Physiologically-based pharmacokinetic model-based translation of OATP1B-mediated drug-drug interactions from coproporphyrin I to probe drugs.

The accurate prediction of OATP1B-mediated drug-drug interactions (DDIs) is challenging for drug development. Here, we report a physiologically-based pharmacokinetic (PBPK) model analysis for clinical DDI data generated in heathy subjects who received oral doses of cyclosporin A (CysA; 20 and 75 mg) as an OATP1B inhibitor, and the probe drugs (pitavastatin, rosuvastatin, and valsartan). PBPK models of CysA and probe compounds were combined assuming inhibition of hepatic uptake of endogenous coproporphyrin I (CP-I) by CysA. In vivo Ki of unbound CysA for OATP1B (Ki,OATP1B ), and the overall intrinsic hepatic clearance per body weight of CP-I (CLint,all,unit ) were optimized to account for the CP-I data (Ki,OATP1B , 0.536 ± 0.041 nM; CLint,all,unit , 41.9 ± 4.3 L/h/kg). DDI simulation using Ki,OATP1B reproduced the dose-dependent effect of CysA (20 and 75 mg) and the dosing interval (1 and 3 h) on the time profiles of blood concentrations of pitavastatin and rosuvastatin, but DDI simulation using in vitro Ki,OATP1B failed. The Cluster Gauss-Newton method was used to conduct parameter optimization using 1000 initial parameter sets for the seven pharmacokinetic parameters of CP-I (ß, CLint, all , Fa Fg , Rdif , fbile , fsyn , and vsyn ), and Ki,OATP1B and Ki,MRP2 of CysA. Based on the accepted 546 parameter sets, the range of CLint, all and Ki,OATP1B was narrowed, with coefficients of variation of 12.4% and 11.5%, respectively, indicating that these parameters were practically identifiable. These results suggest that PBPK model analysis of CP-I is a promising translational approach to predict OATP1B-mediated DDIs in drug development.

Effect of Cyclosporin A and Impact of Dose Staggering on OATP1B1/1B3 Endogenous Substrates and Drug Probes for Assessing Clinical Drug Interactions.

This study was designed to assess the quantitative performance of endogenous biomarkers for organic anion transporting polypeptide (OATP) 1B1/1B3-mediated drug-drug interactions (DDIs). Ten healthy volunteers orally received OATP1B1/1B3 probe cocktail (0.2 mg pitavastatin, 1 mg rosuvastatin, and 2 mg valsartan) and an oral dose of cyclosporin A (CysA, 20 mg and 75 mg) separated by a 1-hour interval (20 mg (-1 hour), and 75 mg (-1 hour)). CysA 75 mg was also given with a 3-hour interval (75 mg (-3 hours)) to examine the persistence of OATP1B1/1B3 inhibition. The area under the plasma concentration-time curve ratios (AUCRs) were 1.63, 3.46, and 2.38 (pitavastatin), 1.39, 2.16, and 1.81 (rosuvastatin), and 1.42, 1.77, and 1.85 (valsartan), at 20 mg, 75 mg (-1 hour) and 75 mg (-3 hours) of CysA, respectively. CysA effect on OATP1B1/1B3 was unlikely to persist at the dose examined. Among 26 putative OATP1B1/1B3 biomarkers evaluated, AUCR and maximum concentration ratio (Cmax R) of CP-I showed the highest Pearson's correlation coefficient with CysA AUC (0.94 and 0.93, respectively). Correlation between AUCR of pitavastatin, and Cmax R or AUCR of CP-I were consistent between this study and our previous study using rifampicin as an OATP1B1/1B3 inhibitor. Nonlinear regression analysis of AUCR-1 of pitavastatin and CP-I against CysA Cmax yielded Ki,OATP1B1/1B3,app (109 ± 35 and 176 ± 42 nM, respectively), similar to the Ki ,OATP1B1/1B3 estimated by our physiologically-based pharmacokinetic model analysis described previously (107 nM). The endogenous OATP1B1/1B3 biomarkers, particularly Cmax R and AUCR of CP-I, corroborates OATP1B1/1B3 inhibition and yields valuable information that improve accurate DDI predictions in drug development, and enhance our understanding of interindividual variability in the magnitude of DDIs.

Evaluation of the pharmacokinetics of pemigatinib in patients with impaired hepatic or renal function.

