RESUMEN
Introduction: Heart failure (HF) is a serious complication of end-stage kidney disease (ESKD). However, most data come from retrospective studies that included patients on chronic hemodialysis at the time of its initiation. These patients are frequently overhydrated, which significantly influences the echocardiogram findings. The primary aim of this study was to analyze the prevalence of heart failure and its phenotypes. The secondary aims were (1) to describe the potential of N-terminal pro-brain natriuretic peptide (NTproBNP) for HF diagnosis in ESKD patients on hemodialysis, (2) to analyze the frequency of abnormal left ventricular geometry, and (3) to describe the differences between various HF phenotypes in this population. Methods: We included all patients on chronic hemodialysis for at least 3 months from five hemodialysis units who were willing to participate, had no living kidney transplant donor, and had a life expectancy longer than 6 months at the time of inclusion. Detailed echocardiography together with hemodynamic calculations, dialysis arteriovenous fistula flow volume calculation, and basic lab analysis were performed in conditions of clinical stability. Excess of severe overhydration was excluded by clinical examination and by employing bioimpedance. Results: A total of 214 patients aged 66.4 ± 14.6 years were included. HF was diagnosed in 57% of them. Among patients with HF, HF with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF) was, by far, the most common phenotype and occurred in 35%, while HF with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF) occurred only in 7%, HF with mildly reduced ejection fraction (HFmrEF) in 7%, and high-output HF in 9%. Patients with HFpEF differed from patients with no HF significantly in the following: they were older (62 ± 14 vs. 70 ± 14, p = 0.002) and had a higher left ventricular mass index [96(36) vs. 108(45), p = 0.015], higher left atrial index [33(12) vs. 44(16), p < 0.0001], and higher estimated central venous pressure [5(4) vs. 6(8), p = 0.004] and pulmonary artery systolic pressure [31(9) vs. 40(23), p = 0.006] but slightly lower tricuspid annular plane systolic excursion (TAPSE): 22 ± 5 vs. 24 ± 5, p = 0.04. NTproBNP had low sensitivity and specificity for diagnosing HF or HFpEF: with the use of the cutoff value of 8,296â ng/L, the sensitivity of HF diagnosis was only 52% while the specificity was 79%. However, NTproBNP levels were significantly related to echocardiographic variables, most significantly to the indexed left atrial volume (R = 0.56, p < 10-5) and to the estimated systolic pulmonary arterial pressure (R = 0.50, p < 10-5). Conclusions: HFpEF was by far the most common heart failure phenotype in patients on chronic hemodialysis and was followed by high-output HF. Patients suffering from HFpEF were older and had not only typical echocardiographic changes but also higher hydration that mirrored increased filling pressures of both ventricles than in those of patients without HF.
RESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Cognitive deficit is a common problem in end-stage renal disease (ESRD) patients. Ultrafiltration and hemodialysis lead to profound hemodynamic changes. The aim of this pilot study was to describe brain and hand oxygenation values in ESRD patients and their changes during hemodialysis. METHODS: Twenty-seven patients treated by chronic hemodialysis and 17 controls patients of the same age were included in the study. Regional saturation of oxygen (SrO2) was measured at the brain frontal lobe and at the hand with dialysis access using the INVOS 5100C. In 17 of ESRD patients, SrO2 was also monitored throughout hemodialysis. Finger systolic blood pressure and basic hemodialysis and laboratory data were collected. RESULTS: Dialysis patients had lower brain and also hand SrO2 values at rest (51.5 ± 10.9 vs. 68 ± 7%, p<0.0001 and 55 ± 16 vs. 66 ± 8%, p = 0.03, respectively). Both values further decreased during the first 35 minutes of hemodialysis (brain SrO2 to 47 ± 8%, p<0.0001 and hand to 45 ± 14%, p<0.0001, respectively). The brain SrO2 decrease was related to the ultrafiltration rate, the hand SrO2 decrease to the finger pressure and to blood hemoglobin. CONCLUSIONS: Chronic dialysis patients suffer from tissue ischemia and that even worsens after the beginning of hemodialysis. This observation may contribute to the understanding of cognitive deficit etiology.
Asunto(s)
Isquemia Encefálica/etiología , Lóbulo Frontal/irrigación sanguínea , Mano/irrigación sanguínea , Isquemia/etiología , Fallo Renal Crónico/terapia , Diálisis Renal/efectos adversos , Adulto , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Biomarcadores/sangre , Velocidad del Flujo Sanguíneo , Isquemia Encefálica/diagnóstico , Isquemia Encefálica/fisiopatología , Estudios de Casos y Controles , Circulación Cerebrovascular , Trastornos del Conocimiento/etiología , Trastornos del Conocimiento/fisiopatología , Trastornos del Conocimiento/psicología , Femenino , Humanos , Isquemia/diagnóstico , Isquemia/fisiopatología , Fallo Renal Crónico/diagnóstico , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Oxígeno/sangre , Proyectos Piloto , Flujo Sanguíneo Regional , Factores de Riesgo , Factores de Tiempo , Resultado del TratamientoRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Repeated inter-dialysis water retention contributes to the development of left ventricular hypertrophy and failure, which is responsible for significant mortality of end-stage renal disease (ESRD) patients. The left atrium has a thin wall, which makes it even more prone to preload changes. In the general population with heart failure with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF), left atrial function is even worse than that in patients with reduced ejection fraction. We hypothesized that repeated water retention is related to left atrial dysfunction in ESRD patients treated by hemodialysis and that the expected changes would be related to the brain natriuretic peptide (BNP) levels. METHODS: Forty six patients were enrolled. Left atrial end-diastolic and end-systolic volumes and left atrial ejection fraction (LAEF) were recorded by echocardiography just before and just after dialysis and then analyzed offline. Moreover, BNP was analyzed also prior to dialysis and after. Effects of dialysis were tested using paired t test and the correlation analysis was applied to test associations. RESULTS: LAEF was inversely related to the dialysis vintage (r = -0.62, p = 0.001) and patient's age (r = -0.48, p = 0.005) and it did not increase after dialysis despite the decrease of left atrial volume. BNP was related to left atrial volume index (r = 0.45, p = 0.019) and to LAEF (r = -0.57, p = 0.003). CONCLUSIONS: LAEF is decreased especially in long-term dialyzed patients and does not improve after dialysis despite the decrease of left atrial volume. Inadequate contractility reserve of the left atrium is similar to the non-ESRD patients with HFpEF and might help explain the high prevalence of heart failure in ESRD patients.