia, 11 femur) using the induced membrane technique between January 2011 and December 2016 and had a complete follow-up. The minimum follow-up was 1 year for fractures and 2 years for non-union cases. Bone union was defined as the presence of at least two cortices with bridging on two radiographic views and return to full weight bearing. RESULTS: The mean patient age was 38.3±15.5 years (18-72). The mean bone defect size was 7.9±5.0cm (2.3-18.0). The mean follow-up was 3.3±1.8 years (1-7.2). The union rate was 61% (20 patients). The mean time to union was 10±6.4 months (3-23). The time to union was significantly longer in the tibia (11.6±6.9 months [3-23]) than in the femur (6.3±2.9 months [3.4-10.3]) (p=0.025). The failure rate did not differ between the tibia and femur. Nine of the 13 patients (69%) in which the treatment failed were reoperated; 7 of them underwent nonunion treatment (78%) and 2 underwent amputation (22%). The other 4 patients were waiting for an infection to resolve before being reoperated. CONCLUSION: The induced membrane technique is an effective surgical procedure for large bone defects in both the tibia and femur. However, the time to union was shorter in the femur than the tibia in our cohort. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: IV, retrospective study.


Asunto(s)
Fémur , Tibia , Adolescente , Adulto , Anciano , Trasplante Óseo , Femenino , Fémur/diagnóstico por imagen , Fémur/cirugía , Curación de Fractura , Fracturas no Consolidadas , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Estudios Retrospectivos , Tibia/diagnóstico por imagen , Tibia/cirugía , Fracturas de la Tibia/diagnóstico por imagen , Fracturas de la Tibia/cirugía , Resultado del Tratamiento , Adulto Joven
3.
Cancers (Basel) ; 12(3)2020 Mar 03.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32138169

RESUMEN

Soft tissue sarcoma (STS) are rare and aggressive tumours. Their classification includes numerous histological subtypes of frequent poor prognosis. Liposarcomas (LPS) are the most frequent type among them, and the aggressiveness and deep localization of dedifferentiated LPS are linked to high levels of recurrence. Current treatments available today lead to five-year overall survival has remained stuck around 60%-70% for the past three decades. Here, we highlight a correlation between Aurora kinasa A (AURKA) and AURKB mRNA overexpression and a low metastasis - free survival. AURKA and AURKB expression analysis at genomic and protein level on a 9-STS cell lines panel highlighted STS heterogeneity, especially in LPS subtype. AURKA and AURKB inhibition by RNAi and drug targeting with AMG 900, a pan Aurora Kinase inhibitor, in four LPS cell lines reduces cell survival and clonogenic proliferation, inducing apoptosis and polyploidy. When combined with doxorubicin, the standard treatment in STS, aurora kinases inhibitor can be considered as an enhancer of standard treatment or as an independent drug. Kinome analysis suggested its effect was linked to the inhibition of the MAP-kinase pathway, with differential drug resistance profiles depending on molecular characteristics of the tumor. Aurora Kinase inhibition by AMG 900 could be a promising therapy in STS.

SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA
...