AIMS: Pemigatinib, an inhibitor of the fibroblast growth factor receptor (FGFR) family of receptor tyrosine kinases, is approved for previously treated, unresectable locally advanced or metastatic cholangiocarcinoma. Pemigatinib is predominantly metabolized by CYP3A4 with minimal renal elimination. METHODS: Separate hepatic and renal impairment studies were conducted to evaluate the effect of these impairments on pemigatinib pharmacokinetics (PK). Each study was of open-label, parallel-group design, conducted in participants with normal organ function and with hepatic or renal impairment. Plasma concentrations of pemigatinib were quantified by liquid chromatography tandem mass spectrometry (LC-MS/MS) and pemigatinib PK parameters were derived by noncompartmental analysis. Geometric mean ratios and two-sided 90% confidence intervals of Cmax , AUC0-t , and AUC0-∞ were compared by analysis of variance (ANOVA). RESULTS: Compared with healthy matched participants: Cmax and AUC0-∞ ratio (90% confidence interval) in participants with moderate hepatic impairment were 96.7% (59.4%, 157%) and 146% (100%, 212%), respectively; Cmax and AUC0-∞ ratio in participants with severe hepatic impairment were 94.2% (68.9%, 129%) and 174% (116%, 261%), respectively; Cmax and AUC0-∞ ratio in participants with severe renal impairment were 64.6% (44.1%, 94.4%) and 159% (95.4%, 264%), respectively; Cmax and AUC0-∞ ratio in participants with end-stage renal disease (ESRD) before haemodialysis (HD) were 77.5% (51.2%, 118%) and 76.8% (54.0%, 109%), respectively; Cmax and AUC0-∞ ratio in participants with ESRD after HD were 90.0% (59.3%, 137%) and 91.3% (64.1%, 130%), respectively. CONCLUSION: Pemigatinib dose should be reduced for patients with severe hepatic or renal impairment, and no dose adjustment is required for patients with moderate hepatic impairment or in ESRD patients undergoing HD.

Evaluation of drug-drug interactions of pemigatinib in healthy participants.

PURPOSE: Pemigatinib (INCB054828), a potent and selective oral fibroblast growth factor receptor 1-3 inhibitor, is a Biopharmaceutical Classification System class II compound with good permeability and pH-dependent solubility that is predominantly metabolized by cytochrome P450 (CYP) 3A. Two drug-drug interaction studies, one with acid-reducing agents, esomeprazole (proton pump inhibitor [PPI]) and ranitidine (histamine-2 [H2] antagonist), and the other with potent CYP3A-modulating agents, itraconazole (CYP3A inhibitor) and rifampin (CYP3A inducer), were performed. METHODS: Both were open-label, fixed-sequence studies conducted in up to 36 healthy participants each, enrolled into two cohorts (n = 18 each). Pemigatinib plasma concentration was measured, and pharmacokinetic parameters were derived by non-compartmental analysis. RESULTS: There was an 88% and 17% increase in pemigatinib area under the plasma drug concentration-time curve (AUC) and maximum plasma drug concentration (Cmax), respectively, with itraconazole, and an 85% and 62% decrease in pemigatinib AUC and Cmax with rifampin coadministration. There was a 35% and 8% decrease in pemigatinib AUC and Cmax, respectively, with esomeprazole, and a 2% decrease in Cmax and 3% increase in AUC with ranitidine coadministration. In both studies, all adverse events reported were grade ≤ 2. CONCLUSION: Coadministration with itraconazole or rifampin resulted in a clinically significant change in pemigatinib exposure. Therefore, coadministration of strong CYP3A inducers with pemigatinib should be avoided, and the dose of pemigatinib should be reduced if coadministration with strong CYP3A inhibitors cannot be avoided. The effect of PPIs/H2 antagonists on pemigatinib exposure was modest, and pemigatinib can be administered without regard to coadministration of PPIs/H2 antagonists.

Effect of Hepatic Impairment on the Pharmacokinetics of Itacitinib.

Itacitinib is a potent, selective JAK-1 inhibitor currently in development for the treatment of chronic graft-vs-host-disease in combination with corticosteroids. Itacitinib is primarily eliminated via cytochrome P450 3A metabolism with minimal renal elimination. The purpose of this open-label study was to investigate the effect of hepatic impairment, as determined by Child-Pugh grade, on itacitinib pharmacokinetics. All participants received a single 300-mg dose of itacitinib orally in the fasted state. Blood samples were collected serially through 96 hours after dosing; 4 hours after dosing, an additional sample was collected for protein binding determination. Participants with moderate hepatic impairment (N = 8) had an approximate 2.5-fold increase in total exposure (area under the plasma concentration-time curve from time 0 to infinity [AUC0-∞ ]) and an approximate 2-fold increase in maximal exposure (Cmax ) compared to those with normal hepatic function (N = 8) (geometric mean ratio, 2.51 [90% confidence interval (CI), 1.54-4.08] for AUC0-∞ and 1.95 [90%CI, 1.14-3.35] for Cmax ). Participants with severe hepatic impairment (N = 6) had an approximate 4-fold increase in total exposure (AUC0-∞ ) and an approximate 3.5-fold increase in maximal exposure compared to participants with normal hepatic function (geometric mean ratio, 4.08 [90%CI, 2.41-6.89] for AUC0-∞ and 3.48 [90%CI, 1.94-6.23] for Cmax ). Protein binding was similar between participants with moderate or severe hepatic impairment and participants with normal hepatic function, with average unbound fractions (percent free) of 25.7%, 31.5%, and 25.6%, respectively. There were no serious or fatal treatment-related adverse events. The results of this study combined with exposure, efficacy, and safety data from the pivotal study in the relevant patient population will inform final dosing recommendations.

An Open-Label Study to Assess the Effect of Itraconazole and Rifampin on Parsaclisib Pharmacokinetics When Administered Orally in Healthy Participants.

Parsaclisib, a selective, potent phosphatidylinositol 3-kinase delta inhibitor being developed for the treatment of cancer and autoimmune diseases, is primarily metabolized by cytochrome P450 (CYP) 3A4. This study assessed the pharmacokinetics (PK) and safety of parsaclisib alone or combined with itraconazole (potent CYP3A inhibitor) or rifampin (potent CYP3A4 inducer) in healthy participants. In this open-label, fixed-sequence study, cohort 1 received oral parsaclisib 10 mg once daily on days 1 and 8 and oral itraconazole 200 mg once daily on days 4-11; cohort 2 received oral parsaclisib 20 mg once daily on days 1 and 11 and oral rifampin 600 mg once daily on days 4-12. Parsaclisib plasma concentration was tested and PK parameters calculated by noncompartmental analysis. Geometric mean ratios (GMRs) and 2-sided 90% confidence intervals (CIs) were estimated by 2-factor analysis of variance. Thirty-six healthy participants were enrolled (18 per cohort). Parsaclisib maximum plasma drug concentration (Cmax ) and area under the concentration-time curve extrapolated to infinity (AUC0-∞ ) were increased by 21% and 107% with concomitant itraconazole versus parsaclisib alone (GMR, 1.21; 90%CI, 1.14-1.29; and 2.07; 90%CI, 1.97-2.17, respectively). Parsaclisib Cmax and AUC were reduced by 43% and 77%, respectively, with concomitant rifampin versus parsaclisib alone (GMR, 0.57; 90%CI, 0.53-0.60; and 0.23; 90%CI, 0.21-0.24, respectively). Headache was the most common adverse event, reported by 13.9% of participants (all in cohort 2). Single-dose parsaclisib alone or combined with itraconazole or rifampin appeared safe and well tolerated in healthy participants. Parsaclisib dose adjustment may be necessary with concomitant administration of strong CYP3A4 inhibitors or inducers.

Subcutaneous administration of human C1 inhibitor with recombinant human hyaluronidase in patients with hereditary angioedema.

BACKGROUND: The currently approved method of C1 inhibitor (C1 INH) administration for patients with hereditary angioedema with C1 INH deficiency (HAE) is by intravenous injection. A C1 INH subcutaneous formulation may provide an attractive mode of administration for some patients. OBJECTIVE: To evaluate efficacy and safety of two doses of subcutaneous, plasma-derived C1 INH with the dispersing agent, recombinant human hyaluronidase (rHuPH20) to prevent angioedema attacks in patients with HAE. METHODS: A randomized, double-blind, dose-ranging, crossover study, patients 12 years of age (n = 47) with a confirmed diagnosis of HAE were randomly assigned to receive subcutaneous injections of 1000 U C1 INH with 24,000 U rHuPH20 or 2000 U C1 INH with 48,000 U rHuPH20 every 3 or 4 days for 8 weeks and then crossed-over for another 8-week period. The primary efficacy end point was the number of angioedema attacks during each treatment period. RESULTS: The study was terminated early as a precaution related to non-neutralizing antibodies to rHuPH20 in 45% of patients. The mean standard deviation number of angioedema attacks during the 8-week treatment periods were 1.58 1.59 with 1000 U C1 INH and 0.97 1.26 with 2000 U. The mean (95% confidence interval [CI]) within-patient difference (2000 U-1000 U, respectively) was 0.61 (95% CI, 1.23 to 0.01) attacks per month (p = 0.0523), and 0.56 (95% CI, 1.06 to 0.05) attacks that required acute treatment, (p = 0.0315). No deaths or other serious adverse events were reported. Injection-site reaction was the most common adverse event. CONCLUSION: Despite early termination, this study demonstrated a clinically and statistically significant difference in burden of disease, which favored 2000 U C1 INH, without associated serious adverse events.

Achieving a physiological cortisol profile with once-daily dual-release hydrocortisone: a pharmacokinetic study.

OBJECTIVE: Oral once-daily dual-release hydrocortisone (DR-HC) replacement therapy was developed to provide a cortisol exposure-time profile that closely resembles the physiological cortisol profile. This study aimed to characterize single-dose pharmacokinetics (PK) of DR-HC 5-20mg and assess intrasubject variability. METHODS: Thirty-one healthy Japanese or non-Hispanic Caucasian volunteers aged 20-55 years participated in this randomized, open-label, PK study. Single doses of DR-HC 5, 15 (3×5), and 20mg were administered orally after an overnight fast and suppression of endogenous cortisol secretion. After estimating the endogenous cortisol profile, PK of DR-HC over 24h were evaluated to assess dose proportionality and impact of ethnicity. Plasma cortisol concentrations were analyzed using liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry. PK parameters were calculated from individual cortisol concentration-time profiles. RESULTS: DR-HC 20mg provided higher than endogenous cortisol plasma concentrations 0-4h post-dose but similar concentrations later in the profile. Cortisol concentrations and PK exposure parameters increased with increasing doses. Mean maximal serum concentration (Cmax) was 82.0 and 178.1ng/mL, while mean area under the concentration-time curve (AUC)0-∞ was 562.8 and 1180.8h×ng/mL with DR-HC 5 and 20mg respectively. Within-subject PK variability was low (<15%) for DR-HC 20mg. All exposure PK parameters were less than dose proportional (slope <1). PK differences between ethnicities were explained by body weight differences. CONCLUSIONS: DR-HC replacement resembles the daily normal cortisol profile. Within-subject day-to-day PK variability was low, underpinning the safety of DR-HC for replacement therapy. DR-HC PK were less than dose proportional - an important consideration when managing intercurrent illness in patients with adrenal insufficiency.

Phase I safety and pharmacokinetic study of the PI3K/mTOR inhibitor SAR245409 (XL765) in combination with erlotinib in patients with advanced solid tumors.

INTRODUCTION: The primary objectives of this phase I study were to evaluate the safety and maximum tolerated dose (MTD) of SAR245409, a pan-class I phosphatidylinositol 3-kinase (PI3K)/mammalian target of rapamycin inhibitor, combined with erlotinib in patients with advanced solid tumors. METHODS: Forty-six patients with advanced solid tumors were enrolled. Patients with lung cancer (n = 37) had received an epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) inhibitor before study entry. SAR245409 30, 50, 70, or 90 mg once daily (QD) or 20 or 30 mg twice daily (BID) was administered, in combination with erlotinib 100 mg QD, in 28-day cycles. Dose escalation of SAR245409 followed a standard 3 + 3 design. Patients were evaluated for adverse events (AEs). Additional evaluations included pharmacokinetics, pharmacodynamic effects on PI3K and EGFR/mitogen-activated protein kinase signaling pathways in tumor and skin samples, and tumor response. RESULTS: The MTDs of SAR245409, in combination with erlotinib 100 mg QD, were 70 mg QD and 20 mg BID. The most frequently reported treatment-related AEs (any grade) were diarrhea (35%), rash (35%), and nausea (28%). No treatment-related AE occurred at grade 3/4 in more than one patient (2.2%). No major pharmacokinetic interaction between SAR245409 and erlotinib was noted. Suppression of PI3K and EGFR/mitogen-activated protein kinase signaling pathway biomarkers was observed in skin and tumor samples. Stable disease was the best overall response reported, occurring in 12 of 32 (37.5%) evaluable patients. CONCLUSION: MTDs of SAR245409 and erlotinib were below the single-agent doses of either agent, despite the lack of major pharmacokinetic interaction.

Pre- or post-treatment with the mitochondrial uncoupler 2,4-dinitrophenol attenuates striatal quinolinate lesions.

We have examined the neuroprotective efficacy of the mitochondrial uncoupler 2,4-dinitrophenol (DNP) in animals receiving striatal injections of the neurotoxin quinolinic acid. Animals administered DNP either 1 h before or 3 h following QA infusion developed lesions that were 25% smaller than control animals. Animals treated with the DNP analogue 2,4,6-trinitrophenol, which does not possess uncoupling activity in intact mitochondria, showed no neuroprotection. These results indicate that DNP, and other compounds that diminish the mitochondrial membrane potential, might provide a novel approach to the treatment of acute neurological injury.